Spacebattle

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

who wins?

ISD II
23
88%
Defenders
1
4%
Tied
2
8%
 
Total votes: 26

User avatar
wautd
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7595
Joined: 2004-02-11 10:11am
Location: Intensive care

Spacebattle

Post by wautd »

An ISD II attacks a planet. The ISD II got his full compliment of TIE fighters, bombers & other craft

The planetary garrison consists of:
- 20 Z-95 headhunters armed with missiles
- 10 Y-wings armed with torpedoes
- 5 Correlian corvettes
- 2 Nebulon-B Escort Frigates
- 1 Carrack cruiser
- 1 Bulk Cruiser

(i think its about equally matched, hopefully not to onesided anyway)
User avatar
Bertie Wooster
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1830
Joined: 2003-10-07 04:38pm
Location: reposed at the bosom of Nyx on the shores of Formentera
Contact:

Post by Bertie Wooster »

Star Destroyers were designed to defeat planetary fleets and pirate fleets and the one in this scenario doesn't even have near the total firepower of the ISD mk II. This is lopsided in favor of the Star Destroyer.

A better question would be: How long could this fleet last against the ISD mk II?
User avatar
wautd
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7595
Joined: 2004-02-11 10:11am
Location: Intensive care

Post by wautd »

How about an ISD I? Still too powerfull?
User avatar
Bertie Wooster
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1830
Joined: 2003-10-07 04:38pm
Location: reposed at the bosom of Nyx on the shores of Formentera
Contact:

Post by Bertie Wooster »

I'd say so. None of the defender's ship would last long enough against the ISD to do any real damage.

The carrack is fast enough and durable enough to be a nuisance to the ISD, but simply doesn't boast enough firepower to actually threaten the ISD. The Bulk Cruiser would simply get hammered from lack of speed and firepower, and the Escort Frigates and Corvettes would all be destroyed or disabled before the shields of the ISD would fail.

The only chance the defenders would have if they use their capital ships in a kamikaze attack or two.
User avatar
Lex
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 519
Joined: 2002-10-07 09:37am
Location: Liezen(Austria)
Contact:

Post by Lex »

give them x-wings instead of headhunters, armed with torpedos...
As long there is gravity, ride on...
Image
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12238
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Post by Lord Revan »

Lex wrote:give them x-wings instead of headhunters, armed with torpedos...
unless you give them Rogue Group pilots also, it's not gonna change anything, x-wings have only 6 torps per craft and the Z-95 is almost as durable as the T-65 (both are known for taking heavy beating and surviving.)
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
wautd
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7595
Joined: 2004-02-11 10:11am
Location: Intensive care

Post by wautd »

About how many TIE's are we talking by the way? Have the defenders enough fighters to destroy them so they can target the ISD's turrets after that?
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Post by Stofsk »

In terms of fighters the defenders are outnumbered; 20 Z-95s and 10 Y-wings, versus 6 squadrons of TIES (Fighters and Bombers, and maybe Interceptors as well). At least in that regard, the attacking ISD has an advantage.
Image
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

If those Nebulon-Bs also have fighters, then the ISDs fighters are outnumbered. 6.5 squadrons vs 6 on the ISD. In this scenario the ISDs fighters are effectively neutralized. Now the planetary defense has enough ships with varrying levels of firepower. If they can manage to close range on the ISD and pound it in one shield arc from close range, the ISD is going to have trouble. The Carrack is the heavy firepower and if the Corvettes are used to shield the Carracks approach, things look interesting for the ISD. The Nebulon-Bs also aren't defenseless and can add to the firepower.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
Kerneth
Jedi Knight
Posts: 523
Joined: 2003-01-16 11:03pm

Post by Kerneth »

Depending on the ISD's fighter complement, it may have Assault Gunboats and Skipray Blastboats as well as TIE Fighters, Bombers, and Interceptors. The Fighters and Interceptors are faster than anything the defenders are fielding, and the Bombers, Assault Gunboats, and Skipray Blastboats carry more firepower, particularly the Blastboats, which are also going to be a threat to lighter enemy starships--like the Corvettes and possibly the Frigates.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the Corvette the same as the ship Leia was on at the beginning of ANH? The Imp gunners were having to be careful to NOT destroy that ship. This doesn't bode well for a mere handful of them in combat with an ISD I or II; if it can bring its HTL batteries to bear on them, they're free-floating debris in a matter of moments, and the LTL batteries will only take a little longer to accomplish the same task.

