Imperial Remnant question
Posted: 2003-12-22 07:38pm
Now that it seems that the NJO has ended what has happened to the Empire? Currently what are its fleet strenght and size?
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=36291
-StarWars.comWhile the Imperial Remnant maintained many of the trappings of Palpatine's regime -- a strong military and limited venues of public expression -- it was far more progressive and devoid of the rampant injustices found during the height of the Empire's power. Slavery was abolished as were the extremes of anti-alien sentiment. The Imperial Remnant unobtrusively continued adhering to the strict tenets of the New Order, growing increasingly irrelevant to galactic affairs.
During the Yuuzhan Vong invasion, Pellaeon recognized the threat the alien menace posed, even though their incursion had skirted past Imperial space. Despite some protests from the Moff Council, Pellaeon committed his forces to a joint Imperial-New Republic offensive at the Battles of Garqi and Ithor. Despite the best efforts of Pellaeon and New Republic Admiral Traest Kre'fey, the Yuuzhan Vong destroyed the ecology of Ithor. Shocked by the power of the attack, the Imperial Remnant recalled their assistance of the New Republic, and chose instead to sit out the invasion on the sidelines.
It was a move the Moff Council would come to regret. They falsely believed the Imperial Remnant safe from attack, since it had been ignored for much of the invasion. The Yuuzhan Vong proved that assumption wrong, when it brutally attacked the Imperial worlds. Pellaeon was critically wounded in the attack, but the sudden arrival of a Jedi mission exploring the Unknown Regions saved his life. Jedi healers stabilized Pellaeon's condition, and Luke Skywalker and Jacen Solo helped Pellaeon expose infiltrators in the Imperial ranks and refocus Imperial efforts to assist the newly founded Galactic Federation of Free Alliances.
Yeah, I don't like this EU minimalist shit too.Oberleutnant wrote:Remember Han's line from ROTJ: "Now don't get jittery, Luke. There are a lot of command ships."
Unlike the EU, which wants us to believe that there were only few SSDs in the galaxy, the movies suggest the opposite.
A command ship doesn't have to be an SSD, though. But it is worth to note that none of the rebels in TESB and ROTJ are surprised to see the Executor, even though they don't know it's Vader's ship.Oberleutnant wrote:Remember Han's line from ROTJ: "Now don't get jittery, Luke. There are a lot of command ships."
Unlike the EU, which wants us to believe that there were only few SSDs in the galaxy, the movies suggest the opposite.
No, the Hand of Thrawn duology states that the Empire doesn't have its own dedicated starfighter manufacturing lines because they were too busy building capital ships.Alyeska wrote:When your territory and fleet has been reduced to less then 1% of what it had been 20 years prior, having a single SSD is not unrealistic. Before the IR signed a treaty with the NR they couldn't even afford to build new ISDs because they were spending all their money on keeping the current ones working and doing repairs. Since they had the peace treaty the IR could finaly begin to expand their little empire further. I would expect they had 50-100 more ISDs by the time the Vong attacks and that they had maybe 2-3 SSDs to serve as fleet flagships.
I thought those were mostly busy with smaller ships and repairing of ISDs. That was the indication I got. Since the IR was constantly being knocked on by just about everyone else, I don't see how they could have been expanding the fleet very much if any.PainRack wrote:No, the Hand of Thrawn duology states that the Empire doesn't have its own dedicated starfighter manufacturing lines because they were too busy building capital ships.Alyeska wrote:When your territory and fleet has been reduced to less then 1% of what it had been 20 years prior, having a single SSD is not unrealistic. Before the IR signed a treaty with the NR they couldn't even afford to build new ISDs because they were spending all their money on keeping the current ones working and doing repairs. Since they had the peace treaty the IR could finaly begin to expand their little empire further. I would expect they had 50-100 more ISDs by the time the Vong attacks and that they had maybe 2-3 SSDs to serve as fleet flagships.
That suggest a very active capital shipbuilding programme at least.
Depends if you're talking in terms of ship type, or just combat role. If you're refering to type, "command ship" specifically refers to the SSD. That exchange in ROTJ would have me believe they were refering to the Executor in terms of type as well.nightmare wrote: A command ship doesn't have to be an SSD, though. But it is worth to note that none of the rebels in TESB and ROTJ are surprised to see the Executor, even though they don't know it's Vader's ship.
Ah, but remember that the HoT duology takes place seven years before 'Vector Prime'. The Remnant surely was able to build several more fighter-based shipyards, especially given that they were using Tie Defenders during the final stages of the NJO.PainRack wrote:No, the Hand of Thrawn duology states that the Empire doesn't have its own dedicated starfighter manufacturing lines because they were too busy building capital ships.Alyeska wrote:When your territory and fleet has been reduced to less then 1% of what it had been 20 years prior, having a single SSD is not unrealistic. Before the IR signed a treaty with the NR they couldn't even afford to build new ISDs because they were spending all their money on keeping the current ones working and doing repairs. Since they had the peace treaty the IR could finaly begin to expand their little empire further. I would expect they had 50-100 more ISDs by the time the Vong attacks and that they had maybe 2-3 SSDs to serve as fleet flagships.
