Page 1 of 1

Killing in Anger

Posted: 2005-03-08 12:06pm
by Alexus
The darkside is more powerful than the light.

Whenever Jedi kill Sith/Dark Jedi, they kill in anger.

Luke beats Vader in anger, Obi-Wan beats Maul in anger.

I rest my case.

Re: Killing in Anger

Posted: 2005-03-08 12:28pm
by Elheru Aran
Alexus wrote:The darkside is more powerful than the light.

Whenever Jedi kill Sith/Dark Jedi, they kill in anger.

Luke beats Vader in anger, Obi-Wan beats Maul in anger.

I rest my case.
*coughs* Excuse me? Dooku vs Yoda.... Yoda was winning. And he certainly wasn't angry. I doubt Obi-wan will be angry-- sad, if anything-- when he fights Anakin in Ep 3.

Posted: 2005-03-08 12:29pm
by Alexus
Sorry. But inexperienced Jedi killed in anger.

Posted: 2005-03-08 12:30pm
by Lord Revan
Well I think that in terms of absolute power the Dark side is more powerfull the Lightside, but the Light side can turn this power against it's user (so the greater power can be more dangerous to you then the Enemy ("much to learn you stilll have").

Also it that Revan didn't kill Darth Malak in anger (a possible KOTOR light side ending)

Posted: 2005-03-08 12:32pm
by Xenophobe3691
Alexus wrote:Sorry. But inexperienced Jedi killed in anger.
No True Scotsman fallacy.

Posted: 2005-03-08 12:33pm
by Dorsk 81
Obi Wan didn't beat Maul in anger. He was pushed back into the minning shaft because he attacked in anger, he killed Maul because he calmed himself and used the Light side to leap from the pit, call Qui Gons saber to him and cut Maul in half.

Posted: 2005-03-08 12:34pm
by Alexus
Oopsie.

I promised myself never to see that movie again, so I'm a bit hazy on details.

Posted: 2005-03-08 12:42pm
by Lord Revan
Alexus wrote:Sorry. But inexperienced Jedi killed in anger.
so, that's hardly suppricing as inexperienced fighter will always use brute force method when fighting a more skilled opponent (as they don't have skill to win with any other method (why do you think a swordmaster can be defeated by a total novice (master tend to be old where novices tend be young)).

Posted: 2005-03-08 12:50pm
by Lord Revan
Alexus wrote:Oopsie.

I promised myself never to see that movie again, so I'm a bit hazy on details.
Like it's said the TPM fight is at descirbing the good and bad point of Brute force method (it wear an opponent down(Maul vs. Jinn), but has less control and against a very skilled opponent suicidal (Maul vs. Kenobi or Dooku vs A. Skywalker)

Posted: 2005-03-08 05:16pm
by Meest
If a Kung-Fu guys beats a Karate guy, does that make Kung-fu stronger? If someone with no training beats the Kung-fu guy after does that make him better than the Karate guy? Just have to judge it on individual power, maybe Palpatine is the strongest because he just is.

Posted: 2005-03-08 05:33pm
by VT-16
Alexus wrote:Sorry. But inexperienced Jedi killed in anger.
Obi-Wan did not cross to the Dark Side to win. When he nearly did, he almost got himself killed. Only when he calmed down and focused did he win over Darth Maul. Luke managed to hold on to himself in the end as well, not striking his father down when he was defeated.

Re: Killing in Anger

Posted: 2005-03-08 06:25pm
by Praxis
Alexus wrote:The darkside is more powerful than the light.

Whenever Jedi kill Sith/Dark Jedi, they kill in anger.

Luke beats Vader in anger, Obi-Wan beats Maul in anger.

I rest my case.
Actually, the most powerful Jedi is one who has the self control of a light side Jedi but slips into the power of the dark side.

Consider.

Maul had anger already. He kills Qui-gon. Obi-wan gets angry, and kills him.

Darth Vader has anger already. Luke gets angry and whoops him.

A light side Jedi temporarily going dark is usually the most powerful.

Re: Killing in Anger

Posted: 2005-03-08 06:38pm
by Lord Revan
Praxis wrote:Maul had anger already. He kills Qui-gon. Obi-wan gets angry, and kills him.
well Kenobi got his ass kicked hard because he angry (he defeated Maul only after he had cooled down).

Re: Killing in Anger

Posted: 2005-03-08 07:00pm
by Praxis
Lord Revan wrote:
Praxis wrote:Maul had anger already. He kills Qui-gon. Obi-wan gets angry, and kills him.
well Kenobi got his ass kicked hard because he angry (he defeated Maul only after he had cooled down).
He cut half of Maul's saber off. Thats better than Qui-gon did. Maul was getting WHOOPED, he just knocked Obi-wan off with a cheap force trick.

