Page 1 of 1
Earths current nuclear Arsenal vs Completed DS 2
Posted: 2005-07-16 02:04am
by navy_seal55
Scenario: A completed DS 2 gets pulled in to a temporal rift thingy and arrives at modern day earth (2005). DS2 starts toying with earth and starts bombarding earth but due to some technobabble, there is a massive power surge and all turbo lasers and superlaser is offline.
Earths leaders decides to launch all their nukes at the DS in an attempt to blow it up. Would it work?
Posted: 2005-07-16 02:06am
by Spanky The Dolphin
No.
Posted: 2005-07-16 02:08am
by Noble Ire
The DS's shield generators can repel the force of a planet detonating at only 6 planetary diameters distance. How does that compare to the world's nuclear arsenal? And that's just the DS 1, the DS2 is many times more massive and powerful.
Posted: 2005-07-16 02:09am
by The Kernel
Ummm, you do realize that the act of the DS2 merely orbiting the Earth would cause massive tidal waves?
Posted: 2005-07-16 02:11am
by navy_seal55
lets just assume or pretend there will be no reprocussions for Earth.
Posted: 2005-07-16 02:11am
by Spanky The Dolphin
Yeah, it still won't do shit. It's nowhere nearly enough output to such an insanely large degree.
Posted: 2005-07-16 02:12am
by President Sharky
The shields absorb everything, and no one on DS2 so much as flinches. The Imperial crew then proceeds to either deploy a full battle army to invade and occupy Earth, or they use their tractor beams to crash the moon onto the planet.
Posted: 2005-07-16 02:24am
by The Grim Squeaker
It might possibly work against an Acclamator if it all detonated at point blank range,
how much firepower in gigatons does earth have?
Posted: 2005-07-16 02:27am
by Spanky The Dolphin
the .303 bookworm wrote:It might possibly work against an Acclamator if it all detonated at point blank range,
No it wouldn't. Acclimator shields need to be hit with well more than the 200 gigatons of each of its turbolasers for their peak point to be passed.
how much firepower in gigatons does earth have?
Um, like less then five, I think.
Posted: 2005-07-16 02:32am
by Utsanomiko
Even if we had a thousand gigatons worth of warheads, that's still only worth 5 medium Turbolaser shots, and an Acclamator can more than easily handle sustained assault from firepower well above that magnitude.
Posted: 2005-07-16 02:37am
by Sharpshooter
Not a chance in hell. If you even wanted to get a shield status display to fluctuate a thousandth of a percent, you'd have to have every single nuke detonate at the same time, in the same place, with the whole of their energy being funneled into a cone no more than a degree in size.
Worse, the light released from the explosion messes up Palps' view from his tower, he gets anoyed, and deploys enough bombers to flatten every single launching facility on Earth.
Posted: 2005-07-16 02:41am
by navy_seal55
Ok now that we know that will never work with shields up. What about with Shields down?
Posted: 2005-07-16 02:43am
by Spanky The Dolphin
With DS2? The damage would be insigificant. More or less superficial.
Posted: 2005-07-16 02:45am
by Lord Revan
navy_seal55 wrote:Ok now that we know that will never work with shields up. What about with Shields down?
they might cause some damage (fighter guns in SW are low kT range), but I don't think that the missiles would be any serious threat to DS2 or an Acclamator.
Posted: 2005-07-16 03:01am
by Stuart Mackey
Bugs vs speeding windsheild
Posted: 2005-07-16 03:21am
by bilateralrope
Depending how the superlaser is built, they might disable it if any fragile parts are one the surface, but thats about it
Posted: 2005-07-16 03:22am
by Spanky The Dolphin
Well, most of the vital structures are in the interior, and I would assume that the Empire would have thought of preventing the superlaser from being damaged in such a way in the first place.
Posted: 2005-07-16 03:28am
by Noble Ire
bilateralrope wrote:Depending how the superlaser is built, they might disable it if any fragile parts are one the surface, but thats about it
I recall reading (on this site I believe) that much of the Death Star's outer plating was built of the same material that makes up ISD sensor globes. If that is correct, than nuclear strikes could do superficial damage, perhaps even knock out some turbolaser turrets and sensor nodes, but as Spanky says, most of the sensitive equiptment would be buried under miles of hull plate.
Posted: 2005-07-16 03:32am
by Lord Revan
The fact in either cases of attacks against the Deathstar, the rebels didn't even think of shooting at Superlaser suggests that it's main components cannot be easily harmed by external attack.
Posted: 2005-07-16 03:33am
by DPDarkPrimus
I'm suprised this thread is still unlocked.
Posted: 2005-07-16 06:51am
by Ghost Rider
Don't be anymore DPDP.
Fucking A, this is dumber then the usual bullshit.