X-Men's Apocalypse In A Sci Fi Setting

SF: discuss futuristic sci-fi series, ideas, and crossovers.

Moderator: NecronLord

User avatar
Ahriman238
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4854
Joined: 2011-04-22 11:04pm
Location: Ocularis Terribus.

Re: X-Men's Apocalypse In A Sci Fi Setting

Post by Ahriman238 »

Invincible, Apocalypse is not. He's been killed at least 3 times to my knowledge, by Magneto in AoA, by Cable in the distant future, and by a possessed Cyclops (it's a really long story.)

He is almost obscenely powerful on a personal level, but depends too much on his technology and his minions too not be severly weakend without them. I'm not sure how much of the Celestials' hardware he really has access to, but his medical technology and knowledge is considered extremely advanced for the Marvel universe. He was able to give Angel hollow metal prosthetics that regenerated his actual wings over time, for example.
"Any plan which requires the direct intervention of any deity to work can be assumed to be a very poor one."- Newbiespud
MrDakka
Padawan Learner
Posts: 271
Joined: 2011-07-20 07:56am
Location: Tatooine

Re: X-Men's Apocalypse In A Sci Fi Setting

Post by MrDakka »

Ahriman238 wrote:Invincible, Apocalypse is not. He's been killed [..] by a possessed Cyclops (it's a really long story.)
Which arc was that?
Needs moar dakka
User avatar
Cykeisme
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2416
Joined: 2004-12-25 01:47pm
Contact:

Re: X-Men's Apocalypse In A Sci Fi Setting

Post by Cykeisme »

jollyreaper wrote:But you are correct that the radically different power levels make comic team-ups implausible. With the Avengers movie, I can buy Iron Man, Hulk, and Thor being on the same team. They're powerful guys. Captain America doesn't seem to be operating at that kind of level. Black Widow, is she supposed to be super-powered or a Charles Atlas hero? I know the archer guy is just supposed to be really good at shooting arrows. Shit, at least the Widow is using a 20th century weapon! I mean shit, would it sound stupid to have a "Greatest American Air Force Team!" where you have an F-22, F-15, F-16 and, oh, say a P-51 as a super sentai group? Sounds absurd. The P-51 would be hard-pressed against Vietnam-era MiG relics, let alone anything from the late 20th century.
Just pointing out, the souped-up (but not yet Abominable) Blonsky that Movie Hulk fought on the college campus was a watered-down version of Move Captain America. So even full-on Movie Cap may not be as strong as Movie Hulk, but they might be in the same league (or at least within a league of each other :D ).

It was discussed here:
++http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic. ... &start=100

Okay, sorry to take the derailment train for a spin, back to regularly scheduled programming.
"..history has shown the best defense against heavy cavalry are pikemen, so aircraft should mount lances on their noses and fly in tight squares to fend off bombers". - RedImperator

"ha ha, raping puppies is FUN!" - Johonebesus

"It would just be Unicron with pew pew instead of nom nom". - Vendetta, explaining his justified disinterest in the idea of the movie Allspark affecting the Death Star
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: X-Men's Apocalypse In A Sci Fi Setting

Post by Simon_Jester »

It depends on the premise of the teamup. Is it really all about sending the same group of guys to deal with all situations? In that case, they need roughly equivalent resources and power to accomplish anything, as you say. Or is it about making sure the group always has the right skill sets to handle a problem? Because in that case, it makes more sense to team up, say, Superman and Batman.

Any problem that can be solved by punching it, Superman can probably solve- but even if he's not stupid or ignorant, he's not qualified to solve a lot of scientific or technical problems. Teaming him up with people who know how to handle things like that complements his strength with a different strength.

Likewise, Black Widow makes some sense teamed up with someone like the Thor, not because she can fight him, but because she can do things he isn't good at. An archer guy makes less sense, since his schtick is all about fighting and he's not good enough as a fighter to keep up.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
Ahriman238
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4854
Joined: 2011-04-22 11:04pm
Location: Ocularis Terribus.

Re: X-Men's Apocalypse In A Sci Fi Setting

Post by Ahriman238 »

MrDakka wrote:
Ahriman238 wrote:Invincible, Apocalypse is not. He's been killed [..] by a possessed Cyclops (it's a really long story.)
Which arc was that?
The Twelve. Apocalypse as discussed above stole the powers of the 12 most powerful mutants (including Scott's) to give him the power needed to overcome X-Man (Scott and Jean's son from an alternate universe, and maybe the most powerful psychic in the series) in a battle of wills and possess him, so Apocalypse could live forever with far greater powers. However, Scott took Nate's place in the high-tech ritual circle thing and got possessed by Apocalypse instead. Then he committed suicide to take Apocalypse with him.

