Avengers (Spoilers)
Moderator: NecronLord
Re: Avengers (Spoilers)
I imagine he did it just to tweak Thor. Sure turning Colson is a better plan but it isn't like Loki is an entirely rational actor at this point.
Re: Avengers (Spoilers)
Loki presumably found it more amusing to make Thor watch Coulson die.Kojiro wrote:Damn it the more I think about it the more I realise Loki's main mistake. Instead of stabbing Coulson he should have just mind controlled him (he was jabbing him with the stick anyway, might as well gain a trooper). The team wouldn't have been as galvanised and who knows how much havok Coulson could have wrought as a sabotouer?
Wouldn't be surprising if the plan was to take out a second engine when they were leaving, but they did need to rescue Loki and recover his staff and some data before crashing the helicarrier.Kojiro wrote:It also strikes me that a second explosive arrow, like the first that crippled the rotor, could have easily been put in place on a second rotor to guarantee a crash. Just wait til you're ready to leave before detonation.
He probably just went down there and got it when his cell was opened. Or one of his goons got it and brought it to him.Kojiro wrote:I still want to know how Loki got his staff back.
"This is supposed to be a happy occasion... Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who."
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail
"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776
"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail
"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776
"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
-
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 30165
- Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm
Re: Avengers (Spoilers)
I think the "he's holding a big gun and I don't know what it does so I'd better put him out of action" explanation is more probable.Ted C wrote:Loki presumably found it more amusing to make Thor watch Coulson die.Kojiro wrote:Damn it the more I think about it the more I realise Loki's main mistake. Instead of stabbing Coulson he should have just mind controlled him (he was jabbing him with the stick anyway, might as well gain a trooper). The team wouldn't have been as galvanised and who knows how much havok Coulson could have wrought as a sabotouer?
In the scene where he mind-controls people at the beginning, we see normal bullets basically bounce right off him- he doesn't consider them to be much of a threat, so he can afford to take his time with mind-controlling people who aren't armed with anything more dangerous than that.
Coulson is armed with something powerful enough to batter him around, so he has to pay attention to that.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
Re: Avengers (Spoilers)
True enough. Coulson did say, up-front, that the gun he had was derived tech salvaged from the Destroyer, which would be something for Loki to worry about.Simon_Jester wrote: think the "he's holding a big gun and I don't know what it does so I'd better put him out of action" explanation is more probable.
In the scene where he mind-controls people at the beginning, we see normal bullets basically bounce right off him- he doesn't consider them to be much of a threat, so he can afford to take his time with mind-controlling people who aren't armed with anything more dangerous than that.
Coulson is armed with something powerful enough to batter him around, so he has to pay attention to that.
"This is supposed to be a happy occasion... Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who."
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail
"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776
"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail
"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776
"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
Re: Avengers (Spoilers)
So I just saw the film for the second time, and while I didn't see Coulson in the background on the Helicarrier at any point, I did catch the scene of Loki being freed. Hawkeye was not carrying the staff, and Loki was not holding it when confronted by Coulson. However, when he re-appeared behind Coulson, he stabbed him with the staff. So either he can teleport the staff (and had no reason to do so while in the trap, and no energy/focus to do so after being floored by the Hulk), or it's a continuity error. But the former makes perfect sense in the context of the film.
Also, when Loki is in full horned regalia, the extended and golden staff very much resembles Odin's sceptre from the Thor movie. Perhaps an affectation stemming from his desire to be ruler of Asgard.
Also, when Loki is in full horned regalia, the extended and golden staff very much resembles Odin's sceptre from the Thor movie. Perhaps an affectation stemming from his desire to be ruler of Asgard.
Name changes are for people who wear women's clothes. - Zuul
Wow. It took me a good minute to remember I didn't have testicles. -xBlackFlash
Are you sure this isn't like that time Michael Jackson stopped by your house so he could use the bathroom? - Superman
Wow. It took me a good minute to remember I didn't have testicles. -xBlackFlash
Are you sure this isn't like that time Michael Jackson stopped by your house so he could use the bathroom? - Superman
- Lord Revan
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 12238
- Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
- Location: Zone:classified
Re: Avengers (Spoilers)
well it could just be that they're both ceremonial spears but considering Loki never tries to use the casket of ancient winters (or what ever it was called) and still uses the look and armor of asgargian prince rather then assuming his jotun form.
