Byss Destruction Question
Posted: 2004-11-17 04:17pm
Can anyone here who has read the second half of Empire's End provide the reaction the NR and the heroes had to Byss going bye-bye?
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=57244
Much like your reaction to Alderaan, if that's what you're driving at.consequences wrote:So 17 billion people(IIRC) die, and the reaction is 'Fuck 'em for being pawns of Palpatine'?
This is the general impression I got, but I wanted to make sure that they really were that callous.
You do grasp NOT to actually transfer thoughts of one debate to another topic, right?Rogue 9 wrote:Much like your reaction to Alderaan, if that's what you're driving at.consequences wrote:So 17 billion people(IIRC) die, and the reaction is 'Fuck 'em for being pawns of Palpatine'?
This is the general impression I got, but I wanted to make sure that they really were that callous.
I personally don't care, it's against the rules and something I enforce when I see it regardless.Kurgan wrote:Sucks, but you gotta admit, people here do it quite often. ; P
So Luke, Leia, and any other Jedi around would undoubtedly know that a crapload of people just died, but the NR as a whole knows nothing more than the fact that the Emperor's gone, and there's no hard information on the Jedi's reactions.Publius wrote:The destruction of Byss occurs on the very last illustrated page of Empire's End; there is absolutely no depiction of any reaction on the part of the leadership or general population of the New Republic. The only commen on the world's annihilation is Chewbacca's acclamation "Long live the New Republic!" Aside from that, no response has been documented on the subject of Byss's fate; it is entirely possible that the majority of the galaxy never even learned of the fact, remote as the world was. There is certainly no reason that the leadership of the New Republic would even know the size of Byss's population. Only General Skywalker, General Solo, and Councilor Organa Solo among the New Republic's leading figures had ever even so much as set foot on Byss; the Dark Empire Sourcebook describes the nearly mythical status of the world.
PUBLIUS
I bet that's what Tarkin was thinking when he blew Aldie up, just replace NR with "Empire."Publius wrote:The destruction of Byss occurs on the very last illustrated page of Empire's End; there is absolutely no depiction of any reaction on the part of the leadership or general population of the New Republic. The only commen on the world's annihilation is Chewbacca's acclamation "Long live the New Republic!"
But SoDwise, someone apparently found out enough about the planet to write that entry in the DESB.Only General Skywalker, General Solo, and Councilor Organa Solo among the New Republic's leading figures had ever even so much as set foot on Byss; the Dark Empire Sourcebook describes the nearly mythical status of the world.
I'm consistent. Since I already decided Alderaan and Hiroshima weren't particularly evil, and that they have strategic value and meant to end a more destructive war. The same logic can go for Byss, and it helps that Byss was supposed to be an accident anyway.Rogue 9 wrote:Much like your reaction to Alderaan, if that's what you're driving at.
Even if one treats the Dark Empire Sourcebook as being an "in universe" document (it is in fact narrated by a third-person omniscient narrator), this is insignificant. There is no information as to who the "author" would be, or when the document were written; it could very well have been written ten thousand years later after the entire Imperial archives have been declassified in entirety. There is no reason to believe that the galaxy at large or even its senior leadership would have any idea as to the population of Byss; indeed, the only people who would have any clue would be Imperial Intelligence, which was responsible for establishing the world in the first place.Kazuaki Shimazaki wrote:But SoDwise, someone apparently found out enough about the planet to write that entry in the DESB.
Considering how most of the other Sourcebooks I know are narrated by In-Universe people (mostly Arhul Hextrophon and his lackeys), I won't be immediately certain this one was not "in-universe" just because they didn't add an Arhul Hextrophon letter or write incriminating things like "Alliance Editor's Note" (DSTC).Publius wrote:Even if one treats the Dark Empire Sourcebook as being an "in universe" document
This faulty diagram is the work of an omniscent narrator? Umm...(it is in fact narrated by a third-person omniscient narrator),
So, in ten thousand years, they hadn't seen through the deception of Alderaan's "Shieldless, Defenceless Claim"? The entire Imperial archives have been declassified and they still think the above diagram is correct? In a one volume work of that time period, they would choose not to cover that rather important period of DEII, the actual execution of Operation Shadowhand. That's kind of like a one-volume WWII work that begins in 1939 and cuts off in 1942. Possible, but strange.There is no information as to who the "author" would be, or when the document were written; it could very well have been written ten thousand years later after the entire Imperial archives have been declassified in entirety.
Oh, he likes to claim that the fact of a shield makes Alderaan a legitimate military target.Kurgan wrote:Shieldless defense claim?
Wait, is it being implied that the Alderaan Shield is only fan conjecture, rather than canon?
Or is it some confusion over "We have no weapons" (ANH onscreen dialouge) and "Vader knew their defenses were as good as any in the Empire" (novel)?? Confused.
No, like you said. It's a Legit question.Kurgan wrote:I hope you weren't talking about me there GR, I had a legitimate question. If it's just referring to that past debate, then nevermind.
I don't intend to join into the fray here, but this is what he meant:Kurgan wrote:Shieldless defense claim?
Wait, is it being implied that the Alderaan Shield is only fan conjecture, rather than canon?
Or is it some confusion over "We have no weapons" (ANH onscreen dialouge) and "Vader knew their defenses were as good as any in the Empire" (novel)?? Confused.
Dark Empire Sourcebook, [i]Chapter Nine: Equipment[/i] wrote:Notes On Planets: A typical habitable planet has a structural rating of 10D-20D (Death Star scale). Alderaan had no shields of any kind, so it was utterly vaporized. A shielded planet that is overcome by a superlaser may "merely" have its entire surface burned off or split into several pieces. Note that planets don't have to be destroyed to be rendered uninhabitable.
Come on, both of you had been in our last debate. What is indisputable is that the officials claim that there is no shield, and trying to grab the Morality of Alderaan debate is just a red herring.Rogue 9 wrote:Oh, he likes to claim that the fact of a shield makes Alderaan a legitimate military target.