Page 1 of 2

Do the "Legacy" comics affect the LotF Books?

Posted: 2006-07-19 05:13pm
by Darth Fanboy
*Potentially Contains Spoilers regarding the Legacy comic books, and Legacy of the Force Book series.*


First of all I'm still wondering why they used such similar names for each series, especially in light of GL wanting Anakin Solo killed in NJO so no one would think he was Anakin Skywalker (or something along those lines).

Secondly, I think the fact that we see The new comics set in the future featuring a "New Sith Order" that supposedly is from the same lineage as Bane. Doesn't it sort of give away the ending of the LotF books? I get this feeling that if I check out the comics, I can pretty much get the gist of what happened in the books. Especially since we see the beginnings of a new Sith Order in Betrayal. I think The comic series sort of jumped the gun. Especially if Darth Krayt is who he is rumored to be.

Does anyone else here think the same way?

Posted: 2006-07-19 07:06pm
by Dorsk 81
*Possible spoilers*

Yea, it does seem pretty stupid launching the two series at the same time, it's seems like they're trying to copy what happened with the films in a way, showing the former Hero whose gone bad with the comics, then (or while, depending on release dates) showing you how it happened with the novels.

I've read Betrayal, and skimmed over what happened in the Legacy comics. Seems like what's going to happen is pretty predictable, Jacen over the course of the Legacy of the Force series will become Darth Krayt and end up killing Luke.

Posted: 2006-07-19 07:23pm
by Knife
Dorsk 81 wrote:*Possible spoilers*

Yea, it does seem pretty stupid launching the two series at the same time, it's seems like they're trying to copy what happened with the films in a way, showing the former Hero whose gone bad with the comics, then (or while, depending on release dates) showing you how it happened with the novels.

I've read Betrayal, and skimmed over what happened in the Legacy comics. Seems like what's going to happen is pretty predictable, Jacen over the course of the Legacy of the Force series will become Darth Krayt and end up killing Luke.
Blah, I've read the blurbs on Wiki and other places. How the hell do they intend to strecht that out so that the 'new Sith Order' is the same lineage of Darth Bane. Sidious and Vader are both dead. Luminyia (or how ever you spell it) wasn't a full Sith, rather just a lacky AFAIK.

Posted: 2006-07-19 07:50pm
by Dorsk 81
There're a few lines in Betrayal about it, Jacen asks "How was the Sith knowledge transmitted to him? ... Through a Sith Holocron? Through loyal retainers?", Luminyia tells him "Through disloyal retainers. Through Sith trainees who could never achieve Mastery themselves... and who rejected Palpatine and his teachings as too selfish, too controlling, too destructive."

When Jacen refers to 'him', he's talking about himself in the future tense, he just doesn't know it yet, Luminyia is refering to herself, I think.

Posted: 2006-07-19 08:04pm
by Darth Fanboy
I find the idea that Luke will be killed in the EU Repugnant. Not because he can't die one day, but because some shitstain author and not the man who created the legendary character is going to do it.

Posted: 2006-07-19 08:47pm
by Publius
Dorsk 81 wrote:There're a few lines in Betrayal about it, Jacen asks "How was the Sith knowledge transmitted to him? ... Through a Sith Holocron? Through loyal retainers?", Luminyia tells him "Through disloyal retainers. Through Sith trainees who could never achieve Mastery themselves... and who rejected Palpatine and his teachings as too selfish, too controlling, too destructive."
Which is rather like claiming that a splinter church founded by an un-baptised, un-confirmed ex-Catholic catachumen is of the "same lineage" as the church ruled by the Pope. It is plainly ridiculous, not unlike Brie's description of Darth Sidious's leaven as "too selfish, too controlling, too destructive." This description seems to make sense until one pauses and considers that she is talking about the Sith. The idea of Sith neophytes complaining that the Dark Lord of the Sith is "too selfish" is not unlike complaining that a terrorist leader is "too violent." Seeing that Sith philosophy revolves around selfishness, the very idea is ludicrous, demonstrative of nothing more than grotesque stupidity on the part of its locutor.

Posted: 2006-07-19 08:48pm
by Aquatain
Darth Fanboy wrote:I find the idea that Luke will be killed in the EU Repugnant. Not because he can't die one day, but because some shitstain author and not the man who created the legendary character is going to do it.
Indeed it could end up as a travissty...(pun totally intended)

Posted: 2006-07-19 11:39pm
by 000
First off, there are no indications that Krayt's Order is anything but tangentally related to Bane's, and plenty of indications that it's a new homegrown one based on pre-Ruusan teachings.

