Page 1 of 4

For those particularly interested in the SW-Wiki:

Posted: 2005-11-20 06:34pm
by VT-16
Here's my revision/tidying up of some ship-classification "problems":

http://starwars.wikicities.com/wiki/Ship_Classification

Does it look good/help/clear up a few things? Or did I miss anything significant?

(You might be able to tell which part of the text is me and which isn't. ;P)

Posted: 2005-11-20 08:24pm
by Jim Raynor
Ah, this article. I asked for some help revising it on the discussion page, and then came back a few weeks later to see a pile of McEwok's bullshit. I was going to bring this up myself, but I've been extremely busy with exams in the last few weeks. I'll look over this and try to help out.

Posted: 2005-11-21 01:31am
by Mange
McEwok (Arkady Hodge) has already edited the article and removed what you had added, VT-16 (according to the Discussion page)...

Posted: 2005-11-21 01:51am
by Kazuaki Shimazaki
That place is already too badly corrupted from TFNers. We are lucky that we got our shots on the Main Wiki first - which is the only reason why it contains so many of our ideas.

Posted: 2005-11-21 02:25am
by VT-16
I made adjustments and readded information from multiple sources, sources which I suspect McEwok (Arkady Hodge) has never read nor cares about.

Posted: 2005-11-21 09:00am
by Jim Raynor
McEwok (Arkady Hodge) keeps bringing up the retarded "standard" classification from the RASB, which states that anything over 400 m is a cruiser, including Star Destroyers (the only "Star" level ship type mentioned in WEG). He's leaving out one part though. The RASB states that the Republic's "cruisers" were completely by Imperial Star Destroyers, so only recently was the term stretched upwards to include anything over 400 m. This means that these cruisers were undersized ships, and the scale they existed in was inadequate to describe larger ships, which we KNOW existed during the Republic. Ironically, McEwok (Arkady Hodge) was the one who posted this on TF.net, and I pointed out how this quote actually helped our side. Can someone with the RASB post the exact quote to put an end to this bullshit?

There are also some quotes in ROTS ICS that state that different scales of ships exist, and that the Dreadnaught-class cruiser, as well as some Sienar warships during the Imperial era (Sienar made the Interdictor and Vindicator-classes) were in downsized scales. I'll try to find them when I have time.

EDIT: "The RASB states that the Republic's 'cruisers' were completely dwarfed by Imperial Star Destroyers, so only recently was the term stretched upwards to include anything over 400 m.

Posted: 2005-11-21 09:58am
by VT-16
There are also some quotes in ROTS ICS that state that different scales of ships exist, and that the Dreadnaught-class cruiser, as well as some Sienar warships during the Imperial era (Sienar made the Interdictor and Vindicator-classes) were in downsized scales. I'll try to find them when I have time.
Please do.

Posted: 2005-11-21 10:54am
by Tribun
Just a question:

Who is this McEwok (Arkady Hodge) guy? I usually only use the fanfiction-part of the TFN-boards, therefore I have no idea what happens in the rest of it.

Posted: 2005-11-21 11:14am
by Mange
Tribun wrote:Just a question:

Who is this McEwok (Arkady Hodge) guy? I usually only use the fanfiction-part of the TFN-boards, therefore I have no idea what happens in the rest of it.
From what I've seen of him over at the TFN literature forums, my impression is that he believes in the infallibility of the WEG material (even the figures that have been shown to be incorrect). I'm sure that VT-16 (or anyone else that has interacted with him, I haven't done so personally) could provide a more accurate view, though.

Posted: 2005-11-21 11:23am
by VT-16
That's it basically.

And he has a strange habit of using naval terms and examples to help his argument that naval terms are not part of Imperial ship-classification. I.e Star Destroyers and Super Star Destroyers, that's it, anything else is fanfiction made canon. Any reference to other terms for dagger-shaped ships other than SD and SSD, is simply up to "interpretation".

Constantly attacks Saxton and the Tech Commentaries. Smart enough to hide all this behind the figure of a "benevolent doubter" and one who's simply bringing a "post-modernist viewpoint" to the wiki, using only canon terms and "less fan-viewpoints/wish-fulfillment".

VERY selective in his criticisim of revision in Star Wars, i.e never pays attention to terms or ideas used before WEG "established" canon.

You only need to look at his profile, to see the degree of douche he really is.

