Your Favorite Stargate Design

SF: discuss futuristic sci-fi series, ideas, and crossovers.

Moderator: NecronLord

What is Your Favorite Stargate Design?

Milky Way Gate (SG-1)
41
55%
Pegasus Gate (SGA)
20
27%
Destiny Gate (SGU)
14
19%
 
Total votes: 75

User avatar
Eternal_Freedom
Castellan
Posts: 10418
Joined: 2010-03-09 02:16pm
Location: CIC, Battlestar Temeraire

Re: Your Favorite Stargate Design

Post by Eternal_Freedom »

Naturally. After all, Toasters as advanced travel machines are quite common I find. Case in point, Homer Simpson successfully builds a time machine from one, but sadly manages to create an alternate timeline where Flanders rules the Earth by lobotomising the population. Fun
Baltar: "I don't want to miss a moment of the last Battlestar's destruction!"
Centurion: "Sir, I really think you should look at the other Battlestar."
Baltar: "What are you babbling about other...it's impossible!"
Centurion: "No. It is a Battlestar."

Corrax Entry 7:17: So you walk eternally through the shadow realms, standing against evil where all others falter. May your thirst for retribution never quench, may the blood on your sword never dry, and may we never need you again.
Werrf
Youngling
Posts: 106
Joined: 2010-06-10 11:11pm

Re: Your Favorite Stargate Design

Post by Werrf »

Eternal_Freedom wrote:Naturally. After all, Toasters as advanced travel machines are quite common I find. Case in point, Homer Simpson successfully builds a time machine from one, but sadly manages to create an alternate timeline where Flanders rules the Earth by lobotomising the population. Fun
Indeed, that's the problem with toasters - they're very powerful, but somewhat unpredictable and difficult to control. One time they burn the toast, next time, with the exact same settings, they throw you back through a rip in space time and the entire universe crumbles around you. For power and control, you really need a phone box.
User avatar
Solauren
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10387
Joined: 2003-05-11 09:41pm

Re: Your Favorite Stargate Design

Post by Solauren »

I choose the Stargate Atlantis gates.

Why?

Simple; That looks more like a space co-ordinate system then 'use the Constellations'. It just makes more sense to me.
I've been asked why I still follow a few of the people I know on Facebook with 'interesting political habits and view points'.

It's so when they comment on or approve of something, I know what pages to block/what not to vote for.
User avatar
Eternal_Freedom
Castellan
Posts: 10418
Joined: 2010-03-09 02:16pm
Location: CIC, Battlestar Temeraire

Re: Your Favorite Stargate Design

Post by Eternal_Freedom »

Umm, As I recall, the symbols on the Atlantis gates are also constellations, some real-life far away ones and some new made up ones, presumably constellations as seen from Atlantis
Baltar: "I don't want to miss a moment of the last Battlestar's destruction!"
Centurion: "Sir, I really think you should look at the other Battlestar."
Baltar: "What are you babbling about other...it's impossible!"
Centurion: "No. It is a Battlestar."

Corrax Entry 7:17: So you walk eternally through the shadow realms, standing against evil where all others falter. May your thirst for retribution never quench, may the blood on your sword never dry, and may we never need you again.
User avatar
JME2
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12258
Joined: 2003-02-02 04:04pm

Re: Your Favorite Stargate Design

Post by JME2 »

Eternal_Freedom wrote:Umm, As I recall, the symbols on the Atlantis gates are also constellations, some real-life far away ones and some new made up ones, presumably constellations as seen from Atlantis
Yes, they're Pegasus Galaxy constellations. But again, the streamlined, digital design makes more sense for an intergalactic gate network.
User avatar
Terralthra
Requiescat in Pace
Posts: 4741
Joined: 2007-10-05 09:55pm
Location: San Francisco, California, United States

Re: Your Favorite Stargate Design

Post by Terralthra »

The whole "chevrons as symbols for constellations as coordinates pinpointing an actual deep-space location" didn't make any sense as the shows progressed. For example, on more than one occasion, they knew the symbols used in the address, but not "what order they go in." This doesn't make any sense if the symbols are constellations; if you have six points in space, there is only one point they can pick out as being at their center. Figuring out the order - (+x,-x, +y, -y, +z, -z) for example - can be done from a single known address and then applied to any combination of symbols to arrange them in order using basic astrography.
User avatar
sirocco
Padawan Learner
Posts: 191
Joined: 2009-11-08 09:32am
Location: I don't know!

