New BSG Premier: "33" and "Water"

SF: discuss futuristic sci-fi series, ideas, and crossovers.

Moderator: NecronLord

User avatar
StarshipTitanic
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4475
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:41pm
Location: Massachusetts

Post by StarshipTitanic »

Alyeska wrote:Do we have any idea how many Vipers a single Battle Star can carry? Do we know how many Vipers BSG started with? They are loosing them at an alarming rate.
http://img64.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img64&im ... all9af.png

That's the absolute lower limit, but we do know that Starbuck's previous Viper is was being repaired from the first battle's damage. Each landing bay has 40 launch tubes, if those are any indication of the maximum loadout.
Alyeska wrote:The Battle Star class Strike Carrier (best designation for it) is a good multi purpose platform, but the Colonial navy had to have some different types of warships. Finding a destroyer or cruiser to help protect the fleet would be nice.
Battlestars (one word) appear to be the only type of ship in the Colonial Fleet.

Adama: "We lost 30 battlestars in the opening attack."
Starbuck: "That's a quarter of the fleet."


I had a little fun with images from this site and figured that the Galactica has roughly 43 decks. Deck 15 not inside the main hull is somewhere in the landing bay pylons, so those must not be filled with the retraction machinery.
"Man's unfailing capacity to believe what he prefers to be true rather than what the evidence shows to be likely and possible has always astounded me...God has not been proven not to exist, therefore he must exist." -- Academician Prokhor Zakharov

"Hal grabs life by the balls and doesn't let you do that [to] hal."

"I hereby declare myself master of the known world."
User avatar
StarshipTitanic
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4475
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:41pm
Location: Massachusetts

Post by StarshipTitanic »

Darwin wrote:I don't believe that was a spoiler. :D
You offered to give one, didn't you?
"Man's unfailing capacity to believe what he prefers to be true rather than what the evidence shows to be likely and possible has always astounded me...God has not been proven not to exist, therefore he must exist." -- Academician Prokhor Zakharov

"Hal grabs life by the balls and doesn't let you do that [to] hal."

"I hereby declare myself master of the known world."
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Broomstick wrote: I looked into that when I started cooking with wakame and nori and the like - there is NO non-animal natural source of B12 that is at all reliable. In the case of seaweed and algae, the variable B12 levels in them could be accounted for by animal contamination (animal plankton, shrimp, crab-crap, etc.) And those levels do vary enormously. I will also point out that such items grown under controlled conditions in a vat will not be exposed to random ocean-critters.... although, depending on circumstances, you might well be able to set up enough shrimp in such a vat as to provide the B12... but it might be just as easy to refine it from the shrimp. Yeast and tempeh with B12 is almost alway supplemented through artificial means, again, frequently through the use of animal-source items. Or chemistry.

Now, BSG's universe might, indeed, have the chemistry to produce a reliable, non-animal source of B12... but we do not. To be honest, extrapolating from our current knowledge and know-how, I'd say creating an artificial source of usable B12 is much more plausible than, say, an FTL drive.

Resourcefulness is vital here. Think about it - all you need are a couple of ornamental acquariums on this liner or that one (clearly they have ships that function as our ocean-going cruise ships do) to have the necessary basis to start acquaculture - just build a bigger tank and hope the beasties breed. It's odd but in fact luxury liners - decorated with plants, fish, perhaps even a small aviary - may provide some of resources for a varied diet. If we could bring ourselves to eat parakeets (actually, I'm told Australian Aborigines consider both parakeets and cockatiels good eating... if a bit on the small side)
Technically, B12 is made by ourselves, or more importantly, digestive tract flora and other micro-organisms, not animals. You can readily supplement them by having cobalt in your diet, as you say, from mainly animal meat sources. But I don't see why they can't use cobalt in the form of vitamin tablets. B12 is able to be stored and is used in minute amounts despite its importance, so rather than go with this food palaver, I suppose all we need is a source of cobalt (should be easy enough with 'roids) and a way to add it to a substrate for direct consumption. The B12 we have is going to have to be filtered from waste as it is excreted since it is formed near the colon. Or simply have a vat of these flora with a steady supply of necessary resources to form cobalamin which can then be extracted.

