Page 1 of 1

UT-AT? Was that posted before?

Posted: 2005-08-20 02:28am
by K. A. Pital
So it wasn't a treaded tank after all, but a repulsorlift?
http://www.starwars.com/databank/vehicle/utat/

Re: UT-AT? Was that posted before?

Posted: 2005-08-20 02:59am
by Mange
Stas Bush wrote:So it wasn't a treaded tank after all, but a repulsorlift?
http://www.starwars.com/databank/vehicle/utat/
It was mentioned in the "What's the Story" thread I started:
http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=75237

However, there's no dedicated thread to it.

EDIT: The name and description doesn't make all that much sense, IMHO, especially since the the SPHA-T is quite similar in the basic design.

Re: UT-AT? Was that posted before?

Posted: 2005-08-21 05:49pm
by The Dark
Mange the Swede wrote:EDIT: The name and description doesn't make all that much sense, IMHO, especially since the the SPHA-T is quite similar in the basic design.
The only part of the description that really seems important is that it's designed to go places the SPHA-T can't, due to have a lower ground pressure and causing less vibration through its movement. Similar concept to the light armored vehicles the American military wants to develop as a supplement/replacement for tanks: it can go where the heavy stuff can't.