Stargate Continuum *SPOILERS*

SF: discuss futuristic sci-fi series, ideas, and crossovers.

Moderator: NecronLord

User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

Brother-Captain Gaius wrote:You're missing the point. It cheapens "Threads", it cheapens season 8, it cheapens the death of the Asgard, it cheapens the whole damn series to have "Reckoning" essentially mean nothing in grand Trek style: "All that big important stuff that happened awhile back when we still had credibility as writers? Yeah scratch that."
Yeah. That's precisely what happened. As part of Ba'al's sinister plan.

And then something else happened, due to heroism, that made that all fully part of the continuity again.

What's the problem?
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Themightytom
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2818
Joined: 2007-12-22 11:11am
Location: United States

Post by Themightytom »

Old Plympto wrote:For a second... and just for a second... I thought they were going to have Mitchell pull a Philip J. Fry.

Baal's plan would have worked if the trio were not in between gates when the timeline change completed itself.

As such it was doomed to fail, because having an unaltered SG-1 in the alternate timeline allowed them to go through a chain of event allowing Earth governments to know about the other Stargate and the Antartica station on Earth, which in turn allowed SG-1 to go to Baal's time machine station and for Mitchell to survive long enough to return to 1929 to stop Baal's plan on the Achilles.

Now this could have been one-upped by Baal when he discovered that his plan didn't work. However, the only (supposedly) clone left was strapped to the Extraction device and that was the end of that. The only evidence of a new alternate timeline which nearly matched the original timeline is the photo of Mitchell with his grandfather, who probably told the new Mitchell that this was a relative of his who worked with the OSS or something, seeing as the new Mitchell didn't know who it was. The old Mitchell must have disappeared soon after to live a quiet life somewhere.

Also, William Devane was hilarious. "He hung up on me!"
The part where people and things were disappearing makes no sense to me. The changes happened in the past, there would be no "Its happening right now!!!"

it would be more of an immediate shift a la yesterday's enterprise in which neither the base timeline nor the altered one would be aware of the change except perhaps the traveller passing from one to the other noting the gradual change.
J Ryan
Youngling
Posts: 140
Joined: 2005-05-17 02:27pm
Location: Somewhere out there

Post by J Ryan »

Themightytom wrote:
Old Plympto wrote:For a second... and just for a second... I thought they were going to have Mitchell pull a Philip J. Fry.

Baal's plan would have worked if the trio were not in between gates when the timeline change completed itself.

As such it was doomed to fail, because having an unaltered SG-1 in the alternate timeline allowed them to go through a chain of event allowing Earth governments to know about the other Stargate and the Antartica station on Earth, which in turn allowed SG-1 to go to Baal's time machine station and for Mitchell to survive long enough to return to 1929 to stop Baal's plan on the Achilles.

Now this could have been one-upped by Baal when he discovered that his plan didn't work. However, the only (supposedly) clone left was strapped to the Extraction device and that was the end of that. The only evidence of a new alternate timeline which nearly matched the original timeline is the photo of Mitchell with his grandfather, who probably told the new Mitchell that this was a relative of his who worked with the OSS or something, seeing as the new Mitchell didn't know who it was. The old Mitchell must have disappeared soon after to live a quiet life somewhere.

Also, William Devane was hilarious. "He hung up on me!"
The part where people and things were disappearing makes no sense to me. The changes happened in the past, there would be no "Its happening right now!!!"

it would be more of an immediate shift a la yesterday's enterprise in which neither the base timeline nor the altered one would be aware of the change except perhaps the traveller passing from one to the other noting the gradual change.
Actually it is similar to what is seen before when time travel in Stargate before. In 1969 despite them travelling back in time, they appear in the gate room which slowly disappears leaving them in a empty silo.

Doesn't seem to make sense, but thats how time travel works in SG1.
User avatar
Strider
Youngling
Posts: 145
Joined: 2007-12-25 11:06pm
Location: Boston: It's a happy place, except that it's not.

Post by Strider »

NecronLord wrote:
PREDATOR490 wrote:I saw this movie and can honestly say I fucking despise it for being a massive cock tease. The trailers paint this as the Goa'Uld going apeshit on Earth Independance Day style and some sort of epic battle.
Let's be fair. If a goa'uld fleet that big is over Earth. It's over. Even with 304s it would be over. That's pretty much how this depicted it, and rightly so. That many goa'uld ships; short of Ancient DeM, it's time to kiss humanity's arse goodbye. I was, after the trailer, never expecting anything but Earth getting totalled.
I am far from convinced. When I first saw the trailer, and witnessed the fleet of a couple dozen Ha'taks, my main reaction was "So what." We've all seen the joke that was Wraith Cruiser vs. the Daedalus in Atlantis 5x01. It SAT there and got hit for something like AN HOUR and the shields did not drop. We saw AoT, where the Odyssey SAT and got shot at by FOUR Toilet-Bowl Ori ships for a couple minutes; it did not die. We've seen the Asgard Blue Beam of Death kill everything it touches in one shot that isn't either 11 kilometers big (Wraith Hive Ship) or 1st Tier tech (Asuran, Ori, new Atlantis guys), which Ha'taks are most certainly not. The Mothership may have been more of a challenge, but iirc that type of ship has nothing that would be state of the art in modern Season 5 Atlantis terms.

I think the three operational BC-304s would have taken Ba'al's fleet to school. I think even one of them alone could have probably wiped the whole thing. They were all packed so close I bet you could kill multiple Ha'taks with one swipe of the BBoD.


Now that I'm done with my little rant about the brokenness of BC-304s (I wonder if they're approaching Star Wars level tech at this point...), my thoughts on the movie itself, Stargate Continuum, staring Dr. Gregory House as Daniel Jackson:

If AoT was the movie that would have made a good two-parter, Continuum was the movie that would have made one good episode :/. If its 1:35 had been cut to about 45 minutes, it would have been fun and engaging. Sure, the things disappearing schtick was wonky, but it's SG-1 time travel, it gets a pass. The Cam & Sam Ice Quest was basically the Teal'c Mountain Quest mk II, now with no meaning at all! The half hour of epic fail that started with them getting on the sub, and finally ended when the Ba'al showed up was absolutely inexcusable. From there though, things were better. Qetesh's poorly timed infighting antics were trademark Goa'uld stupidity, and the last action sequence was a fun little battle. As said earlier, this is a "Moebius" clone with much less fun, and a very disappointing way to end the series. Individual items of note:

-The Jaffa that accompanied Ba'al onto the boat seemed to be better than the average bears. There was a lot less of the rampant missing we see from Staff Weapons a lot of the time. Of course, they totally FUBARed the mission by missing the last guy, but still: for Jaffa, quite competent.

-How does a fat snake Goa'uld get sucked through the tiny extractor needle and still be a snake and not goo when it's in the bottle? It's not a Yeerk slug, it's a Goa'uld; I wasn't aware symbiotes had magical tight-space-squeezing powers.

-Was it really entirely necessary to freeze off Daniel's leg? I mean honestly, don't you think he's already been through enough? Can you imagine the discussions about this: "Hey, it seems like we don't have enough angst for the three remaining members of SG-1, how do we create some more?" "Let's freeze off Daniel's leg! We can show him in a wheelchair and stuff!" "Brilliant!, Write it in!"

-In the next movie, Daniel Jackson and Vala Mal Doran will have an epic 5 minute sequence where some reason is manufactured for them to cross miles of untamed Deserts.

