10,000 Daleks vs. Skynet

SF: discuss futuristic sci-fi series, ideas, and crossovers.

Moderator: NecronLord

User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: 10,000 Daleks vs. Skynet

Post by Stark »

ChosenOne54 wrote:You know, I thought it would be balanced by the fact that Skynet pretty much have control over the entire world
Oh really? Since when? I guess it controls the whole world, but everything important is within walking distance of LA because... AI!
ChosenOne54 wrote:I believe somebody over at spacebattles did some calcs, based on how much power the lone Dalek drained in 'Dalek.'
Are they as big an idiot as you? Or did they just childishly use a display they don't understand to generate ludicrous numbers that don't mean anything?

Since you basically admit you're just making these threads for no-numbers 'gee whiz those Daleks I like sure are tough against these nobody morons with 20th century technology, hoo boy', I'm glad everyone else has noticed.
ChosenOne54
Padawan Learner
Posts: 287
Joined: 2011-05-29 10:45am

Re: 10,000 Daleks vs. Skynet

Post by ChosenOne54 »

Stark wrote:Oh really? Since when? I guess it controls the whole world, but everything important is within walking distance of LA because... AI!
At the end of T3, John Conner specifically mentions that Skynet was 'software,' downloaded all over the world, and had no central core.

"By the time Skynet became self-aware, it had spread into millions of computer servers across the planet. Ordinary computers in office buildings, dorm rooms, everywhere. It was software in cyberspace. There was no system core."
ChosenOne54 wrote: Since you basically admit you're just making these threads for no-numbers 'gee whiz those Daleks I like sure are tough against these nobody morons with 20th century technology, hoo boy', I'm glad everyone else has noticed.
No, you see there's also the fact that Skynet has shit like T-Xs, Harvesters, and H-Ks, which I thought would balance it out fairly well, as the Daleks in this match have no heavy weapon support, spaceships or the like. :P
evilsoup wrote:ChosenOne,Why must you have such horrible poetry as your sig? Also, you'll spoil that episode for anyone who hasn't seen it.
You're not worthy. :mrgreen:
Crazedwraith
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11950
Joined: 2003-04-10 03:45pm
Location: Cheshire, England

Re: 10,000 Daleks vs. Skynet

Post by Crazedwraith »

ChosenOne, do you feel like maybe actually addressing the counter-points made in this thread at all? I can include pretty pictures if you like:

Here this is what's known as Submarine;

Image

And this is an 'Aerial Hunter-Killer';
Image

This is the latter firing on the former...
Image

The plasma bolt in flight...
Image

IMPACT!
Image

And the end result
Image

Oops! No more sub.
JointStrikeFighter
Worthless Trolling Palm-Fucker
Posts: 1979
Joined: 2004-06-12 03:09am
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: 10,000 Daleks vs. Skynet

Post by JointStrikeFighter »

CLEARLY VAPORISED
Crazedwraith
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11950
Joined: 2003-04-10 03:45pm
Location: Cheshire, England

Re: 10,000 Daleks vs. Skynet

Post by Crazedwraith »

Well I can see air bubbles! That's the vapour right there!
ChosenOne54
Padawan Learner
Posts: 287
Joined: 2011-05-29 10:45am

Re: 10,000 Daleks vs. Skynet

Post by ChosenOne54 »

Crazedwraith wrote:ChosenOne, do you feel like maybe actually addressing the counter-points made in this thread at all?
I wasn't disputing your argument. I posted this thread to see who would win.
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: 10,000 Daleks vs. Skynet

Post by Stark »

You mean you made it to repeat amazingly stupid analysis done by others? :lol:

The idea that the T-X would be effective against the Daleks when we've previously heard that the Galactic Empire wouldn't is the best joke of the day.

BTW a botnet != Skynet controls the world. Why, indeed, would it want to, when it blew most of it up? You'd think it'd have less slave problems in this case.
User avatar
Purple
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5233
Joined: 2010-04-20 08:31am
Location: In a purple cube orbiting this planet. Hijacking satellites for an internet connection.

Re: 10,000 Daleks vs. Skynet

Post by Purple »

That whole submarine going off thou is clearly a chain reaction. You can see a small explosion in one image and than the whole sub going up in flames in the next. My bet would be that the shot hit the torpedo bay.
It has become clear to me in the previous days that any attempts at reconciliation and explanation with the community here has failed. I have tried my best. I really have. I pored my heart out trying. But it was all for nothing.