Posted: 2005-11-21 11:50am
by Jim Raynor
Unfortunately I don't own the ICS myself, so I had to write down the quotes on paper. I left the Sienar quote at my home, so I can't post it until later today. Here's the Dreadnaught quote. I don't have the page number, but it's on the page dealing with the Utapaun P-38 fighter.
The Trade Federation protects its position in remote galactic regions by placing embargoes on arms sales to planetary governments. As a result, Utapauns rely upon self-made, downscaled ships - their biggest anti-pirate Rendili Dreadnaught is one-fifth the size of a Trade Federation Battleship.
This proves the existence of more than one scale, and that Dreadnaught-class ships aren't all that. Knowing McEwok (Arkady Hodge), he's going to try to weasel out of this with semantics games. "But not all of Utapau's ships must be downscaled! It didn't explicitly say the Dreadnaught is one of these ships!" :roll:

Posted: 2005-11-21 01:04pm
by Gorefiend
Öh, if it is self-made how come it is build by Rendili? :wink:

There are properly thousands of different scales, which no one should doubt, especially someone using WEG as his favourite source, which implies exactly that in the Rebel Alliance Sourcebook.

Posted: 2005-11-21 01:26pm
by VT-16
Gorefiend wrote:Öh, if it is self-made how come it is build by Rendili? :wink:
*Sigh*
The Trade Federation protects its position in remote galactic regions by placing embargoes on arms sales to planetary governments. As a result, Utapauns rely upon self-made, downscaled ships - their biggest anti-pirate Rendili Dreadnaught is one-fifth the size of a Trade Federation Battleship.
The Dreadnaught-class cruiser is therefore most likely made from parts scavenged by the Utapauns rather than sold to them, as well as being down-scaled in comparison to ships in use with the Confederacy and Republic.
There are properly thousands of different scales, which no one should doubt, especially someone using WEG as his favourite source, which implies exactly that in the Rebel Alliance Sourcebook.
Thank you for stating what others have already said. Now, can we get any actual quotes from the book?

Posted: 2005-11-21 01:51pm
by Gorefiend
The Dreadnaught-class cruiser is therefore most likely made from parts scavenged by the Utapauns rather than sold to them, as well as being down-scaled in comparison to ships in use with the Confederacy and Republic.

Building a 600 meter warship from scrap, not bad for a isolated rim world.

Thank you for stating what others have already said. Now, can we get any actual quotes from the book?

Sure.

Page 50 “Following are the standard Imperial classifications of capital ships; with some variations, these are used by the Alliance and my other space faring species. It should be noted, however, that the distinction between vessel types if often muddy, and individual corporations or navies may give their ships wholly inappropriate classifications.”

Posted: 2005-11-21 02:06pm
by Jim Raynor
Isn't it also possible that native Utapaun factories were building Dreadnaughts under Rendili license?

Gorefiend, can you also look for the quote about Star Destroyers dwarfing Old Republic cruisers, and the term being "stretched" up to include them?

Posted: 2005-11-21 02:20pm
by Gorefiend
Isn't it also possible that native Utapaun factories were building Dreadnaughts under Rendili license?
Hmm… yes, would make sense, along with there own fighters.

Gorefiend, can you also look for the quote about Star Destroyers dwarfing Old Republic cruisers, and the term being "stretched" up to include them?

Haven’t found it yet, your sure it’s in the Rebel Sourcebook? Strikes me a something that’s more likely to be in the Imperial Sourcebook.

Posted: 2005-11-21 02:25pm
by Jim Raynor
I'm not sure the quote even exists, to be honest. Like I said, I got it from McEwok (Arkady Hodge) in a debate at TF.net. He dropped any further mention of the "stretching" when I pointed out how it helped the pro-Saxton side, although he still makes frequent use of the rest of the quote. I have the Imperial Sourcebook, so I know it's not in there. I'll search TF.net to see if I can find the page number McEwok (Arkady Hodge) gave (if he even gave one).

Posted: 2005-11-21 02:59pm
by Jim Raynor
I finally found the quote (TF.net's search function sucks). I made a couple of mistakes. First, it's the Heir to the Empire sourcebook, and secondly, the exact word was "loosened," not "stretched."

