Prequel Characters in the OT Special Edition

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
Battlehymn Republic
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1824
Joined: 2004-10-27 01:34pm

Prequel Characters in the OT Special Edition

Post by Battlehymn Republic »

If Lucas allowed cameos of prequel characters in the second special edition of the original trilogy, who should be featured?

I’m still curious as to why Captain Pananka became a moff.

Jar-Jar’s gleeful shout at the end of ROTJ is a gag, by all accounts. There’s no way he fled to Endor, unless you were to retcon all of the Ewok cartoons and films.

I kind of wonder what happened to the few named clones in ROTS. Did them became commanders?

I still think it would be cool if one of the queen’s doubles (Sabé or Cordé) claimed to be the true queen and joined the Rebellion. Of course, then I guess Padmé should have died secretly to make it possible
User avatar
VT-16
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4662
Joined: 2004-05-13 10:01am
Location: Norway

Post by VT-16 »

Jar Jar wasn´t on Endor, what have you been smoking? :P

I did hear about Lucas wanting to change some of the stormtroopers voices to Temura Morrison´s. Some, mind you, not all.
User avatar
Coriolis
Padawan Learner
Posts: 410
Joined: 2005-02-25 06:34pm

Re: Prequel Characters in the OT Special Edition

Post by Coriolis »

Battlehymn Republic wrote:I’m still curious as to why Captain Pananka became a moff.
When did this happen? I haven't heard of Moff Pananka before. When did he appear?
Image
PRFYNAFBTFC - Verendo Iugula
Commander, Halifax-Class Frigate
MFS Doom Panda
User avatar
Darth Lucifer
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1685
Joined: 2004-10-14 04:18am
Location: In pursuit of the Colonial Fleet

Post by Darth Lucifer »

Watto...buzzing around Luke as he sells of his landspeeder. Hell, They could even pull a CGI like they did with the Human Jabba. Assuming there's nothing that could contradict Watto's appearance, like his untimely death or something.
User avatar
Spanky The Dolphin
Mammy Two-Shoes
Posts: 30776
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)

Re: Prequel Characters in the OT Special Edition

Post by Spanky The Dolphin »

StarWarsJunkie89 wrote:
Battlehymn Republic wrote:I’m still curious as to why Captain Pananka became a moff.
When did this happen? I haven't heard of Moff Pananka before. When did he appear?
It's mentioned in the OT ITW.

Anyway, Panaka became a Moff partially because he remained loyal to Palpatine.
User avatar
Coriolis
Padawan Learner
Posts: 410
Joined: 2005-02-25 06:34pm

Re: Prequel Characters in the OT Special Edition

Post by Coriolis »

Spanky The Dolphin wrote:
StarWarsJunkie89 wrote:
Battlehymn Republic wrote:I’m still curious as to why Captain Pananka became a moff.
When did this happen? I haven't heard of Moff Pananka before. When did he appear?
It's mentioned in the OT ITW.

Anyway, Panaka became a Moff partially because he remained loyal to Palpatine.
Ah, thx a lot. I haven't read OT ITW yet.
Image
PRFYNAFBTFC - Verendo Iugula
Commander, Halifax-Class Frigate
MFS Doom Panda
User avatar
VT-16
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4662
Joined: 2004-05-13 10:01am
Location: Norway

Post by VT-16 »

He was such an admirer of Palpatine´s rule, he even gave him a piece of art to hang inside his private quarters on the DS II.
User avatar
Lord of the Farce
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2198
Joined: 2002-08-06 10:49am
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Post by Lord of the Farce »

I seem to recall "Moff Pananka" being mentioned in the ROTS:VD as well.
"Intelligent Design" Not Accepted by Most Scientists
User avatar
Battlehymn Republic
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1824
Joined: 2004-10-27 01:34pm

Post by Battlehymn Republic »

Lots of people say that there's an edition of ROTJ where in the end you can clearly hear Jar-Jar going "Weesa free!"