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
Re: Avengers (Spoilers)
There's a condsiderable amount of time between when he loses the spear fighting Thor and when he meets Hulk there. More than enough to summon, if possible, the spear. Hell even if he can't summon it it's not preposterous to suggest he might actually go back for it once it's clear. It just seems like a silly thing to leave behind especially if he can summon it.Simon_Jester wrote:I like Broomstick's idea: concussion from getting your head slammed into reinforced concrete by the Incredible Hulk until you leave a crater makes it hard to cast Loki's Instant Summons.
Basically if he can't summon it, someone had to fetch it during the assault, which would be difficult at best and warrant some scene to show it occured. If he can summon it there's no good reason to abandon it on Stark Tower and go about catching arrows from Hawkeye.
As for Coulson being a threat, I doubt Loki's arrogance wouldn't override that. He's happy to engage Thor in melee, getting the drop on Coulson gave him all the time he needed. The hologram does persist a few seconds and as soon as he touches someone they lock up. Perhaps though it's only possible from the front (given Starks immunity) which is odd, but so be it.
edit- fix tags
Dragon Clan Veritech
- Lord Revan
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 12238
- Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
- Location: Zone:classified
Re: Avengers (Spoilers)
Well Thor was holding back most of the time when fighting Loki (and Loki probably knew that) Coulson on the other hand had neither the desire nor the capability to hold back (he had no idea what the gun was capable of).
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
Re: Avengers (Spoilers)
Has anyone read the trivia section on IMDB about The Avengers. It suggest that the stone in Loki's spear isn't linked to the tesseract at all but is actually Spoiler
-
- Youngling
- Posts: 100
- Joined: 2012-04-15 03:39pm
Re: Avengers (Spoilers)
Tsyroc wrote:Has anyone read the trivia section on IMDB about The Avengers. It suggest that the stone in Loki's spear isn't linked to the tesseract at all but is actually Spoiler
That makes total sense
Re: Avengers (Spoilers)
Well, in that case, it would make sense if the Tesseract were actually the SpoilerThe Imperator wrote:Tsyroc wrote:Has anyone read the trivia section on IMDB about The Avengers. It suggest that the stone in Loki's spear isn't linked to the tesseract at all but is actually Spoiler
That makes total sense
(or a container for it, at any rate).
"This is supposed to be a happy occasion... Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who."
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail
"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776
"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail
"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776
"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
Re: Avengers (Spoilers)
That seems too complicated, for them to combine so many story elements together. The Tesseract is pretty clearly the Cosmic Cube, particularly given the Hydra connection in Captain America, and Thanos' plan to obtain it in exchange for allowing Loki to rule Earth in The Avengers.Ted C wrote:Well, in that case, it would make sense if the Tesseract were actually the SpoilerThe Imperator wrote:Tsyroc wrote:Has anyone read the trivia section on IMDB about The Avengers. It suggest that the stone in Loki's spear isn't linked to the tesseract at all but is actually Spoiler
That makes total sense(or a container for it, at any rate).
Name changes are for people who wear women's clothes. - Zuul
Wow. It took me a good minute to remember I didn't have testicles. -xBlackFlash
Are you sure this isn't like that time Michael Jackson stopped by your house so he could use the bathroom? - Superman
Wow. It took me a good minute to remember I didn't have testicles. -xBlackFlash
Are you sure this isn't like that time Michael Jackson stopped by your house so he could use the bathroom? - Superman
-
- Redshirt
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 2010-04-23 11:13pm
Re: Avengers (Spoilers)
Adding to this, a battle in downtown Manhattan is roughly the worst place ever to try to fight with modern fighter jets. Unlike Iron Man, they can't dogfight between buildings and they won't have an angle to fire their air-to-air missiles, assuming they can get a lock at all on those flying chariots. The space whales are almost certainly invulnerable to modern missiles as well, given that missiles rely on shrapnel and the whales were tanking much heavier fire. Maybe an A-10 or attack helicopters could do some good, but even they'd be horribly vulnerable to RPG-equivalent laser fire while trying to strafe down a street. It'd be like the Death Star run, only with a few million screaming civilians you can run into when you get shot down.Havok wrote:Not really.Ahriman238 wrote:That's actually a damn good point. Some air support could have made a huge difference, and could be show in just a couple shots without detracting form the Avenger's efforts in any way.