Link (scroll down a bit on the first post)
Thrawn McEwok wrote:Heir to the Empire[/i] Sourcebook]A specific sub-division of the classification combat starship is that of cruiser. Cruisers were once the backbone of the Old Republic Fleet. The original designation was for the largest class of ships in service, and as a general guideline, they were equipped with heavy weapons, tractor beam projectors and at least one squadron of starfighters. Now, as the Imperial Star Destroyers completely outclass the cruisers, the definition has been loosened to accommodate any combat-oriented ship over 400 meters long and emphasizing heavy weaponry over starfighters (Star Destroyers technically fit within this definition, but due to their enormous firepower, they are considered their own sub-category). Still, some cruisers are quite large, and many types fill important roles in both the Imperial Fleet and the New Republic.
If this quote is legit, then

-The term "cruiser" as used in this book (and probably other WEG sourcebooks) originally meant the largest ships in the Old Republic navy.

-Since these big, bad cruisers are completely outclassed by Imperial Star Destroyers (which are no superships according to the ROTS ICS), they MUST be the largest ships on a downsized scale (which the ICS also alludes to).

-This fits in with information about the Dreadnaught-class, which is stated to be the backbone of the Old Republic fleet in many sources, but is completely pissed on by the Databank, and deemed as an "anti-pirate" vessel by the ROTS ICS.

-The WEG fanwhore belief that "Star Destroyers = cruisers" is true, but ONLY because the term "cruiser" was "loosened" (read: informally used for convenience).

So, can anyone with the HttE sourcebook confirm this fabulous quote?

Posted: 2005-11-21 04:21pm
by Publius
A specific sub-division of the classification combat starship is that of cruiser. Cruisers were once the backbone of the Old Republic Fleet. The original designation was fo the largest class of ships in service, and as a general guideline, they were equipped with heavy weapons, tractor beam projectors and at least one squadron of starfighters. Now, as the Imperial Star Destroyers completely outclass the cruisers, the definition has been loosened to accommodate any combat-oriented ship over 400 meters long and emphasizing heavy weaponry over starfighters (Star Destroyers technically fit within this definition, but due to their enormous firepower, they are considered their own sub-category). Still, some cruisers are quite large, and many types fill important roles in both the Imperial Fleet and the New Republic.
Heir to the Empire Sourcebook, p. 118

This same document classifies Damorian Manufacturing Corporation's 350-meter Carrack class as a Light Cruiser, Rendili StarDrive's 600-meter Dreadnaught and Sienar Fleet Systems' Immobilize 418/Interdictor class as Heavy Cruisers, and the Mon Calamari 1.2-kilometer MC80a as a Star Cruiser, but also mentions the New Republic's 700-meter "Modified Imperial Dreadnaught," more commonly known by the name "New Republic Assault Frigate."

Notably, seeing that this text apparently uses the term cruiser to signify, roughly, "ship of the line," rather than the specific type, it may also use the term "Star Destroyer" to refer not to the specific Imperial class, but rather to the larger "Star Destroyer family," stretching from the Republic's Venator and Victory classes all the way up to the Empire's Executor, Sovereign, and Eclipse classes (as all of these classes are 'ships of the line' rather than escort/patrol, carrier, or support oriented, they would certainly fit into the 'relaxed' definition of a cruiser as presented above, but it would surely be ludicrous to compare a Dreadnaught heavy cruiser to a Super Star Destroyer in the Star Dreadnought range).

Posted: 2005-11-21 04:37pm
by VT-16
but it would surely be ludicrous to compare a Dreadnaught heavy cruiser to a Super Star Destroyer in the Star Dreadnought range
Apparently, to certain individuals, function would supercede everything, thus creating amusing situations if they try to do just that.

I used a Saobath Destroyer vs. Tector-class Star Destroyer scenario to illustrate this fallacy in the article. Hope it was a good example.

Posted: 2005-11-21 04:44pm
by VT-16
I see "someone" has deleted the canon material I provided once again, with sources.

I'd better start preparing another angry letter to the mods...

Posted: 2005-11-21 05:00pm
by Jim Raynor
Sienar quote, found on the page about Palpatine's shuttle:
Sienar will also produce the Empire's primary space-superiority craft, the TIE (Twin Ion Engine) fighter, as well as downscaled warships built to patrol remote sectors.
Unfortunately the book doesn't elaborate on what these downscaled ship classes are. However, Sienar is known to produce the 42-m 344-class Light Cruiser, 200-m Bayonet-class Light Cruiser, and the aforementioned Interdictor and Vindicator-class cruisers.

