Page 1 of 5

Do you support/like the EU?

Posted: 2002-10-23 09:32pm
by Evil Sadistic Bastard
Well, do you? I wanted to know, since I don't really like it and I wanted to hegar from others about it.

Posted: 2002-10-23 09:33pm
by Kuja
What the fuck are you doing?!?!!?!?

You just posted this in the test forum!

Posted: 2002-10-23 09:34pm
by Spanky The Dolphin
Yes.

Posted: 2002-10-23 09:36pm
by Kuja
Don't encourage him, Spanky.

1st, we've done this before
2nd, it has no business in this forum
3rd, he jsut posted it in the Testing forum.

Posted: 2002-10-23 09:48pm
by Alyeska
Hell yes I like the EU. We got authors like Allston, Stackpole, and Zhan.

Posted: 2002-10-23 09:58pm
by Evil Sadistic Bastard
IG:

1) Is it a crime to do a poll like this again? I just want to know how other people feel about the EU.

2) How does this NOT have anything to do with the PSW thread?

3) I posted it in the Test Forum BECAUSE I WAS TESTING IT!!!!!!!!!!!! FYI, I have never started a poll before and I wanted to see how it would come out. If you want, you don't *HAVE* to reply to *THIS* thread, you can reply in the Testing Forum. Geez.

Now go watch G-Fighter and stop bothering me.

Posted: 2002-10-23 10:06pm
by Spanky The Dolphin
There's no such show as G-Fighter.

Posted: 2002-10-23 10:09pm
by Kuja
I'm sorry. it seems I've taken your poll the wrong way. I apologize. Carry on.

Posted: 2002-10-23 10:41pm
by Evil Sadistic Bastard
Ferget it. And what exactly is the show called? Is it Gundam Mobile Fighter or what?

Posted: 2002-10-23 10:45pm
by Spanky The Dolphin
Mobile Fighter G Gundam.

Posted: 2002-10-23 10:53pm
by Evil Sadistic Bastard
Right.

Reason No.1 why I don't like the EU: it cheapens the saga. SW was conceived as a battle of good vs. evil, set in a gritty future context where necessity sometimes outweighs morality. The EU conveniently removes the latter and turns it into SW: Galactic Ghetto.

To wit: THERE IS NO DARK SIDE! Oh no, there is only the misuse of the Force, no dark side. So Yoda and Kenobi were talking through their asses when they warned Luke about the Dark Side. Vader didn't fall, he just misused his powers. For TWENTY YEARS! Geez! What does this serve apart from allowing EU hack writers to let their pet characters do stuff like Force Grip or Force Lightning people while still remaining a "good" guy? Nothing.

Posted: 2002-10-23 10:55pm
by Hotfoot
Evil Sadistic Bastard wrote:Right.

Reason No.1 why I don't like the EU: it cheapens the saga. SW was conceived as a battle of good vs. evil, set in a gritty future context where necessity sometimes outweighs morality. The EU conveniently removes the latter and turns it into SW: Galactic Ghetto.

To wit: THERE IS NO DARK SIDE! Oh no, there is only the misuse of the Force, no dark side. So Yoda and Kenobi were talking through their asses when they warned Luke about the Dark Side. Vader didn't fall, he just misused his powers. For TWENTY YEARS! Geez! What does this serve apart from allowing EU hack writers to let their pet characters do stuff like Force Grip or Force Lightning people while still remaining a "good" guy? Nothing.
Luke used Force Grip in the very beginning of RotJ. Does that mean that he was lost to the Dark Side from the beginning?

Posted: 2002-10-23 11:04pm
by Spanky The Dolphin
Evil Sadistic Bastard wrote:Right.

Reason No.1 why I don't like the EU: it cheapens the saga. SW was conceived as a battle of good vs. evil, set in a gritty future context where necessity sometimes outweighs morality. The EU conveniently removes the latter and turns it into SW: Galactic Ghetto.

To wit: THERE IS NO DARK SIDE! Oh no, there is only the misuse of the Force, no dark side. So Yoda and Kenobi were talking through their asses when they warned Luke about the Dark Side. Vader didn't fall, he just misused his powers. For TWENTY YEARS! Geez! What does this serve apart from allowing EU hack writers to let their pet characters do stuff like Force Grip or Force Lightning people while still remaining a "good" guy? Nothing.
What the fuck are you talking about?

Posted: 2002-10-23 11:10pm
by Evil Sadistic Bastard
Some guy wrote in on TFN that there is no dark side, only its misuse. I'll dig up the URL and show it to you.

Posted: 2002-10-23 11:13pm
by Spanky The Dolphin
Since when are posts on TF.N part of the EU?

Posted: 2002-10-23 11:17pm
by Joe
Evil Sadistic Bastard wrote:Right.

