Doctor Who S32E7, "A Good Man Goes to War" [spoilers]

SF: discuss futuristic sci-fi series, ideas, and crossovers.

Moderator: NecronLord

How do you rate "A Good Man Goes to War"

5 - There are some corners of the universe which have bred terrible things, which act against everything we believe in. They must be fought.
38
51%
4 - Doctor. We did good, didn't we?
19
26%
3 - Wars will end. They are the power not of evil, but of good.
10
14%
2 - I know also that out of their evil must come something good.
4
5%
1 - Where I tread, I leave nothing but dust and darkness...I find that good!
3
4%
 
Total votes: 74

User avatar
HMS Sophia
Jedi Master
Posts: 1231
Joined: 2010-08-22 07:47am
Location: Watching the levee break

Re: Doctor Who S32E7, "A Good Man Goes to War" [spoilers]

Post by HMS Sophia »

So... I'm slightly confused...
A time lord can be created (or at least a part time lord), by two humans getting it on, while inside a tardis/the time vortex....
Aren't time lords grown rather than born? Didn't the families have looms to grow them on or something like that?

And yeah, if river was part time lord this entire time, why didn't the doctor sense her. That's... odd?
"Seriously though, every time I see something like this I think 'Ooo, I'm living in the future'. Unfortunately it increasingly looks like it's going to be a cyberpunkish dystopia, where the poor eat recycled shit and the rich eat the poor." Evilsoup, on the future

StarGazer, an experiment in RPG creation
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: Doctor Who S32E7, "A Good Man Goes to War" [spoilers]

Post by Thanas »

I know I like to harp on RTD a lot, but he never did something this stupid.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
HMS Sophia
Jedi Master
Posts: 1231
Joined: 2010-08-22 07:47am
Location: Watching the levee break

Re: Doctor Who S32E7, "A Good Man Goes to War" [spoilers]

Post by HMS Sophia »

Thanas wrote:I know I like to harp on RTD a lot, but he never did something this stupid.
Which bit? The lack of motivation for the bad guys other than "the doctor is bad"
River being Amy ponds daughter but also half time lord?
Spitfires in fucking space (for no discernible reason this time)?
Pointless cameo's in order to make having a prop department worth it?
Shamelessly introducing characters just to make you feel bad when they are... killed?... twice for that matter (kinda)
Fucking river song maybe?
"Seriously though, every time I see something like this I think 'Ooo, I'm living in the future'. Unfortunately it increasingly looks like it's going to be a cyberpunkish dystopia, where the poor eat recycled shit and the rich eat the poor." Evilsoup, on the future

StarGazer, an experiment in RPG creation
User avatar
DaveJB
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1917
Joined: 2003-10-06 05:37pm
Location: Leeds, UK

Re: Doctor Who S32E7, "A Good Man Goes to War" [spoilers]

Post by DaveJB »

barnest2 wrote:So... I'm slightly confused...
A time lord can be created (or at least a part time lord), by two humans getting it on, while inside a tardis/the time vortex....
Even after the Doctor acknowledged that Amy and Rory had been doing the nasty inside the TARDIS, he still seemed pretty incredulous as to the possibility of that producing a child with Time Lord abilities. There might still be a further explanation as to how Melody/River ended up partially Time Lord.
Aren't time lords grown rather than born? Didn't the families have looms to grow them on or something like that?
That was only in the novels, it was never established in anything canonical. In fact, if you take the "Doctor is half-human" stuff from the TV movie at face value, it implies that Time Lords procreate like we do.
And yeah, if river was part time lord this entire time, why didn't the doctor sense her. That's... odd?
So far, the only Time Lord abilities we've seen from Melody/River are the ability to regenerate, and heightened strength and reflexes (which were also demonstrated by Jenny in The Doctor's Daughter). Time Lords seem to sense each other via their telepathic powers, so presumably River doesn't have them... or possibly she is telepathic, but really good at shielding her thoughts from the Doctor.
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: Doctor Who S32E7, "A Good Man Goes to War" [spoilers]