Posted: 2005-11-22 03:34pm
by Jim Raynor
I tried editing the page, and McEwok (Arkady Hodge) literally had it reverted back to his way within 5 minutes. He's probably patrolling that page 24/7. What a fucking loser.

Anyway, from reading the quotes assembled in this thread:
-"muddy" distinctions between vessel types and individual navies and corporations going by their own classifications (RASB)

-proof of downscaled ships, and therefore more than one scale (ROTS ICS)

-Star Destroyers not fitting into the commonly-known, miniscule scale (even WEG admits it!) until AFTER it was "loosened" (HttE sourcebok)

You would have to be an idiot (like McEwok (Arkady Hodge)), to even think there's something to argue. A distinction between "Star" level ships and smaller ships isn't just a pro-Saxton rationalization of all the observed evidence, it's CLEARLY stated by official sources themselves. All of McEwok's overly-wordy BS in this article, and false claims of confusion (the scale becoming inconsistent during the Clone Wars, Acclamator should be a cruiser, Mon Cal Star Cruisers being smaller than ISDs) should be excised. Of course, I don't think McEwok (Arkady Hodge) is willing to go along with this. He's a complete EU fundie who refuses to accept anything other than his own, narrow interpretation of WEG. I posted this in the discussion page in the hopes of convincing him there was nothing to argue:
How did this even get dragged on? There are no contradictions. Everything - Saxton, the movies, and even WEG can all fit in. A DECADE ago, WEG itself provided an easy "out" by clearly stating that different groups, companies, and races used different scales. The HttE sourcebook made it clear that Star Destroyers don't fit into the scale where ~600m long "cruisers" were the top ships - the term was said to be "loosened" to fit Star Destroyers in. The ROTS ICS has not one, but TWO passages (see the pages about the P-38 and Theta-class shuttle) stating the existence of more than one scale. We've observed KDY's scale - it has at least two ship types (Star Cruisers and Star Dreandaughts) larger than Star Destroyers (ITW), with the Mandator II implied to be a match for ~200 VSDs. The Venator-class Star Destroyer is clearly called a "medium" ship, even though it would be huge by WEG's system. The only rationalization (can it even be called that, when it's clearly been said by offical sources?) is that there are multiple scales of ships. This also neatly wraps up the Mon Cal Star Cruiser "confusion"; they're Star Cruisers by Calamari's standard, NOT KDY/Empire's. All this overly-wordy BS should be cut from the article. The only thing that needs to be in there is that multiple scales exist, and that KDY obviously has a different scale than the miniscule one the Old Republic used. JimRaynor55 20:14, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)
I think the article should be rewritten so that it just explains WEG's stated scale (making it clear that it was loosened), and KDY's observed scale. With the obvious existence of all these different scales, nothing should really be portrayed as an inconsistency. The only thing worth speculating about is how these different scales fit together. Things like a "heavy cruiser" being equivalent to a star frigate (the whole "Rebel Assault Frigate" thing), and how Separatist star frigates and destroyers seem to be generally consistent with KDY's scale (both are quite logical).

Posted: 2005-11-22 04:43pm
by Jim Raynor
Specific problem areas I've targeted for editing:
While this system did not remain completely static even over the period from the Clone Wars to the Yuuzhan Vong invasion
Fails to acknowledge different scales (Clone Wars era). What problems exist with the NJO ships? Anything besides Star Defender?
Cruisers — all ships with a length of 400m upwards, and more than 1,000 crewers; major combat warships.
Star Destroyers — larger warships introduced during the Clone Wars, still technically rated as large cruisers, but generally treated as a distinct sub-category.
I tried editing this to mention how the cruiser definition was "loosened," but McEwok (Arkady Hodge) had it quickly reverted. Supposedly, he dealt with the HttE sourcebook it in the passage below, and there was no need to "overload" things. :roll:
In addition, it can be noted that the basic "cruiser" designation was very broad; it encompassed everything up to and including the massive Executor-class Star Destroyers, the largest warships in commission during the key years of the Galactic Civil War, and excluded only a few "bizarrities" such as the Death Star battlestations. In part, this reflects the fact that the Old Republic saw no need for warships larger than the 600m Dreadnaught Cruiser, and the larger Star Destroyers which began to appear in the Clone Wars were regarded from the first as essentially a new class, although the officials and analysts of the Empire and even the New Republic were unwilling to quite dissociate them from the old cruiser designation. In practice, a length of about 850-900m might be considered the break-off point between cruisers and Star Destroyers - though here as elsewhere, insisting on over-rigid definition is perhaps unwise, and reality will always slip out from under the rigid matrix of any abstract system.
-As you can see, he's a fucking liar who likes to play semantics games. Despite his claim, the HttE sourcebook quote is completely ignored. The cruiser definition is just said to be "broad," fitting in with the EU fanwhore belief that Star Destroyers are just cruisers with a fancy name, generally large size, but no definite meaning.

