you cannot say a whole planet is gone, when its still there, or still recognizable as a planet..
Why not? Entire cities have been declared as "gone," yet do we mean they've been accelerated to escape velocity? How do we know that the Vorlons didn't achieve the required energy, but managed to reduce the planet to a giant blob of fragments still gravitationally bound together?
hiroshima may have been described as gone because of its obliteration (that it was made unrecognizable).
And the planet may have been described as "gone" because it was unrecognizable.
you cant even say that when a large portion of is still present, at the very least that condition wouldve been included in ivanovas brief to the assembled personel, instead of saying that the planet was gone.
So, where did the planet go? Why does "gone" mean "accelerated to escape velocity," rather than "vaporized," or "disintegrated"?
vorlons not thorough?.. they did go after the refugees, on their safe havens, didnt they?.
That's the most inefficient way to do things. They hit the planet, and then waste all their time running around picking up all the pieces? If the refugees had all escaped via starships, then they could go wherever they wanted. Why go to the place that the Vorlons would be most likely to strike next?
and ships couldve been 100,000km away from the planet upon the arrival of the vorlons, they still could be classed as having just escaped, and could still witness, and report on, the planetary wide destruction.
So, they had the brilliant idea to go to camps with concentrations of survivors from attacks that were supposed to wipe everyone out, not even considering that the Vorlons may come back to finish what they started? Is everyone in B5 completely stupid?
she did not say that the ships were going to be sent to those planets that have been recently attacked.
she said that refugee stations were being targeted, that they lost 3 of them already, and that the list of stations will be changed, and then called for available ships to help with the evacuation.
Why would she need to do that? Everyone got their via a starship, so everyone could leave the way they came in: a starship. They obviously left in a timely enough fashion to avoid being destroyed, according to you.
and as i said already.. more ships would allow for quicker evacuation, even though the refugees may have sufficient ships to handle the numbers...
But they could already handle the numbers. How do you think they got there? Did refugees just appear out of nowhere?
ng influenced by the shadows including shadow ships, or/and the pilots within them, themselves.
we do know that the shadows bury their ships deep into the ground.
one way of exposing, and destroying them, all at once is to shatter the planet.
No, we know that Shadow vessels were kept
on the ground. If they were underground, why would Londo's nuclear attack have destroyed them?
as i was saying earlier.. having more ships around makes the evacuation process quicker, and easier, and counter problems associated with panic.. esp since they didnt know that the vorlons would be thorough enough to also start targeting the refugee havens.
You're making this more complex than it needs to be. "OK everyone, get on the ship you came in on!" Problem solved.
there was already a refugee congestion after the first reported attack on ventradi iii.
Which means that the survivors were on the surface because they didn't have ships of their own to escape with.
you said anywhere on the planet.. so yes it can be anywhere on the planet..
And JMS is referring to tactical and strategic mobility, just like I was.
the intent on jump points being able to form within objects was clear.. the actual "what if" was with regards to the actual question of poster on why sol went nova far earlier than its predicted to be...
jms responded with what if jump points interfered with it.
You still haven't explained how this equates to proof of ability.
first.. before the nukes were detonated the vorlons & shadows ignored the yr race completely.. they didnt start attacking the yr straight away.
and secondly.. why didnt the shadows use all the missles their planet killer manifested and surrounded sheridens fleet with. instead they only used two.
Because they have a finite number of missiles with which to accomplish the job of destroying a planet.
as for your above statement, its like saying that no one would hold back in a situation where one got punched and has the ability to punch back, and outright kill, the puncher... truth is some people will hold back.
though its true the vorlons have been killing a lot, but only those influenced by the shadows, likewise the shadows were killing those influenced by the vorlons..
in sheridens fleet you have a mixture of those being influenced by the vorlons, and those being influenced, or have the potential to be influenced, by the shadows..
if anything the vorlons & shadows were like parents, or guardians, of the younger race, each with a strong preference to those they directly influenced.
There is no evidence that the Shadows wanted to kill everyone with Vorlon influence, only the other way around. I'm not going to run around with you and discuss Shadow incompetence, but the fact remains that the Shadows obviously wanted White Star 1 turned into atoms or its whole crew destroyed. Therefore, it's clear that they'd just drain all the energy that they could from it.
as for the bomb scenes..
1st scene does show some shadow ship fragments, though its unclear whether or not these came from a fighter, or scout, or battleship, 2nd scene shows no ships destroyed, vorlons ships emerging apparently unscathed, 3rd scene with shadows again, no ships were destroyed.
It also shows a Vorlon ship being severely damaged, if not destroyed or maimed, by the blast.
im well aware of of heat/energy being in the form of photons of certain frequencies.
No, you're obviously not. Otherwise, you wouldn't have made it look like you thought that heat existed in a form other than particles. Furthermore, energy doesn't exist in the form of particles. It exists in the form of motion, mass, gravitational potential, et cetera. Photons impart energy, but they are
not energy themselves. Saying that an object has 30J of kinetic energy has no bearing on the number of photons in it.
what im saying
they have the ability to create those who can convert energy into matter.. i.e technomages.
Big deal. We can create nuclear reactors that split atoms, does that mean that we personally possess this ability?
thats what i have been trying saying above...
the shadows here were holding back, i.e. they didnt want to kill everyone.. they only wanted to kill those who had unified the younger races against them.
So, naturally, they'd drain the energy from White Star 1 as quickly as possibly. Thank you for proving my point.
and although the heat/energy drain at the showed setting would *eventually* kill everyone in sheridens fleet, that is not actually what they intended to do.
So, they were going to drain everyone's energy in such a way that everyone would die at the same time, but they only wanted to kill Sheridan? That's absurd.
all im saying is that we cannot make a firm judgement given that the shadows held back against the yr, in this particular scene where the energy/drain was being used.
But you
are making a firm judgment. You're saying that the energy dissipation rate of the Death Cloud must exceed the energy production rate of the Death Star with
absolutely no evidence.