Energy Weapon variable power levels in SW

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
Rightous Fist Of Heaven
Jedi Master
Posts: 1201
Joined: 2002-09-29 05:31pm
Location: Finland

Energy Weapon variable power levels in SW

Post by Rightous Fist Of Heaven »

Could someone refresh my memory on this? I seem to recall there being canonical evidence for variable yields somewhere but couldnt find it.
"The ones they built at the height of nuclear weapons could knock the earth out of its orbit" - Physics expert Envy in reference to the hydrogen bombs built during the cold war.
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Re: Energy Weapon variable power levels in SW

Post by Stofsk »

Rightous Fist Of Heaven wrote:Could someone refresh my memory on this? I seem to recall there being canonical evidence for variable yields somewhere but couldnt find it.
* Stormtroopers switching their blasters to "stun" so they can capture Princess Leia (ANH)

* General Veers ordered his gunners to target the power generators on Hoth by switching their blasters to "maximum firepower." (ESB)

* A case could be made that DS2 was firing low-powered shots at the Rebel Fleets, rather than firing planetkiller shots. (ROTJ)

All canon.
Image
User avatar
nightmare
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1539
Joined: 2002-07-26 11:07am
Location: Here. Sometimes there.

Post by nightmare »

"intensify forward firepower"

That probably only means to increase refire rate, but who knows..

*smacks head and edits*

Geez, sometimes you don't see the forest for all the trees.

The absolutely BEST evidence for variable firepower is the fact that they are shown onscreen to fire with different results at different times.

AT-ATs in the snow, compared to hitting the generator. Slave-1 destroying asteroids and the next don't blow up the landing platform, and so on.

When we see anything fire with less than the highest yield observed there must be either additional circumstances or variable yields. It's that simple.
Star Trek vs. Star Wars, Extralife style.
User avatar
YT300000
Sith'ari
Posts: 6528
Joined: 2003-05-20 12:49pm
Location: Calgary, Canada
Contact:

Post by YT300000 »

Also the burning, from Brian Daley's the Han Solo Adventures. I don't remember which book though, and I'm not going to search for it.
Name changes are for people who wear women's clothes. - Zuul

Wow. It took me a good minute to remember I didn't have testicles. -xBlackFlash

Are you sure this isn't like that time Michael Jackson stopped by your house so he could use the bathroom? - Superman
vakundok
Jedi Knight
Posts: 749
Joined: 2003-01-03 06:03pm
Location: in a country far far away

Post by vakundok »

The stun setting produced a different kind of blast, so it is not necesserely a sign of power setting.
The destruction of the power generator on Hoth is clear and canon. An another clear sign is in the novelisation when the probot destroys a wampa.
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Post by Connor MacLeod »

The ANH novelization makes mention of Luke setting his stormtrooper blaster to maximum power to burn through a blast door. NJO makes mention of variable intensity weapons with stutterfire (capital ships also had the ability to alter the strength of bolts for this purpose.) And the SWTJ makes mention of variable settings (from stun to vaporization.)
Post Reply