Kamakazie Sith wrote:It seems like you are making an assumption that they will be just as effective because you can see these beams in space even though lasers are visible in space in B5. Do you know of a B5 episode which states these weapons are particle weapons?
Actually all we really see is that ships get blown up by less than 1000TJ events and with intensity less than 100MW/m2. That those flares are particularly effective in disabling shields as opposed to simply overwhelming them through sheer energy and power is an assumption based on certain incidents like TWoK but which is by no means certain.
Secondly we know that even when the shields are down or rendered irrelevant like in Generations battle against BoP or "Jem'Hadar" episode in which a Galaxy fights against three Jem'Hadar ships the Galaxy class actually didn't sustain large visible damage to its hull even after minutes of combat. Thus the shields don't provide more than a few times more protection than the hull armor itself otherwise a shielded Galaxy should be able to receive sustained pounding for tens of minutes. In First Contact Federation fleet concentrates power on a Borg ship and actually starts digging a hole in it, its shields obviously long gone, and yet the weapons themselves don't cause massive damage. Yet a 1000TJ flare blows up a large Borg vessel outright. So even assuming that flare somehow switches the shields off and proceeds to the hull directly it still puts the limits on the shields and weapons of Federation ships as nowhere near a Shadow ship.
Finally whatever B5 characters call their weapons the fact they are visible means they are not lasers. If they are not photons (massless particles) then they do have mass.
Kamakazie Sith wrote:I agree with your analogy, but that doesn't necessarily apply to GCS shields. If on screen evidence shows photon torpedo strength ranging from 100Kt - 3Mt and the Enterpise-D took several bare hull impacts in Generations, and in Nemesis the Enterprise-E took several shield impacts, and then several hull impacts. It seems like 2Mt isn't an unreasonable number.
I don't see why it wouldn't apply to the shields: like human skin they have a certain heat capacity and reradiation rate. If reradiation rate is exceeded then when heat capacity is overwhelmed there will be damage.
If independent measurements against known objects like stars constrain shield capacity then obviously that will constrain photon torpedo yield rather than assumed large photon torpedo yield somehow upping the shield capacity in the face of their performance against stars.
Like I said: the fact that Galaxy can take bare hull impacts without much visible damage and yet be threatened by 10TW radiation puts upper limits on firepower of major Star Trek civilizations.
Kamakazie Sith wrote:All those direct shield observations that you're refering to have one thing in common. Solar prominences. Though I'm not sure if the example from the DS9 episode Shadow and Symbols is appropriate as it releases a solar flare that will destroy everything within a hundred million kilometers. This solar flare is much larger than the flares in Descent and Redemption, and according to NASA large flares release insane amounts of energy.
The fact they all include flares makes them very useful since we know so much about stars and flares. Flares do indeed sometimes release enormous amounts of energy but they are also hundreds of thousands or millions of km wide. A Star Trek ship or a shipyard will only intercept a tiny fraction of the total energy and we are talking about energy densities that won't exceed 100MJ/m2-1GJ/m2. That Dominion shipyard would be cut to ribbons by a several second burst from a group of Shadow ships.
Kamakazie Sith wrote:You are right we didn't see any visible damage, but we have seen a White Star destroy a Shadow vessel. It took 30 seconds of sustained firing to do so. If we assume that a White star main gun is equal to that of a Sharlin then a Shadow vessel can take 1.5Mt at 50Kt/s before being destroyed.
In TNG Survivors the E-D is able to fire off at least nine photons in roughly a second. Even at 100Kt per photon that should be enough to do some serious damage, and considering that a Shadow vessels was rendered combat ineffective after Narns destroyed a spine then it isn't too far of a stretch to say that a full spread of photons will be enough to at least mission kill the ship.
First I don't remember a Federation ship being able to sustain a phaser beam for 30 seconds under combat conditions. A two-three second burst seems the most they can hold it. Photon torpedoes, on the other hand, can't create the kind of power intensity that enable Narn cruisers to shear off one of its legs. Also 100kt is an upper estimate assuming granite asteroid was completely shattered which is not actually necessary to destroy the cloaking device.
Kamakazie Sith wrote:Of course, if certain weapon fire is more effective due to special properties then that will greatly effect the outcome. If Shadow weapons are particle weapons then they probably will be able to destroy a GCS in roughly a second. However, Shadow ships use shields and are biological in nature. This means phasers will be devastating against them. Using the figures from the main page it will be 7Mt/s. To be conservative we'll say phasers will deliver around 1Mt/s or 4000Tj. Given the White star example a GCS should be able to destroy a Shadow vessel in a second.
As demonstrated Shadow ships can withstand power intensity in excess of TW/m2. No normal biological matter can do that. So we are talking about some exotic shields, or heat dissipation capabilities. In any case I don't see why we should assume that phasers will be more effective against Shadow defenses than weapons used by Minbari or Narn.
The 7Mt/s figure for phasers is used specifically as their
equivalent power against other Star Trek shields. Secondly this figure is extremely generous since it assumes that Star Trek shields have a heat capacity in excess of 100,000TJ which is calculated by simply multiplying the 10TW radiation from Relics with total elapsed time of several hours. It doesn't take into account the fact that during the many hours shields will have plenty of time to shed the excess heat even as it arrives so the actual capacity is a tiny fraction. One might as well use the 1400W/m2 at Earth and multiply it by 1 year to claim that ISS has shield capacity of several kilotons.
Kamakazie Sith wrote:Now since this thread is pretty much a Borg vs. Shadow thread and Borg energy weapons demonstrate a vastly superior NDF effect than phasers a Borg cube will be able to kill Shadow vessels in less than a second. Unfortunately for the Shadow vessel it might take a bit longer to carve up a Borg cube before being destroyed.
Now we know Shadow vessels are able to phase in and out of hyperspace...so that gives that a large advantage for first strike.
Again there is no evidence NDF will be at all effective against Shadow defenses or hull materials which exhibit endurance impossible for a simple biological matter. Nor is there any evidence that phasers will be exceptionally effective against possible Shadow shields. After all they didn't do so well against Species 8472 which was also using bioships. Borg ships aren't even capable of destroying or disabling an Intrepid class vessel one on one in a short amount of time. It seems doubtful they will be able do it to a Shadow ship.
But if the forces of evil should rise again, to cast a shadow on the heart of the city.
Call me. -Batman