In I, Jedi an ISD II engages and annihilates a Kaloth Battlecruiser that has been stated to be able to fight a Nebulon-B to a standstill in a matter of moments using its HTL batteries. The ISD II took minor damage in the process, but its attack was actually massively overkill on the Battlecruiser--HTL beams were said to exit the OPPOSITE end of the vessel by the time the assault was completed. Add that to the fact the Nebulon B's have an enormous structural weak point--that long, thin spar connecting the engines to the main hull--and they aren't going to last long. In Rogue Squadron: Isard's Revenge an ISD II "breaks the back" of a Nebulon-B frigate quite easily.

Finally, the Carrack and Bulk Cruiser simply don't have the firepower or durability to slug it out with an ISD or ISD II.

The Star Destroyer will take some damage, but nothing major, and should annihilate the defenders fairly rapidly. The enemy starships need to concentrate their firepower on a single shield facing in order to have a chance of hurting the ISD II, but approaching from the same angle like that allows the ISD II to turn and engage them with its entire HTL complement, letting it bring maximum firepower to bear on the defenders.

If the defenders spread out so the ISD can only bring its HTL batteries to bear on a few of them, the results are even worse; they'll lack the firepower to overwhelm the ISD's shields on any particular aspect, while the ISD will be free to concentrate its heavy batteries on one or two ships at a time, quickly annihilating them. If anything, the ISD will take LESS damage than it would if the defenders all grouped up and tried to hammer its shields down on one side en masse.
"The best part of losing your mind is not missing it."
User avatar
Praxis
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6012
Joined: 2002-12-22 04:02pm
Contact:

Post by Praxis »

Stofsk wrote:In terms of fighters the defenders are outnumbered; 20 Z-95s and 10 Y-wings, versus 6 squadrons of TIES (Fighters and Bombers, and maybe Interceptors as well). At least in that regard, the attacking ISD has an advantage.
But the Z-95s and Y-wings have torps AND shields. TIEs have neither.
User avatar
Imperial Overlord
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11978
Joined: 2004-08-19 04:30am
Location: The Tower at Charm

Post by Imperial Overlord »

The TIEs are faster and more maneuverable.

Whether or not they have torps depends on the model.
The Excellent Prismatic Spray. For when you absolutely, positively must kill a motherfucker. Accept no substitutions. Contact a magician of the later Aeons for details. Some conditions may apply.
User avatar
Praxis
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6012
Joined: 2002-12-22 04:02pm
Contact:

Post by Praxis »

Perhaps if the Bulk Cruiser and a couple of the corvette's RAM the Star Destroyer at full speed (OR even Hyperdrive)...that might do it.
User avatar
Praxis
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6012
Joined: 2002-12-22 04:02pm
Contact:

Post by Praxis »

Imperial Overlord wrote:The TIEs are faster and more maneuverable.

Whether or not they have torps depends on the model.
Did you read the description?

The Z-95's are armed with their concussion missles, and Y-wings with their torpedoes.

