Deep Impact scenario

SF: discuss futuristic sci-fi series, ideas, and crossovers.

Moderator: NecronLord

User avatar
OmegaChief
Jedi Knight
Posts: 904
Joined: 2009-07-22 11:37am
Location: Rainy Suburb, Northern England
Contact:

Re: Deep Impact scenario

Post by OmegaChief »

Adam, this may be me misinterpriting my post here, but are you suggesting using Orion propulsion rockets to move things into orbit from the surface?

As great as an Orion would be in space, using it as a surface to orbit launch platform just is not a good idea, what with the massive collateral damage such a launch would create.

Not to mention that inside an atmosphere nukes have a much greter damage potential, what with the blastwave and superheated atmosphere and all.
This odyssey, this, exodus. Do we journey toward the promised land, or into the valley of the kings? Three decades ago I envisioned a new future for our species, and now that we are on the brink of realizing my dream, I feel only solitude, and regret. Has my entire life's work been a fool's crusade? Have I led my people into this desert, only to die?
-Admiral Aken Bosch, Supreme Commander of the Neo-Terran Front, NTF Iceni, 2367
Samuel
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4750
Joined: 2008-10-23 11:36am

Re: Deep Impact scenario

Post by Samuel »

Yep. They work best as heavy lifter to get as much into orbit as possible. As for collateral damage, that is what the ocean is for!
User avatar
Temujin
Jedi Master
Posts: 1300
Joined: 2010-03-28 07:08pm
Location: Occupying Wall Street (In Spirit)

Re: Deep Impact scenario

Post by Temujin »

There are some ideas on how to mitigate that problem. Link from Atomic Rockets.
Image
Mr. Harley: Your impatience is quite understandable.
Klaatu: I'm impatient with stupidity. My people have learned to live without it.
Mr. Harley: I'm afraid my people haven't. I'm very sorry... I wish it were otherwise.

"I do know that for the sympathy of one living being, I would make peace with all. I have love in me the likes of which you can scarcely imagine and rage the likes of which you would not believe.
If I cannot satisfy the one, I will indulge the other." – Frankenstein's Creature on the glacier[/size]
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Re: Deep Impact scenario

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Five years is not a enough to build an Orion craft, or any other nuclear powered spacecraft. Way too many engineering challenges need to be overcome to make any of that stuff work with any useful reliability, and you can't build it before you know how to build it. The shock absorbers required for Orion may not be possible at all for example, and you'd need one hell of a control system to hold it stable while it rides the shock wave. The only realistic option I can see would be a 'big dumb booster' kind of setup in which we rush to mass produce known rocket technology to get as many nukes on target as we can. Like we take our largest launchers now, and strap on a dozen shuttle solid rocket boosters on top of it all. Luckily 5 years would be more then enough to build a bunch of new very high yield nukes for the job. A string of nuclear weapons aimed at the same point over time would at least have a chance of diverting a comet that huge.

5 years is also way more realistic for creating deep underground shelters that could protect both a secure gene pool worth of population, and enough machinery and key raw materials to ensure that when they come back out they can reestablish a basic industrial economy, instead of living medieval peasants. Doing that in 2 years as in the movie isn't totally out of reason (minus the secret part... yeah right) but it would be very hard.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
Sky Captain
Jedi Master
Posts: 1267
Joined: 2008-11-14 12:47pm
Location: Latvia

Re: Deep Impact scenario

Post by Sky Captain »

Another advantage of using nukes to deflect asteorid is that you don't need to match velocities with impactor which in case of a long period comet falling into sun's gravity well would be very fuel intensive/impossible with off the shelf rocket technology. A nuke just needs to pass at what standoff distance is most optimal and blow up at right point. The fact that nuke and comet may have 20+ km/s relative velocity shouldn't affect things too much.
Post Reply