Reason No.1 why I don't like the EU: it cheapens the saga. SW was conceived as a battle of good vs. evil, set in a gritty future context where necessity sometimes outweighs morality. The EU conveniently removes the latter and turns it into SW: Galactic Ghetto.

To wit: THERE IS NO DARK SIDE! Oh no, there is only the misuse of the Force, no dark side. So Yoda and Kenobi were talking through their asses when they warned Luke about the Dark Side. Vader didn't fall, he just misused his powers. For TWENTY YEARS! Geez! What does this serve apart from allowing EU hack writers to let their pet characters do stuff like Force Grip or Force Lightning people while still remaining a "good" guy? Nothing.
I actually sort of agree to a very limited extent with your first sentiment. Primarily how so many SW fans worship the Empire these days...I don't think that much is really the fault of the authors, that has more to do with jerk-off fantasies about the Empire that are occassionally confirmed by passages from the EU (I'm not trying to start a new thread about whether the Empire is bad or not, we've had enough of those).

As for your second sentiment, well, it's a recent development in the EU and we have no reason to believe that this early into the development of the no-darkside theory, it is going to become the norm and completely replace the old school of thought concerning the Force.

Posted: 2002-10-23 11:18pm
by Evil Sadistic Bastard
It was a quote from an EU author. And since the authors are going to govern the policy of the EU I think it's fairly reasonable to make the jump. I still haven't found the quote yet (I'm starting to think it may not actually be there at all, because I forgot the URL I encountered it at) but I'm working on it.

Posted: 2002-10-23 11:22pm
by Joe
The book you're looking for is most likely Traitor. The quote is from Vergere. However, Walter Jon Williams, the author of the follow-up to Traitor, Destiny's Way, said in a recent interview that Vergere's view of the force is 1) only one, not the only way of viewing the Force and 2) is ultimately just as incomplete as Luke's view of the force is.

Posted: 2002-10-24 01:06am
by Evil Sadistic Bastard
Korr: That being the case, I'll say no more about the darkside issue until I get the exat quote..

Another peeve I have with the EU is the lack of originality. I think you might have noticed the abundance of superweapons in the EU, all of which are "more powerful than the Death Star" Then what, may I ask, was the point of building the Death Star in the first place? Maybe they want to create a worthy adversary to destroy, but after a while, it just gets too ostentatious.

Ans speaking of the Death Star, who the heck invented it? EU first said Bevel Lemelisk designed the thing, but when we saw the Geonosians handing the plancs to Dooku, the writers were stuck with a continuity problem, until recently they came up with the patch fix that Lemelisk designed the superlaser while the Genonosians designed the rest of it.

Sure. You can almost see them now, scrabbling for an idea to fix the gaping hole in what is supposed to be a coherent universe. This is getting to be like Star Trek already.

Posted: 2002-10-24 11:08am
by Joe
Evil Sadistic Bastard wrote:Korr: That being the case, I'll say no more about the darkside issue until I get the exat quote..

Another peeve I have with the EU is the lack of originality. I think you might have noticed the abundance of superweapons in the EU, all of which are "more powerful than the Death Star" Then what, may I ask, was the point of building the Death Star in the first place? Maybe they want to create a worthy adversary to destroy, but after a while, it just gets too ostentatious.

Ans speaking of the Death Star, who the heck invented it? EU first said Bevel Lemelisk designed the thing, but when we saw the Geonosians handing the plancs to Dooku, the writers were stuck with a continuity problem, until recently they came up with the patch fix that Lemelisk designed the superlaser while the Genonosians designed the rest of it.

Sure. You can almost see them now, scrabbling for an idea to fix the gaping hole in what is supposed to be a coherent universe. This is getting to be like Star Trek already.
As for your superweapons problem: blame KJA.

Posted: 2002-10-24 11:35am
by Vympel
Bah. Some good, some bad. Most of the bad stuff can be attributed to KJA.

Posted: 2002-10-24 11:37am
by Mr Bean
Bad can be attributed to KJA, Good can Be Atribbuted to Zahn

Thus are the laws of EU

I support Zahn, HAIL ZAHN! :D

Posted: 2002-10-24 12:53pm
by Crown
Hail Zahn!

Posted: 2002-10-24 02:36pm
by hvb
I would have to say Zahn & Allston write good stories, while trying to stay true to SW, so good on them :D , and Stackpole is OK although I think his fantasy is better then his SW :wink: .
Everybody else should have been forced to see, read & hear the canon before starting writing their stuff :roll: , 'course it would very much appear from their work that KJA and quite a few of the others didn't do this!

Re: Do you support/like the EU?

Posted: 2002-10-24 02:52pm
by jegs2
Evil Sadistic Bastard wrote:Well, do you? I wanted to know, since I don't really like it and I wanted to hegar from others about it.
It's really more of a yes/no answer. I like some while not liking others. That manual that refers to the globes atop an ISD as shield generators -- don't much like that book.