Re: Killing in Anger

Posted: 2005-03-08 09:38pm
by Lone_Prodigy
Praxis wrote:
Lord Revan wrote:
Praxis wrote:Maul had anger already. He kills Qui-gon. Obi-wan gets angry, and kills him.
well Kenobi got his ass kicked hard because he angry (he defeated Maul only after he had cooled down).
He cut half of Maul's saber off. Thats better than Qui-gon did. Maul was getting WHOOPED, he just knocked Obi-wan off with a cheap force trick.
The double lightsaber was far more suited to fighting two opponents than one. And by the way, if Obi-wan had shown some self-control he could've stopped Maul from doing that "cheap force trick". Instead, he let his emotions run free and he almost died for his mistake.

Re: Killing in Anger

Posted: 2005-03-09 10:14am
by Steven Snyder
Lone_Prodigy wrote: The double lightsaber was far more suited to fighting two opponents than one.
And you base this on what? Or is this just your personal speculation?
And by the way, if Obi-wan had shown some self-control he could've stopped Maul from doing that "cheap force trick".
What the fuck is a 'cheap force trick'? The only place in combat where 'cheap tricks' are found is in the mind of the loser as they blame the victor for their own failings. If we dub all effective, yet easy to implement and hard to defend against tactics "cheap" then I suppose that defines just about all of modern warfare.

Re: Killing in Anger

Posted: 2005-03-09 10:50am
by NecronLord
Lone_Prodigy wrote:if Obi-wan had shown some self-control he could've stopped Maul from doing that "cheap force trick".
RotS spoiler This looks unlikely. Count Dooku can send the older obi-wan flying when he seems quite calm. I don't know if there is a defence.

Re: Killing in Anger

Posted: 2005-03-09 10:51am
by Crown
Steven Snyder wrote:
Lone_Prodigy wrote:And by the way, if Obi-wan had shown some self-control he could've stopped Maul from doing that "cheap force trick".
What the fuck is a 'cheap force trick'?
If you read his post you'll notice the ' "quotation marks" ', showing that he (Lone Prodigy) has the same reaction to the phrase; 'cheap force trick', as you. :wink:

Re: Killing in Anger

Posted: 2005-03-09 10:52am
by NecronLord
Steven Snyder wrote:And you base this on what? Or is this just your personal speculation?
The double sabre has inferior reach to a normal sabre, but a trained user can parry two other sabres at once with it. Further, when attacking just one jedi, Maul only used a single blade.

Re: Killing in Anger

Posted: 2005-03-09 12:00pm
by Lord Revan
NecronLord wrote:RotS spoiler This looks unlikely. Count Dooku can send the older obi-wan flying when he seems quite calm. I don't know if there is a defence.
there's a defence, but ti's success depends on power and skill defender compared to the power and skill of attacker (so Dooku was probaly more powerfull and/or skillfull then Obi-wan) and wont work if your not in controll of yourself

Re: Killing in Anger

Posted: 2005-03-09 12:10pm
by Steven Snyder
Crown wrote: If you read his post you'll notice the ' "quotation marks" ', showing that he (Lone Prodigy) has the same reaction to the phrase; 'cheap force trick', as you. :wink:
Found it.
Mea Culpa.

Re: Killing in Anger

Posted: 2005-03-09 12:19pm
by Steven Snyder
NecronLord wrote:The double sabre has inferior reach to a normal sabre, but a trained user can parry two other sabres at once with it. Further, when attacking just one jedi, Maul only used a single blade.
I always took the action of igniting the second blade as..."There is something I am not telling you, I am not left handed"

I conceed that the double-lightsaber does have inferior reach when both blades are ignited. But by the same token Maul seemed to do quite well with it againt Qui-Gon, despite that.

Re: Killing in Anger

Posted: 2005-03-09 12:34pm
by Dorsk 81
NecronLord wrote:
Lone_Prodigy wrote:if Obi-wan had shown some self-control he could've stopped Maul from doing that "cheap force trick".
RotS spoiler This looks unlikely. Count Dooku can send the older obi-wan flying when he seems quite calm. I don't know if there is a defence.
According to SW.com, Maul used Obi-Wan's touching of the dark side as a conduit for a Force attack; using the Force, Maul pushed Obi-Wan into a deep mining pit.

Most likely because Maul isn't as strong in the Force as Dooku, he needed to use Obi as a "conduit", but because of Dookus power, he doesn't need his target to touch the Dark side. Maybe.

Posted: 2005-03-09 08:36pm
by Death from the Sea
Lord Revan wrote:
Alexus wrote:Sorry. But inexperienced Jedi killed in anger.
so, that's hardly suppricing as inexperienced fighter will always use brute force method when fighting a more skilled opponent (as they don't have skill to win with any other method (why do you think a swordmaster can be defeated by a total novice (master tend to be old where novices tend)).
plus, don't forget that the darkside is an easier path, so it would figure that an inexperienced lightside Jedi would be more likely to take the easy way to beat a superior opponent.

Posted: 2005-03-09 08:41pm
by ali-sama
Anger is a tool. If you let anger rule you then you go down the path to the dark side. If you use anger the way it should be. A tool. then you win.