You win. There, I have said it.

Now there is only one thing left to do. Let us see if I can sum up the strength needed to end things once and for all.
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: 10,000 Daleks vs. Skynet

Post by Stark »

It's almost like watching energy weapons hit a military target and causing a huge explosion isn't a rational way of determining 'power levels'!

That said, their silly pew pew hit it under the water apparently, which is pretty neat.
inviz345
Youngling
Posts: 58
Joined: 2010-10-04 06:35pm

Re: 10,000 Daleks vs. Skynet

Post by inviz345 »

Daleks can adept to energy weapons it said casing impaired adept to weaponry then later it said Daleks restored to full power the weapons was then were useless. dalek gun works perfectly against the Cybermen so it would against Terminators.

Doctor Who - Doomsday Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnoNb_QAxrU

Daleks VS Cybermen and Torchwood
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MA6HFSFC ... re=related
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Re: 10,000 Daleks vs. Skynet

Post by NecronLord »

Purple wrote:That whole submarine going off thou is clearly a chain reaction. You can see a small explosion in one image and than the whole sub going up in flames in the next. My bet would be that the shot hit the torpedo bay.
You're quite right. Those are secondary explosions; You actually see them if you watch the film.

This, though, is the impact.

Image

Certainly impressive in and of itself.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Purple
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5233
Joined: 2010-04-20 08:31am
Location: In a purple cube orbiting this planet. Hijacking satellites for an internet connection.

Re: 10,000 Daleks vs. Skynet

Post by Purple »

Not really. Think about it, a sub is just a very thin pressure vessel with all the air from the inside just waiting to fly out. And that is exactly what you see here. The sub is breaking at joints and the air is bursting out. That image there might as well have been from a normal dept charge.
It has become clear to me in the previous days that any attempts at reconciliation and explanation with the community here has failed. I have tried my best. I really have. I pored my heart out trying. But it was all for nothing.

You win. There, I have said it.

Now there is only one thing left to do. Let us see if I can sum up the strength needed to end things once and for all.
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Re: 10,000 Daleks vs. Skynet

Post by NecronLord »

Purple wrote:Not really. Think about it, a sub is just a very thin pressure vessel with all the air from the inside just waiting to fly out. And that is exactly what you see here. The sub is breaking at joints and the air is bursting out. That image there might as well have been from a normal dept charge.
And people are going all gooey over daleks who require four of them to gut a house, and can shoot down planes. These things are considerably easier.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Shroom Man 777
FUCKING DICK-STABBER!
Posts: 21222
Joined: 2003-05-11 08:39am
Location: Bleeding breasts and stabbing dicks since 2003
Contact:

Re: 10,000 Daleks vs. Skynet

Post by Shroom Man 777 »

Thin pressure vessel? Aren't submarine hulls rather tough? Not to mention, the energy bolt has to go through an unspecified depth of water.
Image "DO YOU WORSHIP HOMOSEXUALS?" - Curtis Saxton (source)
shroom is a lovely boy and i wont hear a bad word against him - LUSY-CHAN!
Shit! Man, I didn't think of that! It took Shroom to properly interpret the screams of dying people :D - PeZook
Shroom, I read out the stuff you write about us. You are an endless supply of morale down here. :p - an OWS street medic
Pink Sugar Heart Attack!
ChosenOne54
Padawan Learner
Posts: 287
Joined: 2011-05-29 10:45am

Re: 10,000 Daleks vs. Skynet

Post by ChosenOne54 »

Stark wrote:The idea that the T-X would be effective against the Daleks when we've previously heard that the Galactic Empire wouldn't is the best joke of the day.
I generally agree, but the logic you just used is terribad.
BTW a botnet != Skynet controls the world. Why, indeed, would it want to, when it blew most of it up? You'd think it'd have less slave problems in this case.
From Terminator: Salvation, I got the impression the war was going on all over the world.
ChosenOne54
Padawan Learner
Posts: 287
Joined: 2011-05-29 10:45am

Re: 10,000 Daleks vs. Skynet

Post by ChosenOne54 »

Just to expand on my previous post:
Terminator Salvation Ending wrote:There is a storm on the horizon. A time of hardship and pain. The battle has been won, but the war against machines rages on. Skynet's global network remains strong, but we will not quit, until all of it's destroyed. This is John Connor. There is no fate but what we make. -John Connor
Post Reply