Second, there's nothing except circumstantial evidence to suggest Jacen is Krayt, and plenty that nixes that-- namely, Krayt telling his Holocron that he obseved the Vong war from the sidelines.

On Lumiya: she's by all indications a Sith of Bane's order, whether ordained by the existing Lord or not. She was groomed as a possible apprentice, she was taught plenty of Sith lore while both reigning Dark Lords were alive, and upon the unprecedented simultaneous death of both she stayed true to Bane's edicts-- truer even than Palpatine, it might be argued. Her status as a genuine Sith is not in doubt, and I don't think there's a whole lot of argument for her not being one of Bane's order, in spite of the slight break in succession.

As to what she tells Jacen: it's quite obvious that she's lying to him. Nearly everything she says is either suspect of outright incorrect.

Posted: 2006-07-19 11:59pm
by Shadowtraveler
000 wrote:As to what she tells Jacen: it's quite obvious that she's lying to him. Nearly everything she says is either suspect of outright incorrect.
It was pretty much all a lie. From the Corellian crisis to her involvement in the assassination, she was responsible for all of it. In fact, Jacen's falling for the exact same trap his grandfather fell into.

Posted: 2006-07-20 12:02am
by 000
There's no indication yet that she had any involvement in the Corellian crisis beyond the assassination. It's certainly possible-- she was behind Palpatine's final death, remember-- but at this point unlikely.

Posted: 2006-07-20 12:08am
by Shadowtraveler
Considering that future Jaccen says the the Crisis could have been avoided if she didn't interfere (remember that captain who decided to take over Tralus? The one who could see his wife who had died? One of Lumiya's force phantoms), she probally is responsible.

Posted: 2006-07-20 12:10am
by Dorsk 81
000 wrote:As to what she tells Jacen: it's quite obvious that she's lying to him. Nearly everything she says is either suspect of outright incorrect.
Of course it is, she was still trying to win him round at that point, although taking into consideration Jacens other actions in Betrayal, he wasn't far off the dark side on his own.
000 wrote:Second, there's nothing except circumstantial evidence to suggest Jacen is Krayt, and plenty that nixes that-- namely, Krayt telling his Holocron that he obseved the Vong war from the sidelines.
That could be one of those certain-point-of-view moments though, like Vader considered Anakin a seperate persona, Krayt would only have seen the Vong war through Jacen, unable to take actions, purely an observer. I haven't read the Legacy comics myself, but it's a possibility.
Shadowtraveler wrote:In fact, Jacen's falling for the exact same trap his grandfather fell into.
Not at all. Anakin wanted the knowledge, which Palpatine didn't even have, to save the woman he loved. Jacen wanted knowledge for the sake of it, killing a woman he didn't have to so he could have it without consequence. Anakin just cut off Mace's hand, trying to stop him killing Palpatine, who he thought was out of energy.

Posted: 2006-07-20 12:15am
by 000
Dorsk 81 wrote:That could be one of those certain-point-of-view moments though, like Vader considered Anakin a seperate persona, Krayt would only have seen the Vong war through Jacen, unable to take actions, purely an observer. I haven't read the Legacy comics myself, but it's a possibility.
Since the Darth title is rarely viewed by the Sith Lord as a separate personality, it's unlikely that this is the case.

Posted: 2006-07-20 08:55am
by Publius
000 wrote:On Lumiya: she's by all indications a Sith of Bane's order, whether ordained by the existing Lord or not. She was groomed as a possible apprentice, she was taught plenty of Sith lore while both reigning Dark Lords were alive, and upon the unprecedented simultaneous death of both she stayed true to Bane's edicts-- truer even than Palpatine, it might be argued. Her status as a genuine Sith is not in doubt, and I don't think there's a whole lot of argument for her not being one of Bane's order, in spite of the slight break in succession.
Jedi Knight: Dark Forces II states that Jerec's powers rivaled Darth Vader's. The Dark Side Sourcebook indicates that he was fluent in Sith and was very familiar with Jedi and Sith arcana. The New Essential Guide to Characters mentions that he had Sithian tattoos on his face, and even goes so far as to suggest that he would have been Darth Sidious's Apprentice if Vader hadn't already held that title. He was, therefore, a possible apprentice and extensively well-versed in Sithian lore while both Sith Lords were alive. And yet Jerec is not considered a Sith Lord, nor a member of the Sith Order, precisely because the reigning Sith Master never chose him.

