The Superlaser
Moderator: Vympel
-
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 392
- Joined: 2003-06-06 10:48am
The Superlaser
Layman question here.
Assuming you actually built a Death Star and fired it at a planet. Would the SL actually blow up the planet or would the beam blast right through the planet and keep on going?
Assuming you actually built a Death Star and fired it at a planet. Would the SL actually blow up the planet or would the beam blast right through the planet and keep on going?
That is the sound of inevitability.
This is perhaps the dumbest question I've seen all day: we've seen exactly what happens when the Death Star fires at a planet. The planet blows up.
And this belongs in PSW.
And this belongs in PSW.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
-
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 392
- Joined: 2003-06-06 10:48am
I just see the one: You.MrAnderson wrote:I see we have a couple of fucking morons here.
Let me put this slowly for you:
If
You
Overcome
The
Gravitational
Binding
Energy
Of
A
Planet
It
Will
Explode.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
-
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 392
- Joined: 2003-06-06 10:48am
Ender wrote:I just see the one: You.MrAnderson wrote:I see we have a couple of fucking morons here.
Let me put this slowly for you:
If
You
Overcome
The
Gravitational
Binding
Energy
Of
A
Planet
It
Will
Explode.
BUT
ONLY
IF
THE
PLANET
SOMEHOW
HOLDS
ALL
THAT
ENERGY
.
A
PLANET
IS
NOT
A
BATTERY.
That is the sound of inevitability.
-
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 392
- Joined: 2003-06-06 10:48am
Sharp-kun wrote:But if you built an exact copy of the Death Star, you would be making a weapon capable of doing exactly what happened in the film. The result would be the same.MrAnderson wrote:I want to know what would happen in the REAL WORLD if you fired a high energy beam like that at a planet.
So you are admitting that the Superlaser of the Deathstar (or something in the Deathstar) does something to cause a planet to explode beyond just putting out the necesary energy.
That is the sound of inevitability.
- Spanky The Dolphin
- Mammy Two-Shoes
- Posts: 30776
- Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
- Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)
- Spanky The Dolphin
- Mammy Two-Shoes
- Posts: 30776
- Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
- Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)
It blows it up. That's all.MrAnderson wrote:Sharp-kun wrote:But if you built an exact copy of the Death Star, you would be making a weapon capable of doing exactly what happened in the film. The result would be the same.MrAnderson wrote:I want to know what would happen in the REAL WORLD if you fired a high energy beam like that at a planet.
So you are admitting that the Superlaser of the Deathstar (or something in the Deathstar) does something to cause a planet to explode beyond just putting out the necesary energy.
I believe in a sign of Zeta.
[BOTM|WG|JL|Mecha Maniacs|Pax Cybertronia|Veteran of the Psychic Wars|Eva Expert]
"And besides, who cares if a monster destroys Australia?"
Not at all. I'm merely answering your question.MrAnderson wrote:Sharp-kun wrote:But if you built an exact copy of the Death Star, you would be making a weapon capable of doing exactly what happened in the film. The result would be the same.MrAnderson wrote:I want to know what would happen in the REAL WORLD if you fired a high energy beam like that at a planet.
So you are admitting that the Superlaser of the Deathstar (or something in the Deathstar) does something to cause a planet to explode beyond just putting out the necesary energy.
You asked what a DS superlaser would do to a planet if we were to build one.
If you were to build a DS like in the movies, the planet would explode.
You are truely one dumb son of a bitch. Go look up what gravitational Binding Energy is you waste of cells. Its something that the SL has to overcome, not energy in the planet.MrAnderson wrote:Ender wrote:I just see the one: You.MrAnderson wrote:I see we have a couple of fucking morons here.
Let me put this slowly for you:
If
You
Overcome
The
Gravitational
Binding
Energy
Of
A
Planet
It
Will
Explode.
BUT
ONLY
IF
THE
PLANET
SOMEHOW
HOLDS
ALL
THAT
ENERGY
.
A
PLANET
IS
NOT
A
BATTERY.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
-
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 392
- Joined: 2003-06-06 10:48am
Your the one being a fucking moron.Ender wrote:You are truely one dumb son of a bitch. Go look up what gravitational Binding Energy is you waste of cells. Its something that the SL has to overcome, not energy in the planet.MrAnderson wrote:Ender wrote:I just see the one: You.