An animal farm would be nicer to have though.
You don't need chemicals to make paper - just suitable fibers suspended in water. Certainly chemicals can improve the texture and durability, but much of what is written on paper is ephermeral. What becomes difficult, with subsequent recyclings, is the color - but they can probably make bleach easily enough. Also, when you recycle there is always a certain unavoidable loss.

The fungal fibers might work better when mixed with other fibers, but that's nothing unusual in paper (or cloth) making either. I would expect the raw fibers would give you something like nori, which is essentially algae fillaments grow on a flat frame, and which is very paperlike in consistency.

For writing, though, slate and chalk might well make a big comeback. Both are mineral, and should be obtainable from floating rocks.
I was thinking more of using the fungi for other things and making nylon for writing and clothing, it should be relatively easy to do if the setup is right. But again, anything to hand. I'd prefer paper be used only for important cases given computers can supplement most needs anyway.
No, it can't - these folks aren't going to set up computer networks, remember? Their systems are kept delibrately isolated.
A basic e-mail system isn't going to kill the network unless they're using Outlook 2000. It won't allow the Cylons to just take control if there are safety measures and most of the bugs with the Cylons being able to take control have been fixed by the good doctor himself. It's when you get too many intelligent computers working together when you get problems. The ships, whether they like it or not, need networks for certain systems regardless of the risk. Remember, Adama didn't want his ship to be highly automated, not that it didn't need networks.
Hemp must be grown.

You can also grow flax, which provides linen fiber (through a rotting process aided, yes, by micro-organisms) which is excellent for both cloth and paper (fine paper is still made with linen today) as well as providing edible linseed oil, an oil that can also be used for lubrication.

One things for sure, these people are going to become really, really good at recycling.

Which, not to be too icky (well, OK, it IS really icky) brings up the issue of recycling people. I don't think using people as a food source is a good idea - that's how you get prion diseases running rampant (Just ask the Fore tribe of New Guinea about that) but there are ways of utilizing human bits and pieces that might be a good choice under such dire survival circumstances. A human carcass can provide bone - suitable for making all sorts of tools, from combs to handles to... well, all sorts of things. A human carcass can provide leather - that's clothing, or even a durable writing surface. Sinew for sewing and binding. Collagen. Prior to death, human hair can be spun into coarse thread, twine, and rope (I've actually done this with my own hair). Certain types of human hair can be processed into felt. There's a HUGE cultural chasm you'd have to leap... on the other hand, an item made of the actual bits of a loved one might become a treasured keepsake.

I have no idea how you'd handle writing that into a script for TV, though. Well, maybe the use of hair from living people, but the rest... very hot-button as a topic.
I don't think Soylent Green tastes very nice without a lot of Worcester or BBQ sauce.

Though yeah, a dead person is a lot of useful things, provided the social stigma tagged onto this is shunted aside.
User avatar
Broomstick
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 28831
Joined: 2004-01-02 07:04pm
Location: Industrial armpit of the US Midwest

Post by Broomstick »

Admiral Valdemar wrote:
Broomstick wrote:
No, it can't - these folks aren't going to set up computer networks, remember? Their systems are kept delibrately isolated.
A basic e-mail system isn't going to kill the network unless they're using Outlook 2000. It won't allow the Cylons to just take control if there are safety measures and most of the bugs with the Cylons being able to take control have been fixed by the good doctor himself. It's when you get too many intelligent computers working together when you get problems. The ships, whether they like it or not, need networks for certain systems regardless of the risk. Remember, Adama didn't want his ship to be highly automated, not that it didn't need networks.
Nope, not quite.

In his first meeting with the Secretary of Education he states very plainly that there would be NO computer network on the Galactica as long as he is in command. I doubt very much his position has changed at all.