That suggest a very active capital shipbuilding programme at least.
Keep in mind that in and of itself isn't definitive by any means. Han was specfically trying to calm Luke and it always struck me as being a rather half hearted reassurance at that. It's entirely possible that Han stretched the truth to keep everyone's nerves up.Oberleutnant wrote:Remember Han's line from ROTJ: "Now don't get jittery, Luke. There are a lot of command ships."
Unlike the EU, which wants us to believe that there were only few SSDs in the galaxy, the movies suggest the opposite.
It wouldn't make much sense for Han to reassure Luke and the others if the other command ships were all of a totally different class. Han could well have stretched the truth about how common Executors really were, but I rather doubt he would flat out spout something that was a definite lie.nightmare wrote:A command ship doesn't have to be an SSD, though.Oberleutnant wrote:Remember Han's line from ROTJ: "Now don't get jittery, Luke. There are a lot of command ships."
Unlike the EU, which wants us to believe that there were only few SSDs in the galaxy, the movies suggest the opposite.
Actually, they probably did know in TESB.nightmare wrote:But it is worth to note that none of the rebels in TESB and ROTJ are surprised to see the Executor, even though they don't know it's Vader's ship.
Except that it is stated clearly in the quote that Imperial manufacturing facillities were stretched building capital ships.Alyeska wrote:I thought those were mostly busy with smaller ships and repairing of ISDs. That was the indication I got. Since the IR was constantly being knocked on by just about everyone else, I don't see how they could have been expanding the fleet very much if any.PainRack wrote:No, the Hand of Thrawn duology states that the Empire doesn't have its own dedicated starfighter manufacturing lines because they were too busy building capital ships.Alyeska wrote:When your territory and fleet has been reduced to less then 1% of what it had been 20 years prior, having a single SSD is not unrealistic. Before the IR signed a treaty with the NR they couldn't even afford to build new ISDs because they were spending all their money on keeping the current ones working and doing repairs. Since they had the peace treaty the IR could finaly begin to expand their little empire further. I would expect they had 50-100 more ISDs by the time the Vong attacks and that they had maybe 2-3 SSDs to serve as fleet flagships.
That suggest a very active capital shipbuilding programme at least.
Only if we compare Executors by the percentage of ships, as opposed to the more common view of numbers of Executors.Stormbringer wrote:
And of course the later puapacy of Executors doesn't mean too much about how common they were in the Imperial Period. We don't know how common they were as command ships (a rather limited demand); with all the other big guns out they could still be relatively rare. A lot of them got tied up in the Deep Core with the clones and the rest winding up in the hands of Warlords that lost them during the infighting like they did so many Imperial-class Stardestroyers. The EU could be right in that an intact ESD is a rare sight.
Although Han was notoriously lax with his statements, I agree with you that there's some truth in what he says. But I fail to see why his comment has to refer specifically to Executor-class vessels. In short, the Executor is a command ship. But is a command ship an Executor? The only agrument for this is that it is the only ship in the movies we hear referred to as a "command ship". But see below.Stormbringer wrote:It wouldn't make much sense for Han to reassure Luke and the others if the other command ships were all of a totally different class. Han could well have stretched the truth about how common Executors really were, but I rather doubt he would flat out spout something that was a definite lie.
Since Luke said "Vader's on that ship." in ROTJ, it doesn't seem like it.Stormbringer wrote:Actually, they probably did know in TESB.nightmare wrote:But it is worth to note that none of the rebels in TESB and ROTJ are surprised to see the Executor, even though they don't know it's Vader's ship.
That's illogical. You're suggesting that Han statement does not refer to the Executor specifically, only because Han shouldn't have said that Vader isn't on that ship as he had no way to check.nightmare wrote: Although Han was notoriously lax with his statements, I agree with you that there's some truth in what he says. But I fail to see why his comment has to refer specifically to Executor-class vessels. In short, the Executor is a command ship. But is a command ship an Executor? The only agrument for this is that it is the only ship in the movies we hear referred to as a "command ship". But see below.
Since Luke said "Vader's on that ship." in ROTJ, it doesn't seem like it.Stormbringer wrote:Actually, they probably did know in TESB.nightmare wrote:But it is worth to note that none of the rebels in TESB and ROTJ are surprised to see the Executor, even though they don't know it's Vader's ship.
This line is indicative of more SSDs in existance (which we know, but only by EU sources), since the Executor was present at Hoth. They should have realized it was Vader's ship - but if there's several others looking exactly like it, they couldn't tell short of matching it with a databank of known vessels, or perhaps read its energy signature with sensors or something like that. But not just by looking at it.
Which brings the question, was it the real Executor that was at the battle of Endor or was it another. We know that there are many Command ships that are like the Executor.Beside, according to some, the Executor in ROTJ is slightly different from the Executor in TESB in terms of bridge design as well as engine banks.