Imperial crafts

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
Tiriol
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2038
Joined: 2005-09-15 11:31am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Imperial crafts

Post by Tiriol »

By the time of NJO, do the Imperials still employ TIE/In fighters (those basic fighters) or have they been mostly replaced by newer models (TIE Interceptors, TIE Defenders, Howlrunners etc)? The New Republic seemed to make a constant progress on the field of starfighter design (although most of those new starfighters seemed to be one-shot wonders, since they don't often appear), so it would seem strange that the Imperials would stick to the basic TIE fighter despite it becoming more and more outdated.

This question is somewhat closely linked to the first one: New Essential Guide to Vehicles and Vessels stated that the Acclamator-class assault ships were made obsolete by the appereance of the Star Destroyers, but somehow that doesn't make sense to me (Acclamators were supposed to be ground assault force carriers, if I remember correctly, and were not meant to engage enemy ships on the same scale as Star Destroyers and bigger warships were meant to). So does the Empire still employ Acclamators (and Venators - another silly idea, since these things were meant to carry a huge load of starfighters, much more than Imperial-class Star Destroyers, not to be jack-of-all-trades as SDs) or have they indeed been replaced by the Star Destroyers entirely?
Confiteor Deo omnipotenti; beatae Mariae semper Virgini; beato Michaeli Archangelo; sanctis Apostolis, omnibus sanctis... Tibit Pater, quia peccavi nimis, cogitatione, verbo et opere, mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa! Kyrie Eleison!

The Imperial Senate (defunct) * Knights Astrum Clades * The Mess
User avatar
Chris OFarrell
Durandal's Bitch
Posts: 5724
Joined: 2002-08-02 07:57pm
Contact:

Re: Imperial crafts

Post by Chris OFarrell »

Tiriol wrote:By the time of NJO, do the Imperials still employ TIE/In fighters (those basic fighters) or have they been mostly replaced by newer models (TIE Interceptors, TIE Defenders, Howlrunners etc)? The New Republic seemed to make a constant progress on the field of starfighter design (although most of those new starfighters seemed to be one-shot wonders, since they don't often appear), so it would seem strange that the Imperials would stick to the basic TIE fighter despite it becoming more and more outdated.
They also lacked the resources of the New Republic to develop new starfighter designs, having far more pressing industrial concerns then Starfighter R&D.

The Tie/IN fighters are very much still in use. But they appear to have been upgraded with shields as standard, as have the Tie Interceptors. By the time of The Final Prophecy/The Unifying Force, Tie Defenders are much more the standard fighter in service, backed up with Scimitar assault bombers and Tie Interceptors. While the New Republic is almost completly XJ3 X-Wings and Series IV E-Wings for its primary fighter force.

This question is somewhat closely linked to the first one: New Essential Guide to Vehicles and Vessels stated that the Acclamator-class assault ships were made obsolete by the appereance of the Star Destroyers, but somehow that doesn't make sense to me (Acclamators were supposed to be ground assault force carriers, if I remember correctly, and were not meant to engage enemy ships on the same scale as Star Destroyers and bigger warships were meant to). So does the Empire still employ Acclamators (and Venators - another silly idea, since these things were meant to carry a huge load of starfighters, much more than Imperial-class Star Destroyers, not to be jack-of-all-trades as SDs) or have they indeed been replaced by the Star Destroyers entirely?
It's a stupid comment I agree. But we do have a few sources which have the Acclamator in service well into the New Order. Frankly I think they were also supposed to be the assault ships ferrying a lot of the commandos onto Courscant during the NR assault in 'The Unifying Force' from descriptions given of some of the ships. But the descriptions are also in error in terms of length of these ships.
Image
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

I've felt since RotS that the Empire likely still usesmost if not all of the Clone Wars stuff we saw. The T-21 is referred to in the RotS novelization, the RotJ speederbike is the same one that Stass Allie is riding in RotS, the AT-ST is mentioned in the RotS novelization, heck the Z-95 is mentioned in the TPM novel.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
Elheru Aran
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13073
Joined: 2004-03-04 01:15am
Location: Georgia

Post by Elheru Aran »

Vympel wrote:I've felt since RotS that the Empire likely still usesmost if not all of the Clone Wars stuff we saw. The T-21 is referred to in the RotS novelization, the RotJ speederbike is the same one that Stass Allie is riding in RotS, the AT-ST is mentioned in the RotS novelization, heck the Z-95 is mentioned in the TPM novel.
The RotJ speederbike is also mounted in the back of the LAAT's in the AOTC:ICS. It's got a few minor differences, but is essentially the same speeder in configuration, layout, and appearance.
It's a strange world. Let's keep it that way.
User avatar
Tychu
Jedi Master
Posts: 1260
Joined: 2002-07-28 01:20am
Location: Deer Park, Long Island, New York
Contact:

Post by Tychu »

Its implied by the first Rouge Squadron and then in a few of the later EU that they mostly use Tie/D's .