Both seek, so in the worst case they can unload them on the TIE's, wiping out the fighters, though they would waste most of their torps.
User avatar
Imperial Overlord
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11978
Joined: 2004-08-19 04:30am
Location: The Tower at Charm

Post by Imperial Overlord »

I was talking about the TIEs. TIE bombers and TIE defenders have missles and torps.
The Excellent Prismatic Spray. For when you absolutely, positively must kill a motherfucker. Accept no substitutions. Contact a magician of the later Aeons for details. Some conditions may apply.
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12238
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Post by Lord Revan »

Well if we're talking about an ISD with TIE-figthers, TIE-Interceptors and TIE-bombers, the defenders have chance to win (but they'll need luck and/or elite pilots). If the ISD has TIE-Avengers and/or TIE-Defenders, the defenders have no chance what so ever. Assault Gunboats or Skipray Blastboats won't probaly change anything as they are rather slow. Also an ISD has other craft that can perform a limited role in this battle.
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

Lex wrote:give them x-wings instead of headhunters, armed with torpedos...
and nothing changes
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

Praxis wrote:
Stofsk wrote:In terms of fighters the defenders are outnumbered; 20 Z-95s and 10 Y-wings, versus 6 squadrons of TIES (Fighters and Bombers, and maybe Interceptors as well). At least in that regard, the attacking ISD has an advantage.
But the Z-95s and Y-wings have torps AND shields. TIEs have neither.
Ties have shields
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Ender wrote:
Praxis wrote:
Stofsk wrote:In terms of fighters the defenders are outnumbered; 20 Z-95s and 10 Y-wings, versus 6 squadrons of TIES (Fighters and Bombers, and maybe Interceptors as well). At least in that regard, the attacking ISD has an advantage.
But the Z-95s and Y-wings have torps AND shields. TIEs have neither.
Ties have shields
The generic Tie fielded by the Empire does not have shields. We have a couple examples of shields on Ties, but these are not standard designs.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
IRG CommandoJoe
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3481
Joined: 2002-07-09 12:51pm

Post by IRG CommandoJoe »

I think the ISD II would destroy all ships without even having to deploy its fighters or even have to use its HTLs except maybe for the Carrack.
Who's the more foolish, the fool or the fool who follows him? -Obi-Wan Kenobi

"In the unlikely event that someone comes here, hates everything we stand for, and then donates a big chunk of money anyway, I will thank him for his stupidity." -Darth Wong, Lord of the Sith

Proud member of the Brotherhood of the Monkey.
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

IRG CommandoJoe wrote:I think the ISD II would destroy all ships without even having to deploy its fighters or even have to use its HTLs except maybe for the Carrack.
If the ISD doesn't deploy its fighter then it runs a serious risk of damage from those Y-Wings. They have sufficent firepower to down one side of shields.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
IRG CommandoJoe
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3481
Joined: 2002-07-09 12:51pm

Post by IRG CommandoJoe »

10 Y-Wings would survive long enough to bring down part of the ISD's shields? That, I find hard to believe.
Who's the more foolish, the fool or the fool who follows him? -Obi-Wan Kenobi

"In the unlikely event that someone comes here, hates everything we stand for, and then donates a big chunk of money anyway, I will thank him for his stupidity." -Darth Wong, Lord of the Sith

Proud member of the Brotherhood of the Monkey.
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

IRG CommandoJoe wrote:10 Y-Wings would survive long enough to bring down part of the ISD's shields? That, I find hard to believe.
They can effectively fire outside of the range of the ISDs kill zone. Thats part of the reason why ISDs have fighters afterall. To prevent this.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

Alyeska wrote:
Ender wrote:
Praxis wrote: But the Z-95s and Y-wings have torps AND shields. TIEs have neither.
Ties have shields
The generic Tie fielded by the Empire does not have shields. We have a couple examples of shields on Ties, but these are not standard designs.
Prove. it.

I'm sorry for the short temper here, but I get really sick of going 12 rounds with BEUPs (Brainless Expanded Universe Parrots) who just deny the films with out proof. Are there maybe 2 kinds of Ties, the shielded the navy version and the unshielded the starfleet version? Maybe. But there is nothing to show shielded Ties are rare.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

Alyeska wrote:
IRG CommandoJoe wrote:I think the ISD II would destroy all ships without even having to deploy its fighters or even have to use its HTLs except maybe for the Carrack.
If the ISD doesn't deploy its fighter then it runs a serious risk of damage from those Y-Wings. They have sufficent firepower to down one side of shields.
As it doesn't say what kind of torps they are carrying, we don't know that.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
Post Reply