Another Half-Baked Blaster theory (repeat?)

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Kurgan
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4069
Joined: 2002-08-19 08:13pm

Another Half-Baked Blaster theory (repeat?)

Post by Kurgan »

Stop me if you've heard this one.

But what if SW blasters (not talking ship level weaponry, just small arms and possibly ground vehicle level for starters) were actually rail-guns that fired "bottles" (of some unknown substance) containing explosive gas that reacted with targets when the bottle (or "bullet") struck a physical target?

This might not work in conjunction with lightsaber deflection of course, unless there's some "sweet spot" on each "bottle" that can be safely deflected at the correct angle (found with Jedi abilities) with a lightsaber without "breaking" it (sort of like the strength of an egg if you squeeze it in your hands at the proper points).

Anyway, let's hear this theory ripped to shreds, or at least somebody telling me it's been done before...
User avatar
Praxis
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6012
Joined: 2002-12-22 04:02pm
Contact:

Post by Praxis »

Actually, that's how BOWCASTERS work, not blasters.
Kurgan
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4069
Joined: 2002-08-19 08:13pm

Post by Kurgan »

Interesting. I thought bowcastors were supposed to be metallic energized bullets or something? I grant you, it's been a long time since I read up on that...
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

Praxis wrote:Actually, that's how BOWCASTERS work, not blasters.
That EU explanation is contradicted by canon. Read Brian Young's Turbolaser commentaries.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
Kurgan
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4069
Joined: 2002-08-19 08:13pm

Post by Kurgan »

It's been awhile since I read over the TLC, but that's a discussion of turbolasers. Do we absolutely know that 'blasters' (infantry level small arms, possibly larger land based vehicle mounted weapons) are the same as "turbo lasers" (or "lasers")?

It's tempting to say that they are, just as it's tempting to say that the SuperLaser of the Death Star and some of the weapons seen in AOTC are the same, but that's not a given is it? Or is it...


Me, I always assumed Chewie's bowcastor was just another type of blaster, possibly the design being a converted crossbow, or with the ability to fire regular crossbow bolts as well as blaster shots (a multi purpose weapon, etc). In the movies it appears to just fire the standard "blaster" shots we know and love. But then the official literature seems to diagree...
User avatar
Mad
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1923
Joined: 2002-07-04 01:32am
Location: North Carolina, USA
Contact:

Post by Mad »

Kurgan wrote:Do we absolutely know that 'blasters' (infantry level small arms, possibly larger land based vehicle mounted weapons) are the same as "turbo lasers" (or "lasers")?
We know they are based on similar technology and principles, but their in-flight behavior differ enough that it's a safe assumption that blasters are, in general, STL projectile weapons while turbolasers tend to be lightspeed energy beams.
Later...
User avatar
nightmare
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1539
Joined: 2002-07-26 11:07am
Location: Here. Sometimes there.

Post by nightmare »

Mad wrote:
Kurgan wrote:Do we absolutely know that 'blasters' (infantry level small arms, possibly larger land based vehicle mounted weapons) are the same as "turbo lasers" (or "lasers")?
We know they are based on similar technology and principles, but their in-flight behavior differ enough that it's a safe assumption that blasters are, in general, STL projectile weapons while turbolasers tend to be lightspeed energy beams.
No arcing. A few cases of damage before impact just like TLs.
Star Trek vs. Star Wars, Extralife style.
User avatar
Mad
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1923
Joined: 2002-07-04 01:32am
Location: North Carolina, USA
Contact:

Post by Mad »

nightmare wrote:No arcing. A few cases of damage before impact just like TLs.
But those aren't as much of a problem for bolt behavior as the non-beam behavior shown by blasters.

The biggest problem is bolt deflection. If we go by my turbolaser theory, then the bolt speed is timed such that it hits its target just as the beam ramps up to full power. So when a Jedi blocks the bolt, a lightspeed beam should be deflected and that beam should instantly hit whatever it is reflected into.

This does not happen. The bolt flies off into another direction, and after a delay hits something else, perhaps killing somebody. That delay would be impossible if the blaster was shooting a lightspeed beam.

As another note, AotC makes a mention about a lightsaber fighting style and its effectiveness against "projectile weapons like blasters."
Later...
Kurgan
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4069
Joined: 2002-08-19 08:13pm

Post by Kurgan »

Yeah, about the "damage before hit" thing, I remember, like when Luke's robot hand is damaged in ROTJ. Though, I still believe that this can be chalked up to SFX gaffs (I know, I know, others will still argue that I'm an idiot and this fits under SOD, etc).

Another thing (and this is only speculation I haven't tried it and don't really have time to) is to go through the films and see if there are any instances of "dodging" blaster bolts. If they are moving at lightspeed we'd have to assume that those doing the dodging are moving at FTL...

