ECR has a point about the split between
homo sapiens and
homo custodis; as I said, "and for the sake of the human future you'd need to be careful to make sure there were still useful roles properly occupied by highly talented members of
sapiens instead of
custodis." Which isn't the sum total of the matter, but is at least part of it.
And, yes, Plato. There's a reason I chose the Latin for "guardian" for the name of the psychic protector-race...
Seriously, it's as good a description of what the Emperor might want to do to make humanity safe from Chaos over the next several millenia as anything else I can come up with. I agree, in the extreme long run the sensible goal would be to uplift
sapiens to the point of being peers of
custodis, if not in raw power then at least in terms of being able to cope with the same reality. But in the 30th millenium, that is still a long way down the road, and you need defenses and a plan for organizing them
now.
lordofchange13 wrote:Simon_Jester wrote:Where do you think the Navigators and the Astartes came from?
They were created during the Dark Age of Technology.
The Navigators yes, the Astartes no- the Emperor made them, and the Primarchs from whose templates they sprang... and the Primarchs represent a level of genetic modification against which any other feat of bio-engineering in the 40k setting pales by comparison, with the possible exception of whoever made the Tyranids.
The Primarchs were just clones of the Emperor that came out wrong. He and his scientists don't necessarily have to have the tech to alter humans to such a high degree as removing their Warp potency.
I do not believe this to be the case. I don't think the Emperor consciously cloned himself- there was, from everything I've heard, conscious genetic engineering involved even if the Emperor laced the clones with bits of his own genome.