If it sank down through a hole, then that hole would seal itself rapidly due to the upwelling of the magma.How about it sinking into the mantle?
A world without oceans?
Moderator: NecronLord
Re: A world without oceans?
You will be assimilated...bunghole!
Re: A world without oceans?
I'm not talking about it sinking into a hole, I'm talking about the mantle itself becoming slightly more porous somehow and letting the water in. A bit like baxter's Flood in reverse. The actual mechanism for this isn't something I can think of, but there isn't that much known about water in the mantle in the first place.Borgholio wrote:If it sank down through a hole, then that hole would seal itself rapidly due to the upwelling of the magma.How about it sinking into the mantle?
Re: A world without oceans?
If that much water suddenly was sucked into the mantle, I would expect a massive steam explosion that would parboil much of the Earth's surface.
You will be assimilated...bunghole!
- Iroscato
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2360
- Joined: 2011-02-07 03:04pm
- Location: Great Britain (It's great, honestly!)
Re: A world without oceans?
It could be gradual, this thought occurred to me earlier. Or maybe the oceans have just partially evaporated...somehow.Borgholio wrote:If that much water suddenly was sucked into the mantle, I would expect a massive steam explosion that would parboil much of the Earth's surface.
Yeah, I've always taken the subtext of the Birther movement to be, "The rules don't count here! This is different! HE'S BLACK! BLACK, I SAY! ARE YOU ALL BLIND!?
- Raw Shark
Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent.
- SirNitram (RIP)
- Raw Shark
Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent.
- SirNitram (RIP)
Re: A world without oceans?
A wizard did it.
I'm a cis-het white male, and I oppose racism, sexism, homophobia, and transphobia. I support treating all humans equally.
When fascism came to America, it was wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.
That which will not bend must break and that which can be destroyed by truth should never be spared its demise.
When fascism came to America, it was wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.
That which will not bend must break and that which can be destroyed by truth should never be spared its demise.
Re: A world without oceans?
Chimaera wrote:It could be gradual, this thought occurred to me earlier. Or maybe the oceans have just partially evaporated...somehow.Borgholio wrote:If that much water suddenly was sucked into the mantle, I would expect a massive steam explosion that would parboil much of the Earth's surface.
Water in the crust is sort-of chemically trapped within mineral arrays. I suppose you could have some flip over in the core, magentosphere pulsing randomly as it does so, damaging or wiping most hard drives, tape backups ect.
The flip over results in a new roll over in the mantle, a time of volcanoes and earthquakes and calamities, with new rifts opening in the sea beds with molecular water being sucked into previously dehydrated rock systems, pulling the oceans down and leaving a tide of salt above the cliffs of the continental plates.
This all in the realm of mad max physics, mind, it's not remotely realistic, any more then Baxter's flood was.
"Aid, trade, green technology and peace." - Hans Rosling.
"Welcome to SDN, where we can't see the forest because walking into trees repeatedly feels good, bro." - Mr Coffee
"Welcome to SDN, where we can't see the forest because walking into trees repeatedly feels good, bro." - Mr Coffee
- Imperial Overlord
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 11978
- Joined: 2004-08-19 04:30am
- Location: The Tower at Charm
Re: A world without oceans?
The best way to read the salt flat exchange is that there is a big area of salt flats and they don't know what lies beyond it, Furiosa thinks augmented with scavenging/gathering their supplies will last 160 days, and Max is saying that whatever lies beyond the salt flats isn't going to be much different than what's on this side of the flats and they already know where food, water, and fertile earth can be found. Instead of massive and unsurvivable planetary changes this interpretation only requires that people who have lived in a post apocalyptic hell for decades are skilled scavengers and not inclined to giving long, drawn out explanations.
The Excellent Prismatic Spray. For when you absolutely, positively must kill a motherfucker. Accept no substitutions. Contact a magician of the later Aeons for details. Some conditions may apply.
- gigabytelord
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 473
- Joined: 2011-08-23 07:49pm
- Location: Chicago IL. formerly Livingston TX.
