Yavin Base Post ANH
Posted: 2004-06-18 07:47am
All,
Though I know that the Yavin moon base has been used as a locale in the post movie books...would remains actually be there?
Given the situation immediately after DS1 going boom...would the Imp fleet that arrived not have BDZ the area out of spite? Modern History would suggest even if a base is abandoned by insurgents/rebels/gureillas/terrorists it is destroyed to prevent the same group from re-occupying that position at a later time. And would the Imp "blood lust" not be at a fever pitch because of DS1 Kaboom? If a fleet looses their greatest vessel...retribution is often gone after (example...after KMS Bismarck sank HMS Hood in WWII...Churchill pulled all available Royal Navy assets, including vessels on convoy duty to go "Sink the Bismarck")
Also...would the Yavin base have felt any of the ill effects that Saxton say shold befall Endor? Or was the Death Star far enough away? Or did the Yavin Gas Giant take some of the blast?
Though I know that the Yavin moon base has been used as a locale in the post movie books...would remains actually be there?
Given the situation immediately after DS1 going boom...would the Imp fleet that arrived not have BDZ the area out of spite? Modern History would suggest even if a base is abandoned by insurgents/rebels/gureillas/terrorists it is destroyed to prevent the same group from re-occupying that position at a later time. And would the Imp "blood lust" not be at a fever pitch because of DS1 Kaboom? If a fleet looses their greatest vessel...retribution is often gone after (example...after KMS Bismarck sank HMS Hood in WWII...Churchill pulled all available Royal Navy assets, including vessels on convoy duty to go "Sink the Bismarck")
Also...would the Yavin base have felt any of the ill effects that Saxton say shold befall Endor? Or was the Death Star far enough away? Or did the Yavin Gas Giant take some of the blast?