-Incidentally, the lack of screentime for the Vala Mal Doran character and her antics was another cause for disappointment, for me at least. I was REALLY hoping at the beginning that she had cloaked herself, and then somehow Ba'al would almost escape, and then she'd stop him. And then he'd turn out to be a clone, and show up with a big fleet of Ha'taks, and sabotage Earth and the 304s somehow, and we get the Vala/Daniel and Sam/Jack moments that haven't (actually) happened for the entire series, and somehow at the end Carter poops out a solution and saves the day, and Teal'c says "Indeed" and it's a FUN MOVIE! Unlike the movie we got.
Atavarius
Padawan Learner
Posts: 309
Joined: 2003-04-30 10:05pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Post by Atavarius »

Very weak. Another Stargate reset button. Should have been a filler episode in one of the later seasons, not a movie.
User avatar
JME2
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12258
Joined: 2003-02-02 04:04pm

Post by JME2 »

Finally saw it last night. Decent with good parts (Ba'al and the cell phone, the System Lords back in action) and certainly a better time-travel story than "Moebius", but I definitely liked Ark of Truth better.

3/5
User avatar
Stargate Nerd
Padawan Learner
Posts: 491
Joined: 2007-11-25 09:54pm
Location: NJ

Post by Stargate Nerd »

Ok regarding the Goa'uld bombardment of Washington DC, give the size of those "explosions" how powerful were those shots in tons? Anyone did any calcs?
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

Strider wrote:I am far from convinced. When I first saw the trailer, and witnessed the fleet of a couple dozen Ha'taks, my main reaction was "So what." We've all seen the joke that was Wraith Cruiser vs. the Daedalus in Atlantis 5x01.
And a ha'tak is stronger and faster than a Wraith Cruiser... Never mind that Ba'al's flagship is vastly more voluminous.

Have you ever heard of N² law? Also known as Lanchester's Laws. It's a military science term, which was prevalant around the time of the "all big gun" battleship in the early C20th. It relates to directly aimed fire with modern weapons.

Say, Ba'al has twenty five ha'tak, each worth 1/1 (attack and defence) and one mothership worth 5/5.

Each 304 is 10/10.

So, it's an open and shut case, right? The 304s slaughter the ha'tak?

It doesn't work that way, each 304 can fire two asgard beams.

So, in the first second of combat, six ha'taks die We'll even assume they get Ba'al's flagship. A moment later, Cronos orders all his ships to fire on, say, the Daedalus.

The Daedalus is destroyed, as it's hit by 20 'points'

The remaining two 304s fire again, destroying four more ha'taks.

Another one, say, the Oddessy dies as it's hit by 16 points

The Apollo kills two more, and is promptly destroyed by the 12 remaining ha'tak.

That's only if we assume the 304s out-class the ha'tak by a massive margin, which honestly, is iffy. Upgraded ha'tak can destroy full-blown Asgard motherships, and ordinary ha'taks don't fold like paper planes when they come up against them.

After that, the goa'uld are quite free to - this being an attack launched by Ba'al (Let's face it, being on the biggest target when going up against a real opponent isn't too wise), who knows about it - sling asteroids (a canonical tactic, albeit one used by the wraith) at Antarctica until the drones are expended, Earth surrenders, or is slowly frozen.
It SAT there and got hit for something like AN HOUR and the shields did not drop. We saw AoT, where the Odyssey SAT and got shot at by FOUR Toilet-Bowl Ori ships for a couple minutes; it did not die. We've seen the Asgard Blue Beam of Death kill everything it touches in one shot that isn't either 11 kilometers big (Wraith Hive Ship) or 1st Tier tech (Asuran, Ori, new Atlantis guys), which Ha'taks are most certainly not. The Mothership may have been more of a challenge, but iirc that type of ship has nothing that would be state of the art in modern Season 5 Atlantis terms.
Two uprated ha'tak are a serious threat to an actual Asgard mothership. There's no reason they shouldn't beat the shit out of what's basically a much smaller asgard ship hampered by being interfaced with crude human technology.
Last edited by NecronLord on 2008-08-07 06:58am, edited 1 time in total.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Revy
Jedi Knight
Posts: 581
Joined: 2008-06-24 05:46pm

Post by Revy »

To be fair, the Biliskner class ship might have been centuries out of date for all we know. By the time the 304's get upgraded with the latest Asgard tech, the Asgard have completely stopped using Biliskner ships and switched to the vastly more advanced O'Neill and Daniel Jackson classes. On top of that, the Asgard beam weapons were only developed by the Asgard just prior to their deaths, as the Asgard O'Neill class ship didn't use anything remotely as effective against the four Ori ships in Camelot. If that ship (an O'Neill class and thus superior to Thors old ship that Anubis trashed) couldn't take out the Ori ships and the Asgard-Beam upgraded 304's could, then no Ha'Tak we've ever seen would last five seconds against a current generation 304.
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

Revy wrote:To be fair, the Biliskner class ship might have been centuries out of date for all we know.
Given that they were still being used against replicator vessels until the O'Neill class was launched... No.
By the time the 304's get upgraded with the latest Asgard tech, the Asgard have completely stopped using Biliskner ships and switched to the vastly more advanced O'Neill and Daniel Jackson classes.
The DJ is a science ship, without any proper armament that we've seen. It's also been in service far longer than the O'Neill, Loki had one, and he'd absconded decades ago.
On top of that, the Asgard beam weapons were only developed by the Asgard just prior to their deaths, as the Asgard O'Neill class
Unknown class. It's not an O'Neill. It may have been an error, where they meant to use a science ship like the Daniel Jackson. It may be a smaller destroyer-analogue.
ship didn't use anything remotely as effective against the four Ori ships in Camelot. If that ship (an O'Neill class and thus superior to Thors old ship that Anubis trashed) couldn't take out the Ori ships and the Asgard-Beam upgraded 304's could,
Powered by a ZPM in both cases...
then no Ha'Tak we've ever seen would last five seconds against a current generation 304.
They don't need to. They just need to hammer it down with numbers.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

Also, for comparing normal 304 performance to the Oddessy in Ark of Truth, remember, that's with the Replicators having seemingly decided that their best option was to "turtle" and routing all power to the shields rather than fighting back. So yes, a 304 with a ZPM can last, what was it, fifteen minutes, against four (Possibly smaller, half fuelled, or incomplete {rather likely, remember, there were no ships in orbit; it's likely that when the core was activated, right over Celestus, the Doci ordered whatever was ready into action to defend the holy city, as opposed to having complete ships on hand}, given that the Oddessy's shields visually fail on screen and it still seems to survive several shots, as opposed to simply blasted out of the sky in a single shot, as the Korelev was) Ori motherships. If it turtles completely and doesn't use any energy to fire back.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Revy
Jedi Knight
Posts: 581
Joined: 2008-06-24 05:46pm

Post by Revy »

NecronLord wrote:Given that they were still being used against replicator vessels until the O'Neill class was launched... No.
According to Thor "The O'Neill is the first Asgard vessel designed solely to fight the replicators." And in Star Trek they continued to update and use the Excelsior class vessel even though it was decades old. So the fact that they used their most commonly existing fleet ship class to fight an enemy that was attacking them right there and then it is no surprise that they would throw whatever they had against the replicators, even if what they had in question had been in service for years and years.
The DJ is a science ship, without any proper armament that we've seen.
Aside from it's ability to swiftly fabricate and use a planet-wide anti-replicator disrupter weapon, which as we've witnessed is only a frequency change away from instantly killing people.
It's also been in service far longer than the O'Neill, Loki had one, and he'd absconded decades ago.
Wasn't it a new class that was named for DJ, just as the O'Neill class was? I'm not sure. As far as I recall though, Loki was merely repremanded and told off for his activities, I dont remember anything saying he went rogue decades ago and took a ship with him.
Unknown class. It's not an O'Neill. It may have been an error, where they meant to use a science ship like the Daniel Jackson. It may be a smaller destroyer-analogue.
Image
Image

^Looks a lot like an O'Neill to me.
Powered by a ZPM in both cases...
The lack of a ZPM didn't seem to reduce the effects of the Asgard beams used by the Daedalus, the Apollo or the Phoenix. I'll give you that we've not seen the Asgard Beam be used against an Ori vessel without a ZPM, but given what we've seen of the weapon in question nothing short of those new alternate universe aliens seems able to stand up to it, and even then that was against a damaged 304 with limited shots, and they lost their main weapons in the attack. I seriously doubt the shields of a Goa'uld Ha'Tak could take that kind of punishment.