Let me put this slowly for you:
If
You
Overcome
The
Gravitational
Binding
Energy
Of
A
Planet
It
Will
Explode.
BUT
ONLY
IF
THE
PLANET
SOMEHOW
HOLDS
ALL
THAT
ENERGY
.
A
PLANET
IS
NOT
A
BATTERY.
I am asking what is keeping that superlaser from just boring straight through the planet and out the otherside. Instead somehow the planet absorbs all of the energy and explodes from it.
So in reality what would happen?
That is the sound of inevitability.
You just claimed that the planet has to hold the energy for the explosion, and I'm the idiot? And the word is "You're".MrAnderson wrote:Your the one being a fucking moron.Ender wrote:You are truely one dumb son of a bitch. Go look up what gravitational Binding Energy is you waste of cells. Its something that the SL has to overcome, not energy in the planet.MrAnderson wrote:
BUT
ONLY
IF
THE
PLANET
SOMEHOW
HOLDS
ALL
THAT
ENERGY
.
A
PLANET
IS
NOT
A
BATTERY.
So, do you have an inability to read or something? I already answered this, and you responded that a planet is not a battery.I am asking what is keeping that superlaser from just boring straight through the planet and out the otherside. Instead somehow the planet absorbs all of the energy and explodes from it.
So in reality what would happen?
Apply enough energy to overcome the GBE of a planet, it will explode. That is what keeps it from boring through the other side you nitwit.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
- Spanky The Dolphin
- Mammy Two-Shoes
- Posts: 30776
- Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
- Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)
Those quotes need to be edited. There is no reason why people should have to scroll through all of that junk just to get to the exchange on the bottom.
I believe in a sign of Zeta.
[BOTM|WG|JL|Mecha Maniacs|Pax Cybertronia|Veteran of the Psychic Wars|Eva Expert]
"And besides, who cares if a monster destroys Australia?"
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord
- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
In order for the beam to punch through the planet and come out the other side, there must be a tunnel through the planet which is transparent to the beam. Unless superdense plasma is transparent to the beam, the material in the beam's path will not be evacuated quickly enough to create this transparent tunnel before the beam has finished pouring more than enough energy into its mass to destroy the planet.
As an aside, the Alderaan effect might have been altered by the presence of a planetary shield which dispersed the beam over the entire facing hemisphere (and then some) before penetration. A regular planet might blow up in a different geometrical pattern.
As an aside, the Alderaan effect might have been altered by the presence of a planetary shield which dispersed the beam over the entire facing hemisphere (and then some) before penetration. A regular planet might blow up in a different geometrical pattern.
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
As far as i understood it the Superlaser heats up the material of the planets core (and the matter inbetween), resulting in a huge expansion of said vaporized material, what blows the planet apart.
The optimist thinks, that we live in the best of all possible worlds and the pessimist is afraid, that this is true.
"Don't ask, what your country can do for you. Ask, what you can do for your country." Mao Tse-Tung.
"Don't ask, what your country can do for you. Ask, what you can do for your country." Mao Tse-Tung.
- Arthur_Tuxedo
- Sith Acolyte
- Posts: 5637
- Joined: 2002-07-23 03:28am
- Location: San Francisco, California
So without a planetary shield, the planet would still explode but part of the beam would keep on going?Darth Wong wrote:In order for the beam to punch through the planet and come out the other side, there must be a tunnel through the planet which is transparent to the beam. Unless superdense plasma is transparent to the beam, the material in the beam's path will not be evacuated quickly enough to create this transparent tunnel before the beam has finished pouring more than enough energy into its mass to destroy the planet.
As an aside, the Alderaan effect might have been altered by the presence of a planetary shield which dispersed the beam over the entire facing hemisphere (and then some) before penetration. A regular planet might blow up in a different geometrical pattern.
"I'm so fast that last night I turned off the light switch in my hotel room and was in bed before the room was dark." - Muhammad Ali
"Dating is not supposed to be easy. It's supposed to be a heart-pounding, stomach-wrenching, gut-churning exercise in pitting your fear of rejection and public humiliation against your desire to find a mate. Enjoy." - Darth Wong
"Dating is not supposed to be easy. It's supposed to be a heart-pounding, stomach-wrenching, gut-churning exercise in pitting your fear of rejection and public humiliation against your desire to find a mate. Enjoy." - Darth Wong
No, more like the presence of rings is explained by the shield's net angular momentum and that the early expolsions were likely do to the shield generators going off under the strain. Atleast that's my read.Arthur_Tuxedo wrote:So without a planetary shield, the planet would still explode but part of the beam would keep on going?Darth Wong wrote:In order for the beam to punch through the planet and come out the other side, there must be a tunnel through the planet which is transparent to the beam. Unless superdense plasma is transparent to the beam, the material in the beam's path will not be evacuated quickly enough to create this transparent tunnel before the beam has finished pouring more than enough energy into its mass to destroy the planet.
