Guardsman Bass wrote:The only rationale I can think of is that they were trying to minimize splatter from slicing a Kaiju to pieces as opposed to simply beating them to death.
Generally I think they try to
reduce massive Kaiju bleeding, rather than completely eliminating it. Hits from their arm-mounted energy weapons didn't result in lakes of blood oozing out, but there was still some bleeding.
So maybe they could use a hot sword, so it does some cauterizing as well as cutting?
EDIT: Admiral Valdemaar said it better
Zinegata wrote:Re: Mining the Breach
My sense is that they didn't want to keep nuking the Pacific Ocean (especially given that Kaiju caracasses were apparently highly toxic) which is why they simply didn't mine the whole area with nukes. In the preview comics some of the earlier Kaijus were apparently killed by nuking, but it was seen as a largely self-defeating measure hence the invention of the Jaegers - which among other things apparently use weaponry that mnimize the toxic spill of the Kaiju carcasses.
Re: Why not fight in the Breach and have 20 Jaegers beating up on one Kaiju?
My suspicion is that Jaegers may not exactly be operating at best efficiency when completely submerged. The Kaiju seemed very capable of outmaneuvering them in full underwater conditions. Their optimal deployment seems to be when the Jaegers are in "waist-deep" water, as seen by the deployment of Gypsy Danger at Anchorage, and the Typhoon and Alpha at Hong Kong.
Yeah, I guess repeatedly nuking Kaiju as they exit the Breach does seem like a bad idea, both in terms of radiation from the nuke and that toxic Kaiju blood (though the nuke might reduce or eliminate the chemical toxicity of the blood).
I still disagree that 20 Jaegers waiting right at the Breach itself would have had any trouble beating up Kaiju as they emerge, even if the Jaegers don't work as well completely submerged.
In the movie, two Jaegers barely won against two Cat4s and the first Cat5 emerging simultaneously (the "Triple Event"), but they did win.
20 or 30 Jaegers lying in wait for a single Cat3 or Cat4 to emerge (there were no "Double Events" until the Hong Kong attack shown in the movie) would be a goddamn beatdown so severe that we'd have PETA protesting our inhumane treatment of Kaiju.
AniThyng wrote:Which is why I really cannot imagine any situation in which a wall makes any sense even using the in universe logic...how can you meaningfully wall off even the Pacific coast? Some cities and bays, sure, but then all the Kaiju have to do is walk around it.
Yeah, how long exactly is the Kaiju Wall supposed to be? Even if the Wall worked (it didn't), how far exactly does it extend?
The Pacific doesn't really have a solid "rim" of land in the actual sense, it extends into other oceans. Unless it's built through the sea (which would require an insane height to extend from the seafloor to its ~100-200m height above sea level), how is it going to stop Kaiju from swimming past the south of Chile or into the South China Sea? Or under the Arctic ice cap?
Worse still, they cut funding from the Jaeger program to build the wall, instead of upgrading the Jaegers to deal with the increasing Kaiju sizes.
Generally the idea of an
undefended wall keeping out a determined enemy demonstrates downright stupidity on the part of the international council that backed it. Or are they stupid enough to still think of the Kaiju as "animals" rather than "enemy"? If the wall had gun emplacements, or if they launched massive airstrikes on Kaiju as they attempt to breach the wall (Bladehead took an hour to break through to Sydney), it would make a bit of sense.
Speaking of airstrikes, I recall them showing F-22s attacking the Tokyo Kaiju by attacking it with automatic low-caliber cannon fire. It seems they modified the F-22s to have two cannons instead of one M61, for the express purpose of peppering Kaiju with ineffective fire, and proceed to fly straight into it. They're supposed to be swatted out of the air with a limb, but considering how big the sky is, it actually looks like they ram into it deliberately.
We
know conventional weaponry (like Strike Eureka's chest missile tubes) can injure and kill Kaiju, so perhaps they could have properly shown us why airstrikes were ineffective.
The general silliness of the F-22 scene seems to serve as a reminder; some flicks are meant to be big, loud and awesome, and not meant to be analyzed.. and this is one of 'em.
I guess I have a lot to say about the movie because I love it, and that's how I treat movies I love, but this really isn't the right way to treat Pacific Rim.
"..history has shown the best defense against heavy cavalry are pikemen, so aircraft should mount lances on their noses and fly in tight squares to fend off bombers". - RedImperator
"ha ha, raping puppies is FUN!" - Johonebesus
"It would just be Unicron with pew pew instead of nom nom". - Vendetta, explaining his justified disinterest in the idea of the movie Allspark affecting the Death Star