Besides, if Anubis' shield advancements were that good, then he wouldn't be getting his ass kicked by Lord Yu in Revelations, requiring reinforcements, because Yu's conventional Goa'uld weapons would have been useless. As it was, the advancements seem to withstand the Ion Cannon looking Asgard shots, but as he still has a hard fight against his fellow Goa'uld the upgrades don't seem to help out much against other weaponry.
They don't need to. They just need to hammer it down with numbers.
I guess that scenario depends on how effective the Asgard shields are against Goa'uld weapons. Even without a ZPM we've seen them stand up to a fair amount of firepower from Wraith ships, including the Daedalus going toe-to-toe with about half a dozen or more Hives, all firing at it (The Siege part 3 I think). And that was before Rodeny wrote his little shield effeciency upgrade when he got that Ancient brain boost. As we saw with the Ori and earlier with Anubis' super ship, if the shields can take the punishment and you have a decent gun, then the number of ships you're going up against is largely irrelevant.

Given what we've seen, I think it's possible that a 304 or two could smash that fleet apart. We saw Anubis using the same fleet (to the point where I think the Continuum folk just reused CG footage from The Lost City episode) and the Prometheus with it's vastly inferior shields was able to withstand a fair bit of punishment. A 304 has much better shields and weapons.
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

Revy wrote:
NecronLord wrote:Given that they were still being used against replicator vessels until the O'Neill class was launched... No.
According to Thor "The O'Neill is the first Asgard vessel designed solely to fight the replicators." And in Star Trek they continued to update and use the Excelsior class vessel even though it was decades old. So the fact that they used their most commonly existing fleet ship class to fight an enemy that was attacking them right there and then it is no surprise that they would throw whatever they had against the replicators, even if what they had in question had been in service for years and years.
So? That doesn't mean that the Beliskners were centuries out of date as you suggest. They were capable of going up against modern replicator-enhanced versions. They can't be that far behind.
The DJ is a science ship, without any proper armament that we've seen.
Aside from it's ability to swiftly fabricate and use a planet-wide anti-replicator disrupter weapon, which as we've witnessed is only a frequency change away from instantly killing people.
By that standard, Tel'taks are warships. We've seen them rapidly modified to have a giant laser beam.
Wasn't it a new class that was named for DJ, just as the O'Neill class was?
Never said on screen. It seems just as likely that Thor simply likes naming things after SG1.
I'm not sure. As far as I recall though, Loki was merely repremanded and told off for his activities, I dont remember anything saying he went rogue decades ago and took a ship with him.
One supposes he may have used a different vessel in his previous antics, though the previous abductee's descriptions held true of the interior of the DJ-class
Unknown class. It's not an O'Neill. It may have been an error, where they meant to use a science ship like the Daniel Jackson. It may be a smaller destroyer-analogue.
^Looks a lot like an O'Neill to me.
That's because you're not engaging your brain.

Yes. It looks like one; it's the same model. It is however, smaller than a 304; There's shots where 304s are behind it, and appear the same size. Compare this with the ships in Unnatural Selection and Revelations. At best, it's maybe a quarter the length (meaning it's 1/64th the volume, and thus, power) of a true O'Neill. One O'Neill, assuming the internal design is essentially the same, equates to sixty four of those ships.
Powered by a ZPM in both cases...
The lack of a ZPM didn't seem to reduce the effects of the Asgard beams used by the Daedalus, the Apollo or the Phoenix.
Pardon? There's no evidence that either Auroras or wraith vessels are in the same league as the toilet ships.
I'll give you that we've not seen the Asgard Beam be used against an Ori vessel without a ZPM, but given what we've seen of the weapon in question nothing short of those new alternate universe aliens seems able to stand up to it, and even then that was against a damaged 304 with limited shots, and they lost their main weapons in the attack. I seriously doubt the shields of a Goa'uld Ha'Tak could take that kind of punishment.
They don't need to. Even if the Goa'uld lose a ship with every shot (and that's not certain; an Aurora, probably with its shields down from just jumping out of hyperspace, took a fairly concentrated volley, rather than being effortlessly destroyed in a single shot- upgraded Ha'taks use ancient technology, possibly of the same vintage too)
Besides, if Anubis' shield advancements were that good, then he wouldn't be getting his ass kicked by Lord Yu in Revelations, requiring reinforcements, because Yu's conventional Goa'uld weapons would have been useless.
This is poor reasoning. You're saying "It can't be that good, because other ha'taks can still pose a threat" which is... questionable. Ha'taks are a threat to everything but the toilet bowls, in sufficient numbers. Yu was a major system lord, later joined by the others.
As it was, the advancements seem to withstand the Ion Cannon looking Asgard shots, but as he still has a hard fight against his fellow Goa'uld the upgrades don't seem to help out much against other weaponry.
They don't need to. They just need to hammer it down with numbers.
I guess that scenario depends on how effective the Asgard shields are against Goa'uld weapons. Even without a ZPM we've seen them stand up to a fair amount of firepower from Wraith ships, including the Daedalus going toe-to-toe with about half a dozen or more Hives, all firing at it (The Siege part 3 I think). And that was before Rodeny wrote his little shield effeciency upgrade when he got that Ancient brain boost. As we saw with the Ori and earlier with Anubis' super ship, if the shields can take the punishment and you have a decent gun, then the number of ships you're going up against is largely irrelevant.
... Tell that to the Lanteans.
Given what we've seen, I think it's possible that a 304 or two could smash that fleet apart. We saw Anubis using the same fleet (to the point where I think the Continuum folk just reused CG footage from The Lost City episode)
Err. No. Really. No. There's at least thirty vessels in Ba'al's fleet, probably far more ("around the planet" is mentioned) there were maybe a dozen in Anubis' fleet.
and the Prometheus with it's vastly inferior shields was able to withstand a fair bit of punishment. A 304 has much better shields and weapons.
Withstand a fair bit of punishment? Their shields were depleated by an almost casual bombardment from the flagship, with no other vessels firing upon them. If Anubis had taken the threat seriously, there's no reason he couldn't have ordered every vessel to fire on the Prometheus and blown it out of the stars in seconds.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Stargate Nerd
Padawan Learner
Posts: 491
Joined: 2007-11-25 09:54pm
Location: NJ

Post by Stargate Nerd »

NecronLord wrote: So? That doesn't mean that the Beliskners were centuries out of date as you suggest. They were capable of going up against modern replicator-enhanced versions. They can't be that far behind.
I think he means the one Thor showed up with to scare away Osiris, not the entire series.
NecronLord wrote:Pardon? There's no evidence that either Auroras or wraith vessels are in the same league as the toilet ships.
The Auroras should be somewhat close. Unless the Ori used ascended knowledge to keep improving their shields.
NecronLord wrote: This is poor reasoning. You're saying "It can't be that good, because other ha'taks can still pose a threat" which is... questionable. Ha'taks are a threat to everything but the toilet bowls, in sufficient numbers. Yu was a major system lord, later joined by the others.
I still believe that Anubis's forces were vastly outnumbered by the collective Systemlord forces. When you have up to 4 times the number of ships your enemy has you can close the gap created by technological superiority somewhat.
NecronLord wrote:Withstand a fair bit of punishment? Their shields were depleated by an almost casual bombardment from the flagship, with no other vessels firing upon them. If Anubis had taken the threat seriously, there's no reason he couldn't have ordered every vessel to fire on the Prometheus and blown it out of the stars in seconds.
Wasn't the Prometheus one shot away from being destroyed when the squids of doom trashed the Goa'uld fleet?
User avatar
Stargate Nerd
Padawan Learner
Posts: 491
Joined: 2007-11-25 09:54pm
Location: NJ

Post by Stargate Nerd »

Stargate Nerd wrote:Ok regarding the Goa'uld bombardment of Washington DC, give the size of those "explosions" how powerful were those shots in tons? Anyone did any calcs?
Anyone?
User avatar
Revy
Jedi Knight
Posts: 581
Joined: 2008-06-24 05:46pm

Post by Revy »

NecronLord wrote:So? That doesn't mean that the Beliskners were centuries out of date as you suggest. They were capable of going up against modern replicator-enhanced versions. They can't be that far behind.