Post by Thanas »

^All of the above, but River Song easily takes the cake for the worst Mary Sue ever in Doctor Who. I mean, not only is she female Indiana Jones, she also travels through time, generally AWESOME (so awesome the audience is constantly beaten over the head with it) etc. And now she is half-timelord to boot.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
HMS Sophia
Jedi Master
Posts: 1231
Joined: 2010-08-22 07:47am
Location: Watching the levee break

Re: Doctor Who S32E7, "A Good Man Goes to War" [spoilers]

Post by HMS Sophia »

Thanas wrote:^All of the above, but River Song easily takes the cake for the worst Mary Sue ever in Doctor Who. I mean, not only is she female Indiana Jones, she also travels through time, generally AWESOME (so awesome the audience is constantly beaten over the head with it) etc. And now she is half-timelord to boot.
This is actually only the first time River has really annoyed me. She has rubbed me the wrong way before (fnar, fnar), but... yeah.
To start with it was because I felt like she was really phoning it in. When she was explaining why all this crap was happening, it didn't feel like she was trying very hard. And then she cracked out the utter stupid, and River Song might as well wear a red cape and declare herself Super-Girl!
Her always having the answers is just getting annoying. Especially when she is arrogant and AWESOME (as thanas said) to boot.

That was only in the novels, it was never established in anything canonical. In fact, if you take the "Doctor is half-human" stuff from the TV movie at face value, it implies that Time Lords procreate like we do.
Ah okay. Thankee.

Also, I think I should say: I like the spitfires in space the first time round. Yes they were silly, but it was campy action fun, and I thought it was enjoyable, and even a little suitable for Doctor Who. It felt like it was getting back to it's roots.
But this time, they just made no fucking sense. And how were they returned to their own time? The doctor just said they were and it is so?
And yeah, were they not de-teched after the battle with the Dalek's in space? Otherwise... what?
"Seriously though, every time I see something like this I think 'Ooo, I'm living in the future'. Unfortunately it increasingly looks like it's going to be a cyberpunkish dystopia, where the poor eat recycled shit and the rich eat the poor." Evilsoup, on the future

StarGazer, an experiment in RPG creation
User avatar
2000AD
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6666
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:32pm
Location: Leeds, wishing i was still in Newcastle

Re: Doctor Who S32E7, "A Good Man Goes to War" [spoilers]

Post by 2000AD »

LadyTevar wrote:The only water in the forest is the river.

No pond, just a river. A melody is a song. Family name first is not unusual even on Earth.

Holy shit that was AWESOME!!!!!!!!
I'm wondering how far back this was planned and how much was fudging stuff to make it work.
Thanas wrote:All of the above, but River Song easily takes the cake for the worst Mary Sue ever in Doctor Who. I mean, not only is she female Indiana Jones, she also travels through time, generally AWESOME (so awesome the audience is constantly beaten over the head with it) etc. And now she is half-timelord to boot.
Surely getting killed and still needing the Doctor to do most of the thinking and the work are big hits against Mary Sui-ism.
Ph34r teh eyebrow!!11!Writers Guild Sluggite Pawn of Chaos WYGIWYGAINGW so now i have to put ACPATHNTDWATGODW in my sig EBC-Honorary Geordie
Hammerman! Hammer!
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: Doctor Who S32E7, "A Good Man Goes to War" [spoilers]

Post by Thanas »

You might have a point if she would be indeed dead, moreover dieing is not really against Mary-Suism.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
HMS Sophia
Jedi Master
Posts: 1231
Joined: 2010-08-22 07:47am
Location: Watching the levee break

Re: Doctor Who S32E7, "A Good Man Goes to War" [spoilers]

Post by HMS Sophia »

The problem is, of course, that while she died, she is still hanging around. Yes, I know, timey-wimey, but it doesn't stop her being a mary-sue.

