Sea Skimmer wrote:But maybe I should have since you clearly do not grasp the concept of variable rate of fire at all.
Yeah. I mean I totally didn't say I
knew there were advantages to be had from a gatling gun even at low rates of fire or something. Oh wait. I
did. I merely questioned they were worth going gatling on the (possibly mistaken, I have admittedly not looked into the respective costs yet) assumption that a gatling gun would be more epensive.
This isn't a paper ability, its present on a number of such guns in service. The Russian AK-306 can fire as low as 600rpm for example, while the fastest single barrel gun ever was something like 3,200rpm. Lower rates of fire extend your ammo supply, make your gunfire a lot more accurate and are generally useful if you aren't firing on a fast moving target that actually demands it. I don't recall the movie that well, but I think the use of that gun was in situation when a higher rate of fire would have been vital to employ. Like about every movie with automatic cannon it did a pretty poor job of representing how violent those weapons actually are anyway.
All of which are completely true and completely irrelevant to the point I was making. I never once doubted the ability of gatling guns to have low refire rates (the original ones were hand-cranked, remember?
) I asked why anybody would bother going gatling if they're happy with that kind of refire rate to begin with. I
in that very same post said I
could think of several advantages gatling has over conventional or revolver cannon, I just doubted it was worth the (assumed by me) additional cost.
You logic basically amounts to asking why single shots would ever be used on fully automatic rifles and ignoring all other possible information except the fact that one rate of fire is higher then the other or that a selector can exist.
Um-no. My logic amounts to since the rate of fire displayed by the gun can easily be matched and exceeded by single barrel weapons,
assuming gatling guns are more expensive (which I'll happily admit
is at least for the time being nothing more than an assumption) I wonder why they bothered with a gatling gun, because while those
are capable of pretty impressive firing rates in both principle and practice...there's no evidence the one on the SHIELD bird is.
However, there's no evidence it
isn't either, and as you say, in the situation they used the gun in, Vulcan firing rates wouldn't really have helped. It's just a pet peeve of mine. You don't want 4000 and up rpm firing rates, don't use gatling cannon. I don't care how useful they are even at equal to or significantly below ordinary autocannon ROF, 'you gotta be kidding me' firing rates is what makes them special. You
use a gatling gun in a movie, yes, I want that kind of firing rate.