Say what? *When* has a Biliskner ship *ever* gone up against a Replicator controlled vessel successfully? In the episode where Thor enlists Carters help to fight them, a number of Asgard ships were already defeated, and the Biliskner class ship Thor was flying was so inferior to the Replicator ships (and showed no signs of agression) that they flat out ignored it. And this was three Biliskner class ships the Replicators had *already* overcome and taken control of. Thor even tells us that the O'Neill is specifically being built to combat the Replicators because their currents ships (ie Biliskners) are proving ineffective.

The *fact* is that as soon as a Biliskner class ship is proven obsolete due to Anubis' enhanced motherships, the Asgard *completely* cease to use them in *all* future encounters in which we see them. Clearly the Asgard no longer consider them to be up to date enough to deal with the kind of weapons tech the galaxy is throwing around by then.
By that standard, Tel'taks are warships. We've seen them rapidly modified to have a giant laser beam.
Oh yes, that's a fair comparison. An advanced Asgard vessel with the ability to completely wipe out all enemies on a pottential enemy vessel or *planet* in just a *single* shot is so obviously comparable to a cargo ship with a gun strapped onto it. Indeed.

Incidentally, I believe there have been instances of cargo, merchant and other similar ships being modified to serve as combat ships throughout history. It was common in the 15-1600's to upgrade merchant ships with guns and troops in order to hunt down pirates, and pirates themselves would capture merchant ships and such, and make use of their large size to turn into their own combat ships. So yes, regardless of what ship you start with, if you want to start putting weapons and such on it then I see no reason why it can't be classified as a warship. Or at least a destroyer, frigate, corvette or cruiser. So long as it can do the job and fill the role. If you have a science vessel that can fight ... I seem to recall a Trek episode when the crew have their memories wiped, and Worf takes one look at Starfleets 'science and exploration' ship the Enterprise, and swiftly concludes that it is a warship. It has weapons and shields, and as has been pointed out, during wartime Starfleet did in fact start using them as warships.
One supposes he may have used a different vessel in his previous antics, though the previous abductee's descriptions held true of the interior of the DJ-class
In fairness though, one Goa'uld or Tau'ri ship looks much like another on the inside. I can scarcely tell the difference between the interior of the Prometheus and the Daedalus unless I actually play episodes one after the other and specifically look for details.
That's because you're not engaging your brain.

Yes. It looks like one; it's the same model. It is however, smaller than a 304; There's shots where 304s are behind it, and appear the same size. Compare this with the ships in Unnatural Selection and Revelations. At best, it's maybe a quarter the length (meaning it's 1/64th the volume, and thus, power) of a true O'Neill. One O'Neill, assuming the internal design is essentially the same, equates to sixty four of those ships.
I've been on forums discussing Stargate ship sizes, and most of them include a disclaimer at the start of each thread voiding that particular episode, because a lot of people seem to think that the sizing of that entire battle scene was completely fucked up by the SFX department. I don't however have any practice in doing the scaling issues these people use, so I'd concede this point.

However, my original point stands - namely that an *Asgard* vessel sent by the Asgard to assist in stopping a pottential invasion, and which actually engaged in fighting the enemy rather than escaping to hyperspace once the battle began (as a pure science vessel would surely do), lacked the Asgard Beam technology. If the Asgard had it, and even lowly human powered 304's can supply the energy to fire them, then that ship would have used it, and I'm sure it would have proven at least somewhat effective against the Ori. However that Asgard ship instead fired another weapon entirely, and clearly did not possess the Asgard Beam weapon that is fitted to 304 ships now as standard. Thus this tells us that either the Asgard sent one of their ships to the Beachead of a dangerous enemy, without giving it their best weapons availible, or that they simply didn't have that weapon ready or in existence at the time. In fact the Asgard *never* once demonstrated a beam based weapon in all the years we've seen their ships fight, and only prior to their mass death when they give SG1 *everything* they've got do we get to see such a weapon, strongly implying that it was a cutting edge weapon.
They don't need to. Even if the Goa'uld lose a ship with every shot (and that's not certain; an Aurora, probably with its shields down from just jumping out of hyperspace, took a fairly concentrated volley, rather than being effortlessly destroyed in a single shot- upgraded Ha'taks use ancient technology, possibly of the same vintage too)
Ehh ... can you finish this sentance? I'm not sure what you were trying to say here, you don't finish after the bracketed bit you wrote. Why don't they need to?
This is poor reasoning. You're saying "It can't be that good, because other ha'taks can still pose a threat" which is... questionable. Ha'taks are a threat to everything but the toilet bowls, in sufficient numbers.
Wrong. A fully upgraded Anubis mothership effortlessly destroyed the System Lord fleet over Abydos with no evident damage, and continued to deal the System Lords a heavy blow (according to SG1 in the following episode). It was only destroyed after a huge internal explosion knocked out it's main weapon, and atmospheric conditions greatly reduced the effectiveness of its shields. However, at its peak a mass Ha'Tak attack was useless.

They were also insufficient to tackle the Asgard before Anubis stepped in. It was only after Anubis that Freyr said "We can no longer be confident of victory when dealing with superior numbers." which implies that prior to Anubis they *could* be confident of victory in the face of superior numbers of Goa'uld ships, and that was back before they even started using O'Neills.
Yu was a major system lord, later joined by the others.
Which says exactly bugger all about the *technology* of his ships and weapons, which was the issue - there has *never* been any indication that Yu's fleets were technologically more advanced than any normal Goa'uld, but Anubis' are repeatedly stated as being more advanced, to the point where he was able to defeat a previously unassailable enemy - the Asgard. Despite this, Yu's convention fleet of ships (and if they weren't convention someone *would* have said, especially if they were unconventional enough to tackle Anubis and win) was able to cause Anubis such trouble that Anubis' forces were forced to request aid.

Now, again, if Anubis' advanced shields and weapons were *so* advanced they could defeat an Asgard ship, regular Goa'uld ships would have been made paste of. Remember - regular Ha'Taks can be pasted by Asgard ships even when possessing superior numbers (Freyr). And if Anubis' ships trumps them, then they would double trump the rest of the Goa'uld. This doesnt happen. He is still on even footing with them until he brings his super ship and super soldiers into the fray, and Yu and the other Goa'uld are still able to tackle his fleet and achieve victory, despite not having the advances Anubis had. Clearly either those advances were keyed to defeating Asgard tech specifically, or the Biliskner class ship was simply so inferior and outdated that it was an easy target ... something Freyr also suggests by pointing out that the ships *he* arrives with (O'Neills) are "far" superior to the one he attacked.
... Tell that to the Lanteans.
What? The "dumbest sci-fi race ever"? That's what I keep hearing about them, especially around here. Besides, the Ancients main weapon of choice was a finite supply of funky missiles. The Wraith stuck with energy weapons that seemed to last long enough to provide a continuous rain of fire on Atlantean installations. It's one thing to face superior numbers, but it's much much worse to face superior numbers with limited ammunition.
Err. No. Really. No. There's at least thirty vessels in Ba'al's fleet, probably far more ("around the planet" is mentioned) there were maybe a dozen in Anubis' fleet.
I'm sorry, but that's fucking BS.

