The Star Destroyer Conference
Posted: 2005-03-24 05:14pm
Now that we have Definitive evidence of the length of an SSD I say we finish this thing and get Fighter numbers on capships finished. I shall resign from argument and simply sum up the arguments at points for going over.
Points hopefully covered
1.Numbers of space superiority fighters already argued and run through
2.New numbers that dont follow minimalism and some that do
3.What those three hangars are for on an SSD
4.Why 72 and 144 are wrong (or right)
5.Definite numbers on support craft on ISDs and SSDs
And finally hopefully a Sticky thread with the Full and eventual Numbers for future reference agianst all bitching.
I felt this was necessary to provide an end to the argument, all will be welcome, all will be heard.
First I ask what each person thinks the right number of fighters on a standard Imperial Star Destroyer should be, no discussion on anothers numbers untill all are heard. then it is time for hammering out something realistic.
Flame as you like but, as I said, I felt it was necessary.
Points hopefully covered
1.Numbers of space superiority fighters already argued and run through
2.New numbers that dont follow minimalism and some that do
3.What those three hangars are for on an SSD
4.Why 72 and 144 are wrong (or right)
5.Definite numbers on support craft on ISDs and SSDs
And finally hopefully a Sticky thread with the Full and eventual Numbers for future reference agianst all bitching.
I felt this was necessary to provide an end to the argument, all will be welcome, all will be heard.
First I ask what each person thinks the right number of fighters on a standard Imperial Star Destroyer should be, no discussion on anothers numbers untill all are heard. then it is time for hammering out something realistic.
Flame as you like but, as I said, I felt it was necessary.