Page 1 of 2

Byss Destruction Question

Posted: 2004-11-17 04:17pm
by consequences
Can anyone here who has read the second half of Empire's End provide the reaction the NR and the heroes had to Byss going bye-bye?

Posted: 2004-11-17 04:29pm
by Ghost Rider
Chewies said something like "Long Live the Republic."

They gave a brief Epilogue that with the destruction of Byss and the end of Palpatine, that they could begin rebuilding.

Not much more was given beyond that.

Posted: 2004-11-17 04:32pm
by Illuminatus Primus
Much of the rest is basically taken care of by Crimson Empire and Crimson Empire II: Council of Blood.

Posted: 2004-11-17 04:44pm
by consequences
So 17 billion people(IIRC) die, and the reaction is 'Fuck 'em for being pawns of Palpatine'? :?

This is the general impression I got, but I wanted to make sure that they really were that callous.

Posted: 2004-11-17 04:49pm
by Rogue 9
consequences wrote:So 17 billion people(IIRC) die, and the reaction is 'Fuck 'em for being pawns of Palpatine'? :?

This is the general impression I got, but I wanted to make sure that they really were that callous.
Much like your reaction to Alderaan, if that's what you're driving at. :roll:

Posted: 2004-11-17 04:51pm
by Ghost Rider
Rogue 9 wrote:
consequences wrote:So 17 billion people(IIRC) die, and the reaction is 'Fuck 'em for being pawns of Palpatine'? :?

This is the general impression I got, but I wanted to make sure that they really were that callous.
Much like your reaction to Alderaan, if that's what you're driving at. :roll:
You do grasp NOT to actually transfer thoughts of one debate to another topic, right? :evil:

Posted: 2004-11-17 05:44pm
by Kurgan
Sucks, but you gotta admit, people here do it quite often. ; P

Posted: 2004-11-17 05:47pm
by Ghost Rider
Kurgan wrote:Sucks, but you gotta admit, people here do it quite often. ; P
I personally don't care, it's against the rules and something I enforce when I see it regardless.

Keeping one's argument in one's topic is the reason we have it since otherwise we would have flamewars in everyone's topic, because at some point someone has had a disagreement with someone else.

Posted: 2004-11-17 05:51pm
by Imperial Overlord
They were acting as a base for a planet buster. I think relief that no more worlds would be destroyed would be the dominate emotion at the time.

Posted: 2004-11-17 08:34pm
by Publius
The destruction of Byss occurs on the very last illustrated page of Empire's End; there is absolutely no depiction of any reaction on the part of the leadership or general population of the New Republic. The only commen on the world's annihilation is Chewbacca's acclamation "Long live the New Republic!" Aside from that, no response has been documented on the subject of Byss's fate; it is entirely possible that the majority of the galaxy never even learned of the fact, remote as the world was. There is certainly no reason that the leadership of the New Republic would even know the size of Byss's population. Only General Skywalker, General Solo, and Councilor Organa Solo among the New Republic's leading figures had ever even so much as set foot on Byss; the Dark Empire Sourcebook describes the nearly mythical status of the world.

PUBLIUS

Posted: 2004-11-17 08:45pm
by consequences
Publius wrote:The destruction of Byss occurs on the very last illustrated page of Empire's End; there is absolutely no depiction of any reaction on the part of the leadership or general population of the New Republic. The only commen on the world's annihilation is Chewbacca's acclamation "Long live the New Republic!" Aside from that, no response has been documented on the subject of Byss's fate; it is entirely possible that the majority of the galaxy never even learned of the fact, remote as the world was. There is certainly no reason that the leadership of the New Republic would even know the size of Byss's population. Only General Skywalker, General Solo, and Councilor Organa Solo among the New Republic's leading figures had ever even so much as set foot on Byss; the Dark Empire Sourcebook describes the nearly mythical status of the world.

PUBLIUS
So Luke, Leia, and any other Jedi around would undoubtedly know that a crapload of people just died, but the NR as a whole knows nothing more than the fact that the Emperor's gone, and there's no hard information on the Jedi's reactions.

I've only got the first half of Empire's End, is the impression I have that the ending was horribly rushed correct?

Posted: 2004-11-17 10:14pm
by Kazuaki Shimazaki
Publius wrote:The destruction of Byss occurs on the very last illustrated page of Empire's End; there is absolutely no depiction of any reaction on the part of the leadership or general population of the New Republic. The only commen on the world's annihilation is Chewbacca's acclamation "Long live the New Republic!"
I bet that's what Tarkin was thinking when he blew Aldie up, just replace NR with "Empire."
Only General Skywalker, General Solo, and Councilor Organa Solo among the New Republic's leading figures had ever even so much as set foot on Byss; the Dark Empire Sourcebook describes the nearly mythical status of the world.
But SoDwise, someone apparently found out enough about the planet to write that entry in the DESB.
Rogue 9 wrote:Much like your reaction to Alderaan, if that's what you're driving at.
I'm consistent. Since I already decided Alderaan and Hiroshima weren't particularly evil, and that they have strategic value and meant to end a more destructive war. The same logic can go for Byss, and it helps that Byss was supposed to be an accident anyway.

Only people on their moral high-horse, like the NR and you, may have some thinking to do.

Posted: 2004-11-17 10:15pm
by Illuminatus Primus
Knock it the fuck off. Can you two not destroy another thread, please?

Posted: 2004-11-17 10:25pm
by Kazuaki Shimazaki
I'm not particularly trying to pick a fight. I just made my point and that's that. Even if Rogue 9 decides to pick a fight, I won't respond to him. Happy?

The last time, it all blew up because I made the awful mistake of voicing a brief thought on the RA. Sigh...

