StarDestroyer.Net BBS

Despite the fact Tierce was a failure to Thrawn's original standards of trying to create a leader.. why wouldn't Thrawn clone a few more Tierce's at least given his combat skills and at least his rabid loyalty to the Grand Admiral? Would he have been too bloodthirsty and vindictive in his campaigns if Thrawn wasn't there keeping him on a leash?

Trytostaydead wrote:Despite the fact Tierce was a failure to Thrawn's original standards of trying to create a leader.. why wouldn't Thrawn clone a few more Tierce's at least given his combat skills and at least his rabid loyalty to the Grand Admiral? Would he have been too bloodthirsty and vindictive in his campaigns if Thrawn wasn't there keeping him on a leash?

We saw what Tierce did when he was let off the leash. He tried to engineer a coup and perpetuate the Galactic Civil War when the Empire was clearly ready to sue for peace. He was a complete failure, and producing more of him would have been a Bad Thing.

Iceberg wrote:

Trytostaydead wrote:Despite the fact Tierce was a failure to Thrawn's original standards of trying to create a leader.. why wouldn't Thrawn clone a few more Tierce's at least given his combat skills and at least his rabid loyalty to the Grand Admiral? Would he have been too bloodthirsty and vindictive in his campaigns if Thrawn wasn't there keeping him on a leash?

We saw what Tierce did when he was let off the leash. He tried to engineer a coup and perpetuate the Galactic Civil War when the Empire was clearly ready to sue for peace. He was a complete failure, and producing more of him would have been a Bad Thing.

That was when he was let off the leash, but what if Thrawn was still around? I'm assuming based off of his loyalty, training, rank as stormtrooper commander and reaction to the con man, he was at least highly loyal to a true Grand Admiral.

Trytostaydead wrote:

Iceberg wrote:

Trytostaydead wrote:Despite the fact Tierce was a failure to Thrawn's original standards of trying to create a leader.. why wouldn't Thrawn clone a few more Tierce's at least given his combat skills and at least his rabid loyalty to the Grand Admiral? Would he have been too bloodthirsty and vindictive in his campaigns if Thrawn wasn't there keeping him on a leash?

We saw what Tierce did when he was let off the leash. He tried to engineer a coup and perpetuate the Galactic Civil War when the Empire was clearly ready to sue for peace. He was a complete failure, and producing more of him would have been a Bad Thing.

That was when he was let off the leash, but what if Thrawn was still around? I'm assuming based off of his loyalty, training, rank as stormtrooper commander and reaction to the con man, he was at least highly loyal to a true Grand Admiral.

Like Pelleanon said, Teirce wasn't what Thranw wanted he had no vision, no leadership skills ,just thrawns genius hooked up to his pathetic manitpuating brain.

Crazedwraith wrote:

Trytostaydead wrote:

Iceberg wrote: We saw what Tierce did when he was let off the leash. He tried to engineer a coup and perpetuate the Galactic Civil War when the Empire was clearly ready to sue for peace. He was a complete failure, and producing more of him would have been a Bad Thing.

That was when he was let off the leash, but what if Thrawn was still around? I'm assuming based off of his loyalty, training, rank as stormtrooper commander and reaction to the con man, he was at least highly loyal to a true Grand Admiral.

Like Pelleanon said, Teirce wasn't what Thranw wanted he had no vision, no leadership skills ,just thrawns genius hooked up to his pathetic manitpuating brain.

And also as Pellaeon said, Thrawn simply wanted the peace and calm that order brought with it, something that Tierce of course had not interest in at all.