From Lost City Prt 2:
JUMPER (into phone): OK. (He lowers the phone.) Sir, thirty-plus ships just appeared in orbit, taking station around the planet.
Withstand a fair bit of punishment? Their shields were depleated by an almost casual bombardment from the flagship, with no other vessels firing upon them. If Anubis had taken the threat seriously, there's no reason he couldn't have ordered every vessel to fire on the Prometheus and blown it out of the stars in seconds.
It nevertheless takes continuous fire from the largest and strongest ship present, and survives. And the Prometheus was far inferior to a 304 with the latest Asgard enhanced shields and McKay's shield upgrade programme.

Either way, my point still remains - we see a 304 without a ZPM take protracted fire from a fleet of Wraith Hiveships - and just a *few* of those ships were able to put enough firepower onto Atlantis and it's ZPM powered shield to deplete it in a very short time. 304's have very effective shields (so effective that people here complain about how advanced and tough the 304's are).

And we've seen 304's perform hit and run strikes, firing on an enemy and then jumping out. Ba'als fleet was besieging Earth at a fixed location. One or more 304's could make strafing runs, destroying Goa'uld ships with the Asgard beams, and then jump to safety and give their shields a chance to recharge, before jumping back into the fray. In fact with two or more ships they could take turns, with one attacking and one recharging its shields, and then switching. Ba'al would be forced to pull his fleet back and either break off altogether or intentionally pursue the ships ... the ships with Asgard intergalactic hyperdrives that can effortlessly outdistance any Goa'uld ship.
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

Revy wrote:Say what? *When* has a Biliskner ship *ever* gone up against a Replicator controlled vessel successfully?
One would assume, offscreen. Thor had some hope for thier success in small victories, if the right tactics could be found. If Beliskners were the fucking literal antiques you claim they are, why would he have any hope whatsoever?
The *fact* is that as soon as a Biliskner class ship is proven obsolete due to Anubis' enhanced motherships, the Asgard *completely* cease to use them in *all* future encounters in which we see them.
Has it occured to you that that one (most likely the Valkyrie, according to Small Victories concept art) from Small Victories was probably the last of its class, and it was sent to deal with Osiris precisely because the ship was out of production as of small victories?

That does not support the notion that they're antiques as you suggest.
By that standard, Tel'taks are warships. We've seen them rapidly modified to have a giant laser beam.
Oh yes, that's a fair comparison. An advanced Asgard vessel with the ability to completely wipe out all enemies on a pottential enemy vessel or *planet* in just a *single* shot is so obviously comparable to a cargo ship with a gun strapped onto it. Indeed.
No. Dumb-ass. It's exactly the same situation. Exactly. Stock unarmed ships, that've been known up-rated in one instance only. Yes, when Thor equipped the Daniel Jackson with ancient technology, it could purge all replicators on a planet.

You realise that Thor could also handily fit a PWARW in a Tel'tak too, and give it the same ability you're wanking about. Those things are not big. That doesn't mean the Daniel Jackson class has proper ship-to-ship weapons for regular use.
Incidentally, I believe there have been instances of cargo, merchant and other similar ships being modified to serve as combat ships throughout history. It was common in the 15-1600's to upgrade merchant ships with guns and troops in order to hunt down pirates, and pirates themselves would capture merchant ships and such, and make use of their large size to turn into their own combat ships. So yes, regardless of what ship you start with, if you want to start putting weapons and such on it then I see no reason why it can't be classified as a warship. Or at least a destroyer, frigate, corvette or cruiser. So long as it can do the job and fill the role. If you have a science vessel that can fight ... I seem to recall a Trek episode when the crew have their memories wiped, and Worf takes one look at Starfleets 'science and exploration' ship the Enterprise, and swiftly concludes that it is a warship. It has weapons and shields, and as has been pointed out, during wartime Starfleet did in fact start using them as warships.
For the record, the Enterprise is a warship, with science roles added. Gene Roddenberry's novellisation of TMP is quite clear that the UFP's designations of its premiere ships as 'heavy cruisers' and such is euphamistic, and that they deserve the name battleship.
One supposes he may have used a different vessel in his previous antics, though the previous abductee's descriptions held true of the interior of the DJ-class
In fairness though, one Goa'uld or Tau'ri ship looks much like another on the inside. I can scarcely tell the difference between the interior of the Prometheus and the Daedalus unless I actually play episodes one after the other and specifically look for details.
I'm willing to concede that the DJ class may not be older than a few years. I forget what point you were trying to make.
That's because you're not engaging your brain.

Yes. It looks like one; it's the same model. It is however, smaller than a 304; There's shots where 304s are behind it, and appear the same size. Compare this with the ships in Unnatural Selection and Revelations. At best, it's maybe a quarter the length (meaning it's 1/64th the volume, and thus, power) of a true O'Neill. One O'Neill, assuming the internal design is essentially the same, equates to sixty four of those ships.
I've been on forums discussing Stargate ship sizes, and most of them include a disclaimer at the start of each thread voiding that particular episode, because a lot of people seem to think that the sizing of that entire battle scene was completely fucked up by the SFX department. I don't however have any practice in doing the scaling issues these people use, so I'd concede this point.
Yes. The general consensus is that it's either a destroyer, or that it was meant to be a DJ. Regardless, it's maybe 1/64th the volume of an O'Neill. For all we know, if the Asgard actually sent an O'Neill, it would have smacked the Ori ships down the second they appeared.
However, my original point stands - namely that an *Asgard* vessel sent by the Asgard to assist in stopping a pottential invasion, and which actually engaged in fighting the enemy rather than escaping to hyperspace once the battle began (as a pure science vessel would surely do)
Actually, how do we know that's not precisely what it did? It fired a few shots, while flying off away from the other ships, and then didn't appear in the battle any more. It certainly wasn't in the debris later.
lacked the Asgard Beam technology.
I never said that it should have. That was outright stated to be new.

You're not getting it.

Even with the very latest bells and whistles, there's nothing suggesting a modern diminutive asgard cruiser should outclass what was a top of the line mile long battleship ten years ago. There's been no mention of a massive revolution in thier power or shield technologies to support this idea that a 304 is more dangerous than a Beliskner. Let alone O'Neills, which are even larger.
If the Asgard had it, and even lowly human powered 304's can supply the energy to fire them, then that ship would have used it, and I'm sure it would have proven at least somewhat effective against the Ori. However that Asgard ship instead fired another weapon entirely, and clearly did not possess the Asgard Beam weapon that is fitted to 304 ships now as standard. Thus this tells us that either the Asgard sent one of their ships to the Beachead of a dangerous enemy, without giving it their best weapons availible, or that they simply didn't have that weapon ready or in existence at the time. In fact the Asgard *never* once demonstrated a beam based weapon in all the years we've seen their ships fight, and only prior to their mass death when they give SG1 *everything* they've got do we get to see such a weapon, strongly implying that it was a cutting edge weapon.
No, dumbass, what they didn't do, was send a full on, sixty four times larger O'Neill class battleship to engage the Ori. For what reason, we don't know.
Ehh ... can you finish this sentance? I'm not sure what you were trying to say here, you don't finish after the bracketed bit you wrote. Why don't they need to?
Even if they lose a ship with every 304 shot, there's still a good chance they'll win. That's the way attrition works.
Wrong. A fully upgraded Anubis mothership effortlessly destroyed the System Lord fleet over Abydos with no evident damage,
Err. Yes. With a deus-ex-machina. And the small fleet that engaged it was supposedly enough to destroy Anubis' ship, if it didn't have all six eyes.
and continued to deal the System Lords a heavy blow (according to SG1 in the following episode). It was only destroyed after a huge internal explosion knocked out it's main weapon, and atmospheric conditions greatly reduced the effectiveness of its shields. However, at its peak a mass Ha'Tak attack was useless.
Are you being deliberately dense. Of course you can mulch them with a super-ship. All you need to do is use your super-ship to pick your fights, and take on planets with say, less than thirty ha'tak defending them.

