Iraq vs. Federation Earth

SF: discuss futuristic sci-fi series, ideas, and crossovers.

Moderator: NecronLord

User avatar
Grand Admiral Thrawn
Ruthless Imperial Tyrant
Posts: 5755
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:11pm
Location: Canada

Post by Grand Admiral Thrawn »

Pcm979 wrote:Vulcan becomes the 'seat' of the Federation because Earth is a nuclear wasteland.[/color]

Nuclear wasteland? WTF? At best, Iraq has a few mid range kiloton nukes with short range missles.


I mean, if all else fails, the E-D could simply pound Iraq into the ground.
"You know, I was God once."
"Yes, I saw. You were doing well, until everyone died."
Bender and God, Futurama
User avatar
The Duchess of Zeon
Gözde
Posts: 14566
Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.

Post by The Duchess of Zeon »

Shadow wrote:
They've beamed up 400Tonnes of water (ST:IV) ok actually that was a Kling BoP, and though there is a major case for technological regression since then, I'd say that they probably still can. They can beam shuttles, Deja Q, ST:X
What technological regression? Do you believe in the "Cult of the Connie" nonsnse from Spacebattles? If so, you should note that the Enterprise was threatened by a 1960's nuke from an airplane, probably in the kilton range.
F-104 Starfighter wasn't equipped to carry nuclear missiles or rockets as part of its standard loadout. The largest air-to-air nuclear missile or rocket in terms of yield the USA fielded, however, was a mere 1.5 kT device, and six of them theoretically might have been carried by a Starfighter. Maybe.

So, six 1.5 kT nuclear warheads could threaten the Enterprise Zilch. Wow.
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.

In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
User avatar
seanrobertson
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2145
Joined: 2002-07-12 05:57pm

Post by seanrobertson »

Darth Garden Gnome wrote:Three letters: NBC! Whats the worst thing that has ever happened to Earth in Treks time? The Breen bombing maybe (even though the Feds saw them coming days in advance :roll: ), and that's just a sample of the stuff that'd be raining down on them IF they decided to go to war with Iraq.
Which has no intercontinental ballistic missile capabilities. They'd
be limited to striking only their immediate area. One starship could
easily destroy them all from orbit in a few minutes, at most.

And what's this about knowing the Breen were coming in
advance? The Breen have *cloaking devices*! I know
this is mentioned at least once on TNG (the episode with the
little kid that emulates Data might be the one I'm thinking of;
I'll hunt for a quote).
If they decided to go into negotiations, Iraq would bide their time, maybe secure this furture tech from the Roms, Klings, or just the Feds own black market (I'm assuming such a thing exsists). And then strike in full fury, a combo fo Trek modern day stuff, adn good 'ol fashioned chem/bio warfare.
Err...how are the Romulans going to sneak onto Earth to sell
them stuff? And why would the Klingons do such a thing? They're
rebuilding their fleet and have a Federation-friendly Chancellor.
Losing the Federation--which siding with the Iraqis would cause--would
open the Empire up to threats from the Breen and Romulans, both
of whom didn't suffer as much as did the Klingons from the Dominion
War. (Entering late and not being wreckless are sometimes good
things. On the former count, ask Stalin in his "campaign" against
Japan :) .)

What could they do with what they obtain, anyway? Say they
got a photorp. How are they going to launch it? If they manage
to arm it and even launch it, that's hardly a war-winning device,
even if you regarded the torpedo as a mid-ranged megaton
device.
Still, I'd give the Feds astounding complete ability to act in these situations a backseat. I'd say 50/50 on the outcome.
Since the Iraqis are free to act however they apparently like in this
scenario (which I would argue is unrealistic, though Hussein has
proven himself to be a royal son of a bitch in his Kurd massacre),
so, too, should the Federation. To treat one in a manner for
which we have precedent requires that we do the same for the
other side IMO.

That makes this incomprehensibly easy. One starship launches
a full spread of photon torpedoes on the Iraqis. End of story...
whoever's left will promptly surrender to Federation reporters and
camera crews like the bunch of pussies they are.
Pain, or damage, don't end the world, or despair, or fuckin' beatin's. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, ya got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man ... and give some back.
-Al Swearengen

Cry woe, destruction, ruin and decay: The worst is death, and death will have his day.
-Ole' Shakey's "Richard II," Act III, scene ii.
Image
Pcm979
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 4092
Joined: 2002-10-26 12:45am

Post by Pcm979 »

Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote:
Pcm979 wrote:Vulcan becomes the 'seat' of the Federation because Earth is a nuclear wasteland.[/color]

Nuclear wasteland? WTF? At best, Iraq has a few mid range kiloton nukes with short range missles.


I mean, if all else fails, the E-D could simply pound Iraq into the ground.
It's a dream I have......
User avatar
The Dark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7378
Joined: 2002-10-31 10:28pm
Location: Promoting ornithological awareness

Post by The Dark »

The Duchess of Zeon wrote:
F-104 Starfighter wasn't equipped to carry nuclear missiles or rockets as part of its standard loadout. The largest air-to-air nuclear missile or rocket in terms of yield the USA fielded, however, was a mere 1.5 kT device, and six of them theoretically might have been carried by a Starfighter. Maybe.

So, six 1.5 kT nuclear warheads could threaten the Enterprise Zilch. Wow.
True, it was the F-89 that fired the one and only live-fire AIR-2A Genie nuclear rocket. There's no way a Starfighter could carry them, though. Not enough carrying ability. F-100, OTOH, could probably replace its Bulldogs with Genies and carry 2. By the 1960s the USAF also had the F-106, designed to carry the Genie.
Stanley Hauerwas wrote:[W]hy is it that no one is angry at the inequality of income in this country? I mean, the inequality of income is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Why isn’t that ever an issue of politics? Because you don’t live in a democracy. You live in a plutocracy. Money rules.
BattleTech for SilCore
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Uraniun235 wrote:No, silly, the Iraqis will weld electrical transformers to their tanks, preventing beam-up!
Actually, most internal-combustion engines already contain a transformer. Does it ever occur to you that you NEED a step-up transformer to go from a 12V battery to a 12000V potential across a spark plug? I'm still not seeing justification for the assumption that they can transport a tank, although I'll grant that I forgot about Scotty tweaking the system to beam up the whales in ST6.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Howedar »

Again, nearly all tanks (and all of Iraq's) are powered by diesel engines, which lack ignition coils.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
Post Reply