Shira Brie was not 'special.' Darth Vader did not handpick her to be his Apprentice when he became the Sith Master. The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi make very clear that it was his son that he wanted to be the second Sith Lord, and "Evil Never Dies: The Sith Dynasties" even goes so far as to say that he trained Brie and Flint with the express intention to "pit these pupils against one another as past Dark Lords had done, taking the victor as his Shadow Hand." Consider that the same article states quite clearly that the position of Shadow Hand existed among Exar Kun's Brotherhood of the Sith (ca 3,962 BrS) and even in the Sith'ari period of the Sith Empire, nearly 24,000 years before the arrival of the first dark Jedi and the creation of the Jen'ari; being a Sith Lord's Shadow Hand is by no means synonymous with being his or her Apprentice, since it predates even the institution of the Dark Lord of the Sith.

"Lumiya: Dark Star of the Empire" only claims that she "embraced the dark path Vader laid before her," which is equally true of Procurator of Justice the Lord Hethrir (The Crystal Star), High Inquisitor Tremayne ("Dark Vendetta"), and Inquisitors Lanu Pasiq, Halmere, and Gwellib Ap-Llewff ("Evasive Action: Recruitment") – all of whom Vader trained and none of whom were Sith Lords. It then goes on to say that she constructed her lightwhip as part of "the final test of all Jedi," having "uncovered an ancient Sith tome," but the example of Jerec has already shown that being a Sithologist does not qualify one as a Sith Lord. Nor is he the only example of non-Sith Lords having uncovered and used Sithian arcana: The Lord Cronal and Roganda Ismaren recovered Sith scrolls preserving the mechu-deru disciplines of Belia Darzu, a Sith Lord active during the Sictis Wars of 1215 - 1195 BrS ("Evil Never Dies: The Sith Dynasties"), Cartariun learned to control Sith magic on the planet of Malrev ("Requiem for a Rogue"), the Sorcerers of Tund had incorporated Sith teachings into their religion before Rokur Gepta joined their number (The New Essential Guide to Characters), the Mecrosa Order included Sith rituals within its initiation rites and ceremonies ("Evil Never Dies: the Sith Dynasties"), the Prophets of the Dark Side were actually founded by a Sith Lord and their Dark Force religion was heavily influenced by Sith dogmata ("The Dark Forces Saga, Part 3: Two Peas in a Pod"), and the entire world of Thule was ruled by a theocracy of priests and prophets of the old Imperial Sith religion (Geonosis and the Outer Rim Worlds).

"The Emperor's Pawns" never even claims that Vader taught her any of the secrets of the Sith, and does not even bother to mention the Sithian weapons manual that inspired her lightwhip (and it is worth noting that using a Sithian weapon does not a Sith Lord make; consider the example of the anonymous Imperial Intelligence assassin who uses a Sith lanvarok in "Mandatory Retirement"). It does mention that "like Bane after the Battle of Ruusan, Lumiya plunged the Sith order back into secrecy," but one immediately notes that the Sith Order did not exist before the Battle of Ruusan, because Darth Bane created it to replace the now-defunct Brotherhood of Darkness. If the comparison is to be meaningful, it demands that the Order of the Sith Lords have been destroyed, and that Lumiya create something new to be its spiritual successor – but recall too that the United Nations Organization is the spiritual successor of the League of Nations, but is nevertheless a distinct and separate entity.

It is true that "The Emperor's Pawns" says that she "has grown powerful in her seclusion, blending traditional Sith ways with new and dangerously innovative tactics," but keep in mind that the only Sithian knowledge she is known to have possessed at the time of the Battle of Endor was an ancient Sithian weapons manual, of unknown provenance – was the lightwhip the product of the Ordinal Sith, the Fraternal Sith, or the Imperial Sith? It certainly predates the Order of the Sith Lords, because a member of the Brotherhood of Darkness used one in Jedi vs. Sith, which now presents the question of which traditional ways did she blend with her own innovations? "Evil Never Dies: The Sith Dynasties" mentions that she obtained the ancient holocron of Sith'ari Adas from the Mecrosa Order, and that she had access to the ancient Sith Oracle at Korriban – but note again that both of these are not part of the Ordinal traditions, but rather the Imperial traditions.