Some have interpreted as he actually being on Endor, but I think it's just a gag. I think it's listed on Wikipedia.
User avatar
Instant Sunrise
Jedi Knight
Posts: 945
Joined: 2005-05-31 02:10am
Location: El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora la Reina de los Angeles del Río de Porciúncula
Contact:

Post by Instant Sunrise »

It's in the DVD release. It's part of a victory montage added in the 1997 SE, the 2004 DVD added Naboo to it, with the "Weesa Free!" scream.

I wouldn't mind having Prequel Charcters SE'd into the OT, as long at the originals are also released.
Hi, I'm Liz.
Image
SoS: NBA | GALE Force
Twitter
Tumblr
Rommie2006
Padawan Learner
Posts: 331
Joined: 2005-02-12 08:32am

Post by Rommie2006 »

skyman8081 wrote:It's in the DVD release. It's part of a victory montage added in the 1997 SE, the 2004 DVD added Naboo to it, with the "Weesa Free!" scream.

I wouldn't mind having Prequel Charcters SE'd into the OT, as long at the originals are also released.
OH MY GOD. Are you sure? I should not have read this posts.
I'll never watch ROTJ in the same way again...
User avatar
Kenoshi
Youngling
Posts: 132
Joined: 2005-06-23 07:51am
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
Contact:

Post by Kenoshi »

Not so much a character, but I'd love to see some of the prequel ships show up in the Battle of Endor in ROTJ: some refurbished Naboo fighters, maybe a beaten-up ARC-170 or two. I have a hard time believing that all older ship models are scrapped every few years in favor of completely new stuff.
I like frogs!
User avatar
ray245
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7956
Joined: 2005-06-10 11:30pm

Post by ray245 »

who doesn't want to use better weapons...ab=nd thoes ships are outdated...besides, the N1 fighters are pretty weak, as stated in the PT.
User avatar
Kenoshi
Youngling
Posts: 132
Joined: 2005-06-23 07:51am
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
Contact:

Post by Kenoshi »

ray245 wrote:who doesn't want to use better weapons...ab=nd thoes ships are outdated...besides, the N1 fighters are pretty weak, as stated in the PT.
Considering how technologically stagnant the Star Wars universe is, would there really be that big a gap in performance? And considering how desperate the Rebel Allance is, how short on resources they must be, I'd think that they'd make use of any ships they had available.

And above all I just want to see a bigger variety of ships...so many pretty designs from the prequels. It would look cool, IMHO.
I like frogs!
User avatar
Dooey Jo
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3127
Joined: 2002-08-09 01:09pm
Location: The land beyond the forest; Sweden.
Contact:

Post by Dooey Jo »

Rommie2006 wrote:OH MY GOD. Are you sure? I should not have read this posts.
I'll never watch ROTJ in the same way again...
I watched RotJ the day before yesterday and I clearly heard a familiar voice screaming "Weesa Free". I had never noticed it before. But is also clear that Jar-Jar is on Naboo, and not on Endor, because the scream is heard during the Naboo celebration shot.
Image
"Nippon ichi, bitches! Boing-boing."
Mai smote the demonic fires of heck...

Faker Ninjas invented ninjitsu
Grandmaster Jogurt
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1725
Joined: 2004-12-16 04:01am

Post by Grandmaster Jogurt »

Kenoshi wrote:Not so much a character, but I'd love to see some of the prequel ships show up in the Battle of Endor in ROTJ: some refurbished Naboo fighters, maybe a beaten-up ARC-170 or two. I have a hard time believing that all older ship models are scrapped every few years in favor of completely new stuff.
The N-1 Naboo fighters would be sorely out of place. They would never be part of the Imperial squadrons seen in the movies, and, being the equivalent of the Blue Angels squadron (from what I've heard) from a single, Imperial-supporting planet, the odds of them turning up in the rebel forces are very slim.