An assembled fleet is not the same thing as engaging them piecemeal. There is FUCK ALL to suggest Anubis parked up over Chulak with his flagship and sent a message to all the other system lords saying "gather your fleets and come get me, pansies" and then took them all on at once, which is what you're suggesting with this "immune to large numbers" BS.
They were also insufficient to tackle the Asgard before Anubis stepped in. It was only after Anubis that Freyr said "We can no longer be confident of victory when dealing with superior numbers." which implies that prior to Anubis they *could* be confident of victory in the face of superior numbers of Goa'uld ships, and that was back before they even started using O'Neills.
With the obvious caveat that he's talking about reasonable scenarios. Do you think these ships are just plain invulnerable, and that Anubis switched to using kryptonite bullets or something?

If we had it your way, Thor could have just parked over earth in Fair Game and waited for the two hundred ha'tak to arrive, and then slaughtered them, because one asgard mothership is invulnerable to superior numbers of goa'uld ships.
Which says exactly bugger all about the *technology* of his ships and weapons, which was the issue - there has *never* been any indication that Yu's fleets were technologically more advanced than any normal Goa'uld, but Anubis' are repeatedly stated as being more advanced, to the point where he was able to defeat a previously unassailable enemy - the Asgard. Despite this, Yu's convention fleet of ships (and if they weren't convention someone *would* have said, especially if they were unconventional enough to tackle Anubis and win) was able to cause Anubis such trouble that Anubis' forces were forced to request aid.

Now, again, if Anubis' advanced shields and weapons were *so* advanced they could defeat an Asgard ship, regular Goa'uld ships would have been made paste of. Remember - regular Ha'Taks can be pasted by Asgard ships even when possessing superior numbers (Freyr).
In your strange world, does 2 = 200? It was quite clear from Fair Game that the Asgard could not deal with one dominant goa'uld
And if Anubis' ships trumps them, then they would double trump the rest of the Goa'uld. This doesnt happen. He is still on even footing with them until he brings his super ship and super soldiers into the fray, and Yu and the other Goa'uld are still able to tackle his fleet and achieve victory, despite not having the advances Anubis had. Clearly either those advances were keyed to defeating Asgard tech specifically, or the Biliskner class ship was simply so inferior and outdated that it was an easy target ... something Freyr also suggests by pointing out that the ships *he* arrives with (O'Neills) are "far" superior to the one he attacked.
Are you a retard.

They're about a hundred times the volume. Of course they're far superior. They're SODDING MASSIVE. Everything else is gravy.
What? The "dumbest sci-fi race ever"? That's what I keep hearing about them, especially around here. Besides, the Ancients main weapon of choice was a finite supply of funky missiles. The Wraith stuck with energy weapons that seemed to last long enough to provide a continuous rain of fire on Atlantean installations. It's one thing to face superior numbers, but it's much much worse to face superior numbers with limited ammunition.
By your retard logic, just having superior technology would mean they could handwave away any number of enemies. Because situational superiority of force is exactly the same thing as overall superiority of force.

Of course, that seems to be just what they thought, which I guess makes you about on their level of practical sense.
I'm sorry, but that's fucking BS.

From Lost City Prt 2:
JUMPER (into phone): OK. (He lowers the phone.) Sir, thirty-plus ships just appeared in orbit, taking station around the planet.
Thirty plus ships... including Al'kesh, which he previously counted as 'ships.' It's obviously not a re-use of the shots from Lost City as you claim. Because there's more motherships on the screen. (Also, Ba'al's ship's weapon is also 'open' in the 'armed' position, Anubis' wasn't.)
Withstand a fair bit of punishment? Their shields were depleated by an almost casual bombardment from the flagship, with no other vessels firing upon them. If Anubis had taken the threat seriously, there's no reason he couldn't have ordered every vessel to fire on the Prometheus and blown it out of the stars in seconds.
It nevertheless takes continuous fire from the largest and strongest ship present, and survives. And the Prometheus was far inferior to a 304 with the latest Asgard enhanced shields and McKay's shield upgrade programme.
And? That doesn't mean it can take on thirty ha'tak. Your no-numbers arguments are really beginning to grate.
Either way, my point still remains - we see a 304 without a ZPM take protracted fire from a fleet of Wraith Hiveships - and just a *few* of those ships were able to put enough firepower onto Atlantis and it's ZPM powered shield to deplete it in a very short time.
And you know how long it would take ha'tak, I assume. (Incidentally, I can link you to calcs that suggest very strongly that Anubis' flagship's regular powerplant should dwarf a ZPM)
304's have very effective shields (so effective that people here complain about how advanced and tough the 304's are).
And? That doesn't mean they're a match for ten times their number.
And we've seen 304's perform hit and run strikes, firing on an enemy and then jumping out. Ba'als fleet was besieging Earth at a fixed location. One or more 304's could make strafing runs, destroying Goa'uld ships with the Asgard beams, and then jump to safety
So, they should... Jump out of hyperspace (no shields) into an enemy fleet, and then into hyperspace again... Rather than just damn well manouvering? This doesn't sound sensible. But it's a ray of sanity compared to your other blither.
and give their shields a chance to recharge, before jumping back into the fray. In fact with two or more ships they could take turns, with one attacking and one recharging its shields, and then switching. Ba'al would be forced to pull his fleet back and either break off altogether or intentionally pursue the ships ... the ships with Asgard intergalactic hyperdrives that can effortlessly outdistance any Goa'uld ship.
Or he could threaten to use cloaked al'kesh to fire a naquadah bomb at the US for every ha'tak they destroy. Leaving him to run around Earth at will and attacking him with hit-and-run attacks would be... dumb.

And for that matter, if he has the eyes in this scenario, he's the ability to 'destroy' the Earth in one shot while they're fucking about doing this.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Revy
Jedi Knight
Posts: 581
Joined: 2008-06-24 05:46pm

Post by Revy »

One would assume, offscreen.
Oh. Sure. Ok ...
Thor had some hope for thier success in small victories, if the right tactics could be found.
You just hit it right on the nail there - the right tactics. It took a plan that did not involve simply using their technology to save their asses. Thor only had hope for success because SG1 had just recently defeated the Replicators, a feat that the Asgard had not achieved themselves even with all their advanced tech.
If Beliskners were the fucking literal antiques you claim they are, why would he have any hope whatsoever?
Certainly not by simply blasting the Replicator ships with Biliskners, since Thor CLEARLY tells us that approach is doomed to failure. His hope lay in the ingenuity of humans who proved themselves capable of exploiting Replicator weaknesses WITHOUT simply throwing their ships uselessly into battle and getting them taken over. As Carter puts it "We cant touch them, but they can EASILY take over our ship or blow us up." Thus showing how fantastically effective the Biliskners were in fighting the Replicators.
Has it occured to you that that one (most likely the Valkyrie, according to Small Victories concept art) from Small Victories was probably the last of its class, and it was sent to deal with Osiris precisely because the ship was out of production as of small victories?

That does not support the notion that they're antiques as you suggest.
Nor does it support the notion that they are modern, cutting edge ships. In fact it doesnt support either notion and the whole thing is open to speculation, making it irrelevant. Still, the Asgard stopped using Biliskners in favour of O'Neill class, DJ class, and that Camelot class ship. The Biliskners were shown to be vulnerable to both Replicator attack and Anubis' upgraded ships. Even if they weren't antique by Asgard standards, they were clearly of little further use to the Asgard, illustrating that the Biliskners were insufficient force in SG1's modern galaxy. Which is what I said.
No. Dumb-ass. It's exactly the same situation. Exactly. Stock unarmed ships, that've been known up-rated in one instance only. Yes, when Thor equipped the Daniel Jackson with ancient technology, it could purge all replicators on a planet.

