baneblade/shadowsword vs AT-AT

SF: discuss futuristic sci-fi series, ideas, and crossovers.

Moderator: NecronLord

Post Reply
User avatar
starfury
Jedi Master
Posts: 1297
Joined: 2002-07-03 08:28pm
Location: aboard the ISD II Broadsword

baneblade/shadowsword vs AT-AT

Post by starfury »

how would these two imperium superheavy tank matchup to theb famous imperial AT-AT of star wars.

Image

banebalde

Image

shadowsword
"a single death is a tragedy, a million deaths are a statistic"-Joseph Stalin

"No plan survives contact with the enemy"-Helmuth Von Moltke

"Women prefer stories about one person dying slowly. Men prefer stories of many people dying quickly."-Niles from Frasier.
User avatar
Kuja
The Dark Messenger
Posts: 19322
Joined: 2002-07-11 12:05am
Location: AZ

Post by Kuja »

Your pics aren't working.
Image
JADAFETWA
User avatar
starfury
Jedi Master
Posts: 1297
Joined: 2002-07-03 08:28pm
Location: aboard the ISD II Broadsword

Post by starfury »

damm images won't come out
"a single death is a tragedy, a million deaths are a statistic"-Joseph Stalin

"No plan survives contact with the enemy"-Helmuth Von Moltke

"Women prefer stories about one person dying slowly. Men prefer stories of many people dying quickly."-Niles from Frasier.
User avatar
white_rabbit
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2039
Joined: 2002-09-30 09:04pm

Post by white_rabbit »

Either would manage it, armed as they are with superheavy guns.
User avatar
Sokar
Jedi Master
Posts: 1369
Joined: 2002-07-04 02:24am

Post by Sokar »

Both of these are Superheavy Tanks (1000 tons+ each with crews in the double digits) fron the Warhammer 40,000 Universe.

The Shadowsword ices the AT-AT at a distance with one shot from its Volcano Laser....its designed to take out Titans which dwarf even the largest AT-AT. However the main gun is so large that it is hull mounted and lacks a wide field of fire, if the AT-AT's can flank the tank , then its definatly in danger

The Baneblade is shorter ranged , but its Mega-battle cannon is turret mounted. The AT-AT's will have the initial advantage of range , but will have trouble once the Baneblades open fire.

Both of these tanks are also studded with smaller turrets containing ant-personnel and anti-vehicle weapons
BotM
User avatar
Vendetta
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10895
Joined: 2002-07-07 04:57pm
Location: Sheffield, UK

Post by Vendetta »

Sokar wrote:The Shadowsword ices the AT-AT at a distance with one shot from its Volcano Laser....its designed to take out Titans which dwarf even the largest AT-AT. However the main gun is so large that it is hull mounted and lacks a wide field of fire, if the AT-AT's can flank the tank , then its definatly in danger
AT-ATs are about the size of a Reaver titan, but much less agile.

Of course, the Volcano Cannon can quite easily flatten a Reaver, if it hits in the right place.

In a fight between a Reaver and a Shadowsword, if one flanked the other, it would be utterly decisive. Imperial heavy tanks might have bloody thick armour, but it's weaker at the sides and the ass. I'd say that the Shadowsword has the advantage of range, the Volcano Cannon is one of the longest ranged weapons in the Epic game. It's a dedicated weapon for taking down battle vehicles exactly like the AT-AT.

The Baneblade would probably be outranged, if the AT-AT could stay at long range and hit it with it's full power barrage, it could probably slag the tank.
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

Super-Heavy tanks

(old style) Necron Scarabs

heh

heh heh

heh heh heh
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
Post Reply