Starship design question

SF: discuss futuristic sci-fi series, ideas, and crossovers.

Moderator: NecronLord

User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Starship design question

Post by Stark »

Stofsk wrote:I asked him this earlier, but my guess is the Broadsword. It's the only official Traveller ship design that I know of where the decks are arranged perpendicular to the axis of thrust. I thought the AHL was just another standard Traveller Big Ship where the decks are arranged like it was a naval analogue. The Broadsword is a really interesting design and I just wish the whole game had did their designs based off that kind of layout.
Yeah, it's the Broadsword. It's a far 'harder' design than everything else in Traveller (the game with both plasma AND fusion guns). 4 removable shuttles that are like 20% of the ship's volume! :D
User avatar
montypython
Jedi Master
Posts: 1130
Joined: 2004-11-30 03:08am

Re: Starship design question

Post by montypython »

The radial deck-layout ovoid vessel (which was what I was envisioning originally) can have uniform gravitational force in an inhabited uniform cylindrical central body, with the narrower bow and stern regions occupied by machinery. Biggest reason for an ovoid shape off the top of my head is possibly relativistic streamlining, possibly.
User avatar
Jusu
Youngling
Posts: 51
Joined: 2010-04-27 03:53pm
Location: Tsienville, Europa

Re: Starship design question

Post by Jusu »

Hmm, since this is ships in TV Scifi (not bringing in Anime here, most of their stuff is...eh), what do you all think with the nBSG Galactica and Pegasus? I always thought the fact the Galactica's flight pods retracting into the main hull would provide an extra measure of integrity and possibly help prove to be the key to her survival. Galactica relied more on structural design for integrity, rather than armor (although I'm sure Pegasus had a similar design as well) to survive. By my last count, the only time the Galactica jumped without retracting its pods was in in the last episode, and she broke her back. But I'm also sure being pounded on by heavy arty helped contribute to it.

So I wanted to ask. Are Earth ships shaped the way they are mainly due to our familiarity in building stuff like it? Big, impressive things with bulky angular designs made to withstand damage?

Also as a side note, in terms of visual impressiveness. The Pegasus remake was damn way better than the Galactica or Basestars. Or it could be the fact she dished out pain in ways I never saw the Galactica do. :twisted:
User avatar
Nyrath
Padawan Learner
Posts: 341
Joined: 2006-01-23 04:04pm
Location: the praeternatural tower
Contact:

Re: Starship design question

Post by Nyrath »

Stofsk wrote:I asked him this earlier, but my guess is the Broadsword. It's the only official Traveller ship design that I know of where the decks are arranged perpendicular to the axis of thrust. I thought the AHL was just another standard Traveller Big Ship where the decks are arranged like it was a naval analogue. The Broadsword is a really interesting design and I just wish the whole game had did their designs based off that kind of layout.
Yes, I like it too.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nyrath/set ... 724051592/
dworkin
Jedi Master
Posts: 1313
Joined: 2003-08-06 05:44am
Location: Whangaparoa, one babe, same sun and surf.

Re: Starship design question

Post by dworkin »

Whats the layout of Battletech's Drop Ships? Specifically the ones which are the Broadsword's bastard offspring, the Union and Overlord.
Don't abandon democracy folks, or an alien star-god may replace your ruler. - NecronLord
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16432
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: Starship design question

Post by Batman »

dworkin wrote:Whats the layout of Battletech's Drop Ships? Specifically the ones which are the Broadsword's bastard offspring, the Union and Overlord.
As is repeatedly and routinely laid out throughout the series they ARE set up so the thrust's artifical pseudogravity would be 'down'?
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
tim31
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3388
Joined: 2006-10-18 03:32am
Location: Tasmania, Australia

Re: Starship design question

Post by tim31 »

I was trying to get a pic of the Alliance towerblock cruisers to throw into the discussion here, but apparently Firefly fan jealously guard their material.
lol, opsec doesn't apply to fanfiction. -Aaron

PRFYNAFBTFC
CAPTAIN OF MFS SAMMY HAGAR
ImageImage
Sinewmire
Padawan Learner
Posts: 468
Joined: 2009-12-15 12:17pm

Re: Starship design question

Post by Sinewmire »

http://firefly.wikia.com/wiki/I.A.V._Dortmunder
I was trying to get a pic of the Alliance towerblock cruisers to throw into the discussion here, but apparently Firefly fan jealously guard their material.
There's a pic and some info on the wiki, accessible at the link above. It's a strange looking ship to my gravity-and-wind-resistance-bound mind.
"Our terror has to be indiscriminate, otherwise innocent people will cease to fear"
-Josef Stalin
Post Reply