And as for the doctor doing most of the thinking. how many times has he been stuck without knowing what to do, and she has hinted, revealed things, or just outright told him what he needs to figure it out.
"Seriously though, every time I see something like this I think 'Ooo, I'm living in the future'. Unfortunately it increasingly looks like it's going to be a cyberpunkish dystopia, where the poor eat recycled shit and the rich eat the poor." Evilsoup, on the future

StarGazer, an experiment in RPG creation
User avatar
Dartzap
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5969
Joined: 2002-09-05 09:56am
Location: Britain, Britain, Britain: Land Of Rain
Contact:

Re: Doctor Who S32E7, "A Good Man Goes to War" [spoilers]

Post by Dartzap »

I think the nicest/cruellest bit was when the Doctor was using his telepathic abilities to lie to the dying solider about remembering her (I assume that's what all the head touching was about, anyway) I suppose saying "I've not met you - yet" would be a bit too Riverish :lol:
EBC: Northeners, Huh! What are they good for?! Absolutely nothing! :P

Cybertron, Justice league...MM, HAB SDN City Watch: Sergeant Detritus

Days Unstabbed, Unabused, Unassualted and Unwavedatwithabutchersknife: 0
User avatar
El Moose Monstero
Moose Rebellion Ambassador
Posts: 3743
Joined: 2003-04-30 12:33pm
Location: The Cradle of the Rebellion... Oop Nowrrth, Like...
Contact:

Re: Doctor Who S32E7, "A Good Man Goes to War" [spoilers]

Post by El Moose Monstero »

Thanas wrote:^All of the above, but River Song easily takes the cake for the worst Mary Sue ever in Doctor Who. I mean, not only is she female Indiana Jones, she also travels through time, generally AWESOME (so awesome the audience is constantly beaten over the head with it) etc. And now she is half-timelord to boot.
QFFT.

The mechanism of getting the timelord DNA was also frickin' ridiculous. Amy and Rory had sex in the TARDIS and their baby got superpowers? How does that even work? 'Being next to the time vortex'? You'd think the doctor might have realised, you know, when he was doing all of his baby scans and when they had the whole frickin' conversation about 'baby getting a timehead'. Just because you had a comedy throwaway conversation about it, I don't think that counts as foreshadowing or makes the idea any less stupid. Of all the ways to get timelord DNA into the little girl, this one was by far the least interesting method of doing it.

Also, I ranted before about the whole 'this is your fault' thing, and it's irritating me even more the longer it sits. I didn't mind RTD's axe to grind about the Doctor using people and his actions having consequences that he doesn't see. If Moffat actually believes the crap that River was spouting, it's not only shit writing but makes me think he hasn't been paying attention. Even if you can justify what she said as being the propaganda inserted into her from birth (so why has she never expressed these ideas before?), it's still a rubbish way to express the idea that the Doctor might make enemies with people he's never met.

Also, I think they've tried to pack far too much in this season and I think it's ruining the characters for me. I quite liked Amy and Rory last season, but they seem to have been entirely 'plot mouthpieces' in this series - the random lurching forward in time means that character development is just sort of thrust upon you than being observed. They're actually starting to grate on me a little.
Image
"...a fountain of mirth, issuing forth from the penis of a cupid..." ~ Dalton / Winner of the 'Frank Hipper Most Horrific Drag EVAR' award - 2004 / The artist formerly known as The_Lumberjack.

Evil Brit Conspiracy: Token Moose Obsessed Kebab Munching Semi Geordie
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: Doctor Who S32E7, "A Good Man Goes to War" [spoilers]

Post by Thanas »

El Moose Monstero wrote:The mechanism of getting the timelord DNA was also frickin' ridiculous. Amy and Rory had sex in the TARDIS and their baby got superpowers? How does that even work? 'Being next to the time vortex'? You'd think the doctor might have realised, you know, when he was doing all of his baby scans and when they had the whole frickin' conversation about 'baby getting a timehead'. Just because you had a comedy throwaway conversation about it, I don't think that counts as foreshadowing or makes the idea any less stupid. Of all the ways to get timelord DNA into the little girl, this one was by far the least interesting method of doing it.
Yes. Also, if she is that linked to the Tardis, why doesn't the tardis recognize her? (Nevermind, as a lot have already pointed out, the doctor).

