I have a few questions about Phasers?
1)What is the diference between phasers and disruptors and what is their max power output known?
2)In ST2 the Enterprise and the Reliant fired pulsed phasers, then why didi starfleet considered the defiant pulse phasers a new technology?
3)If the phasers are matter dependent how do they affect shields?(EMP?)
Phasers...
Moderator: NecronLord
- Darth Phoenix
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 320
- Joined: 2002-09-24 01:34pm
Phasers...
-...and the entire room goes silent when one of the stormtroopers points to a stain in Darth Vaders cape. -
There is no peace, there is Anger;
There is no fear, there is Power.
There is no death, there is immortality;
There is no weakness, there is the Dark Side.
There is no peace, there is Anger;
There is no fear, there is Power.
There is no death, there is immortality;
There is no weakness, there is the Dark Side.
- His Divine Shadow
- Commence Primary Ignition
- Posts: 12791
- Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
- Location: Finland, west coast
Re: Phasers...
I believe the TM's say phasers use fast nadions and disruptors use slow nadions, whatever difference that makes then...Darth Phoenix wrote:1)What is the diference between phasers and disruptors and what is their max power output known?
Disruptors are more brute-force weapons too, while phasers are more delicate and many many small emitters can be linked in arrays, which is why there are no phaser turrets anymore on UFP ships.
with disruptors OTOH you cannot do this, you just build bigger and and stronger single emitters like you would build a bigger gun.
This gives disruptors a bigger punch than any phaser system IIRC and in contrast to phasers they can refire quicker because a phaser array very deflicate focusing system has to be re-callibrated or something after each shot.
They may havebeen more disruptor like in the old days, disruptors are more primitive in a way but more powerfull too.2)In ST2 the Enterprise and the Reliant fired pulsed phasers, then why didi starfleet considered the defiant pulse phasers a new technology?
The phaser system is more delicate and can be tuned and meddled with to your hearts content, perfect for those starfleet sissies.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
- His Divine Shadow
- Commence Primary Ignition
- Posts: 12791
- Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
- Location: Finland, west coast
The Defiant PPCs are of a different type of pulse weapon. If you watch DS9 The Maquis, you will also see another type of pulse phaser.
IMO the old pulse phasers were more or less like normal phasers, but they fired them in rapid pulses. Modern PPCs are fixed axis cannons. Furthermore, if the DS9 TM is to be trusted, modern PPC shots are layered with hundreds if not thousands of different frequencies for the shot. In other words, that entire pulse contains information from the entire spectrum, for the most part. But you have to remember what PPCs were originally designed to fight. Borg ships that adapt to frequencies. So PPCs are designed so that the Borg can't fully adapt and that some of the Pulse might be stopped, but not all of it.
IMO the old pulse phasers were more or less like normal phasers, but they fired them in rapid pulses. Modern PPCs are fixed axis cannons. Furthermore, if the DS9 TM is to be trusted, modern PPC shots are layered with hundreds if not thousands of different frequencies for the shot. In other words, that entire pulse contains information from the entire spectrum, for the most part. But you have to remember what PPCs were originally designed to fight. Borg ships that adapt to frequencies. So PPCs are designed so that the Borg can't fully adapt and that some of the Pulse might be stopped, but not all of it.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
Slightly off-topic I know, but since you're a ST fan, thought I'd ask. Do you stand with the claims of the Connie crowd that claims fantasic numbers for the Connie ships, making them infinitely more powerful than TNG Galaxy-class ships?Alyeska wrote:The Defiant PPCs are of a different type of pulse weapon. If you watch DS9 The Maquis, you will also see another type of pulse phaser.
IMO the old pulse phasers were more or less like normal phasers, but they fired them in rapid pulses. Modern PPCs are fixed axis cannons. Furthermore, if the DS9 TM is to be trusted, modern PPC shots are layered with hundreds if not thousands of different frequencies for the shot. In other words, that entire pulse contains information from the entire spectrum, for the most part. But you have to remember what PPCs were originally designed to fight. Borg ships that adapt to frequencies. So PPCs are designed so that the Borg can't fully adapt and that some of the Pulse might be stopped, but not all of it.
- Kamakazie Sith
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7555
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:00pm
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Ya know when that first started it was simply a joke, but now some people appear to have taken it much farther.jegs2 wrote:Slightly off-topic I know, but since you're a ST fan, thought I'd ask. Do you stand with the claims of the Connie crowd that claims fantasic numbers for the Connie ships, making them infinitely more powerful than TNG Galaxy-class ships?Alyeska wrote:The Defiant PPCs are of a different type of pulse weapon. If you watch DS9 The Maquis, you will also see another type of pulse phaser.
IMO the old pulse phasers were more or less like normal phasers, but they fired them in rapid pulses. Modern PPCs are fixed axis cannons. Furthermore, if the DS9 TM is to be trusted, modern PPC shots are layered with hundreds if not thousands of different frequencies for the shot. In other words, that entire pulse contains information from the entire spectrum, for the most part. But you have to remember what PPCs were originally designed to fight. Borg ships that adapt to frequencies. So PPCs are designed so that the Borg can't fully adapt and that some of the Pulse might be stopped, but not all of it.
- His Divine Shadow
- Commence Primary Ignition
- Posts: 12791
- Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
- Location: Finland, west coast
There are a variety of lines of thought in that area. Prior to ICS and all that you had two groups. Those who saw TOS as seperate from the rest of ST, those who saw TOS as part of ST and new canon over rides old canon.jegs2 wrote:Slightly off-topic I know, but since you're a ST fan, thought I'd ask. Do you stand with the claims of the Connie crowd that claims fantasic numbers for the Connie ships, making them infinitely more powerful than TNG Galaxy-class ships?Alyeska wrote:The Defiant PPCs are of a different type of pulse weapon. If you watch DS9 The Maquis, you will also see another type of pulse phaser.
IMO the old pulse phasers were more or less like normal phasers, but they fired them in rapid pulses. Modern PPCs are fixed axis cannons. Furthermore, if the DS9 TM is to be trusted, modern PPC shots are layered with hundreds if not thousands of different frequencies for the shot. In other words, that entire pulse contains information from the entire spectrum, for the most part. But you have to remember what PPCs were originally designed to fight. Borg ships that adapt to frequencies. So PPCs are designed so that the Borg can't fully adapt and that some of the Pulse might be stopped, but not all of it.
So if you had a debate, at that time, it depended on the rules you gave. If you forcably made TOS as part of the rest of ST, then TOS is weaker then ST and newer canon prevented older canon from taking flight. If you seperated TOS from the rest of ST, then any calcs you can find limited to TOS only are acceptable.
IMO, there is evidence that TOS era ships have greater firepower and damage taking capabilities then TNG, but not by the vast degrees that some people like to pretend.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."