When Thor awakens on Earth, he clearly expects his godlike powers to still work, despite very clearly not wearing his armor. Plus, what kind of sense does it make for Odin to strip his armor, removing his power (assuming his powers are in his armor), then put them in the hammer? Why not just geas the armor, instead of moving the powers to the hammer and geasing that?Lusankya wrote:And when Odin stripped Thor's powers, he tore off Thor's armour. Maybe Thor's power is in that. What's more likely? Son of the king gets all the good toys, or the difference in capability between Thor and the next best warrior is greater than the difference between Loki and Frigga (who we also see fighting, and who would probably make a good candidate for determining "base" Adgardian capabilities).Terralthra wrote:It may have been an awesome weapon before that, but Thor was the powerful one who wielded it, until Odin stripped him of his power and placed it within Mjölnir.
The most parsimonious explanation is that Thor has power, that Odin takes from him ("the power of THOR!", not "the power of THOR's armor") and imbues in Mjölnir, dependent on the wielder being "worthy."