Posted: 2004-11-17 11:38pm
by Publius
Kazuaki Shimazaki wrote:But SoDwise, someone apparently found out enough about the planet to write that entry in the DESB.
Even if one treats the Dark Empire Sourcebook as being an "in universe" document (it is in fact narrated by a third-person omniscient narrator), this is insignificant. There is no information as to who the "author" would be, or when the document were written; it could very well have been written ten thousand years later after the entire Imperial archives have been declassified in entirety. There is no reason to believe that the galaxy at large or even its senior leadership would have any idea as to the population of Byss; indeed, the only people who would have any clue would be Imperial Intelligence, which was responsible for establishing the world in the first place.

PUBLIUS

Posted: 2004-11-18 01:59am
by Kazuaki Shimazaki
Publius wrote:Even if one treats the Dark Empire Sourcebook as being an "in universe" document
Considering how most of the other Sourcebooks I know are narrated by In-Universe people (mostly Arhul Hextrophon and his lackeys), I won't be immediately certain this one was not "in-universe" just because they didn't add an Arhul Hextrophon letter or write incriminating things like "Alliance Editor's Note" (DSTC).
(it is in fact narrated by a third-person omniscient narrator),
This faulty diagram is the work of an omniscent narrator? Umm...
There is no information as to who the "author" would be, or when the document were written; it could very well have been written ten thousand years later after the entire Imperial archives have been declassified in entirety.
So, in ten thousand years, they hadn't seen through the deception of Alderaan's "Shieldless, Defenceless Claim"? The entire Imperial archives have been declassified and they still think the above diagram is correct? In a one volume work of that time period, they would choose not to cover that rather important period of DEII, the actual execution of Operation Shadowhand. That's kind of like a one-volume WWII work that begins in 1939 and cuts off in 1942. Possible, but strange.

Based on its choice of cutoff (right in the middle of the Dark Empire campaign) and the mistakes, SoDwise, it is most likely a in-universe, at the time document.

Considering the NR didn't plan on killing Byss back then, I think it is most likely that after Luke (who was allowed into so many of the Emperor's secrets that he can get the MCP codes) came back, he made a report of the population of Byss. Why would they need to try to hide it? This is, to them, another of the Emperor's evil plots. They should write it out and let it be known how many people the Emperor got onto his orb. Evil, evil Palpy.

But then, History is not my profession.

Posted: 2004-11-18 01:51pm
by Kurgan
Shieldless defense claim?

Wait, is it being implied that the Alderaan Shield is only fan conjecture, rather than canon?


Or is it some confusion over "We have no weapons" (ANH onscreen dialouge) and "Vader knew their defenses were as good as any in the Empire" (novel)?? Confused.

Posted: 2004-11-18 02:20pm
by Rogue 9
Kurgan wrote:Shieldless defense claim?

Wait, is it being implied that the Alderaan Shield is only fan conjecture, rather than canon?


Or is it some confusion over "We have no weapons" (ANH onscreen dialouge) and "Vader knew their defenses were as good as any in the Empire" (novel)?? Confused.
Oh, he likes to claim that the fact of a shield makes Alderaan a legitimate military target. :roll:

Posted: 2004-11-18 02:34pm
by Ghost Rider
Both of you I will lock and start deleting your shit if you start.

Take your fucking petty vendetta out of here...this applies to both because you're bringing up SHIT FROM OTHER DEBATES.

You both want to keep debating who destroyed and why...make a thread.

Do I make myself clear, dumbfucks :evil: ?

Posted: 2004-11-18 04:16pm
by Kurgan
I hope you weren't talking about me there GR, I had a legitimate question. If it's just referring to that past debate, then nevermind.

Posted: 2004-11-18 04:43pm
by Ghost Rider
Kurgan wrote:I hope you weren't talking about me there GR, I had a legitimate question. If it's just referring to that past debate, then nevermind.
No, like you said. It's a Legit question.

Posted: 2004-11-18 05:29pm
by The Cleric
Also, in the grand scheme of things, 17 billion isn't THAT many in the SW universe.

Posted: 2004-11-18 07:11pm
by The Original Nex
Apologies in advance for bringing up Alderaan, but, in the grand scheme of the galaxy, the 2 billion on that planet isn't that much either....

Posted: 2004-11-18 09:59pm
by Lord of the Farce
Kurgan wrote:Shieldless defense claim?

Wait, is it being implied that the Alderaan Shield is only fan conjecture, rather than canon?


Or is it some confusion over "We have no weapons" (ANH onscreen dialouge) and "Vader knew their defenses were as good as any in the Empire" (novel)?? Confused.
I don't intend to join into the fray here, but this is what he meant:
Dark Empire Sourcebook, [i]Chapter Nine: Equipment[/i] wrote:Notes On Planets: A typical habitable planet has a structural rating of 10D-20D (Death Star scale). Alderaan had no shields of any kind, so it was utterly vaporized. A shielded planet that is overcome by a superlaser may "merely" have its entire surface burned off or split into several pieces. Note that planets don't have to be destroyed to be rendered uninhabitable.

Posted: 2004-11-19 01:15am
by Kazuaki Shimazaki
Rogue 9 wrote:Oh, he likes to claim that the fact of a shield makes Alderaan a legitimate military target. :roll:
Come on, both of you had been in our last debate. What is indisputable is that the officials claim that there is no shield, and trying to grab the Morality of Alderaan debate is just a red herring.

I'd prefer not to have to fight Morality again in the near future. Please, can we call a truce at least until the last thread where we fought slides out of sight in Page 1 and 2?

EDIT: In case it wasn't explicit enough before, I now believe I've stated as unambigiously as I can I don't want any part of a New Morality thread in the near future, much less in this thread.