A: All the deck fighters that were prepped for launch were tossed off and and probably quite a bit of the deck crew. It is a logical assumption that many of the below deck fighters were heavily damaged as well as well as the crew down there being injured.
B: Fury obviously doesn't have sole command and loyalty of SHIELD as there were people on the HC that immediately obeyed commands to ignore him. The idea that he had command back fully and before the battle was over is a stretch at best.
Re: Avengers (Spoilers)
How many infinite power sources do you want to have in one setting? Keeping adding more and they lose their impact. It might simplify things to have one simply be an interface to another.YT300000 wrote:That seems too complicated, for them to combine so many story elements together. The Tesseract is pretty clearly the Cosmic Cube, particularly given the Hydra connection in Captain America, and Thanos' plan to obtain it in exchange for allowing Loki to rule Earth in The Avengers.
We've seen something resembling the Infinity Gauntlet in Odin's weapon vault, so it's not a stretch to see it become a future plot device. It would keep threads a little more neat if the Gauntlet needed the Tesseract to work properly. That might also explain why the Asgardians didn't store them both in the same place.
"This is supposed to be a happy occasion... Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who."
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail
"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776
"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail
"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776
"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
Re: Avengers (Spoilers)
I would have to say that's demonstrably not true by simple virtue that Coulson didn't immediately open fire on Loki. Instead he gave a quite polite instruction, which I would say is pretty much the definition of restraint.Lord Revan wrote:Well Thor was holding back most of the time when fighting Loki (and Loki probably knew that) Coulson on the other hand had neither the desire nor the capability to hold back (he had no idea what the gun was capable of).
But yeah, it probably was more about winding up Thor than anything but it's still a miscalculation on Loki's behalf. Momentary gratification that had unintended consequences.
Dragon Clan Veritech
-
- Youngling
- Posts: 100
- Joined: 2012-04-15 03:39pm
Re: Avengers (Spoilers)
Yeah, I figured it was the cosmic cube, too. It makes way more sense than being the SpoilerYT300000 wrote:Ted C wrote: That seems too complicated, for them to combine so many story elements together. The Tesseract is pretty clearly the Cosmic Cube, particularly given the Hydra connection in Captain America, and Thanos' plan to obtain it in exchange for allowing Loki to rule Earth in The Avengers.
Re: Avengers (Spoilers)
You almost make that sound like it would be out of character for Loki.Kojiro wrote:But yeah, it probably was more about winding up Thor than anything but it's still a miscalculation on Loki's behalf. Momentary gratification that had unintended consequences.
"This is supposed to be a happy occasion... Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who."
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail
"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776
"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail
"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776
"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
Re: Avengers (Spoilers)
Regarding Coulson not firing immediately, it could be that he knew Loki could make hologram duplicates (and thus the Loki he was aiming at could be a decoy) and didn't want to risk missing, damaging the ship needlessly, or using up a shot he might not be able to reload before the real Loki shows up. So he was counting on the real Loki making an appearance so he at least had a chance at a shot.Kojiro wrote:I would have to say that's demonstrably not true by simple virtue that Coulson didn't immediately open fire on Loki. Instead he gave a quite polite instruction, which I would say is pretty much the definition of restraint.Lord Revan wrote:Well Thor was holding back most of the time when fighting Loki (and Loki probably knew that) Coulson on the other hand had neither the desire nor the capability to hold back (he had no idea what the gun was capable of).
But yeah, it probably was more about winding up Thor than anything but it's still a miscalculation on Loki's behalf. Momentary gratification that had unintended consequences.
Spoiler
Fry: No! They did it! They blew it up! And then the apes blew up their society too. How could this happen? And then the birds took over and ruined their society. And then the cows. And then... I don't know, is that a slug, maybe? Noooo!