There will be no e-mail on the Galactica, and it's unlikely they'll have it on the civilian ships, either.
User avatar
CJvR
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2926
Joined: 2002-07-11 06:36pm
Location: K.P.E.V. 1

Post by CJvR »

StarshipTitanic wrote:I had a little fun with images from this site and figured that the Galactica has roughly 43 decks. Deck 15 not inside the main hull is somewhere in the landing bay pylons, so those must not be filled with the retraction machinery.
That is one UGLY ship!
Particulary considering the great looks of the original Galactica.
I thought Roman candles meant they were imported. - Kelly Bundy
12 yards long, two lanes wide it's 65 tons of American pride, Canyonero! - Simpsons
Support the KKK environmental program - keep the Arctic white!
User avatar
StarshipTitanic
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4475
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:41pm
Location: Massachusetts

Post by StarshipTitanic »

CJvR wrote:
StarshipTitanic wrote:I had a little fun with images from this site and figured that the Galactica has roughly 43 decks. Deck 15 not inside the main hull is somewhere in the landing bay pylons, so those must not be filled with the retraction machinery.
That is one UGLY ship!
Particulary considering the great looks of the original Galactica.
I don't care for the ribbing, myself. It doesn't appear to serve any function, except to hold random pieces of armor plate to the hull. I do love the positioning and sheer amount of weapons, though. They did a good job while staying true to the form of the original.
"Man's unfailing capacity to believe what he prefers to be true rather than what the evidence shows to be likely and possible has always astounded me...God has not been proven not to exist, therefore he must exist." -- Academician Prokhor Zakharov

"Hal grabs life by the balls and doesn't let you do that [to] hal."

"I hereby declare myself master of the known world."
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Broomstick wrote:
In his first meeting with the Secretary of Education he states very plainly that there would be NO computer network on the Galactica as long as he is in command. I doubt very much his position has changed at all.

There will be no e-mail on the Galactica, and it's unlikely they'll have it on the civilian ships, either.
Well, that doesn't really preclude the system from being immune to Cylon attack. We all know Adama is a very touchy type when it comes to technology, so any form of networking will obviously get his attention (although the ship must have some integrated networks in order to function, especially with so few crew).
User avatar
StarshipTitanic
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4475
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:41pm
Location: Massachusetts

Post by StarshipTitanic »

Admiral Valdemar wrote:
Broomstick wrote:
In his first meeting with the Secretary of Education he states very plainly that there would be NO computer network on the Galactica as long as he is in command. I doubt very much his position has changed at all.

There will be no e-mail on the Galactica, and it's unlikely they'll have it on the civilian ships, either.
Well, that doesn't really preclude the system from being immune to Cylon attack. We all know Adama is a very touchy type when it comes to technology, so any form of networking will obviously get his attention (although the ship must have some integrated networks in order to function, especially with so few crew).
Perhaps the standard Colonial military computer network uses mainframes, but Adama retained individual computers for each system. Or at least weapon and navigational software doesn't run off the same mainframe.
"Man's unfailing capacity to believe what he prefers to be true rather than what the evidence shows to be likely and possible has always astounded me...God has not been proven not to exist, therefore he must exist." -- Academician Prokhor Zakharov

"Hal grabs life by the balls and doesn't let you do that [to] hal."

"I hereby declare myself master of the known world."
User avatar
LadyTevar
White Mage
White Mage
Posts: 23424
Joined: 2003-02-12 10:59pm

Post by LadyTevar »

StarshipTitanic wrote:
CJvR wrote:
StarshipTitanic wrote:I had a little fun with images from this site and figured that the Galactica has roughly 43 decks. Deck 15 not inside the main hull is somewhere in the landing bay pylons, so those must not be filled with the retraction machinery.
That is one UGLY ship!
Particulary considering the great looks of the original Galactica.
I don't care for the ribbing, myself. It doesn't appear to serve any function, except to hold random pieces of armor plate to the hull. I do love the positioning and sheer amount of weapons, though. They did a good job while staying true to the form of the original.
I was wondering if the ribbing was baffling or if it was just decorative myself.

But 64 rail guns and 4 heavy cannons forewards? Sweet. I don't think we've seen her fire the forward cannons yet, just the rail gun 'flak'.
Image
Nitram, slightly high on cough syrup: Do you know you're beautiful?
Me: Nope, that's why I have you around to tell me.
Nitram: You -are- beautiful. Anyone tries to tell you otherwise kill them.

