Questions from T:SCC s2

SF: discuss futuristic sci-fi series, ideas, and crossovers.

Moderator: NecronLord

User avatar
Rogue 11
Padawan Learner
Posts: 180
Joined: 2002-07-27 02:29pm
Location: Norway

Re: Questions from T:SCC s2

Post by Rogue 11 »

Thanas wrote:Without going too far into details - and please note that this is not official show policy, just me shooting off my own mouth, the future is IMO changed as soon as you stepped out in the year X. Of course, you have to influence the past in order to make a noticeable change (like Stark did).

It is simply not enough to just live in the past.
So we agree on the basics. (I'm really not keen on alternate realities. They cheapen the whole deal)

But if that is the case. How can you send somebody back to stop somebody from say killing John Connor?

I mean after the Terminator transits. Shouldn't the future be altered immediately and thus if Skynet is right and the resistance loses without John Connor the resistance has lost before they can even consider sending somebody back to stop it? Or am I missing something?

If my drawn out wild rants above didn't tip you off I'm enough of a completionist to chase every last detail down if I get even a hint of a scent.

BTW: Talking about show policy and such. Do you work on it or something? (And if so. Should I feel stupid for not having figured it out before? :P )

EDIT: Also I was wrong about them jumping from New Mexico to LA in the timeshift in the pilot. I completely forgot they went to LA before jumping.
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: Questions from T:SCC s2

Post by Thanas »

Rogue 11 wrote:
Thanas wrote:Without going too far into details - and please note that this is not official show policy, just me shooting off my own mouth, the future is IMO changed as soon as you stepped out in the year X. Of course, you have to influence the past in order to make a noticeable change (like Stark did).

It is simply not enough to just live in the past.
So we agree on the basics. (I'm really not keen on alternate realities. They cheapen the whole deal)

But if that is the case. How can you send somebody back to stop somebody from say killing John Connor?

I mean after the Terminator transits. Shouldn't the future be altered immediately and thus if Skynet is right and the resistance loses without John Connor the resistance has lost before they can even consider sending somebody back to stop it? Or am I missing something?

If my drawn out wild rants above didn't tip you off I'm enough of a completionist to chase every last detail down if I get even a hint of a scent.
To be honest, I think it is a paradox, comparable to the one in T1. Similarly to the way Fisher engineered himself to get caught. The same should apply when Terminators intervene or try to intervene.
BTW: Talking about show policy and such. Do you work on it or something? (And if so. Should I feel stupid for not having figured it out before? :P )
No, but I semi-regularly communicate with people who do and some of them have clarified tech questions before - like the weight of terminators. Thus the clarification here.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
Peptuck
Is Not A Moderator
Posts: 1487
Joined: 2007-07-09 12:22am

Re: Questions from T:SCC s2

Post by Peptuck »

Just in case anyone wants to have a look, a summarized interview with Summer Glau and Friedman that gives some rather interesting hints as to the latter half of the season.
X-COM: Defending Earth by blasting the shit out of it.

Writers are people, and people are stupid. So, a large chunk of them have the IQ of beach pebbles. ~fgalkin

You're complaining that the story isn't the kind you like. That's like me bitching about the lack of ninjas in Robin Hood. ~CaptainChewbacca
Post Reply