Furthermore, precisely how much preparatory training did she receive from Darth Vader, after all? Consider that the entirety of her training in the dark side of the Force took place after "Shira's Story" (set after The Empire Strikes Back) and some time before Return of the Jedi – i.e., substantially less than a year. By her own admission, she defeated Luke Skywalker in "Duel with a Dark Lady!" because he was surprised by the fact that her lightwhip contained both physical and energetic tendrils; later that same issue, he adapted and easily defeated her, leaving her half-naked and humiliated. In fact, her performance without the element of surprise was decidedly lackluster; she actually began the second duel already in possession of Skywalker's lightsaber – only to curse ineffectually "No!! Curse you, using the Force – telekinesis," when he simply took it back. He defeated her with only one grazing blow as she tried to run past him – which is particularly unimpressive, in light of the fact that the completely Force-blind Orman, Baron Tagge, withstood such a blow in "Saber Clash!" and simply leapt over a lateral strike in "In Mortal Combat!" In "All Together Now," she brags that "my training in the ways of the Force gives me mastery over limited amounts of matter and energy, and hence – telekinesis," and manages to psychokinetically seize the Princess Leia's pistol; one might compare this to Darth Vader in The Empire Strikes Back, except that – unlike Vader – Lumiya manages to get herself shot by two different people in "All Together Now." If this is the much-vaunted "Sith training" she received from Darth Vader, it succeeds only in putting her at the same level as Force-blind duelists like the Baron Tagge. It is certainly not comparable to the level of Sithologists and dark side mavens like Jerec and the Lord Cronal – both of whom were dark Jedi Masters. Lumiya's performance as a "Sith disciple" and would-be Shadow Hand was mediocre at best.

There is, then, no indication at all that she is a legitimate Sith Lord of Darth Bane's Order. Certainly there is a very compelling argument against her membership of the Order: viz., the Galactic Emperor intended to replace Darth Vader with Luke Skywalker, not only before the Battle of Endor but after as well. The Dark Empire Sourcebook specifically states that "one of the key ingredients of this Shadow Hand Strategy" was "a new servant to replace Vader," and that this was the purpose for Darth Sidious's second attempt to corrupt Skywalker. How can one claim that someone is a member of a cult when she is pointedly excluded by the cult's leadership? The Sith Order was a clearly defined cult with its own culture, dogmata, and traditions. Membership was not achieved by acclamation or by consensus. She was never inducted into the Order; she was therefore never a member.

This has nothing to do with whether or not she is the spiritual successor to the Order of the Sith Lords, or with whether or not she is a Sith Lord. That is not really a matter of dispute; it takes very little to obtain the imprimatur of some Sith Lord or other, as the Krath and Brotherhood of the Sith proved. One need little more than the cooperative ghost of some long-dead Jen'ari to accomplish that, and given her cultural ties to the Imperial Sith, that seems a likely avenue of obtaining the necessary credentials. But there is a great deal of difference between being a Sith Lord – or even a Dark Lord of the Sith – and being a member of the Order of the Sith Lords. She is the former, almost certainly; she is the latter as no more than a bastard at best, illegitimate and unacknowledged.
000 wrote:There's no indication yet that she had any involvement in the Corellian crisis beyond the assassination. It's certainly possible-- she was behind Palpatine's final death, remember-- but at this point unlikely.
"Evil Never Dies: The Sith Dynasties" makes quite clear that Lumiya told Carnor Jax "of her need to now gather the necessary elements to rebuild the Sith Order" and then "disappeared on this quest." Carnor Jax was responsible for the plot that led to the destruction of the Galactic Emperor's clones; indeed, the article states that after Jax seized power as chairman of the Interim Ruling Council, he "attempted to reestablish communication with Lumiya – not to rejoin her but to lure her into a trap." They had not been in contact since she departed to 'gather resources,' and she was uninvolved in the conspiracy.

Posted: 2006-07-20 12:00pm
by Shadowtraveler
Dorsk 81 wrote:
Shadowtraveler wrote:In fact, Jacen's falling for the exact same trap his grandfather fell into.
Not at all. Anakin wanted the knowledge, which Palpatine didn't even have, to save the woman he loved. Jacen wanted knowledge for the sake of it, killing a woman he didn't have to so he could have it without consequence. Anakin just cut off Mace's hand, trying to stop him killing Palpatine, who he thought was out of energy.
One of the major reasons he goes Sith is because every outcome that didn't involve killing Nelani in Lumiya's base eventually had Luke dying, usually by Jacen's hands.

