Page 1 of 1
Hand blasters and recoil
Posted: 2003-10-03 01:02am
by Eleas
All right. We know that turbolasers exhibit recoil. Do we know to what degree hand blasters do, or even if they do? The question came up when discussing how accurate a blaster set on burst mode would be. If the blaster had no recoil, the grouping would be as narrow as you'd like - obviously this might prove very beneficial in a combat environment.
So, anyone have any ideas?
Posted: 2003-10-03 02:36am
by Spanky The Dolphin
Blasters have recoil comparable to real life guns, especially considering that the prop guns fired blanks.
Posted: 2003-10-03 08:53am
by Old Plympto
You can see the recoil onscreen quite clearly, and Carrie Fisher flinching because of it, during the escape from Cloud City, under the Millennium Falcon, in the Empire Strikes Back.
Posted: 2003-10-03 11:10am
by Ender
Yet the bolts themselves have very low momentum as the lightsabres don't seem to move back at all when they deflect them.
Posted: 2003-10-03 11:54am
by Chardok
Lightsabers don't move, true, but there could be a factor with the force which causes that.
Posted: 2003-10-03 12:07pm
by Old Plympto
Heh! It would be cool to show onscreen a bunch of Jedi easily deflecting blaster bolts left and right, then a non-Jedi picks up a discarded lightsaber, ignites to do the same, and a single bolt strikes the blade and sends it flying away.
Posted: 2003-10-03 12:10pm
by Chardok
Lightsabers are more danger to the untrained user than they are to an enemy of an untrained user. I think it has something to do with the fact that the blades are weightless...fucks up our perception or something, I don't know, I would find it weird, too...swinging around a something that can melt through bulkheads and shit and it doesn't weigh anything....that's got to be difficult as hell.
Posted: 2003-10-03 12:46pm
by The Dark
Did Leia's sporting blaster have a recoil when she fired it at the stormtrooper in ANH? I don't recall that pistol having any recoil.
Posted: 2003-10-03 02:41pm
by Connor MacLeod
Ender wrote:Yet the bolts themselves have very low momentum as the lightsabres don't seem to move back at all when they deflect them.
Yet we've seen the guns visibly recoiling. think some sort of "explosive interaction" occuring inside the gun.
And as noted its possible the Jedi *might* counter recoil with Force-TK.
Posted: 2003-10-03 09:17pm
by The Silence and I
Yes, every make of blaster except the Clone Trooper rifles has shown varying degrees of recoil, sometimes much, sometime little. A good rule of thumb seems to be the larger the flash the more the recoil (as others have said the OT used blanks+real guns, so they have both bigger flashes and more recoil than the NT, which is less consistent in its recoil).
Edit: A great example of recoil from the NT is in TPM, when Amidala's chief of security blasts out the palace window, the gun is on automatic and fire wildly with erratic aiming at best due to the heavy recoil. Same thing in ANH when Han covers his retreat to the Falcon in Hanger bay 94.
Posted: 2003-10-03 11:24pm
by Sea Skimmer
Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Blasters have recoil comparable to real life guns, especially considering that the prop guns fired blanks.
Blanks produce a small fraction of the recoil of an actual round.
Posted: 2003-10-04 12:43am
by Spanky The Dolphin
Well, I didn't know that, having never fired a black cartridge.
But at least there is still some recoil present.
Posted: 2003-10-04 10:17am
by His Divine Shadow
Connor MacLeod wrote:Ender wrote:Yet the bolts themselves have very low momentum as the lightsabres don't seem to move back at all when they deflect them.
Yet we've seen the guns visibly recoiling. think some sort of "explosive interaction" occuring inside the gun.
And as noted its possible the Jedi *might* counter recoil with Force-TK.
I think explanation two might be right, as indicated by the Jedi who got his saber knocked out of his hand by the blaster bolt fired by Jango, there was definitly momentum to that bolt.
Posted: 2003-10-04 12:22pm
by Ender
His Divine Shadow wrote:Connor MacLeod wrote:Ender wrote:Yet the bolts themselves have very low momentum as the lightsabres don't seem to move back at all when they deflect them.
Yet we've seen the guns visibly recoiling. think some sort of "explosive interaction" occuring inside the gun.
And as noted its possible the Jedi *might* counter recoil with Force-TK.
I think explanation two might be right, as indicated by the Jedi who got his saber knocked out of his hand by the blaster bolt fired by Jango, there was definitly momentum to that bolt.
This implies that blasters either use a differnt mechanism (and have mass in their shots, but this has problems with alot of blaster stuff matching what we see from TLs), or that that shot was pretty fucking powerful.
or would momentum=energy/C not apply for some reason?
Posted: 2003-10-04 04:04pm
by Durandal
Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Blasters have recoil comparable to real life guns, especially considering that the prop guns fired blanks.
The primary recoil from a weapon firing comes from the momentum of the slug. Simple gaseous expansion of gun powder won't create recoil anywhere near that of the slug's motion.
Posted: 2003-10-04 04:10pm
by Spanky The Dolphin
Sea Skimmer already corrected me on such.
In my defence, I've never fired a gun with blanks, nor have I ever read about blank rounds before.
Posted: 2003-10-04 04:19pm
by Sea Skimmer
Durandal wrote:
The primary recoil from a weapon firing comes from the momentum of the slug. Simple gaseous expansion of gun powder won't create recoil anywhere near that of the slug's motion.
Depending on who made the blank, there may be a small chunk of wood being shot out, though most use basically cotton and paper to hold in the propellant.
Posted: 2003-10-04 04:44pm
by Knife
In the blaster, it doesn't necessarily have to be the bolt creating the recoil that is observed, rather some internal action that creates the bolt. Perhaps when the Tibanna gas is excited, it creates a small explosion comparable with a round being fired in an Earth gun that creates the recoil of the weapon.
Posted: 2003-10-04 04:47pm
by Darth Wong
You see more substantial recoil with the Rebel soldiers in the trenches in TESB when they fire their rifles. In that case, one can reasonably assume they've probably got their guns cranked to maximum yield.
Posted: 2003-10-04 05:28pm
by Chardok
His Divine Shadow wrote:I think explanation two might be right, as indicated by the Jedi who got his saber knocked out of his hand by the blaster bolt fired by Jango, there was definitly momentum to that bolt.
I suppose, also, it *is possible* that jango caught that particular jedi unawares/off guard so that he could not call upon force TK to counter the momentum? I don't recall that particular scene...was the jedi looking at jango? Or concentrating on other combat around him?
Posted: 2003-10-04 07:20pm
by neoolong
Chardok wrote:His Divine Shadow wrote:I think explanation two might be right, as indicated by the Jedi who got his saber knocked out of his hand by the blaster bolt fired by Jango, there was definitly momentum to that bolt.
I suppose, also, it *is possible* that jango caught that particular jedi unawares/off guard so that he could not call upon force TK to counter the momentum? I don't recall that particular scene...was the jedi looking at jango? Or concentrating on other combat around him?
Trebor looked to be about to attack Dooku and was looking that way.