Ever hear of ballast?Feil wrote:Jaegers don't float.Batman wrote:1. How do you know Jaegers weigh thousands of tons? Sure, using real world physics they should, but what's your canon information they do?

Moderator: NecronLord
Ever hear of ballast?Feil wrote:Jaegers don't float.Batman wrote:1. How do you know Jaegers weigh thousands of tons? Sure, using real world physics they should, but what's your canon information they do?
That's just a way to make them heavy!Elheru Aran wrote: Ever hear of ballast?
It'd be hilarious if one tried, they'd be swung around too ^^Simon_Jester wrote:Yeah. Also, good-sized ships weigh many thousands of tons. Gypsy Danger uses such a ship as a club, meaning it's got considerably more mass than a ship. No matter how strong you are, you can't swing something like a baseball bat, or even a sledgehammer, if its weight is a significant fraction of your own weight.
Because the helicopters aren't important.Archinist wrote:So why do the helicopters look so mundane and plain? If they were supposed to be that powerful, shouldn't they have some FTL-capable thrusters on them, or millions of flashing lights so bright they evaporate the ocean into nothingness, or maybe no helicopters at all, just floating hooks and ropes?
While they may look like helicopters, those were actually the engines of the Avengers Helicarrier after they were replaced with giant repulsors.Archinist wrote:Just asking how they work? I've never actually watched the film, but I thought it was about modern-day USA with giant robots and generic godzillas?
Because doing any of those things would be a random distraction from the things the movie is supposed to be about. You're not supposed to notice the helicopters. They're only even in the story as an excuse for the giant robots to be moved around quickly- a bad excuse. If there were gigantic lights or magical rockety things or if they were invisible, then normal people watching the movie would focus on them. That would be bad.Archinist wrote:So why do the helicopters look so mundane and plain? If they were supposed to be that powerful, shouldn't they have some FTL-capable thrusters on them, or millions of flashing lights so bright they evaporate the ocean into nothingness, or maybe no helicopters at all, just floating hooks and ropes?
Yes, and I can assure you, a Jaeger waaay surpasses itCykeisme wrote:Is there an upper limit to lifting capacity that can be attained using helicopter rotors, if variables like rotor radius (blade length), air density, and air viscosity are given? I'm assuming there is, but tbh I was too lazy and/or dumb to look up/understand the basic physics involved, and thus should be taken out back and shot.
Someone did the math on this and it'd be, like, several dozen iirc. Enough that it'd look almost silly, I think.That said, the best move to appease realism (even if it isn't one of their goals), and also increase the rule of cool (which, apparently is one of their goals) would be to simply increase the number of choppers and cables, spread over a larger horizontal flight pattern.
Hybrid airship/helos ("helistat", like the Piasecki PA97) are one such heavy-lift (failed, experimental) option, but that would have been a) too slow for the movie, and b) distracting. And they didn't work out in real life as well, eitherElheru Aran wrote:There have been a number of fancy ways explored of making helicopters that can lift more... but, basically, they're pretty much dead ends because either we don't have the technology, the materials science, or the physics necessary to pull them off.
Ah, I suppose you're right, at a certain point, increasing the numbers of the helicopter swarm is going to look odd.. the sheer number of cables alone would evoke the image of an airborne version of Gulliver and 21st Century Lilliputians, or something.Q99 wrote:Someone did the math on this and it'd be, like, several dozen iirc. Enough that it'd look almost silly, I think.Cykeisme wrote:That said, the best move to appease realism (even if it isn't one of their goals), and also increase the rule of cool (which, apparently is one of their goals) would be to simply increase the number of choppers and cables, spread over a larger horizontal flight pattern.
Distracting? Hell, Anti-Kaiju Zeppelins might be the way to go!Khaat wrote:Hybrid airship/helos ("helistat", like the Piasecki PA97) are one such heavy-lift (failed, experimental) option, but that would have been a) too slow for the movie, and b) distracting. And they didn't work out in real life as well, either.
And it'd certainly be the bigger presence on the screen than the Jaegers.Cykeisme wrote:Ah, I suppose you're right, at a certain point, increasing the numbers of the helicopter swarm is going to look odd.. the sheer number of cables alone would evoke the image of an airborne version of Gulliver and 21st Century Lilliputians, or something.
Not so good against those who fly or have ranged attack!Distracting? Hell, Anti-Kaiju Zeppelins might be the way to go!