Page 1 of 1
Quick Praetor-class question
Posted: 2005-07-14 03:53am
by Kazuaki Shimazaki
Who has the ITW:OT?
http://www.theforce.net/swenc/entrydesc ... arch=47417
Praetor-class Star Battlecruiser
Category: Ship Types
Type: Cruiser
this outdated warship was produced during the Old Republic, although a few specimens survived during the era of the Galactic Civil War.
I want to know whether this was ever said or implied. Quotes, if possible.
Thanks.
Posted: 2005-07-14 10:07am
by VT-16
Not in the book as far as I could tell.
Posted: 2005-07-14 10:16am
by Jim Raynor
I don't have the book, and only know about the Praetor-class from reading forums. From what I've read at TF.net, there is no indication that the Praetor-class is outdated. I don't know where the guy who writes the CUSWE got that from.
Posted: 2005-07-14 10:57am
by The Original Nex
The book actually suggests that it's an Imperial era ship.
Posted: 2005-07-14 11:00am
by VT-16
TFN quite plainly manufactures facts in their encyclopedia. It´s silly, but what can you do?
Posted: 2005-07-14 11:10am
by Luzifer's right hand
From the ITW:OT
Droid access tunnel to base main reactors: stolen parts from a derelict Praetor-class Star Battlecruiser
Posted: 2005-07-14 05:50pm
by Jim Raynor
VT-16 wrote:TFN quite plainly manufactures facts in their encyclopedia. It´s silly, but what can you do?
I thought the CUSWE was the work of one man, and that the site is just hosted on TF.net like Saxton's site is. Am I wrong?
Anyway, the guy who writes the articles is an EU/WEG repeater, who doesn't bother with visuals or doing any kind of analysis. Unless it's been spelled out in words, he doesn't put it in. While I don't have any hard evidence, I suspect he might have anti-Saxton leanings. There's the unsupported statement about the
Praetor-class being some obsolete piece of crap, his continual use of the 5 mile fallacy, and a refusal to call the
Executor a "Star Dreadnaught," even though he's aware of ITWotSWT.
The CUSWE is a great resource for story information and trivia, but I don't trust it on anything that requires a bit of analysis.