Futurama: The Late Philip J. Fry
Futurama: The Late Philip J. Fry
- Nephtys
- Sith Acolyte
- Posts: 6227
- Joined: 2005-04-02 10:54pm
- Location: South Cali... where life is cheap!
Re: Avengers (Spoilers)
I figured Colson didn't know what the gun would do (as he said), and was stalling for backup personally. It makes the most sense. That gun looked so ridiculous, phase 2 was experimental, and he had said he didn't know what it does.
-
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1725
- Joined: 2004-12-16 04:01am
Re: Avengers (Spoilers)
Loki was just about to press the button to drop Thor. Coulson deciding to bluff and hope for the best makes the most sense by far. If he'd known how to use the gun from the beginning, why not keep Loki from dropping Thor by shooting him away from the console? It'd be a lot more sure than talking and hoping he engages you first.
Re: Avengers (Spoilers)
What is this LMD people keep mentioning? Something from the comics, I assume.
Re: Avengers (Spoilers)
He knew it had been developed from Asgardian technology recovered from the Destroyer. I'm not sure that he knew if or how well it would actually work. Better to retain the threat value: if it works great, he can still pull the trigger when necessary; if it's not strong enough to affect an Asgardian, best not to let the bad guy know immediately.Nephtys wrote:I figured Colson didn't know what the gun would do (as he said), and was stalling for backup personally. It makes the most sense. That gun looked so ridiculous, phase 2 was experimental, and he had said he didn't know what it does.
"This is supposed to be a happy occasion... Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who."
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail
"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776
"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail
"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776
"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
Re: Avengers (Spoilers)
Marvel comics has "Life Model Decoys" that are artificial duplicates of people that might be targeted for assassination.Darmalus wrote:What is this LMD people keep mentioning? Something from the comics, I assume.
"This is supposed to be a happy occasion... Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who."
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail
"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776
"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail
"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776
"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
Re: Avengers (Spoilers)
I doubt he knew of the hologram ability as Loki's never displayed it (at least not the teleporting version). If he did though- say he'd just watched him go from the cage entrance to the railing where he taunts Thor (hilarious) that would have been the ideal time to shoot. Note that when Loki does that trick he's mobile, then briefly freezes up (and someone goes through him). It seems like it's a short range teleport that leaves behind a final image. Indeed after Loki stabs him the same 'image' is there for a second and fades out after Coulson is stabbed.Rossum wrote:Regarding Coulson not firing immediately, it could be that he knew Loki could make hologram duplicates (and thus the Loki he was aiming at could be a decoy) and didn't want to risk missing, damaging the ship needlessly, or using up a shot he might not be able to reload before the real Loki shows up. So he was counting on the real Loki making an appearance so he at least had a chance at a shot.
While I'm sure he didn't know exactly what the weapon would do it's safe to assume he knew it wouldn't wreck the carrier. That part of it- designed to hold Hulk- I'm guessing is about as resistant to damage and far from any critical systems as possible. I could be wrong though, perhaps they put the Hulk chamber right next to something very important but I doubt it.
I missed the bit where he said the gun is made from Asguardian tech, I only recall him saying it was started after the Destroyer showed up. Granted though the opening barrel and orange beam are reminiscent of the Destroyer and with the Bifrost gone Asguard would have no way to retrieve it so it would have been left behind.
As for LMDs I'd find it highly unlikely they bleed, become incapacitated or expire like that. It's a bit Cylon-ish for my liking and in the comics they're pretty much robots. More importantly none of the Avengers are present for the conversation between Fury and Coulson, where Fury shows genuine concern and Coulson apologises. If that was a LMD Fury wouldn't have cared. Or he didn't know but that seems unlikely.
Dragon Clan Veritech
- SylasGaunt
- Sith Acolyte
- Posts: 5267
- Joined: 2002-09-04 09:39pm
- Location: GGG
Re: Avengers (Spoilers)
ALso if you listen carefully it makes a very similar noise when fired.I missed the bit where he said the gun is made from Asguardian tech, I only recall him saying it was started after the Destroyer showed up. Granted though the opening barrel and orange beam are reminiscent of the Destroyer and with the Bifrost gone Asguard would have no way to retrieve it so it would have been left behind.