But that's only if any instances are actually observed.
User avatar
The Cleric
BANNED
Posts: 2990
Joined: 2003-08-06 09:41pm
Location: The Right Hand Of GOD

Post by The Cleric »

Mad wrote:As another note, AotC makes a mention about a lightsaber fighting style and its effectiveness against "projectile weapons like blasters."
I believe that "projectile" is simply a reference to range.
{} Thrawn wins. Any questions? {} Great Dolphin Conspiracy {} Proud member of the defunct SEGNOR {} Enjoy the rythmic hip thrusts {} In my past life I was either Vlad the Impaler or Katsushika Hokusai {}
User avatar
Rogue 9
Scrapping TIEs since 1997
Posts: 18685
Joined: 2003-11-12 01:10pm
Location: Classified
Contact:

Post by Rogue 9 »

Kurgan wrote:Yeah, about the "damage before hit" thing, I remember, like when Luke's robot hand is damaged in ROTJ. Though, I still believe that this can be chalked up to SFX gaffs
That'd be a lot of SFX gaffes, then. It also happened with the asteroid destroyed by a laser cannon shot in TESB. The asteroid turned white before the green bolt hit it. It just happens too many times in too many wildly different circumstances to be a coincidental string of errors.
It's Rogue, not Rouge!

HAB | KotL | VRWC/ELC/CDA | TRotR | The Anti-Confederate | Sluggite | Gamer | Blogger | Staff Reporter | Student | Musician
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

Kurgan wrote:It's been awhile since I read over the TLC, but that's a discussion of turbolasers. Do we absolutely know that 'blasters' (infantry level small arms, possibly larger land based vehicle mounted weapons) are the same as "turbo lasers" (or "lasers")?

It's tempting to say that they are, just as it's tempting to say that the SuperLaser of the Death Star and some of the weapons seen in AOTC are the same, but that's not a given is it? Or is it...
Do you realy think I would direct you there if there was not relevent information there? I am quite fucking aware that they must operate by different mechanisms.

Me, I always assumed Chewie's bowcastor was just another type of blaster, possibly the design being a converted crossbow, or with the ability to fire regular crossbow bolts as well as blaster shots (a multi purpose weapon, etc). In the movies it appears to just fire the standard "blaster" shots we know and love. But then the official literature seems to diagree...
And his pages detail how the EU explanation is unworkable.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
Crazedwraith
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11953
Joined: 2003-04-10 03:45pm
Location: Cheshire, England

Post by Crazedwraith »

Rogue 9 wrote:
Kurgan wrote:Yeah, about the "damage before hit" thing, I remember, like when Luke's robot hand is damaged in ROTJ. Though, I still believe that this can be chalked up to SFX gaffs
That'd be a lot of SFX gaffes, then. It also happened with the asteroid destroyed by a laser cannon shot in TESB. The asteroid turned white before the green bolt hit it. It just happens too many times in too many wildly different circumstances to be a coincidental string of errors.
So the grand total of two instances qualifies as "a lot" now?
User avatar
Rogue 9
Scrapping TIEs since 1997
Posts: 18685
Joined: 2003-11-12 01:10pm
Location: Classified
Contact:

Post by Rogue 9 »

Crazedwraith wrote:
Rogue 9 wrote:
Kurgan wrote:Yeah, about the "damage before hit" thing, I remember, like when Luke's robot hand is damaged in ROTJ. Though, I still believe that this can be chalked up to SFX gaffs
That'd be a lot of SFX gaffes, then. It also happened with the asteroid destroyed by a laser cannon shot in TESB. The asteroid turned white before the green bolt hit it. It just happens too many times in too many wildly different circumstances to be a coincidental string of errors.
So the grand total of two instances qualifies as "a lot" now?
There's more than that, I'm pretty sure. Didn't Leia's blaster do it too when she shot the stormtrooper on the Tantive IV during her capture? I'm not sure.
It's Rogue, not Rouge!

HAB | KotL | VRWC/ELC/CDA | TRotR | The Anti-Confederate | Sluggite | Gamer | Blogger | Staff Reporter | Student | Musician
Jessie Stamos
BANNED
Posts: 587
Joined: 2004-08-07 07:48pm

Post by Jessie Stamos »

Rogue 9 wrote:It just happens too many times in too many wildly different circumstances to be a coincidental string of errors.
Have you ever worked on a film?

If you're going to use it in a debate you should probably come up with an explination, but in real world terms, I would bet one of my testicles that it is a coincidence.
User avatar
Rogue 9
Scrapping TIEs since 1997
Posts: 18685
Joined: 2003-11-12 01:10pm
Location: Classified
Contact:

Post by Rogue 9 »

Jessie Stamos wrote:
Rogue 9 wrote:It just happens too many times in too many wildly different circumstances to be a coincidental string of errors.
Have you ever worked on a film?
Yes. Yes I have. But I wasn't on the special effects end of things, so I can't really speak for them regardless.
It's Rogue, not Rouge!