The ARCs, on the other hand, would be perfect for the rebellion. They are long-ranged and durable heavy-hitters, something which would be a wonderful asset for the rebels. However, despite their prominence in RotS, it could be argued that the ICS vaguely implies that they are not common, or at least less so than the Z-95.
Revenge of the Sith: Incredible Cross Sections, page 6 wrote:Notable cousins [of the ARC-170] include the heavier PTB-625 and NTB-630 planetary and navel bombers, as well as the lighter, popular one-man Z-95 Headhunter fighter...
ray245 wrote:who doesn't want to use better weapons...ab=nd thoes ships are outdated...besides, the N1 fighters are pretty weak, as stated in the PT.
The N-1 may be "weak" fighter, but neither one is outdated. There is a technological stasis in the GFFA, and there is no evidence that the OT fighters perform better than the military fighters of the PT. In fact, if the 5e16 watt shield figure for the ARC-170 and the ability for the fighter to survive being "...surrounded by dozens or even hundreds of light, evasive droid fighters" (RotS:ICS, page 7) are to be believed, PT fighters perform more than comparably to their OT counterparts.
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12238
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Post by Lord Revan »

Grandmaster Jogurt wrote:The N-1 may be "weak" fighter, but neither one is outdated. There is a technological stasis in the GFFA, and there is no evidence that the OT fighters perform better than the military fighters of the PT. In fact, if the 5e16 watt shield figure for the ARC-170 and the ability for the fighter to survive being "...surrounded by dozens or even hundreds of light, evasive droid fighters" (RotS:ICS, page 7) are to be believed, PT fighters perform more than comparably to their OT counterparts.
IIRC there no shield stats in Real Life units for the Alpha Class Xg-1 Star Wing Assault gunboat, the BTL-A4 Y-wing or B-wing Starfighters (the ARC-170 equilevants in OT era), so while I think it would fit into the rebel fleet, I wouldn't better then OT craft without more evidence to back it up.
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
Grandmaster Jogurt
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1725
Joined: 2004-12-16 04:01am

Post by Grandmaster Jogurt »

Lord Revan wrote:IIRC there no shield stats in Real Life units for the Alpha Class Xg-1 Star Wing Assault gunboat, the BTL-A4 Y-wing or B-wing Starfighters (the ARC-170 equilevants in OT era), so while I think it would fit into the rebel fleet, I wouldn't better then OT craft without more evidence to back it up.
True. However, IIRC, all stats for fighter lasers that we have so far have been listed in the low kiloton level, and visual evidence from the movies indicates that similar levels are the case for OT fighter lasers. Since a few shots from these weapons in a timespan of roughly one second will down an X-Wing (in the tunnels of the second Death Star, it is almost certain that a barrage from a single TIE was the cause of one X-Wing's destruction), and the ARC-170's shields are rated at more than 10 megatons per second, the evidence shows that an ARC-170's shields are at least an order of magnitude higher than that of its most analogous OT craft.
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12238
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Post by Lord Revan »

Well in both ANH and ROTJ Y-wings have been in combat for while so their shield could have not been up to full specs (and T-65 X-wings are lighter then ARC-170). X-wing isn't equal to ARC-170 were as Y-wing is (X-wing is only a bit heavier then Z-95).
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
Grandmaster Jogurt
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1725
Joined: 2004-12-16 04:01am

Post by Grandmaster Jogurt »

True. I guess I don't really have anything too solid to show that the ARC is notably more durable than the OT ships, so I'll concede.

Also, this shielding debate was off topic, so I apologise for both starting it and dragging it out.
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12238
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Post by Lord Revan »

Grandmaster Jogurt wrote:True. I guess I don't really have anything too solid to show that the ARC is notably more durable than the OT ships, so I'll concede.
Thank you and as for OP I'd like to see species of the CIS in some minor role in the backround.
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
VT-16
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4662
Joined: 2004-05-13 10:01am
Location: Norway

Post by VT-16 »

thoes ships are outdated..
Meh, they´ve been added to SW: Galaxies: Rage of the Wookiees, and it takes place in the OT era. ARCs, Belbullabs and Eta-2 interceptors are available to all factions there, so they´re still seeing use.

Then there´s the brief shot of N-1s on Naboo in its one ROTJ-scene.
I'd like to see species of the CIS in some minor role in the backround.
Seconded. Especially Geonosians on the DS/DS II, if only to piss off certain members on this board. :P
Post Reply