Posted: 2006-07-20 12:39pm
by The Grim Squeaker
Shadowtraveler wrote:One of the major reasons he goes Sith is because every outcome that didn't involve killing Nelani in Lumiya's base eventually had Luke dying, usually by Jacen's hands.
So, he didn't stop to think that long term Jedi precog is not 100% accurate, especially over a period of years, even more so on Force users and can be dampened by Normal Force users especially someone who might have learned some of Sidious's "Shroud" techniques :roll:

Posted: 2006-07-20 04:13pm
by Shadowtraveler
DEATH wrote:
Shadowtraveler wrote:One of the major reasons he goes Sith is because every outcome that didn't involve killing Nelani in Lumiya's base eventually had Luke dying, usually by Jacen's hands.
So, he didn't stop to think that long term Jedi precog is not 100% accurate, especially over a period of years, even more so on Force users and can be dampened by Normal Force users especially someone who might have learned some of Sidious's "Shroud" techniques :roll:
Thinking is not really his strong point. :wink:

Posted: 2006-07-20 05:56pm
by Dorsk 81
Shadowtraveler wrote:One of the major reasons he goes Sith is because every outcome that didn't involve killing Nelani in Lumiya's base eventually had Luke dying, usually by Jacen's hands.
Wrong, only some futures end with Jacen killing Luke, "Scores of time lines", not all. And as DEATH said, how do we know he's not having his visions manipulated, just as Lumiya has been doing to the situation all along?

Posted: 2006-07-20 07:49pm
by Shadowtraveler
Dorsk 81 wrote:
Shadowtraveler wrote:One of the major reasons he goes Sith is because every outcome that didn't involve killing Nelani in Lumiya's base eventually had Luke dying, usually by Jacen's hands.
Wrong, only some futures end with Jacen killing Luke, "Scores of time lines", not all.
Fair enough.


Dorsk 81 wrote:And as DEATH said, how do we know he's not having his visions manipulated, just as Lumiya has been doing to the situation all along?
The point is that this is one of the major reasons he decides to join Lumiya. Whether his visions were being manipulated or not is a moot point.

Posted: 2006-07-21 12:53am
by Guardsman Bass
That seems pretty lame, having Jacen turn into a Sith Lord - especially after his whole ordeal to get a new viewpoint on the Force that embraced all aspects of it in Traitor and beyond.

Posted: 2006-07-21 12:57am
by Darth Fanboy
Guardsman Bass wrote:That seems pretty lame, having Jacen turn into a Sith Lord - especially after his whole ordeal to get a new viewpoint on the Force that embraced all aspects of it in Traitor and beyond.
That, plus we know that he eventually succeeds in some way thanks to the new comics. Unless there is yet ANOTHER way for the Sith Order to be reformed at some point by the end of book 9. But at any rate it doesn't look like i'll need to read any of the new books.

Posted: 2006-07-21 01:00am
by Guardsman Bass
For Christ's sake - why can't they just let the bloody Sith Order die? It's been revived how many times?

Posted: 2006-07-21 01:07am
by Noble Ire
Guardsman Bass wrote:For Christ's sake - why can't they just let the bloody Sith Order die? It's been revived how many times?
While I agree that the Sith may be somewhat of a played concept, the presence of Dark force-users is a fairly essential counterpoint to the existance of Jedi in the universe. Shifting the focus off of them for another thousand years or so might not be a bad idea, but to remove the Dark Side (and thus, some form of "Sith", even if it isn't called that), the Jedi must also be removed as well. And for all its depth and other elements, SW can't exist without the Jedi in some form.

Posted: 2006-07-21 01:11am
by Guardsman Bass
Noble Ire wrote:
Guardsman Bass wrote:For Christ's sake - why can't they just let the bloody Sith Order die? It's been revived how many times?
While I agree that the Sith may be somewhat of a played concept, the presence of Dark force-users is a fairly essential counterpoint to the existance of Jedi in the universe. Shifting the focus off of them for another thousand years or so might not be a bad idea, but to remove the Dark Side (and thus, some form of "Sith", even if it isn't called that), the Jedi must also be removed as well. And for all its depth and other elements, SW can't exist without the Jedi in some form.
I'm all in favor of including Dark Side-users, but why Sith? I think it would be much cooler if there was a group of either Dark Side or Gray Jedi that started an organization that became the core of a new kind of Dark Side Order.

Posted: 2006-07-21 01:23am
by Noble Ire
Guardsman Bass wrote:I'm all in favor of including Dark Side-users, but why Sith? I think it would be much cooler if there was a group of either Dark Side or Gray Jedi that started an organization that became the core of a new kind of Dark Side Order.
Well, as Publius points out, they really are only Sith in name only. I suppose you could simply give the Dark Side group a new name, but that seems both rather insufficent and dishonest (you're essentially making Sith, but calling them something different just to be "unique".)

Then again, I suppose you could create a genuinely different Dark or Gray organization, in appearence and ideology. But that would take creativity, and those few authors that possess it and still work for Lucasfilm seem to be focused more on the PT/OT or KOTOR eras.