Re: Your Favorite Stargate Design

Post by sirocco »

I thought the problem was that even if you make up an adress with 6 coordinates nothing assures you that

1 there is a planet there
2 there is a gate on that particular planet

Though after they got the Goa'uld and Ancient Yellow Pages, SG Earth basically knew the exact number of habitable planets in our galaxy.
Future is a common dream. Past is a shared lie.
There is the only the 3 Presents : the Present of Today, the Present of Tomorrow and the Present of Yesterday.
User avatar
Terralthra
Requiescat in Pace
Posts: 4741
Joined: 2007-10-05 09:55pm
Location: San Francisco, California, United States

Re: Your Favorite Stargate Design

Post by Terralthra »

sirocco wrote:I thought the problem was that even if you make up an adress with 6 coordinates nothing assures you that

1 there is a planet there
2 there is a gate on that particular planet

Though after they got the Goa'uld and Ancient Yellow Pages, SG Earth basically knew the exact number of habitable planets in our galaxy.
On more than one occasion, they had someone use a gate, and wrote down the symbols, but "didn't know what order the symbols went in." A big deal was made over how many combinations there were. This doesn't make any sense with chevron = constellation = coordinate.
User avatar
Eternal_Freedom
Castellan
Posts: 10418
Joined: 2010-03-09 02:16pm
Location: CIC, Battlestar Temeraire

Re: Your Favorite Stargate Design

Post by Eternal_Freedom »

Yeah, I think the series made a mistake with blindly following Daniel Jackson's intepretation in the Stargate film.

Which, incidentally, he came up with BEFORE he even new the Stargate existed.

I always interpreted the symbols as as Ancient alphabet or set of numerals, as shown in "Lost City," and that theses symbols where like, shorthand for coordinates or whatever
Baltar: "I don't want to miss a moment of the last Battlestar's destruction!"
Centurion: "Sir, I really think you should look at the other Battlestar."
Baltar: "What are you babbling about other...it's impossible!"
Centurion: "No. It is a Battlestar."

Corrax Entry 7:17: So you walk eternally through the shadow realms, standing against evil where all others falter. May your thirst for retribution never quench, may the blood on your sword never dry, and may we never need you again.
User avatar
sirocco
Padawan Learner
Posts: 191
Joined: 2009-11-08 09:32am
Location: I don't know!

Re: Your Favorite Stargate Design

Post by sirocco »

Eternal_Freedom wrote:Yeah, I think the series made a mistake with blindly following Daniel Jackson's intepretation in the Stargate film.

Which, incidentally, he came up with BEFORE he even new the Stargate existed.

I always interpreted the symbols as as Ancient alphabet or set of numerals, as shown in "Lost City," and that theses symbols where like, shorthand for coordinates or whatever
What's worse is that in the film they use constellation only seen from Earth to dial a planet at the other end of the Universe!

But well after some time I just forgot the mechanics of gate system and just started enjoying the stories (the Fiction part in science-fiction).
Future is a common dream. Past is a shared lie.
There is the only the 3 Presents : the Present of Today, the Present of Tomorrow and the Present of Yesterday.
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Re: Your Favorite Stargate Design

Post by NecronLord »

For the record, as of episode two of SG1, they were using astronomical data to cross reference the 'constellations' with known star positions. And as for saying that it should be easy to work out which one is which. It is of course going to be much easier to simply search a database for hits.