"A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. LLAP" -- Leonard Nimoy, last Tweet
User avatar
Stravo
Official SD.Net Teller of Tales
Posts: 12806
Joined: 2002-07-08 12:06pm
Location: NYC

Post by Stravo »

For all that firepower she doesn't seem to have a point defense system. Afterall they relied completely on Starbuck's Viper to intercept the three nukes coming at her in the pilot and could do nothing but watch as the one missile got by Starbuck and struck them.
Wherever you go, there you are.

Ripped Shirt Monkey - BOTMWriter's Guild Cybertron's Finest Justice League
This updated sig brought to you by JME2
Image
User avatar
LadyTevar
White Mage
White Mage
Posts: 23424
Joined: 2003-02-12 10:59pm

Post by LadyTevar »

Stravo wrote:For all that firepower she doesn't seem to have a point defense system. Afterall they relied completely on Starbuck's Viper to intercept the three nukes coming at her in the pilot and could do nothing but watch as the one missile got by Starbuck and struck them.
True... but in the first two episodes they seem to be doing better protecting the Galactica against the nukes. Still, they may just be anti-fighter, like the original Galatica's side guns.
Image
Nitram, slightly high on cough syrup: Do you know you're beautiful?
Me: Nope, that's why I have you around to tell me.
Nitram: You -are- beautiful. Anyone tries to tell you otherwise kill them.

"A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. LLAP" -- Leonard Nimoy, last Tweet
User avatar
Black Admiral
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1870
Joined: 2003-03-30 05:41pm
Location: Northwest England

Post by Black Admiral »

Stravo wrote:For all that firepower she doesn't seem to have a point defense system. Afterall they relied completely on Starbuck's Viper to intercept the three nukes coming at her in the pilot and could do nothing but watch as the one missile got by Starbuck and struck them.
That was before they actually had any ammunition aboard, aside from the Viper ammo, IIRC, so the Galactica's guns didn't have anything to fire there.
"I do not say the French cannot come. I only say they cannot come by sea." - Admiral Lord St. Vincent, Royal Navy, during the Napoleonic Wars

"Show me a general who has made no mistakes and you speak of a general who has seldom waged war." - Marshal Turenne, 1641
User avatar
Stravo
Official SD.Net Teller of Tales
Posts: 12806
Joined: 2002-07-08 12:06pm
Location: NYC

Post by Stravo »

Black Admiral wrote:
Stravo wrote:For all that firepower she doesn't seem to have a point defense system. Afterall they relied completely on Starbuck's Viper to intercept the three nukes coming at her in the pilot and could do nothing but watch as the one missile got by Starbuck and struck them.
That was before they actually had any ammunition aboard, aside from the Viper ammo, IIRC, so the Galactica's guns didn't have anything to fire there.
Ah, forgot about that little detail. I was hoping we would see a little more realism from this warship since they stressed so much in the commentary how they did research for this, spent time on carriers and got alot of the little details like the groundcrews right to miss something fundamental like a point defense system seemed so wrong.
Wherever you go, there you are.

Ripped Shirt Monkey - BOTMWriter's Guild Cybertron's Finest Justice League
This updated sig brought to you by JME2
Image
User avatar
StarshipTitanic
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4475
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:41pm
Location: Massachusetts

Post by StarshipTitanic »

LadyTevar wrote:I was wondering if the ribbing was baffling or if it was just decorative myself.

But 64 rail guns and 4 heavy cannons forewards? Sweet. I don't think we've seen her fire the forward cannons yet, just the rail gun 'flak'.
The heavy cannons are the giant, two-barreled cannons that shot exploding flak rounds in the pilot, and the Galactica has 20 of them. There are 8 dorsal guns, the 4 forward guns, and 8 ventral guns (which we haven't seen fire yet). The forward guns fired on a Basestar briefly in one sequence in "33."
Stravo wrote:For all that firepower she doesn't seem to have a point defense system. Afterall they relied completely on Starbuck's Viper to intercept the three nukes coming at her in the pilot and could do nothing but watch as the one missile got by Starbuck and struck them.
There was a deleted scene on the DVD that showed the decommissioning ceremony, which involved jettisoning all the ordinance and exploding it at once at a safe distance. Later, when they do have railgun and cannon ammo, the Galactica intercepted several missiles sent its way.
"Man's unfailing capacity to believe what he prefers to be true rather than what the evidence shows to be likely and possible has always astounded me...God has not been proven not to exist, therefore he must exist." -- Academician Prokhor Zakharov

"Hal grabs life by the balls and doesn't let you do that [to] hal."

