What is a Grade III battlestation?

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
Star Wars Fan
Subhuman Pedophilia Advocate
Posts: 111
Joined: 2005-09-15 07:42pm
Location: leesci@sbcglobal.net

What is a Grade III battlestation?

Post by Star Wars Fan »

In the Munificant Separitist destroyer, it says that the 2 front cannons can "pierce the shields of a 10 kn wide Grade III battlestation. what is that?
User avatar
Ace Pace
Hardware Lover
Posts: 8456
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:04am
Location: Wasting time instead of money
Contact:

Post by Ace Pace »

First off, you mean a Golan 3 station, which is something roughly with the mass of an ISD(if I remember Wedge's Gamble correctly), but with far greater power(no need to move).
Brotherhood of the Bear | HAB | Mess | SDnet archivist |
Star Wars Fan
Subhuman Pedophilia Advocate
Posts: 111
Joined: 2005-09-15 07:42pm
Location: leesci@sbcglobal.net

Post by Star Wars Fan »

Ace Pace wrote:First off, you mean a Golan 3 station, which is something roughly with the mass of an ISD(if I remember Wedge's Gamble correctly), but with far greater power(no need to move).
i thought that, but did Golan build battlestations during the Clone Wars? amd a G/3 is 1.5km, not 10km. maybe Curtis Saxton made a mistake, and you're right.

(they refer to this in the Episode III Incredible cross ections)
User avatar
Ace Pace
Hardware Lover
Posts: 8456
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:04am
Location: Wasting time instead of money
Contact:

Post by Ace Pace »

There could have been differant versions of the Golan battlestations.

Sidenote: This is another example of editors not catching references to real life, as Golan is a mountain area in the Israel-Syrian border.
Brotherhood of the Bear | HAB | Mess | SDnet archivist |
Star Wars Fan
Subhuman Pedophilia Advocate
Posts: 111
Joined: 2005-09-15 07:42pm
Location: leesci@sbcglobal.net

Post by Star Wars Fan »

Ace Pace wrote:There could have been differant versions of the Golan battlestations.

Sidenote: This is another example of editors not catching references to real life, as Golan is a mountain area in the Israel-Syrian border.
thank you, Golan did build other things
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

No, he means Grade III, and apparently there are huge battlestations in operation back in the Clone Wars that the Banking Clan frigates can house with their siege guns.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
FTeik
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2035
Joined: 2002-07-16 04:12pm

Post by FTeik »

Grade III stations are said to be 10 kilometers wide. Golan3-stations are only 2.2 kilometers wide.
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Re: What is a Grade III battlestation?

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Star Wars Fan wrote:In the Munificant Separitist destroyer, it says that the 2 front cannons can "pierce the shields of a 10 kn wide Grade III battlestation. what is that?
Everything written in the book represents the sum total of all that is known about 'Grade III' battlestations. Presumably its just a general size classification, and probably includes a range of different designs built by different manufacturers.

The fact that a frigate can hurt one is damn stupid though. Simple because of the huge size disparity (and the battlestations doesn't have to devote mass and energy to propulsion) it ought to be quite immune to even the entire reactor output of a mere frigate. Seriously now, no one would ever build fortifications that big if they could be harmed by even minor enemy combatants.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
VT-16
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4662
Joined: 2004-05-13 10:01am
Location: Norway

Post by VT-16 »

I dunno, those front Munificent turbolasers were pretty damn massive.
User avatar
Glimmervoid
Jedi Master
Posts: 1344
Joined: 2005-01-29 09:00am
Location: Some were in the unfashionable end of the western spiral arm.
Contact:

Post by Glimmervoid »

VT-16 wrote:I dunno, those front Munificent turbolasers were pretty damn massive.
Maybe is some Super duper use all the hypermatter up in one go mode.
Image
User avatar
Alan Bolte
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2611
Joined: 2002-07-05 12:17am
Location: Columbus, OH

Post by Alan Bolte »

This really has nothing to do with reactor output and everything to do with capacitor size and the gun itself. I doubt it could fire at full power more than once a day, if that. Much like the first Death Star.
Any job worth doing with a laser is worth doing with many, many lasers. -Khrima
There's just no arguing with some people once they've made their minds up about something, and I accept that. That's why I kill them. -Othar
Avatar credit
Star Wars Fan
Subhuman Pedophilia Advocate
Posts: 111
Joined: 2005-09-15 07:42pm
Location: leesci@sbcglobal.net

Re: What is a Grade III battlestation?

Post by Star Wars Fan »

Sea Skimmer wrote:
Star Wars Fan wrote:In the Munificant Separitist destroyer, it says that the 2 front cannons can "pierce the shields of a 10 kn wide Grade III battlestation. what is that?
Everything written in the book represents the sum total of all that is known about 'Grade III' battlestations. Presumably its just a general size classification, and probably includes a range of different designs built by different manufacturers.
okay, thank you
The fact that a frigate can hurt one is damn stupid though. Simple because of the huge size disparity (and the battlestations doesn't have to devote mass and energy to propulsion) it ought to be quite immune to even the entire reactor output of a mere frigate. Seriously now, no one would ever build fortifications that big if they could be harmed by even minor enemy combatants.
the Munificent frigate warships have very large turbolasers, and can't the local shields be overwhelmed if they fire quickly enough (in Isard's Revenge, Rogue Squadron fired their Proton Torpedoes all at once at one part of a Golan II battlestation, taking the shields out, allowing the Assault Frigates Tyrant's Bane and Liberty Star to disable it
Grandmaster Jogurt
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1725
Joined: 2004-12-16 04:01am

Post by Grandmaster Jogurt »

The Munifiscent's guns are said to be able to blast-melt an ice moon 1000 km in diameter (RotS:ICS 15). This gives an output of 6.62*10^7 gigatons or 66.2 petatons. If this energy is delivered all at once, it could possibly overwhelm the heat sinks that were designed to withstand larger amounts of energy but over longer periods of time.

Note that the Munifiscent takes (IIRC) 22 minutes to recharge after firing a shot like that.
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Re: What is a Grade III battlestation?

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Sea Skimmer wrote:
Star Wars Fan wrote:In the Munificant Separitist destroyer, it says that the 2 front cannons can "pierce the shields of a 10 kn wide Grade III battlestation. what is that?
Everything written in the book represents the sum total of all that is known about 'Grade III' battlestations. Presumably its just a general size classification, and probably includes a range of different designs built by different manufacturers.

The fact that a frigate can hurt one is damn stupid though. Simple because of the huge size disparity (and the battlestations doesn't have to devote mass and energy to propulsion) it ought to be quite immune to even the entire reactor output of a mere frigate. Seriously now, no one would ever build fortifications that big if they could be harmed by even minor enemy combatants.
The reactor has to charge the siege guns for a long time, and it consumes a large amount of the ship's mass-energy fuel.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
Post Reply