Re: A world without oceans?
Thank you that's exactly what I was trying to say earlier but didn't come across the way I wanted.Imperial Overlord wrote:The best way to read the salt flat exchange is that there is a big area of salt flats and they don't know what lies beyond it, Furiosa thinks augmented with scavenging/gathering their supplies will last 160 days, and Max is saying that whatever lies beyond the salt flats isn't going to be much different than what's on this side of the flats and they already know where food, water, and fertile earth can be found. Instead of massive and unsurvivable planetary changes this interpretation only requires that people who have lived in a post apocalyptic hell for decades are skilled scavengers and not inclined to giving long, drawn out explanations.
Re: A world without oceans?
I'm not sure why anyone acts as if Max knows what's on the other side of the dry lake. He didn't know anything about the "green place", for example. He doesn't seem to have much knowledge of the local geography.
"The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles."
Re: A world without oceans?
The problem is a recently evaporated sea bed wouldn't be flat.The Romulan Republic wrote:Its the size of the salt flats that weighs against them being anything other than the oceans.madd0ct0r wrote:The only evidence is the salt flats, and that isn't really conclusive. The crows area was muddy and had been farmland in the past. Salt intrusion into aquifers seems more likely.
Besides, mad max films are like 300. They are legends narrated to an audience with the visual exaggerated and stylised.
Re: A world without oceans?
If the ocean evaporated or sank into the mantle it would leave tens of metres deep of salt which would smooth out landscape features.Patroklos wrote:The problem is a recently evaporated sea bed wouldn't be flat.The Romulan Republic wrote:Its the size of the salt flats that weighs against them being anything other than the oceans.madd0ct0r wrote:The only evidence is the salt flats, and that isn't really conclusive. The crows area was muddy and had been farmland in the past. Salt intrusion into aquifers seems more likely.
Besides, mad max films are like 300. They are legends narrated to an audience with the visual exaggerated and stylised.
Re: A world without oceans?
And all that salt would gather in the abyssal plain, well below the continental shelves. If the ocean hasn't lowered that much, then we're not dealing with all the salt of the oceans. If they are in the abyssal plain, how did they get all those cars and shit down there? Not to mention that the atmosphere would be at least half again as dense as it is at current sea level.jwl wrote:If the ocean evaporated or sank into the mantle it would leave tens of metres deep of salt which would smooth out landscape features.
Simon_Jester wrote:"WHERE IS YOUR MISSILEGOD NOW!?"
Starglider wrote:* Simon stared coldly across the table at the student, who had just finnished explaining the link between the certainty of young earth creation and the divinely ordained supremacy of the white race. "I am updating my P values", Simon said through thinned lips, "to a direction and degree you will find... most unfavourable."
Re: A world without oceans?
Note: I haven't actually watched mad max, I'm just speculating based on what I've been told in this thread.
Not sure why the atmosphere would be half as much, though. Baxter's flood says something similar (except in reverse, of course) but surely the air pressure levels would move down with the water?
Not sure why the atmosphere would be half as much, though. Baxter's flood says something similar (except in reverse, of course) but surely the air pressure levels would move down with the water?
Re: A world without oceans?
Half again as much, as in, 1.5 times, and it's because we've now got all these former continents jutting dozens of kilometers up into the atmosphere.jwl wrote:Note: I haven't actually watched mad max, I'm just speculating based on what I've been told in this thread.
Not sure why the atmosphere would be half as much, though. Baxter's flood says something similar (except in reverse, of course) but surely the air pressure levels would move down with the water?
Something like this: http://www.worlddreambank.org/S/SIP.HTM
Simon_Jester wrote:"WHERE IS YOUR MISSILEGOD NOW!?"
Starglider wrote:* Simon stared coldly across the table at the student, who had just finnished explaining the link between the certainty of young earth creation and the divinely ordained supremacy of the white race. "I am updating my P values", Simon said through thinned lips, "to a direction and degree you will find... most unfavourable."
Re: A world without oceans?
I get it now.