All sci fi shields are vulnerable to visible light lasers
Moderator: NecronLord
All sci fi shields are vulnerable to visible light lasers
I mean if light can go through the shield and reflect out for you to see it, its got to be able to let visible light through. In that case..... Blow up a trekkie ship with a 6 mt laser!!!!! Oh and this won't work on an ISD, since it is heavily armored anyway.
- SylasGaunt
- Sith Acolyte
- Posts: 5267
- Joined: 2002-09-04 09:39pm
- Location: GGG
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
Its more likely that there is an energy thresh hold, since Star Wars ship at least have come within 1000 kilometers of a star and not been damaged.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
- Master of Ossus
- Darkest Knight
- Posts: 18213
- Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
- Location: California
That appears to be what is indicated in ICS, with shield power measured in watts (that's funny. It's called shield POWER). Anything below that threshold and there will be no damage done. Anything above that threshold and there will be.Sea Skimmer wrote:Its more likely that there is an energy thresh hold, since Star Wars ship at least have come within 1000 kilometers of a star and not been damaged.
"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul
Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner
"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000
"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner
"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000
"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
I recall WC lasers are supposed to lose their effectiveness in atmosphere or any place that breaks up their coherency . . .
That's the wrong way to tickle Mary, that's the wrong way to kiss!
Don't you know that, over here lad, they like it best like this!
Hooray, pour les français! Farewell, Angleterre!
We didn't know how to tickle Mary, but we learnt how, over there!
Don't you know that, over here lad, they like it best like this!
Hooray, pour les français! Farewell, Angleterre!
We didn't know how to tickle Mary, but we learnt how, over there!
- omegaLancer
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 621
- Joined: 2002-07-04 05:54pm
- Location: New york
- Contact:
polarizing effect..
one wonder if shield act like polarizing sun glasses, polarizing light.. this would dimish the effect of lasers, and allow potion of visible light thru..
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord
- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
Or it is exceedingly difficult to make a sufficiently powerful laser without using higher-frequency photons.
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
- Connor MacLeod
- Sith Apprentice
- Posts: 14065
- Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
- Contact:
We do know SW shields have some selectivity tied wo that they do and do stop with at least physical objects. They can let slow moving objects pass without harm (TPM) and there are cloaking devices as well (various). While I could not and dare not venture how they would let visible light pass but stop a laser.
Visible light and a "visible light laser" would not neccesarily be the same thing though. Would that matter in blocking or stopping it?
Visible light and a "visible light laser" would not neccesarily be the same thing though. Would that matter in blocking or stopping it?
Slow Moving? If you refering to Anakins ship during the Space battle, the book I belive says the shield was down to launch more Fighters(At least over the bay)They can let slow moving objects pass without harm (TPM)
"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
Yeah probably, though you could use lots of low power lasers to produce lots of low power photons. Of course there is the problem of armor.Darth Wong wrote:Or it is exceedingly difficult to make a sufficiently powerful laser without using higher-frequency photons.
Yet another example of EU stupidity.That appears to be what is indicated in ICS, with shield power measured in watts (that's funny. It's called shield POWER). Anything below that threshold and there will be no damage done. Anything above that threshold and there will be.
Diffrent style of Shield, That was a specilised version they use underwaterBut the droids were able to movie through it slowly. At least I'm pretty sure that's what happened.
It makes sense to have somthing that can repel anything but slow moving objects(Also notice how its completly diffrent from anything ever seen on regular Imperal Shields?)
It was a smart adaptation of the "force fields" for lack of a better word that they use to keep the air in and the water and animals out
"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
- Mad
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1923
- Joined: 2002-07-04 01:32am
- Location: North Carolina, USA
- Contact:
Well, in Trek, when the Enterprise got really close to a star using its metaphasic shielding, I don't recall people in Ten Forward going "Ahhh my eyes!" from the light, or the bridge brightening up at all from the light that should have gotten through the windows at the top. So the light that should've done had to have been stopped somehow. It could be the shields, or maybe the windows polarizing like in Wars. But something had to block the excess visible light.
In Wars, the transparisteel windows polarize when hit with intense light, so I haven't been able to find any direct evidence that Wars' shields can block visible light. (Of course having a technology to protect pilots that doesn't rely on shields when there are shieldless fighters like TIEs around is a good thing.)
In Wars, the transparisteel windows polarize when hit with intense light, so I haven't been able to find any direct evidence that Wars' shields can block visible light. (Of course having a technology to protect pilots that doesn't rely on shields when there are shieldless fighters like TIEs around is a good thing.)
-
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 613
- Joined: 2002-09-13 12:41pm
Cutting down the incoming visible light intensity by a maximum factor of 50%? You'd need more than that, wouldn't you?Mad wrote: In Wars, the transparisteel windows polarize when hit with intense light, so I haven't been able to find any direct evidence that Wars' shields can block visible light. (Of course having a technology to protect pilots that doesn't rely on shields when there are shieldless fighters like TIEs around is a good thing.)
