Civil War #7 - Spoilers

FAN: Discuss various fictional worlds that don't qualify for SF.

Moderator: Steve

Post Reply
User avatar
18-Till-I-Die
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7271
Joined: 2004-02-22 05:07am
Location: In your base, killing your d00ds...obviously

Post by 18-Till-I-Die »

Edward Yee wrote:
18-Till-I-Die wrote:Now here, i'm fairly hypocritical i must admit :oops: . On the one hand, yes i feel it betrays the ideals of the character to make him such a jingoistic, ultra-conservitive lapdog.
If compared to -616 Captain America, I would note that 616's seems to have had a lot more time to acclimatize to the changed moral/sociopolitical climate than Ult-Cap, regardless of how much Ult-Cap has developed, and that 616's Captain America was thawed out a lot closer to his own time than Ult-Cap.
Yeah but he seems, like most characters in the Ultimate universe, to be really seedy and ruthless. Thats kind of my main complaint about the whole Ultimate Marvel thing is that, besides just 'reimagining' the characters they said "Now remember...they have to be as intensely cynical and nearly-criminalistic as possible. And if anyone asks it's either 'gritty' or 'realistic' and say it 'mirrors a post 9/11 world'. Got that? Great, lets do this!"

Of course, while i say this, i've got like every issue of Ultimates so far, and several Ultimate X-Men too. Like i said, i'm a hypocrite. I do love how they handled the characters in a new way in terms of powers and how they use them. For example, Ultimate Cap is a significantly more superhuman 'brick' type, whereas his normal universe counterpart is a Batman-ish 'badass human' type of guy. I still have reservations about Cap using guns though, but at the same time i cant muster a whole lot of negitivity it was just a really well done series.
(I remember panels from his unfreezing issue where he noticed that some elements like women and cars were not so different.)
Well seeing as the basic design for women has remained pretty much constant since the dawn of man, i doubt he was expecting HUGE changes. :P
I'm not really sure what Matt Fraction said, or, to be honest, who that is.
He's the author of Punisher War Journal, and in this interview he gave his take on the Punisher-Captain America relationship, as well as stating that he intended to continue it. Based on that, I can see Steve Rogers (name used to distinguish from Castle's "Cap"), after somehow getting out of the Raft, being fucking PIIIIIIIIISSED when he finds out. :twisted:
Yeah...if Rogers is alive, of course. I've been unable to follow some of teh recent developments i dont know if that is a given anymore. All i know is Warbird says he is, and i dont trust someone who shills out to Iron Man the second the shit hits the fan. I would actually find it interesting if two Caps with opposing views were present at the same time.
(Btw, I don't have a problem with your ignoring; I admittedly do the same.)
Yeah, believe it or not though i used to pay heed to those "rockstar publishers" from the old Image days though. But that is in my past, i rarely even know who is writing what anymore. Call me disillusioned.
If somehow no writer could save a fundamentally flawed idea, then that would be the fault of this sudden deviation from what was the apparent original intent of the Punisher War Journal, as presented prior to Civil War #5: Specifically, that the Punisher was supposed to be essentially neutral about the SHRA and the Civil War -- until one side started using supervillains -- and would go after supervillains since the superheroes were fighting one another, upgrading accordingly. (For example, a longarm taken from a SHIELD armory to punched through the Rhino's armor and broke his horn... then I swear I saw him wearing a fucking pwnerfist.)
I can in my minds eye, see this working to a degree. But my fear is that "Capital Punisher" will turn into some kind of Protocide, like Venom is to Spiderman, and start just offing people. Not 'fear' perhaps, but i can see them going that route easily and it's kind of divergent from what people expect from Captain America.

A thought just now that I had, though unrelated -- the MAX version of the Punisher presents an interesting dichotomy in that to my knowledge, everyone who's targeted him has done so with "mind games."

(snip spoilers for space)[/quote]

See thats what i mean about some of these 'reimaginings' that Marvel has done. Thsi isnt the same as Ultimate Marvel but it hits on the general idea that, some people think if they make something 'dark' enough it somehow becomes more 'mature' and 'adult'. Me, that just kind of grosses me out. Desicration of bodies and such...i mean, Jesus Christ.
Kanye West Saves.