You realise that Thor could also handily fit a PWARW in a Tel'tak too, and give it the same ability you're wanking about. Those things are not big. That doesn't mean the Daniel Jackson class has proper ship-to-ship weapons for regular use.
Fine. Fair enough. So? It's a science ship. It can be modified for combat, as can a Teltak. Call them whatever you want.
For all we know, if the Asgard actually sent an O'Neill, it would have smacked the Ori ships down the second they appeared.
It is actually dumb that the Asgard didn't decide to go out fighting by taking down as many Ori as possible rather than simply blowing themselves up. We know their ships can self destruct to avoid capture, so it's not like that would have been a concern. They even end up with a weapon that can crack Ori shields, and they still dont simply use their fleet to put the smack down on the Ori invaders and then commit suicide. It's mad.
Actually, how do we know that's not precisely what it did? It fired a few shots, while flying off away from the other ships, and then didn't appear in the battle any more. It certainly wasn't in the debris later.
True. However I'd be inclined to call the Asgard complete bastards if so, because in the aftermath everyone was royally boned for space and life support, and having an intact Asgard ship around to beam up survivors and provide aid would have been the sort of thing allies do. If the Asgard ship did survive and run away, and then not turn back to provide help afterwards and simply ran home or whatever, then it really speaks ill of the Asgard crewing it.
There's been no mention of a massive revolution in thier power or shield technologies to support this idea that a 304 is more dangerous than a Beliskner. Let alone O'Neills, which are even larger.
My point was that the Asgard Beam, which I was trying to get you to admit to as being new, was a large part of what makes the 304's dangerous, especially to Ha'Taks. We know the 304's shields can survive attack from Ha'Taks because it comes under fire from them (controlled by Ba'al and the Lucian Alliance) and survives. However in the past 304's lacked anti-ship weaponry to eliminate the opposition. Now with Asgard Beams they have that weakness covered, and so dont have to sit there impotently while enemy ships wear down their shields, which may be good but wont last forever.

What makes them dangerous is the combination of good shields and a good weapon. Without the shields they could dish out the damage, but get destroyed before they could defeat all enemies. Without the weapons they can survive for a while, but eventually they will lose because they cant destroy the enemy. With both, they can survive long enough to blast their enemies apart.
Even if they lose a ship with every 304 shot, there's still a good chance they'll win. That's the way attrition works.
Normally, yes, but not always. Attrition didn't do squat against Anubis' super ship until it was utterly castrated. Attrition spectacularly failed to put a dent in even a single Ori ship. Despite having a vast fleet attacking Earth, Anubis was anhilated by a single super weapon. If the Asgard Beams can take out Ha'Taks as easily as drones, and the 304's shields last long enough for that to happen, then a fleet like Ba'als would lose.

Yes, it's a big if, but like I said it's not like they have to just take one ship and sit their and play tit-for-tat until they either win or get blown away.
Err. Yes. With a deus-ex-machina. And the small fleet that engaged it was supposedly enough to destroy Anubis' ship, if it didn't have all six eyes.
Based on what? Daniels say so? Not only did Anubis call him on that ("Do you know that for a fact?") but if Daniel himself really believed it, then he was a fucking moron for not telling Yu to strike and finish Anubis then and there. Besides, even after SG1 destroyed the Eye's power source, Carter tells us that the shields are still intact and powerful as ever, and only because Anubis was dumb enough to park his ship inside the planets atmosphere and handily reduce his shields to 40% strength, were they able to destroy his ship in the first place.
An assembled fleet is not the same thing as engaging them piecemeal. There is FUCK ALL to suggest Anubis parked up over Chulak with his flagship and sent a message to all the other system lords saying "gather your fleets and come get me, pansies" and then took them all on at once, which is what you're suggesting with this "immune to large numbers" BS.
Yu shows up with a fleet and says he commands the collective might of the system lords. He gets whipped, and the survivors run away. Knowing now what he is capable of, if the System Lords believed they could take that ship down through sheer force of numbers, then why the hell didn't they bunch their attack fleets together and hunt the damned thing down? What's Anubis going to do, run away from such a fleet with his brand new seemingly untouchable super weapon? Use it's firepower to deal them a heavy blow by picking on stragglers?

Even IF the case, my point remains - the Ha'Taks were useless against that ship even when they outnumbered it, and even with the collective might of the system lords their combined fleets were unable to stop it. And that is comparable to a 304 because if the 304 can one-shot Ha'Taks, take decent punishment in return, and pick it's own battles as you say, then it will eventually prevail against such an attack. And the odds start increasing tremendously with each 304 you add to the equation.
Do you think these ships are just plain invulnerable, and that Anubis switched to using kryptonite bullets or something?
Well, yes. That's the Stargate way. At first Earth couldnt touch a Ha'Tak, and then you have Ion Cannons bypassing their shields and blowing them up, and shield frequency modulators bypassing them. You have the Ori turn up and be pretty invulnerable, until SG1 gets a blue kryptonite death ray to kill them. The Replicators? We cant touch them, they can kill us easily, but oh look, and anti-replicator weapon that can bypass their shields and kill them.

So yes, going in vein with Stargate history in general, it's pretty standard for them to have ships that have untouchable shields and one-shot killer guns, and then have some technobable way that flips it around and acts as a kryptonite bullet. If the Asgard weapons were even close to Tollans, they would be one-shotting Ha'Tak by bypassing their shields. Next thing we know, Anubis makes his shields Ion Cannon proof, and they magically stop the Biliskners weapons from doing any damage. This is Stargate. This is what happens.
If we had it your way, Thor could have just parked over earth in Fair Game and waited for the two hundred ha'tak to arrive, and then slaughtered them, because one asgard mothership is invulnerable to superior numbers of goa'uld ships.
That was pretty much what Jack wanted. Thor on the other hand, had to leave Earth even before negotiations were over. At the very least, if his ship was packing the equivelant of a Tollan Ion canon it could be blasting apart Ha'Taks left right and center without effort, and provided the shields could stand up to the return fire he would eventually whittle them down. Massed fire obviously had not effect on the Ori ships, or on Anubis' ship, so why would it on Thors ship, provided the relative shield to weapons gap was similarly wide? To put it another way, if the entire of Starfleet tried to take down one Imperial ship, could they do it?
In your strange world, does 2 = 200? It was quite clear from Fair Game that the Asgard could not deal with one dominant goa'uld
I believe his words were "We may not have sufficient power to stop him [from destroying Earth]". Back when they were tied up by the Replicators and still used Biliskner class ships. Unless Thor knew how many ships they would face from an attack by a single dominant Goa'uld, it was probably wise of him to be conservative and admit that a single ship may not be able to defend earth from an unkown number of Goa'uld ones. Then again it may have, he doesnt say "If Sokar rose to power and attacked you, there'd be nothing we could do about it." he says he feels they might be unable to stop him from attacking protected planets.
By your retard logic, just having superior technology would mean they could handwave away any number of enemies. Because situational superiority of force is exactly the same thing as overall superiority of force.
They practically did. According to the Ancients, they won nearly every battle. They destroyed wave after wave of attackers. All they lacked was the endurance to keep it up.

