Grumman wrote:The Ecclesiarchy uses the bones of martyrs who have died, but that's not the same thing as killing these saints themselves. And the old Grey Knights lore never had them doing things like wielding daemon weapons, using the holy numbers of the Chaos gods or performing blood rites while under the influence of the blood god.
Please, where in GK Codex they wield daemon weapons? If you mean Castellan Crowe, it is noted that he doesn't draw any power from it, in fact, uses
his own to keep the sword suppressed at all times. Also, because Grey Knights had no means of destroying or storing it Crowe instead put it to practical use, luring potential Chaos champions into single combat with best GK swordsman. You may note the sword gives no bonuses to Crowe, only to his enemy. How is it in any way contradicting old Codex?
As for martyrs, look
here, page 9 (holy relic, bones) and page 11 (unguents of warding, which only
suspiciously sound exactly like what GK did in new Codex). Using holy numbers of the Chaos? Why, page 9, Grimoire of True Names. Yeah, they did absolutely
nothing of the sort.
Kuja wrote:That's actually wrong. Pre-5th edition if you took a daemonhost in your army you could not bring Grey Knights, because they wouldn't stand for that shit.
You may note all similar restrictions (say Black Templars hating librarians) were removed in 5th and 6th editions. They were not fun to play with, and you can always 'count as' daemonhost as something else and use its rules only (or not use it at all) if it bothers you. Plus, seeing GK only side of their Codex and full Inquisition build are contradictory, no one actually uses them both. I prefer this greatly, instead of hard bans discouraging by creating synergy between fluffy units to encourage their use together.
Then there is nothing to say the inquisitor and his daemonhost won't be executed as soon as battle ends and was ignored only for expediency while real enemy took priority, so it isn't exactly a big deal.
Grumman wrote:The planet was under the influence of a daemon of the blood god. The old, good Grey Knights not do anything that might give the blood god an opening, and that is part of the reason why they'd endure. They would not "resist" the daemon by giving the daemon exactly what it fucking wants.
See above. The method GK were hinted to use was
always this. The 'we're 200% incorruptible without help of wards and spells' was fanon nonsense that arose because people failed to notice hinted nuances, and that was in much more grimdark period of WH writing, when unguents made from liquefied orphans wouldn't be out of place.
It's just shitty writing. Everything about the new Grey Knights shoves the cost of resiliance onto other people, instead of making the Grey Knights sacrifice anything.
No, the new Grey Knights show resilience, but also that their armour and gear actually have a
point. What shitty writing is was insistence that their resistance was entirely innate and that the mere human can be far better than a primarch. No, they are result of 10 000 years of trial and error hard won knowledge that makes them that good. Not the Mary Sue 'why we aren't using this 100% Chaos immune proven process on everyone, exactly?' the fans made out of them.