Image
User avatar
Lonestar
Keeper of the Schwartz
Posts: 13321
Joined: 2003-02-13 03:21pm
Location: The Bay Area

Post by Lonestar »

If we are to believe this week's New Avengers then Cap Really is dead, in fact they had a fake body set up to draw Spidey, Cage, Wolverine, Jessica Drew, etc into a trap
"The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles."
Edward Yee
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3395
Joined: 2005-07-31 06:48am

Post by Edward Yee »

18-Till-I-Die wrote:Yeah but he seems, like most characters in the Ultimate universe, to be really seedy and ruthless. Thats kind of my main complaint about the whole Ultimate Marvel thing is that, besides just 'reimagining' the characters they said "Now remember...they have to be as intensely cynical and nearly-criminalistic as possible. And if anyone asks it's either 'gritty' or 'realistic' and say it 'mirrors a post 9/11 world'. Got that? Great, lets do this!"
Makes sense for something to find distasteful.
Well seeing as the basic design for women has remained pretty much constant since the dawn of man, i doubt he was expecting HUGE changes. :P
And fortunately expectations he may have had clearly held up. :D
I can in my minds eye, see this working to a degree. But my fear is that "Capital Punisher" will turn into some kind of Protocide, like Venom is to Spiderman, and start just offing people. Not 'fear' perhaps, but i can see them going that route easily and it's kind of divergent from what people expect from Captain America.
If so, then that'd correlate with the problem of colliding two differently intended character concepts (in the post-Civil War context).
See thats what i mean about some of these 'reimaginings' that Marvel has done. Thsi isnt the same as Ultimate Marvel but it hits on the general idea that, some people think if they make something 'dark' enough it somehow becomes more 'mature' and 'adult'. Me, that just kind of grosses me out. Desicration of bodies and such...i mean, Jesus Christ.
MAX Punisher for me isn't more "mature/adult" to me simply for being "dark" and (sometimes) explicit; on the contrary, I feel that some of those are arguably elements of 616 that we don't see within the regular comics, and that MAX Punisher's focuses more on 'supporting' characters and the mental aspect (seeing as this Punisher is chronologically 57 -- going by The Tyger and an early cover to Punisher #44 -- and closer physically than his 616 counterpart) are what's gotten it over more with fans.

Apparently the author too is of the mind that you can't get the Punisher to act differently from "refit, reload, recon, ream, rinse/repeat" unless you throw a wrench in the works, and the ones that'd jam the gears will get you in worse shit than just being dead.
"Yee's proposal is exactly the sort of thing I would expect some Washington legal eagle to do. In fact, it could even be argued it would be unrealistic to not have a scene in the next book of, say, a Congressman Yee submit the Yee Act for consideration. :D" - bcoogler on this

"My crystal ball is filled with smoke, and my hovercraft is full of eels." - Bayonet

Stark: "You can't even GET to heaven. You don't even know where it is, or even if it still exists."
SirNitram: "So storm Hell." - From the legendary thread
User avatar
TheDarkling
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4768
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:34am

Post by TheDarkling »

Great guy that Tony Stark, weeps over the body of his dead friend then turns and around and thinks "now to use people's love of you and grief to crush them".


What a Prince.
User avatar
DPDarkPrimus
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 18399
Joined: 2002-11-22 11:02pm
Location: Iowa
Contact:

Post by DPDarkPrimus »

Lonestar wrote:If we are to believe this week's New Avengers then Cap Really is dead, in fact they had a fake body set up to draw Spidey, Cage, Wolverine, Jessica Drew, etc into a trap
Uhm, did you not read the dialog? Like where Wolverine says "snif, this isn't him"?

But he is dead. CW: The Confession Iron Man confesses to Cap's corpse sitting on a slab that all he feels the casualties of CW weren't worth it.
Mayabird is my girlfriend
Justice League:BotM:MM:SDnet City Watch:Cybertron's Finest
"Well then, science is bullshit. "
-revprez, with yet another brilliant rebuttal.
User avatar
KrauserKrauser
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2633
Joined: 2002-12-15 01:49am
Location: Richmond, VA

Post by KrauserKrauser »

See the perfect ending to that would Tony taking a gun and shooting himself.

Strike that...

Taking a gun that Punisher handed to him and THEN adding windows to his cranium.
VRWC : Justice League : SDN Weight Watchers : BOTM : Former AYVB

Resident Magic the Gathering Guru : Recovering MMORPG Addict
User avatar
Lonestar
Keeper of the Schwartz
Posts: 13321
Joined: 2003-02-13 03:21pm
Location: The Bay Area

Post by Lonestar »

DPDarkPrimus wrote:
Uhm, did you not read the dialog? Like where Wolverine says "snif, this isn't him"?

Yeah, I did. That was kinda the point of my statement. :P
"The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles."
Post Reply