what are GCT's in Star Wars?

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
Darth_Nader
Redshirt
Posts: 49
Joined: 2002-12-26 01:40am
Location: Arroyo Grande, Cali

what are GCT's in Star Wars?

Post by Darth_Nader »

can GCT's pick up cloaked ships? because i know there are mini cloakers used by bounty hunters and people, because it says it in the essential guide to weapons and technology. But once again what are GCT's and why would they use them because if i remeber right Star Wars doesnt have any ships that can cloak or something to that effect.
Star Wars forever!
User avatar
Darth Garden Gnome
Official SD.Net Lawn Ornament
Posts: 6029
Joined: 2002-07-08 02:35am
Location: Some where near a mailbox

Post by Darth Garden Gnome »

"No ship that small has a cloaking device!" -Captain Needa, ISD Avenger;TESB
Leader of the Secret Gnome Revolution
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

Needa was wrong, Mauls ship had a cloak, as did the Emperor's shuttle

It's actually CGT, an acronym that stnads for crystaline gravfield trap IIRC. It is an extremely sensitive gravitational sensor and the only known way to pick up a cloaked SW ship just standing there.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

And while the bounty hunters have stealth systems, they don't have true cloaking. There are only 3 ways to do that, one seems to be lost tech, one is unable to be reproduced because the necessary crystals are unavailable by ROTJ era, and one the Imperial remnant has a monopoly on.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Mr Bean
Lord of Irony
Posts: 22459
Joined: 2002-07-04 08:36am

Post by Mr Bean »

Crystal Gravity Traps are in essance massive computers hooked up to many many gravatoinc sensors

They take a fixed based(Starship/Starbase) measures the gravity effecting it and if it ever changes, boom there's your cloaked ship, Its sensative enough to pick up fighters with cloaks at light-hour ranges as its said to be system wide.

"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

They needed it to pick out 40 m cloaked asteroids among the Coruscant traffic. Those asteroids wouldn't produce any emissions, so they needed the extremely sensitive CGT to find it.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Post by Connor MacLeod »

Mr Bean wrote:Crystal Gravity Traps are in essance massive computers hooked up to many many gravatoinc sensors

They take a fixed based(Starship/Starbase) measures the gravity effecting it and if it ever changes, boom there's your cloaked ship, Its sensative enough to pick up fighters with cloaks at light-hour ranges as its said to be system wide.
No, they're apparently a form of gravitic sensor (its possible there is more than one kind..) that works on picking up the gravitic disturbances created by the presence of mass in space. They typically have ranges of hundreds of thousands of km (probably being passive and quite sensitive, explaining the relatively short ranges.)

Their ability to detect cloaked SW ships is only of secondary benefit, because mass-cloaking/baffling is impractical/improbable. Even then, it requires dedicated platforms (IE the Bilbringi CGT array) and can only detect ships at ranges of thousands of km, a fraction of the typical range.
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Post by Connor MacLeod »

Illuminatus Primus wrote:They needed it to pick out 40 m cloaked asteroids among the Coruscant traffic. Those asteroids wouldn't produce any emissions, so they needed the extremely sensitive CGT to find it.
Its because cloaking shields block all forms of sensor aside from the CGT array (mass baffling seems impractical). Even then, the ranges of the dedicated arrays were no greater htan 10,000 km, even though a CGT array is generally a "common" sensor many tens of times the range.
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Connor MacLeod wrote:Its because cloaking shields block all forms of sensor aside from the CGT array (mass baffling seems impractical). Even then, the ranges of the dedicated arrays were no greater htan 10,000 km, even though a CGT array is generally a "common" sensor many tens of times the range.
The cloaking field can't stop detection of the engine wash. Asteroids lack that, are completely passive...they just orbit. Sensitive enough sensor screening might reveal the presence of a cloaked vessel w/ out where it is; engine wash detected but not easily traced to a position.

There appear to be other gravitic sensors, but whether they could pick up a single cloaked frieghter (like in Thrawn's first scheme) or a cloaked asteroid is something else entirely.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
nightmare
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1539
Joined: 2002-07-26 11:07am
Location: Here. Sometimes there.

Post by nightmare »

"No ship that small has a cloaking device!" -Captain Needa, ISD Avenger;TESB

Now, this obviously implies that largers vessels could have a cloaking device.

Let's also bring up Qui-Gon Jinn in TPM:

"Do you have a cloaking device?"
Star Trek vs. Star Wars, Extralife style.
User avatar
Master of Ossus
Darkest Knight
Posts: 18213
Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
Location: California

Post by Master of Ossus »

Incidentally, A-Wings are the smallest ships with any ability to confuse SW sensors that have been observed. They lack true cloaking ability, and it is unclear whether or not Qui-Gon or Needa was mistaken. I would suspect Needa was mistaken, given the prevalence of EU sources that seem to verify Qui-Gon's assessment.
"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul

Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner

"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000

"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Post by Connor MacLeod »

Master of Ossus wrote:Incidentally, A-Wings are the smallest ships with any ability to confuse SW sensors that have been observed. They lack true cloaking ability, and it is unclear whether or not Qui-Gon or Needa was mistaken. I would suspect Needa was mistaken, given the prevalence of EU sources that seem to verify Qui-Gon's assessment.
They're a sort of sensor mask/jammers.. cloaking seems to be something else. :D

The smallest cloak capable ship would be the V-38's from "DArk Forces 2" which carry fighter-scale cloaking.

And There are the "Decoy beams" from the XvT and XWA games... which effectively function like sensor masks or cloaks.

Slave-1 had a form of cloaking or sensor masking that didn't visually obscure them, though, too.
User avatar
Eleas
Jaina Dax
Posts: 4896
Joined: 2002-07-08 05:08am
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Contact:

Post by Eleas »

Mr Bean wrote:Crystal Gravity Traps are in essance massive computers hooked up to many many gravatoinc sensors

They take a fixed based(Starship/Starbase) measures the gravity effecting it and if it ever changes, boom there's your cloaked ship, Its sensative enough to pick up fighters with cloaks at light-hour ranges as its said to be system wide.
Crystal Gravfield Traps. As for the rest of this information, where is it from?
Björn Paulsen

"Travelers with closed minds can tell us little except about themselves."
--Chinua Achebe
User avatar
Grand Admiral Thrawn
Ruthless Imperial Tyrant
Posts: 5755
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:11pm
Location: Canada

Post by Grand Admiral Thrawn »

IDIOTS!
"You know, I was God once."
"Yes, I saw. You were doing well, until everyone died."
Bender and God, Futurama
Post Reply