HAB | KotL | VRWC/ELC/CDA | TRotR | The Anti-Confederate | Sluggite | Gamer | Blogger | Staff Reporter | Student | Musician
Kurgan
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4069
Joined: 2002-08-19 08:13pm

Post by Kurgan »

Ender wrote: Do you realy think I would direct you there if there was not relevent information there? I am quite fucking aware that they must operate by different mechanisms.

And his pages detail how the EU explanation is unworkable.
Fair enough. You are right that he does spend some time dealing with the blaster (& bowcastor, which was a side issue brought up by Praxis you'll note) issue.

And I didn't mean to accuse you (or anyone in particular) of saying that blasters & turbolasers are identical. I simply forgot that his page does make a clear distinction (while he focuses primarily on the ship weaponry), and there we don't disagree (ie: that blasters & turbo lasers aren't necessarily the same thing, even if they might be "similar").

---------

As to filmic elements, I have not done any special effects work for film either. But I wouldn't think it impossible for an effects team to create some effect and then declare it "good enough" (to fool the audience) when in fact it is less than perfect. We've all heard the stories of the early attempts at making the lightsabers "glow" and we've seen the metal sticks that Obi-Wan and Vader are clearly holding even in the special editions. We've seen the boxes around ships, the matte lines on the Rancor, etc. And we've heard the stories about the filming of Star Wars, and all the problems they had. So it's not out of the realm of possibility that the FX crew could have made mistakes, even repeated the same ones in multiple instances.

I'll admit it is still something of a judgement call without a crewer coming out and directly saying "We didn't mean for it to look that way, oops! We meant for it to look like ____. Sorry!"

The mere fact that we're dealing with the depiction of things that aren't real leaves open the possibility that there might be an explanation in the material itself, I admit that also. I mean, we don't try to argue that many of the characters in AOTC must be ghosts because they often don't cast shadows or appear to pass through solid objects at times.

Still, the "damage appears before bullet/missile/etc hits" is a common SFX gaff in a lot of movies (and in Star Wars films too, note how Anakin's arm gets cut before Dooku's saber hits), so when I see it in Star Wars, I immediately think "gaff" not "ah, invisible lightspeed weapon with visible tracer!" And I'm not planning to argue the TurboLaser thing, since that's been done to death here.
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Post by His Divine Shadow »

Kurgan wrote:Yeah, about the "damage before hit" thing, I remember, like when Luke's robot hand is damaged in ROTJ. Though, I still believe that this can be chalked up to SFX gaffs
I wouldn't rule out that some hand weapons might work on the TL principle as well, though they seem rare.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
Kurgan
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4069
Joined: 2002-08-19 08:13pm

Post by Kurgan »

Like Disruptors?
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Post by His Divine Shadow »

Never seen one in operation so I couldn't say.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
Kurgan
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4069
Joined: 2002-08-19 08:13pm

Post by Kurgan »

Well neither have I, except in the games, which don't count.

Though they are based on descriptions from the Essential Guide to Weapons and Tech, so that might list the sources they come from...
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Post by His Divine Shadow »

I was thinking about the massless energy travelling in a tight spiral theory again in order to explain E-11 blasters, in the new screenshots from the ANH 2004 DVD the shot fired from an E-11 is clearly translucent and sub-light speed, soit can't be a projectile-plasma weapon but we know from later on that E-11's aren't firing invisible beams with ripples either(the ANH trash compactor scene).

They really seem to be energy weapons and they seem to travel forwards at sub-light velocities, the idea of having the particles making up a blaster shot travelling in a tight spiral would have them being both, but IIRC this would create a visible drop in gravity as well.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
Kurgan
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4069
Joined: 2002-08-19 08:13pm

Post by Kurgan »

Having the DVD's (19 days!) will definately be a nice thing for this type of analysis (sure, divx or LD rips and such are nice, but not everyone of us is so privileged)...

This "tight spiral" you speak of, this isn't like the Quake style "rail guns" is it? Or do you just mean the spin, like that of a physical "bullet" (say in a conventional firearm)?
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

What the hell does "light in a spiral" do for us? Its still moving sublight and will arc. It doesn't work.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
The Silence and I
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1658
Joined: 2002-11-09 09:04pm
Location: Bleh!

Post by The Silence and I »

E-11 shots are translucent? Bugger. Are any blaster shots opaque? Because some bad screen caps I've got kicking around have them as opaque bolts, but obviously the DVD would have priority...
Post Reply