As an aside, the Alderaan effect might have been altered by the presence of a planetary shield which dispersed the beam over the entire facing hemisphere (and then some) before penetration. A regular planet might blow up in a different geometrical pattern.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
- Admiral Johnason
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2552
- Joined: 2003-01-11 05:06pm
- Location: The Rebel cruiser Defender
From what I put together, you think that that big gun is a laser. It is not. It fires a massive volley of subatomic particle called lexons that cause fission. It basically just acts as a giant chain-reation machine.MrAnderson wrote:I see we have a couple of fucking morons here.
So SW is now an example of real world physics?
I want to know what would happen in the REAL WORLD if you fired a high energy beam like that at a planet.
He asked a layman qusetion, so I gave him a layman answer. I don't think he could hadle all of the actual info.
Liberals for Nixon in 3000: Nixon... with carisma and a shiny robot body.
never negoiate out of fear, but never fear to negoiate.
Captian America- Justice League
HAB submarine commander-
"We'll break you of your fear of water."
never negoiate out of fear, but never fear to negoiate.
Captian America- Justice League
HAB submarine commander-
"We'll break you of your fear of water."
- Darth Garden Gnome
- Official SD.Net Lawn Ornament
- Posts: 6029
- Joined: 2002-07-08 02:35am
- Location: Some where near a mailbox
Admiral Johnason wrote:From what I put together, you think that that big gun is a laser. It is not. It fires a massive volley of subatomic particle called lexons that cause fission. It basically just acts as a giant chain-reation machine.
No, its a giant ray gun. It's whatever a normal Star Wars laser is except bigger. Not a Mysterious Chain Reaction as you and some others like to place it as.
EDIT: I mean FFS we saw the exact same laser in AOTC except smaller. Unless you think that's a giant chain-reaction machine too.
[Obi-Wan]Use your brain, think![/Obi-Wan]
Leader of the Secret Gnome Revolution
- Spanky The Dolphin
- Mammy Two-Shoes
- Posts: 30776
- Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
- Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)
- CmdrWilkens
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 9093
- Joined: 2002-07-06 01:24am
- Location: Land of the Crabcake
- Contact:
Please tell me that was a joke response.Admiral Johnason wrote:From what I put together, you think that that big gun is a laser. It is not. It fires a massive volley of subatomic particle called lexons that cause fission. It basically just acts as a giant chain-reation machine.MrAnderson wrote:I see we have a couple of fucking morons here.
So SW is now an example of real world physics?
I want to know what would happen in the REAL WORLD if you fired a high energy beam like that at a planet.
SDNet World Nation: Wilkonia
Armourer of the WARWOLVES
ASVS Vet's Association (Class of 2000)
Former C.S. Strowbridge Gold Ego Award Winner
MEMBER of the Anti-PETA Anti-Facist LEAGUE
ASVS Vet's Association (Class of 2000)
Former C.S. Strowbridge Gold Ego Award Winner
MEMBER of the Anti-PETA Anti-Facist LEAGUE
"I put no stock in religion. By the word religion I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called the will of god. I have seen too much religion in the eyes of too many murderers. Holiness is in right action, and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves, and goodness. "
-Kingdom of Heaven
- Illuminatus Primus
- All Seeing Eye
- Posts: 15774
- Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
- Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Contact:
Admiral Johnason wrote:From what I put together, you think that that big gun is a laser. It is not. It fires a massive volley of subatomic particle called lexons that cause fission. It basically just acts as a giant chain-reation machine.MrAnderson wrote:I see we have a couple of fucking morons here.
So SW is now an example of real world physics?
I want to know what would happen in the REAL WORLD if you fired a high energy beam like that at a planet.
He asked a layman qusetion, so I gave him a layman answer. I don't think he could hadle all of the actual info.
Could you do worse, perpetual newb? Have you ever read Mike's site, or paid attention at all?
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.
The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.
The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |