ATTN: BURNETT Composition of Asteroids
Posted: 2002-11-23 09:43am
How come it is assumed that the asteroids in ESB are Iron asteroids?
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=6578
1. Novel statements that the asteroids are primarily iron.Ted wrote:How come it is assumed that the asteroids in ESB are Iron asteroids?
But Darkstars stupidity gives us 300 MT low end!Master of Ossus wrote: 3. DarkStar says they weren't. DarkStar can be assumed to be wrong.
Don't count on an idiot to fetch you firepower... he'll most likely blow himself up first.Ender wrote:But Darkstars stupidity gives us 300 MT low end!Master of Ossus wrote: 3. DarkStar says they weren't. DarkStar can be assumed to be wrong.
Well Dengar, in Tales of the Bounty Hunters, specifically menions that the asteroids are nickel-iron rather than carbonaceous. Furthermore visually they have a ratehr high albedo (in other words they are pretty bright, nearly as bright as the hull of the ISD) which would place them amongst the S-type (silicates with iron) and M-type (nickel-iron). the only alternative high albedo asteroid type that has ever been presented to me was the E-type (primarily enstatite) and that was by DarkStar nonetheless I included it for sake of thuroughness.Ted wrote:How come it is assumed that the asteroids in ESB are Iron asteroids?