I'd say it all made more sense in context, but it didn't. It really didn't.
Simon_Jester wrote:It depends on the premise of the teamup. Is it really all about sending the same group of guys to deal with all situations? In that case, they need roughly equivalent resources and power to accomplish anything, as you say. Or is it about making sure the group always has the right skill sets to handle a problem? Because in that case, it makes more sense to team up, say, Superman and Batman.

Any problem that can be solved by punching it, Superman can probably solve- but even if he's not stupid or ignorant, he's not qualified to solve a lot of scientific or technical problems. Teaming him up with people who know how to handle things like that complements his strength with a different strength.

Likewise, Black Widow makes some sense teamed up with someone like the Thor, not because she can fight him, but because she can do things he isn't good at. An archer guy makes less sense, since his schtick is all about fighting and he's not good enough as a fighter to keep up.
This. One of the few things Civil War got right was a scene where Tony and Carol are discussing the new Avengers lineup. Carol asks why they don't just grab 8 or 9 of the most powerful superhumans available and call it a day. Tony rebukes her, saying that the avengers were more than just Thor or Tony's backup, they a meeting of vastly different skills and mindsets, and thus had the flexibility to deal with any challenge.
"Any plan which requires the direct intervention of any deity to work can be assumed to be a very poor one."- Newbiespud
User avatar
Solauren
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10386
Joined: 2003-05-11 09:41pm

Re: X-Men's Apocalypse In A Sci Fi Setting

Post by Solauren »

I'm still waiting for proof that apocalypse can sense a transporter beam activating on him and somehow alter his molecules to prevent demolecularization.
I've been asked why I still follow a few of the people I know on Facebook with 'interesting political habits and view points'.

It's so when they comment on or approve of something, I know what pages to block/what not to vote for.
Demiurgas
Padawan Learner
Posts: 178
Joined: 2010-06-16 06:57pm

Re: X-Men's Apocalypse In A Sci Fi Setting

Post by Demiurgas »

Solauren wrote:I'm still waiting for proof that apocalypse can sense a transporter beam activating on him and somehow alter his molecules to prevent demolecularization.
Maybe he can't, but he does possess very strong psionic powers he could probably sense it.
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16431
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: X-Men's Apocalypse In A Sci Fi Setting

Post by Batman »

Demiurgas wrote:
Solauren wrote:I'm still waiting for proof that apocalypse can sense a transporter beam activating on him and somehow alter his molecules to prevent demolecularization.
Maybe he can't, but he does possess very strong psionic powers he could probably sense it.
Based on what? Strong psionic powers means...nothing much, actually. At best it says that whatever psionic powers he has are strong. Him being, say, a strong telepath or telekinetic or mind-bender or anything else doesn't necessarily mean he'd know he's about to be beamed up. Now I don't know much about Apocalypse so it's entirely possible he has displayed this ability at some point in time, but just because he has 'very strong psionic powers' isn't any reason to assume he could.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
Demiurgas
Padawan Learner
Posts: 178
Joined: 2010-06-16 06:57pm

Re: X-Men's Apocalypse In A Sci Fi Setting

Post by Demiurgas »

Well like I said, I conceeded that I could be wrong. I just think it 'might" not work either.
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: X-Men's Apocalypse In A Sci Fi Setting

Post by Simon_Jester »

Put it this way, Demi.

Is there any reason whatsoever to think that this guy has any ability whatsoever to resist teleportation? It's not like that's a normal ability. We might infer from "he's bulletproof" that he's also laserproof within reason. We might infer from knowing that his arms are very strong that his legs are also very strong. We might infer that because he can see Invisible Mutant Chick, he can also see Guy With Cloaking Device or whatever.

But what possible basis do we have for saying he's teleport-proof?
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
Demiurgas
Padawan Learner
Posts: 178
Joined: 2010-06-16 06:57pm

Re: X-Men's Apocalypse In A Sci Fi Setting

Post by Demiurgas »

He has superior healing regeneration. Better than Wolverine's. How much more better is the question.
lance
Jedi Master
Posts: 1296
Joined: 2002-11-07 11:15pm
Location: 'stee

Re: X-Men's Apocalypse In A Sci Fi Setting

Post by lance »

Can he project a field or turn himself into different materials like those that caused teleporter problems in teleporter problem of the season eps?
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: X-Men's Apocalypse In A Sci Fi Setting

Post by Simon_Jester »

Demiurgas wrote:He has superior healing regeneration. Better than Wolverine's. How much more better is the question.
Why would being very good at regeneration have anything to do with teleportation?
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
Demiurgas
Padawan Learner
Posts: 178
Joined: 2010-06-16 06:57pm

Re: X-Men's Apocalypse In A Sci Fi Setting

Post by Demiurgas »

I already mentioned Apocalypse has total molecular control over his body.
Healing regeneration occurs BECAUSE of his molecular control over his body.
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: X-Men's Apocalypse In A Sci Fi Setting

Post by Simon_Jester »

So, why would molecular control have anything to do with teleportation?