"I hereby declare myself master of the known world."
User avatar
StarshipTitanic
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4475
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:41pm
Location: Massachusetts

Post by StarshipTitanic »

Something I just concocted.

Points of interest:

The Galactica's heavy cannons are about the size of a heavy turbolaser turret.

While longer, the Galactica is about as tall as the Galaxy. This makes sense, because the Galactica has 43 (rather tall) decks.
"Man's unfailing capacity to believe what he prefers to be true rather than what the evidence shows to be likely and possible has always astounded me...God has not been proven not to exist, therefore he must exist." -- Academician Prokhor Zakharov

"Hal grabs life by the balls and doesn't let you do that [to] hal."

"I hereby declare myself master of the known world."
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

I have to wonder why they don't have point defence lasers for missile duty. But at least railguns means no propellant to have explode or worry about manufacturing.
User avatar
Alex Moon
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 3358
Joined: 2002-08-03 03:34am
Location: Weeeee!
Contact:

Post by Alex Moon »

Admiral Valdemar wrote:I have to wonder why they don't have point defence lasers for missile duty. But at least railguns means no propellant to have explode or worry about manufacturing.
I'm no expert, but could lasers require a higher amount of maintainance than railguns? Also, wouldn't lasers be rendered ineffective by smoke/reflective materials?
Warwolves | VRWC | BotM | Writer's Guild | Pie loves Rei
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Alex Moon wrote:
I'm no expert, but could lasers require a higher amount of maintainance than railguns? Also, wouldn't lasers be rendered ineffective by smoke/reflective materials?
Not really. Solid state lasers are simple and bar the actual lenses, not all that hard to maintain. A railgun can get rail erosion or overheat just as quick as a laser. Lasers can be limited by smoke and reflective materials unless sufficiently high powered, say, in the X-ray wavelength. They would be faster than railguns to hit and engage more targets and also not have ammo problems so long as power remains consistent.
User avatar
Arrow
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2283
Joined: 2003-01-12 09:14pm

Post by Arrow »

Admiral Valdemar wrote:
Alex Moon wrote:
I'm no expert, but could lasers require a higher amount of maintainance than railguns? Also, wouldn't lasers be rendered ineffective by smoke/reflective materials?
Not really. Solid state lasers are simple and bar the actual lenses, not all that hard to maintain. A railgun can get rail erosion or overheat just as quick as a laser. Lasers can be limited by smoke and reflective materials unless sufficiently high powered, say, in the X-ray wavelength. They would be faster than railguns to hit and engage more targets and also not have ammo problems so long as power remains consistent.
IIRC, the Galactic ate a nuke in the miniseries without much damage (the fighter bay got a beating, but the rest of the ship and the hull seemed fine). It could be that armor (the same kind or perhaps something ablative) is light enough and cheap enough to put on missiles, and the the lasers in the universe can't effectively overcome it.
Artillery. Its what's for dinner.
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Arrow Mk84 wrote:
IIRC, the Galactic ate a nuke in the miniseries without much damage (the fighter bay got a beating, but the rest of the ship and the hull seemed fine). It could be that armor (the same kind or perhaps something ablative) is light enough and cheap enough to put on missiles, and the the lasers in the universe can't effectively overcome it.
Could be. The ship did sustain a sizeable impact that could've made some real nasty problems arise, hence the chaos that ensued because fuel lines were at risk of being ignited and so the atmosphere had to be evacuated at the cost of dozens of support crew lives. Even if the missiles have this armour type, they still require guidance and a laser need only damage the sensor suite or ablate a little bit of the hull off to put it off course and detonate safely away.
User avatar
Arrow
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2283
Joined: 2003-01-12 09:14pm

Post by Arrow »

Admiral Valdemar wrote:Even if the missiles have this armour type, they still require guidance and a laser need only damage the sensor suite or ablate a little bit of the hull off to put it off course and detonate safely away.
While this is true, the missile could had been receiving guidance data from another source, with the command receiver placed safe and sound at the back of the missile. That could also explain why they couldn't just jam the missile.