In relation to the main issue, if the Ancients could slaughter Wraith ships with apparent ease (which they claimed) and only lost due to attrition, then it's a matter of whether Earth's 304's could hold out against Ba'als combined forces. I know, the point you're making is that Ba'als forces could defeat the 304's through attrition. I'm not convinced they could, I don't think Ba'al had enough ships to do it, and Ba'al himself was present. If he and the other Goa'uld present were killed before they could escape then unless the next Goa'uld in the system over feels like throwing more ships at such a formidable foe, the attack will end then and there.
Thirty plus ships... including Al'kesh, which he previously counted as 'ships.' It's obviously not a re-use of the shots from Lost City as you claim. Because there's more motherships on the screen. (Also, Ba'al's ship's weapon is also 'open' in the 'armed' position, Anubis' wasn't.)
I don't believe that. I'll get the discs and go over them, and make screenshots for comparison. I'll get back to this.
And? That doesn't mean it can take on thirty ha'tak. Your no-numbers arguments are really beginning to grate.
Ok, I admit that if Ba'als fleet was smarter than Anubis', and all his ships targeted the one 304 making the attack, and if enough were able to bring their fire to bear upon the smaller earth ship without their superior numbers getting in the way in the process, then yes, the combined firepower would surely obliterate the 304. In that case they would win, unless there were more than one 304 and depending on what kind of manouvers each side was pulling off.
And you know how long it would take ha'tak, I assume. (Incidentally, I can link you to calcs that suggest very strongly that Anubis' flagship's regular powerplant should dwarf a ZPM)
No, I admit I don't. We do see the Odyssey attacked by Ha'Taks, and it's shields stood up fairly well, but they were few in number, and in no way 30+. And if the 304's shield cant stand up to all the fire for long enough, yes they are screwed. You don't need to show me any calcs, I wouldn't understand them, I'll take your word for it.
So, they should... Jump out of hyperspace (no shields) into an enemy fleet, and then into hyperspace again... Rather than just damn well manouvering? This doesn't sound sensible. But it's a ray of sanity compared to your other blither.
Well in the final SG1 episode they fought off Ori ships, got pounded, but jumped to hyperspace and were able to recharge their shields somewhat before they decided to drop out into normal space, and the fight ressumed, they kicked more Ori ass, then jumped again. Granted the Ori were following them from hyperspace, but all they would have to do is drop out of hyperspace sufficiently far enough away from Ba'als fleet to engage the shields. Provided they vary their attack vector, at the very least they should force Ba'al to give up his entrenched position and mobilise to make such strike tactics less effective.
Or he could threaten to use cloaked al'kesh to fire a naquadah bomb at the US for every ha'tak they destroy. Leaving him to run around Earth at will and attacking him with hit-and-run attacks would be... dumb.
Well seeing as they (Earth) got zapped in the end anyway, they may as well go for it. At least that way the deal out damage to their attackers and stand the chance of killing Ba'al in the process. If they're smart, whatever 304's are involved will simply combine attacks on Ba'als ship itself and eliminate him from the get go. The series has demonstrated that the Jaffa are unlikely to continue fighting when their 'God' is dead, and so long as no other Goa'uld picks up the standard and tries to carry on, cutting off the head in this instance ought to work.
And for that matter, if he has the eyes in this scenario, he's the ability to 'destroy' the Earth in one shot while they're fucking about doing this.
Right. Because the Eye weapon was so powerful that Anubis had to target planets Stargates just to amplify the blast to a decent level ... and as I said, if they dont fight they're boned. Either they'll get blasted from orbit or sold to a life of slavery. If they're going down why wouldn't the humans go down fighting? If you're damned if you do and damned if you dont, you might as well take any chance you might have at killing the bugger leading the attack.
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

I shan't be replying to all that in detail right now, not enough time, but yep, we've seen ships jump to hyperspace during combat, and vice versa. We've also seen ships try it and get ganked (wraith cruisers, Asuran Auroras) attempting to flee, and intercepted dropping out of hyperspace when the enemy's ready for them (Replicator-block battleship, Asuran Auroras). I don't think repeatedly jumping in and out is exactly a low risk strategy.

And yes, Ba'al was on his flagship. In Continuum. If he actually expected to face Asgard-beams-of-rape-incarnate, he'd have to be fairly dumb to sit in the biggest target. Though it does have an escape ship.

As for death and slavery; one of the things about Ba'al, is that, during his brief stint as an Earth based terrorist, he demonstrated that he comprehended the concept of at least a modicum of good faith in negotiations. The 304s would also be in a position to harm his empire, if they just buggered off and fought a guerilla war.

As for the eye weapon; are you sure he wasn't just targetting the one prominent structure on the planet? Could you perhaps be confusing it with the (human) Hathor's destruction of Abydos in the (pre-SG1) old books, where she does actually detonate the stargate to cause the destruction?
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Revy
Jedi Knight
Posts: 581
Joined: 2008-06-24 05:46pm

Post by Revy »

Actually, you don't need to bother replying to what I've said, I'll conceede it all. I just rewatched the attack in Continuum and the one in Lost City, and you're right - Ba'al's fleet is considerably larger. I count at least 36 ships (Ha'Taks) 37 if you include his flagship, and rewatching the amount of firepower they all dish out I'm inclined to change my mind and agree with you - a 304 would likely be incinerated.

Sorry for being so pig-headed, but having seen the thing afresh I get the picture as to how strong that fleet was.
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

Yeah. It's ginormous. And there may be more offscreen. Anubis' attack; yeah, the 304s could probably deal with it, using the beam weapons, at least provided they took out the flagship first, and then worked their way through the others. But Ba'al's fleet was much bigger.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Brother-Captain Gaius
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6859
Joined: 2002-10-22 12:00am
Location: \m/

Post by Brother-Captain Gaius »

NecronLord wrote:Yeah. That's precisely what happened. As part of Ba'al's sinister plan.

And then something else happened, due to heroism, that made that all fully part of the continuity again.

What's the problem?
I wasn't referring to Continuum (it's only logical the Replicators would be there in the altered timeline, of course), but rather the notion that the Replicators coming back in the show's normal continuity would be anything but crap. Apologies for any confusion.
Agitated asshole | (Ex)40K Nut | Metalhead
The vision never dies; life's a never-ending wheel
1337 posts as of 16:34 GMT-7 June 2nd, 2003

"'He or she' is an agenderphobic microaggression, Sharon. You are a bigot." ― Randy Marsh
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

Ah yes. Ark-of-Truth was just about tolerable for me (because it was a vaguely sensible, as opposed to Deus-ex-Machina, plan to ruin the Ori's war-fighting capacity). Any other return of the replicators would likely be suck-o-rama.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Stile
Jedi Knight
Posts: 654
Joined: 2006-01-02 06:22pm
Location: Badger Central
Contact:

Post by Stile »

I just saw it tonight. Okay, 3 of 5.
Did anyone get the offhand joke about how cold it was in the freighter? i guess I got it since I deal with that sort of stuff. -40 degrees is the same in both Fahrenheit and Celsius.
Image
User avatar
neoolong
Dead Sexy 'Shroom
Posts: 13180
Joined: 2002-08-29 10:01pm
Location: California

Post by neoolong »

I didn't think it was bad, though if it was being advertised as something else (ie an epic battle) then I could understand being annoyed. It did feel like a two part episode, which I don't think is that bad of a way to go. And I did feel it captured some of the energy of the earlier episodes of Stargate.

However, what did happen to Cam at the end? All I can think of is Back to the Future. Basically, does/would Cam write a letter to be delivered to Cameron Mitchell at his address thirty or forty years in the future?

Long enough for it to be believed and have an effect. In other words, they could have avoided a number of problems by having future knowledge. NID would be less of an issue for instance. Basically, reenact Ba'al's plan.

Or does he basically off himself to avoid being tempted to change the timeline?

Oh, and using the same actors for the goa'uld was kind of neat. Camulus, Nirrti, Cronus, Aphophis, all by the same guys.
Member of the BotM. @( !.! )@
Post Reply