Probably explains why they avoid having the 304s fire beam weapons at every opportunity thus far too. Though I wouldn't put Zats in the same league here. I feel like SGU has done more to bring in SG-1 tech than Atlantis seemed to, referring to both events and devices as they still exist in the universe, so I find it hard that they can wash their hands on some of the most prolific weapons in the SGverse (Zats, not Beam weapons).NecronLord wrote:Oooh no, they specifically don't like how powerful they made Zats. They've said as much.
And what do they mean by how powerful they are? I understand why they silently buried the "3 shots vaporizes" rule, but we've lived without that rule for years on SG-1. Without that, a Zat is basically just a phaser.
The writers just flat decided not to deal with the elephant in the room with Atlantis, and seem to be taking the same stance here. But they brought the elephant food, a bed, and an entertainment center when they put Zats in Atlantis in "Midway". Up until this point, we might have written it off as they tried to use them at one point off screen, found them ineffective against Wraith biology, so stuck to stunners. Instead, it just looks stupid that they won't supply Atlantis with one of the more versatile weapons in the SG verse.
Here with the LA, it's even more incomprehensible. I can see the LA agreeing with O'Neill's speech about the staff weapon being a weapon that terrorizes people, while the P-90 is a weapon that kills people, but the absence of the Zat doesn't fly. The writers are randomly deciding what past tech is in and out based on nothing but whimsy.