Why more than one combination works, hell knows. The constallation thing is a bit silly anyway.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Themightytom
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2818
Joined: 2007-12-22 11:11am
Location: United States

Re: Your Favorite Stargate Design

Post by Themightytom »

NecronLord wrote:For the record, as of episode two of SG1, they were using astronomical data to cross reference the 'constellations' with known star positions. And as for saying that it should be easy to work out which one is which. It is of course going to be much easier to simply search a database for hits.

Why more than one combination works, hell knows. The constallation thing is a bit silly anyway.
Especially since the arctic gate has more symbols, and after Ba'al played the shell game with a couple dozen planetary stargates

"Since when is "the west" a nation?"-Styphon
"ACORN= Cobra obviously." AMT
This topic is... oh Village Idiot. Carry on then.--Havok
User avatar
Terralthra
Requiescat in Pace
Posts: 4741
Joined: 2007-10-05 09:55pm
Location: San Francisco, California, United States

Re: Your Favorite Stargate Design

Post by Terralthra »

Well, they did establish that the Stargate system connects to whatever gate is on the appropriate planet, including a gate in orbit. If there's more than one gate, it defaults to the one with an active DHD. What it does if there are two gates with active DHDs has never been established.

So, there's nothing wrong on its face with taking a gate from planet A and putting it on planet B. Dial planet B, you'll get the stolen gate.

Which makes you wonder why SGC never took Odyssey or Daedalus, picked a gate from a hellworld (for example, the world they first encountered the Tollans on) and used it to replace the Beta gate lost when Anubis hacked it, instead of putting up with extortion from the Russians from whom they were leasing the Alpha gate. The Russians didn't actively want a stargate program, they only periodically threatened to pull the gate whenever they wanted concessions from SGC. Once the Russian DHD was destroyed (retrieving Teal'c in 48 Hours), the Russians had nothing to hold over their head.
User avatar
Chris OFarrell
Durandal's Bitch
Posts: 5724
Joined: 2002-08-02 07:57pm
Contact:

Re: Your Favorite Stargate Design

Post by Chris OFarrell »

Because the Prometheus wasn't launched until the very end of Season 6, apart from the unexpected NID launch in the middle of Season 6. Anubis hacked the Gate at the start of Season-6.
And the DHD event in 48 hours was a season earlier then that.


Of course, none of this answers why in the HELL they gave up the next 304 in the pipeline to Russia in exchange for a new 'lease' on a Stargate in season 9! I mean its not like the writers had this whole Russian arc planned out where the Russians would be stretching forth into the Galaxy with their own (mostly alligned but not always) agenda to the SGC's own projects or something, they just blew it up another episode down the line. The logical answer to Russia and China playing power games is clearly "Oh...okay then, have your Gate back, we're going to pick up a Gate and a DHD to make sure ours supercedes yours, bye!" after all, so it doesn't even make much sense diplomatically.

I mean, if Russia had 'sold' the Gate that time, in exchange for a few key components for the Korolev (this time a Russian ship about the size of the Prometheus, but very 'Russian') like Asgard shields, hyperdrive, sensors, transporters and some technicial help to integrate it, it would have been a perfect episode. Russia gets the US to give them the goodies, they then screw China having played them for chumps AND still stay on more or less reasonable political terms...
Image
User avatar
Terralthra
Requiescat in Pace
Posts: 4741
Joined: 2007-10-05 09:55pm
Location: San Francisco, California, United States

Re: Your Favorite Stargate Design

Post by Terralthra »

Chris OFarrell wrote:Because the Prometheus wasn't launched until the very end of Season 6, apart from the unexpected NID launch in the middle of Season 6. Anubis hacked the Gate at the start of Season-6.
And the DHD event in 48 hours was a season earlier then that.