In a way, this retroactively makes Silence in the library even less logical. Captain Jack/Rose are mutated by the time vortex (one even looking directly into it, which is supposedly much more dangerous/powerful) and the Tardis reacts to them or their commands. Silence in the Library? Nothing.

I somehow feel as if Moffat has fallen into the Davies trap - loving one character so much that the only way to go forward is in his mind to make the character more and more powerful (Jack). I mean, it has not gotten to the point where the writer invents a bogus one-season long arc that turns out to be nothing and was just a glorified cameo (wasted storyline potential with Rose in S4, for example) yet, but we are fast approaching it.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
HMS Sophia
Jedi Master
Posts: 1231
Joined: 2010-08-22 07:47am
Location: Watching the levee break

Re: Doctor Who S32E7, "A Good Man Goes to War" [spoilers]

Post by HMS Sophia »

I liked Jack. He was fun. Why cant we have Jack back, instead of this river song bullshit :P
"Seriously though, every time I see something like this I think 'Ooo, I'm living in the future'. Unfortunately it increasingly looks like it's going to be a cyberpunkish dystopia, where the poor eat recycled shit and the rich eat the poor." Evilsoup, on the future

StarGazer, an experiment in RPG creation
User avatar
Lord Woodlouse
Mister Zaia
Posts: 2357
Joined: 2002-07-04 04:09pm
Location: A Bigger Room
Contact:

Re: Doctor Who S32E7, "A Good Man Goes to War" [spoilers]

Post by Lord Woodlouse »

Thanas wrote:
El Moose Monstero wrote:The mechanism of getting the timelord DNA was also frickin' ridiculous. Amy and Rory had sex in the TARDIS and their baby got superpowers? How does that even work? 'Being next to the time vortex'? You'd think the doctor might have realised, you know, when he was doing all of his baby scans and when they had the whole frickin' conversation about 'baby getting a timehead'. Just because you had a comedy throwaway conversation about it, I don't think that counts as foreshadowing or makes the idea any less stupid. Of all the ways to get timelord DNA into the little girl, this one was by far the least interesting method of doing it.
Yes. Also, if she is that linked to the Tardis, why doesn't the tardis recognize her? (Nevermind, as a lot have already pointed out, the doctor).

In a way, this retroactively makes Silence in the library even less logical. Captain Jack/Rose are mutated by the time vortex (one even looking directly into it, which is supposedly much more dangerous/powerful) and the Tardis reacts to them or their commands. Silence in the Library? Nothing.

I somehow feel as if Moffat has fallen into the Davies trap - loving one character so much that the only way to go forward is in his mind to make the character more and more powerful (Jack). I mean, it has not gotten to the point where the writer invents a bogus one-season long arc that turns out to be nothing and was just a glorified cameo (wasted storyline potential with Rose in S4, for example) yet, but we are fast approaching it.
What are you talking about? What commands have any of the above given the TARDIS that have been accepted or rejected?
Check out TREKWARS (not involving furries!)

EVIL BRIT CONSPIRACY: Son of York; bringing glorious summer to the winter of your discontent.