Of course theres still those loyal hot shot aces and their squadrons who still use their old ships. well probally with upgrades and stuff but you know the squads that used TIE Fighters will still use fighters not interceptors
"Boring Conversation anyway" Han Solo

"What kinda archeologist carries a weapon........Bad Example" Colonel Jack O'Neil

"My name is Olo... Hans Olo" -Dr. Daniel Jackson

"Well you did make the Farmingdale Run in less than 12 parsecs" --Personal Quote

"Just popped out for lunch" - Rowan Atkinson as Mr. Bean
User avatar
VT-16
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4662
Joined: 2004-05-13 10:01am
Location: Norway

Post by VT-16 »

So does the Empire still employ Acclamators (and Venators - another silly idea, since these things were meant to carry a huge load of starfighters, much more than Imperial-class Star Destroyers, not to be jack-of-all-trades as SDs) or have they indeed been replaced by the Star Destroyers entirely?
Acclamators and Venators are in Empire at War, Acclamators are also shown in the SW:Empire comics, in a military parade in Coruscant and the Core Worlds, in cover art for the reissued Dark Empire comic (although due to poor drawing skills, the ship in question had an enlarged command-tower).

Additional stuff:

- A5 and A6 Juggernauts participate in the GCW.
- Imperial AT-AP walkers in EaW
- Imperial AT-TE walkers in the GCW-era also exist, according to the link on the OS databank (as well as a top-less cargo variant).
- ISP speeders in EaW (on the Rebel side, probably stolen)
- Rebel LAATs in Battlefront II (probably stolen as well)
- Imperial Theta-class shuttles in BFII.
- Belbullab-22 fighters, ARC-170 fighters and Eta-2 interceptors available as elite fighters for both Imperials and Rebels in SW:Galaxies (according to Leland Chee, he does take stuff like that from games and add to the Holocron, so it's not pure game-mechanics).
User avatar
Elheru Aran
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13073
Joined: 2004-03-04 01:15am
Location: Georgia

Post by Elheru Aran »

IIRC, the LAATs on the Rebel side in Battlefront II are from an abandoned factory/warehouse captured by the Rebels, according to Wookieepeda.
It's a strange world. Let's keep it that way.
User avatar
VT-16
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4662
Joined: 2004-05-13 10:01am
Location: Norway

Post by VT-16 »

I see. That might indicate either no LAATs in the GCW-era Empire, or older models being mothballed. (We've seen the latter with other units that fell into rebel hands).
User avatar
The Dark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7378
Joined: 2002-10-31 10:28pm
Location: Promoting ornithological awareness

Post by The Dark »

Tychu wrote:Its implied by the first Rouge Squadron and then in a few of the later EU that they mostly use Tie/D's .
The only Defenders I recall running into in the series was in Isard's Revenge, when RS runs into the "special squadron" that has Defenders. Every other mention of TIEs seems to be either eyeballs, squints, or dupes, with a few brights thrown in.
Stanley Hauerwas wrote:[W]hy is it that no one is angry at the inequality of income in this country? I mean, the inequality of income is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Why isn’t that ever an issue of politics? Because you don’t live in a democracy. You live in a plutocracy. Money rules.
BattleTech for SilCore
User avatar
The Original Nex
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1593
Joined: 2004-10-18 03:01pm
Location: Boston, MA

Post by The Original Nex »

TIE Defenders are seen in the NJO novel Final Prophesy, assigned to an Interdictor commanded by Pellaeon's bastard son. They were again mentioned in The Unifying Force where Defenders are participants in the defense of Mon Calamari against the Yuuzhan Vong armada.

The earlier NJO trilogy Force Heretic doesn't mention TIE Defenders outright but does refer to TIEs with missiles implying either the TIE Defender or the TIE Avenger. Many of the old, standard TIE/ln Line Fighters had been decommissioned, and implanted with droid brains for training excercizes.

The entire NJO story suggests the Imperial Remnant has largely recovered economically relative to their situation in tHoT duology, having constructed (or possibly obtained) a presumed Executor-class Star Dreadnought, resumed construction on Imperial-class ships (previously only small frigates, like Vindicators were economical), as well as restarting elite fighter programs like the Defender and/or Avenger lines.
Post Reply