Of course, none of this answers why in the HELL they gave up the next 304 in the pipeline to Russia in exchange for a new 'lease' on a Stargate in season 9! I mean its not like the writers had this whole Russian arc planned out where the Russians would be stretching forth into the Galaxy with their own (mostly alligned but not always) agenda to the SGC's own projects or something, they just blew it up another episode down the line. The logical answer to Russia and China playing power games is clearly "Oh...okay then, have your Gate back, we're going to pick up a Gate and a DHD to make sure ours supercedes yours, bye!" after all, so it doesn't even make much sense diplomatically.
Uh, yes. That is pretty much exactly what I was saying. They gave in to Russian extortion and gave them the Koralev for no reason at all.
User avatar
Chris OFarrell
Durandal's Bitch
Posts: 5724
Joined: 2002-08-02 07:57pm
Contact:

Re: Your Favorite Stargate Design

Post by Chris OFarrell »

What you said was;

"Which makes you wonder why SGC never took Odyssey or Daedalus, picked a gate from a hellworld (for example, the world they first encountered the Tollans on) and used it to replace the Beta gate lost when Anubis hacked it, instead of putting up with extortion from the Russians from whom they were leasing the Alpha gate."

Anubius 'hacked' the Stargate to make it go 'Boom' back before they had any starships. Hell the plot point of the second episode as the gate countdown ticks down is that they take the X-302 prototype, strap it to the Stargate and try to push it to better then 11K/s to get it the hell away from Earth.
Image
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Re: Your Favorite Stargate Design

Post by NecronLord »

Chris OFarrell wrote:Of course, none of this answers why in the HELL they gave up the next 304 in the pipeline to Russia in exchange for a new 'lease' on a Stargate in season 9! I mean its not like the writers had this whole Russian arc planned out where the Russians would be stretching forth into the Galaxy with their own (mostly alligned but not always) agenda to the SGC's own projects or something, they just blew it up another episode down the line. The logical answer to Russia and China playing power games is clearly "Oh...okay then, have your Gate back, we're going to pick up a Gate and a DHD to make sure ours supercedes yours, bye!" after all, so it doesn't even make much sense diplomatically.
I would assume they are limited in such acts by the IOA treaty. Something like "Any unilateral act of such nature will forefit United States presence in the Ancient Weapons Platform in Antarctica." Having the dominant stargate wouldn't really balance the Chair Weapon being in the hands of Boris the Patriotic Russian and Tsai the Patriotic Chinese Scientist.

Of course, such a thing should really have been in the episode if that's the idea.

I have no idea how to grok that with the hilarious bit of the control chair being moved to Area 51, which was presumably done because they didn't feel like rebuilding the outpost set, and because the outpost had shields which would render the whole dart attack futile.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Terralthra
Requiescat in Pace
Posts: 4741
Joined: 2007-10-05 09:55pm
Location: San Francisco, California, United States

Re: Your Favorite Stargate Design

Post by Terralthra »

Chris OFarrell wrote:What you said was;

"Which makes you wonder why SGC never took Odyssey or Daedalus, picked a gate from a hellworld (for example, the world they first encountered the Tollans on) and used it to replace the Beta gate lost when Anubis hacked it, instead of putting up with extortion from the Russians from whom they were leasing the Alpha gate."

Anubius 'hacked' the Stargate to make it go 'Boom' back before they had any starships. Hell the plot point of the second episode as the gate countdown ticks down is that they take the X-302 prototype, strap it to the Stargate and try to push it to better then 11K/s to get it the hell away from Earth.
Yes, and then the Russians extorted the Korolev out of them in season 9, when they had already had at least two ships with Asgard beaming tech. Which part of that isn't clear in my paragraph? They lost the Beta gate in season 6, the Russians lease them the Alpha gate back, and then in Season 9, the Russians make trouble. Before the Russians try to extort anything, there would be little reason for the SGC to bypass their extortion, yes?
User avatar
Starglider
Miles Dyson
Posts: 8709
Joined: 2007-04-05 09:44pm
Location: Isle of Dogs
Contact:

Re: Your Favorite Stargate Design

Post by Starglider »

I like the Pegasus gates. Anything that's supposed to last for tens of thousands, if not millions of years should have as few moving parts as possible. Also it is my firm belief that while steampunk is cute, true sophistication is indicated by the number of flashing lights the device has. :)
User avatar
thegreatpl
Youngling
Posts: 80
Joined: 2010-02-05 08:12pm

Re: Your Favorite Stargate Design

Post by thegreatpl »

I like the look of the Destiny gate. Just seems to be more rounded.