(3.13, 1.49, -1.01)
- Mad
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1923
- Joined: 2002-07-04 01:32am
- Location: North Carolina, USA
- Contact:
Is 50% the max for transparisteel? I haven't seen a reference mentioning the maximum amount.ClaysGhost wrote: Cutting down the incoming visible light intensity by a maximum factor of 50%? You'd need more than that, wouldn't you?
If that's the maximum, and there's an instance where 50% isn't enough but the job was still accomplished, then that would be evidence that something more than just transparisteel can filter excess visible light. (Two possibilities would be pilot goggles and, of course, shields.) I don't know of any instances that meet that criteria, though.
-
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 613
- Joined: 2002-09-13 12:41pm
If this "transparisteel" blocks light by becoming polarised, then I can't see how the maximum wouldn't be 50%. You block one polarisation, the orthogonal one will still get through, carrying 50% of the energy of the original wave (the other 50% absorbed by the transparisteel, and presumably heating it slightly).Mad wrote:Is 50% the max for transparisteel? I haven't seen a reference mentioning the maximum amount.ClaysGhost wrote: Cutting down the incoming visible light intensity by a maximum factor of 50%? You'd need more than that, wouldn't you?
If that's the maximum, and there's an instance where 50% isn't enough but the job was still accomplished, then that would be evidence that something more than just transparisteel can filter excess visible light. (Two possibilities would be pilot goggles and, of course, shields.) I don't know of any instances that meet that criteria, though.
(3.13, 1.49, -1.01)
- Graeme Dice
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1344
- Joined: 2002-07-04 02:10am
- Location: Edmonton
That's most likely the real reason. To increase the energy you can go either for more photons, or higher energy photons. Lots of materials have problems with handling high photon densities, so you go for higher energy photons. Plus, with shorter wavelengths you can get much better focusing over long distances.Darth Wong wrote:Or it is exceedingly difficult to make a sufficiently powerful laser without using higher-frequency photons.
"I have also a paper afloat, with an electromagnetic theory of light, which, till I am convinced to the contrary, I hold to be great guns."
-- James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879) Scottish physicist. In a letter to C. H. Cay, 5 January 1865.
-- James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879) Scottish physicist. In a letter to C. H. Cay, 5 January 1865.
- Graeme Dice
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1344
- Joined: 2002-07-04 02:10am
- Location: Edmonton
You block more by using both polarizations at the same time of course. You can block all light if you put the two materials at 90 degrees relative to each other.ClaysGhost wrote:If this "transparisteel" blocks light by becoming polarised, then I can't see how the maximum wouldn't be 50%. You block one polarisation, the orthogonal one will still get through, carrying 50% of the energy of the original wave (the other 50% absorbed by the transparisteel, and presumably heating it slightly).
"I have also a paper afloat, with an electromagnetic theory of light, which, till I am convinced to the contrary, I hold to be great guns."
-- James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879) Scottish physicist. In a letter to C. H. Cay, 5 January 1865.
-- James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879) Scottish physicist. In a letter to C. H. Cay, 5 January 1865.
-
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 613
- Joined: 2002-09-13 12:41pm
If this stuff reacts to intense light by developing polarisation, why aren't the polarisation directions of the two layers going to be parallel?Graeme Dice wrote: You block more by using both polarizations at the same time of course. You can block all light if you put the two materials at 90 degrees relative to each other.
(3.13, 1.49, -1.01)
- Connor MacLeod
- Sith Apprentice
- Posts: 14065
- Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
- Contact:
Really? Explain how the Imperials got throught the shield with TESB, why both the Ep2 VD and ICS mention that Clonetrooper armor and AT-TEs are able to penetrate forcefields (the latter are able to penetrate PARTICLE shielding specifically).Mr Bean wrote:Diffrent style of Shield, That was a specilised version they use underwaterBut the droids were able to movie through it slowly. At least I'm pretty sure that's what happened.
It makes sense to have somthing that can repel anything but slow moving objects(Also notice how its completly diffrent from anything ever seen on regular Imperal Shields?)
It was a smart adaptation of the "force fields" for lack of a better word that they use to keep the air in and the water and animals out
- Connor MacLeod
- Sith Apprentice
- Posts: 14065
- Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
- Contact:
- Graeme Dice
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1344
- Joined: 2002-07-04 02:10am
- Location: Edmonton
You spin the one material, or spin its polarization of course.ClaysGhost wrote:If this stuff reacts to intense light by developing polarisation, why aren't the polarisation directions of the two layers going to be parallel?
"I have also a paper afloat, with an electromagnetic theory of light, which, till I am convinced to the contrary, I hold to be great guns."
-- James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879) Scottish physicist. In a letter to C. H. Cay, 5 January 1865.
-- James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879) Scottish physicist. In a letter to C. H. Cay, 5 January 1865.