Honestly, how many more big cats do the Germans even have to name vehicles after? If Tiger and Panther are off-limits, and they're already using Leopard and Puma and so on...
I know! They could call the new tank the Löwe! (Lion) The Nazis never actually used that. Amusingly, if I remember my Secret Prototypes of the Napkinmacht correctly, that's what one of the candidates for a successor to the Tiger II would have been anyway- it's a more appropriate name for a "Tiger III" than the name Tiger III itself would be.
MKSheppard wrote:Or just done it like the RDA should have done it in Avatar:
Alien Spacebattlesheps show up in LEO, brush aside the few ships the Galactics can give us, vaporize the ISS; before turning their HYPERSPACESPECTRAL MAIN DRIVES onto earth in a FIERY TORCH OF BURNINATION.
...or launch so many nuclear cluster bombs that each square mile of inhabited land gets hit by a 1 kt alien nuke.
THEN you send in the mindless ravening alien hordes. Suddenly, humanity teetering on the brink of exinction suddenly makes sense, as does the Sub-Urbs, etc....
From the point of view of a species of conquerors, that's a kind of bad plan, though. The Posleen are radiation-resistant, but they're not fucking
radiodurans; they couldn't live on a planet they'd just hammered with one kiloton per square mile. An alien horde could be made that resistant, yes, but we'd have the same set of fans calling that a blatant and stupid handwave that we do (rightly) criticizing the series now.
Also, there are many things a conqueror might want to use that would be destroyed by a one kiloton per square kilometer bombardment. If that was their normal invasion practice on non-Earth planets, they'd probably have gone extinct already.
Thanas wrote:Kratman is a loathsome and insane Nazi fetishist.
[nods]
Absolutely. This is widely known and accepted, I think.
Mr Bean wrote:Finding enough Posleen effective weapons you mean. There are storehouses on American leased bases specifically for that contingency. We are not the Russians with entire tank brigades ready to go only waiting on new conscripts but there are a large stockpile of small arms and ammo in Germany for US use from the Cold War days that could be sold to Germany since we are not invading A-Stan or Iraq in the Posleen timeline.
*Edit
And before you ask no, in a war economy when the US Government is going to ammo makers and giving them orders for ten billion .50cal rounds the ammo makes no sense to ship home economically.
I am reminded of something Shep once told me- that the USAAF once dumped massive amounts of ammunition on the Pacific islands into the sea, because given the huge war surplus at the end of the war, it was more cost-effective to throw the stuff away than to ship it home.
Sea Skimmer wrote:Ahriman238 wrote:I don't think it was so much a .1kt explosion that killed the ships, but a .1kt explosion occuring inside the heavily armored ships. Much discussion is had during the design phase of all the things they can't do and still have the shot penetrate.
Well, such low yield nukes would waste fissile material anyway, making them higher yield is easy. If anything like a modern cannon, however big, is going to pierce the ships then a direct contact burst of a nuke will too. Plus if battleship caliber gunfire can pierce the ships, then of course so could much much smaller shaped charge weapons. Even if one won't hurt a big ship, hundreds from an artillery barrage of 155mm shaped charges sure would.
Hmm. That might not be a foregone conclusion. Depending on how their ship armor works, it might perform drastically better against shaped charges then against solid penetrators, and actually reward you for using "big and slow" objects to punch through it. Then again, I could be totally wrong about that. Also, those ships are
big, much bigger than tanks, and a shaped charge that penetrates the outer hull won't necessarily damage anything critical. Hundreds of hits would probably manage to cripple it eventually, but scoring hundreds of hits on an airborne target with powerful beam weapons to shoot back with strikes me as a bit problematic. One-hit kills are desirable.
You might note that no actual battleship gun ever took out a Posleen starship in the series- the one occasion on which the US military
thinks it was done, it was actually a GalTech weapon that did the job. The SheVa gun mounts a much longer-barreled and weirder weapon, with a far higher muzzle velocity. Which is still rather silly, because...
Also, the Tiger rounds sometimes kill Posleen ships in one shot and sometimes don't. You can say that about a lot of weapons, though.
Yes, but its no big deal to make much bigger nuclear shells for normal sizes of artillery projectiles. Technologically this would be easier then making 105mm nukes, 105mm just shows what a joke the whole issue really would be.
The size of contact explosion it takes to kill Posleen ships seems to be around 5-10 kt. Matching that against known nuclear artillery shells, a "rationalized" SheVa-equivalent design might be a self-propelled, high velocity 8" gun on an anti-aircraft mount. It might still be too big to put on a normal chassis, but you could probably get it into a tank that's at least within shouting distance of what it's practical to build with modern technology (100-150 tons?) without making it a bad joke.
A 6" gun might be too small caliber to carry a big enough nuclear weapon to destroy the ship reliably without penetrating the hull- and, as you say, there's the fissile material supply to consider.