Does his molecular control make him immune to being picked up and thrown, a la "go be invulnerable in Jersey?" If I put him in a moving vehicle against his will, can he use "molecular control" to prevent himself from moving, and rip out through the back of the vehicle without having to do anything or strike at the vehicle with his own strength?

If not, why the hell would this affect him being teleported? Does molecular control stop someone from just picking up all his molecules at once and shoving them somewhere else?
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
mr friendly guy
The Doctor
Posts: 11235
Joined: 2004-12-12 10:55pm
Location: In a 1960s police telephone box somewhere in Australia

Re: X-Men's Apocalypse In A Sci Fi Setting

Post by mr friendly guy »

Molecular control in comics usually means some form of shapeshifting and also resistance to injury. For examples the Eternals could reform after being disintegrated, eg Avengers vol 1 ?#310. However all this means is that you need a powerful enough attack which can disrupt their molecular control. For example the Deviants used a type of disentegrator against the Eternals, it disentegrated Sersi's arm eg Avengers vol 1 ?#370. However since her brain was still intact, when she recovered she just recreated her arm with her ability to maintain molecular control over her own molecules.

If teleportation works by "breaking down" you molecules and reassembling them, theoretically someone with molecular control could resist. Whether they can resist successfully however is another matter.
Never apologise for being a geek, because they won't apologise to you for being an arsehole. John Barrowman - 22 June 2014 Perth Supernova.

Countries I have been to - 14.
Australia, Canada, China, Colombia, Denmark, Ecuador, Finland, Germany, Malaysia, Netherlands, Norway, Singapore, Sweden, USA.
Always on the lookout for more nice places to visit.
Demiurgas
Padawan Learner
Posts: 178
Joined: 2010-06-16 06:57pm

Re: X-Men's Apocalypse In A Sci Fi Setting

Post by Demiurgas »

mr friendly guy wrote:Molecular control in comics usually means some form of shapeshifting and also resistance to injury. For examples the Eternals could reform after being disintegrated, eg Avengers vol 1 ?#310. However all this means is that you need a powerful enough attack which can disrupt their molecular control. For example the Deviants used a type of disentegrator against the Eternals, it disentegrated Sersi's arm eg Avengers vol 1 ?#370. However since her brain was still intact, when she recovered she just recreated her arm with her ability to maintain molecular control over her own molecules.

If teleportation works by "breaking down" you molecules and reassembling them, theoretically someone with molecular control could resist. Whether they can resist successfully however is another matter.
^
This
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: X-Men's Apocalypse In A Sci Fi Setting

Post by Simon_Jester »

Well, what does it mean to say that it works by breaking down your molecules? Is it physically separating your molecules and reassembling them elsewhere? If so, then resisting it might actually be a bad idea, sort of like trying to stop your car from skidding by turning the steering wheel against the direction of the skid.

That would be hilarious- this superpowerful mutant receives a benign offer of transport off the planet in a Star Trek teleporter, he accepts, someone beams him up- and his own attempt to resist being beamed up accidentally scatters his molecules across half the world. :D

And what if it's simply grabbing your molecules and moving them through some higher dimensional space? Maybe teleportation is in that regard no different from being picked up bodily and thrown to another place. In which case you couldn't really resist it, at least not by those means.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
PhilosopherOfSorts
Jedi Master
Posts: 1008
Joined: 2008-10-28 07:11pm
Location: Waynesburg, PA, its small, its insignifigant, its almost West Virginia.

Re: X-Men's Apocalypse In A Sci Fi Setting

Post by PhilosopherOfSorts »

You know, I'm pretty sure Apocalypse has been teleported against his will before, during the "X-cutioner's Song" arc, back in the early 90's.
A fuse is a physical embodyment of zen, in order for it to succeed, it must fail.

Power to the Peaceful

If you have friends like mine, raise your glasses. If you don't, raise your standards.
Demiurgas
Padawan Learner
Posts: 178
Joined: 2010-06-16 06:57pm

Re: X-Men's Apocalypse In A Sci Fi Setting

Post by Demiurgas »

PhilosopherOfSorts wrote:You know, I'm pretty sure Apocalypse has been teleported against his will before, during the "X-cutioner's Song" arc, back in the early 90's.
Kay.
Post Reply