I would prefer the Milky way gates though. That seems to just have more redundancy than the other gates. If the remotes sensors or DHD break down or get fried in the Pegasus gate, then you have a useless circle. Lose your Milky way DHD? Hook it up to a power source and spin it with a bunch of clamps.
User avatar
JME2
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12258
Joined: 2003-02-02 04:04pm

Re: Your Favorite Stargate Design

Post by JME2 »

thegreatpl wrote:I like the look of the Destiny gate. Just seems to be more rounded.

I would prefer the Milky way gates though. That seems to just have more redundancy than the other gates. If the remotes sensors or DHD break down or get fried in the Pegasus gate, then you have a useless circle. Lose your Milky way DHD? Hook it up to a power source and spin it with a bunch of clamps.
Yeah, that's the one thing I never liked about the Pegasus Gates. It seemed weird that the Ancients hadn't created a backup in case of an accident like that.
User avatar
Terralthra
Requiescat in Pace
Posts: 4741
Joined: 2007-10-05 09:55pm
Location: San Francisco, California, United States

Re: Your Favorite Stargate Design

Post by Terralthra »

JME2 wrote:
thegreatpl wrote:I like the look of the Destiny gate. Just seems to be more rounded.

I would prefer the Milky way gates though. That seems to just have more redundancy than the other gates. If the remotes sensors or DHD break down or get fried in the Pegasus gate, then you have a useless circle. Lose your Milky way DHD? Hook it up to a power source and spin it with a bunch of clamps.
Yeah, that's the one thing I never liked about the Pegasus Gates. It seemed weird that the Ancients hadn't created a backup in case of an accident like that.
They might have. We never see them with a Pegasus gate that has no DHD and no remote-sensor where they have any chance to experiment.
User avatar
thegreatpl
Youngling
Posts: 80
Joined: 2010-02-05 08:12pm

Re: Your Favorite Stargate Design

Post by thegreatpl »

sure, they may have some sort of backup system, but the only way i can see that is if someone links a computer up to them. Unless there are some hidden buttons on it somewhere.
User avatar
Starglider
Miles Dyson
Posts: 8709
Joined: 2007-04-05 09:44pm
Location: Isle of Dogs
Contact:

Re: Your Favorite Stargate Design

Post by Starglider »

Perhaps they decided that permitting people to operate a gate without using a DHD was too dangerous. SG1 nearly wiped out an inhabited planet by making their gate traverse its sun ('Red Sky'), and it was stated that this happened because their dialing computer doesn't have the safety protocols that the DHDs have. The spinning ring is still ridiculously over-elaborate and cumbersome as a backup dialing mechanism, a keypad would be much more sensible.
User avatar
Temujin
Jedi Master
Posts: 1300
Joined: 2010-03-28 07:08pm
Location: Occupying Wall Street (In Spirit)

Re: Your Favorite Stargate Design

Post by Temujin »

Could it be that the Milky Way gate system was purposefully retrofitted with a less advanced more user friendly kind of gate before the Ancients ascended to benefit the younger races. They obviously couldn't do this in the Pegasus Galaxy with the Wraith in control.
Image
Mr. Harley: Your impatience is quite understandable.
Klaatu: I'm impatient with stupidity. My people have learned to live without it.
Mr. Harley: I'm afraid my people haven't. I'm very sorry... I wish it were otherwise.

"I do know that for the sympathy of one living being, I would make peace with all. I have love in me the likes of which you can scarcely imagine and rage the likes of which you would not believe.
If I cannot satisfy the one, I will indulge the other." – Frankenstein's Creature on the glacier[/size]
Post Reply