Also, if self-guided, the missile could be programmed to recognize the fact that a laser was trying to fry its guidance system, and it could switch to home in on the laser source (a lot of missiles do this now of days to defeat jammer); granted, the seeker head would have to be very tough. And its possible that the missile has multiple seekers focusing on certain characteristics, making it hard to jam/spoof/destroy with ECM or lasers. Or if its seekers get damaged/destroyed, the missile could still fly to the last known position of the target and detonate when it reasons its close enough.

Any number of counter measures built into the missile's seeker head and sensor system could make using lasers just not worth it.
Artillery. Its what's for dinner.
User avatar
Sidious
Padawan Learner
Posts: 326
Joined: 2002-09-12 11:02pm
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Post by Sidious »

Off the current discussion, but the ratings are in.
scifi.com wrote:Galactica Scores Big Ratings

The two-hour Jan. 14 premiere of SCI FI Channel's original series Battlestar Galactica was the number-one cable program on that date in key demographics and ranked as the highest-rated January show in the network's history. Galactica ranked first among adults aged 25-54 and 18-49 and men aged 25-54, 18-49 and 18-34. The show earned a 2.6 household rating (3.1 million viewers), ranking second among all cable programs.

Galactica was also SCI FI's highest-rated first-quarter series telecast ever and its second highest-rated series telecast ever, behind only Stargate Atlantis' series premiere in summer 2004.

Galactica delivered 2.2 million viewers aged 25-54 and 1.9 million among those aged 18-49. The show won a decisive victory over UPN's Star Trek: Enterprise, outperforming its new episode in total viewers, among adults 25-54 (2.2 million vs. 1.7 million) and 18-49 (1.9 million vs. 1.5 million). Among men 25-54, Galactica delivered 1.5 million viewers, beating 16 of the top 20 programs on the six broadcast networks, including JAG and Fox's premiere of Jonny Zero.

Battlestar Galactica moves to its regular timeslot on Jan. 21, joining SCI FI's Friday-night lineup of original programming, "SCI FI Fridays." Galactica will air Fridays at 10 p.m. ET/PT, following Stargate SG-1 at 8 p.m. and Stargate Atlantis at 9 p.m.
Good news :) Hope it continues to pull in good numbers.
User avatar
Stravo
Official SD.Net Teller of Tales
Posts: 12806
Joined: 2002-07-08 12:06pm
Location: NYC

Post by Stravo »

YES. KILL Enterprise Galactica, kill that turd like the Cylons killed the colonies. Fuckers. Maybe they'll get a clue about what writing is all about.
Wherever you go, there you are.

Ripped Shirt Monkey - BOTMWriter's Guild Cybertron's Finest Justice League
This updated sig brought to you by JME2
Image
User avatar
StarshipTitanic
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4475
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:41pm
Location: Massachusetts

Post by StarshipTitanic »

The fact that Enterprise still pulls in those numbers is pretty sad, though. Hopefully those that watched the premier will spread the word about Galactica.
"Man's unfailing capacity to believe what he prefers to be true rather than what the evidence shows to be likely and possible has always astounded me...God has not been proven not to exist, therefore he must exist." -- Academician Prokhor Zakharov

"Hal grabs life by the balls and doesn't let you do that [to] hal."

"I hereby declare myself master of the known world."
User avatar
Aaron
Blackpowder Man
Posts: 12031
Joined: 2004-01-28 11:02pm
Location: British Columbian ExPat

Post by Aaron »

I had noticed in "33" that there are what appear to be cargo and ammo containers stacked in the Galacticas corridors. If these are what I think they are, then she overstocked at the anchorage.
M1891/30: A bad day on the range is better then a good day at work.
Image
Post Reply