-Executor-class Star Destroyer? McEwok (Arkady Hodge) likes to slip in these little bits of minimalism where he can.
Even within the navies of the major galactic powers of the period, there were seemingly odd exceptions to this system. During the Clone Wars, the 752-meter Acclamator-class vessels assigned to the Grand Army of the Republic were normally described as "assault ships", although they would fall into the cruiser bracket according to the standard system,
He's such a fucking WEG zombie that any designation that wasn't explicitly mentioned in his one precious RASB passage is "odd" and in violation of canon. I noticed that through numerous edits, VT-16's Empire At War info about Acclamators being designated as frigates was removed. Now, it just points out how strange it is that they're called "assault ships" when they should be cruisers. :roll: While ships are often classified by size, size is NOT completely independent from function; many ships do the things they do in part BECAUSE of how big (or small) they are. The Acclamator is an assault ship because it's meant to land troops. Also, McEwok (Arkady Hodge) again fails to consider the possibility of more than one scale here.
At first sight, it seems as though a hierarchical pattern can be discerned here — and this may at one point have been the intention; but in practice, the terminology has been stretched and slackened in several directions, particularly to accommodate the large, spearhead-shaped ships colloquially known as "Star Destroyers". Most obviously, at 1600m in length, the standard Imperial-class Star Destroyer is significantly longer on the keel and almost certainly larger in internal volume than a common contemporary Star Cruiser class, the 1200m Mon Calamari design known as the MC80 — when in a hierarchial system based on size, an ascent from destroyer to cruiser would seem more rational.

The different shipbuilding traditions of Dac and the human-dominated drive-yard systems of the Core may play a role in this discrepancy, but Imperial and New Republuic officers used the "Star Cruiser" designation for Mon Cal ships without hesitation, so it cannot be casually assumed in the absence of direct evidence that Star Destroyers "should" or "must" be smaller than Star Cruisers.
-AGAIN, McEwok (Arkady Hodge) fails to consider the existence of multiple scales. He's using the existence of smaller Calamari starships to portray Kuat Drive Yards' observed scale as crap. He's also blatantly lying about the lack of absence that KDY Star Cruisers are larger than Star Destroyers. I've shown this ItW quote to him NUMEROUS times in the past:

"Eventually designated the Executor-class after the vessel assigned to Vader's personal use and commanded by Admiral Ozzel, it is usually referred to in rebel slang as a "Super Star Destroyer" -- a term that covers many warship classes bigger than a Star Destroyer, from Star Cruisers to ultimate Star Dreadnaughts like Executor. Over one hundred times more massive than a common Star Destroyer and almost 12 times as long, the Executor bristles with more than 5000 turbolasers and ion cannons, and carries wings of star fighters and two pre assembled garrison bases."

That crap about characters on both sides calling MC80s "Star Cruiser" is also meaningless; Imperial officers frequently refer to their own ships in Rebel slang.
Moreover, it can be noted that some Star Destroyers are almost double the length and more than twice the tonnage of others (and the 1137m design is known interchangeably as an "attack cruiser"),
Meaningless, since the size discrepancies between different ships in SW are much, much bigger than they are in real life. An ISD might have several times the volume of a Venator, but a Star Dreadnaught has several HUNDRED times the volume.
and on an even larger scale, the terms "Star Destroyer" and "Star Dreadnought" have both been applied to the Executor-class design.
Once again ignoring the ItW quote, which puts a limit on Star Destroyer size, states the Executor's true designation, and is logically more credible since it's intended to clear up confusion from slang. :roll:
Behind the Scenes
All of our quotes need to be posted here, to expose McEwok (Arkady Hodge) for the moron he is.

Posted: 2005-11-22 05:05pm
by VT-16
The Separatists keeping an almost even classification system with the Republic/Empire seems logical, as they are a powerful faction were absorbed into it.

Nice post, hopes he actually pays attention to it. That guy is such an attentionwhore. And he makes problems out of almost anything.