KNIGHTS ASTRUM CLADES: I am a holy knight! Or something rhyming with knight, anyway...
User avatar
2000AD
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6666
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:32pm
Location: Leeds, wishing i was still in Newcastle

Re: Doctor Who S32E7, "A Good Man Goes to War" [spoilers]

Post by 2000AD »

El Moose Monstero wrote: The mechanism of getting the timelord DNA was also frickin' ridiculous. Amy and Rory had sex in the TARDIS and their baby got superpowers? How does that even work? 'Being next to the time vortex'?
It's Doctor Who, a family fun sci-fi show, you were expecting hard science? The show that coined the term 'wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey ball' to hand wave explaining anything that might be complicated to justify and you're complaining about something being pulled out of thin air with only a little direct foreshadowing as an explanation?
The Time Vortex has been established as dangerous and AFAIK not very well explained, so the potential for it to have some 'wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey' side effects on a foetus is not exactly a shocker in my book. It's not like "something weird happens to a baby/child/person and now they have special powers" is a rarity in fiction.
You'd think the doctor might have realised, you know, when he was doing all of his baby scans and when they had the whole frickin' conversation about 'baby getting a timehead'.
You mean the fake baby that wasn't even growing inside fake-amy properly, that baby he was scanning? If the scanner can't even determine if she's pregnant or not I doubt it'll be able to give an accurate DNA profile. Doc probably put any discrepancies down to it being fake-amy he's scanning.
Plus until reptile lady and blue fat guy questioned him he was sure Rory and Amy hadn't got it on inside the Tardis, so even if he knew about the potential for the time vortex to screw up impregnation he wasn't considering it.

---
Thanas wrote: Yes. Also, if she is that linked to the Tardis, why doesn't the tardis recognize her? (Nevermind, as a lot have already pointed out, the doctor).

In a way, this retroactively makes Silence in the library even less logical. Captain Jack/Rose are mutated by the time vortex (one even looking directly into it, which is supposedly much more dangerous/powerful) and the Tardis reacts to them or their commands. Silence in the Library? Nothing.
Who says the TARDIS doesn't recognise her? Sexy is one big ball of 'wizard did it' plot device. In The Doctor's Wife she had control rooms The Doctor hadn't used yet archived so she presumably knows something about his future, so probably knows more about River than the Doctor and isn't letting on so she doesn't mess up the future.
River said she learned how to fly the Tardis from the best but not the Doctor, who better to learn how to fly a Tardis from then a Tardis itself, maybe she's met Sexy (pretty sure someone put forward that theory earlier in the thread, or somewhere else).
Ph34r teh eyebrow!!11!Writers Guild Sluggite Pawn of Chaos WYGIWYGAINGW so now i have to put ACPATHNTDWATGODW in my sig EBC-Honorary Geordie
Hammerman! Hammer!
User avatar
El Moose Monstero
Moose Rebellion Ambassador
Posts: 3743
Joined: 2003-04-30 12:33pm
Location: The Cradle of the Rebellion... Oop Nowrrth, Like...
Contact:

Re: Doctor Who S32E7, "A Good Man Goes to War" [spoilers]

Post by El Moose Monstero »

2000AD wrote: It's Doctor Who, a family fun sci-fi show, you were expecting hard science? The show that coined the term 'wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey ball' to hand wave explaining anything that might be complicated to justify and you're complaining about something being pulled out of thin air with only a little direct foreshadowing as an explanation?
The Time Vortex has been established as dangerous and AFAIK not very well explained, so the potential for it to have some 'wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey' side effects on a foetus is not exactly a shocker in my book. It's not like "something weird happens to a baby/child/person and now they have special powers" is a rarity in fiction.
Of course I'm not expecting hard science. I was, however, expecting something a bit more creative than 'OMG,they had sex in the tardis', and yes, it's not as if there's an absence of crazy origin stories out there for superheroes etc, but I was hoping for something a bit interesting rather than a handwave. The silence had tardis tech, they're clearly aware enough of the doctor to know what they're up against, couldn't there have been some sort of way for them to impart timelord powers? Hell, even pulling a Rose and exposing the baby to whatever passes for the heart of the tardis in the silents machine would have been a bit more of an explanation rather than just putting a sign on the Tardis door that says 'no fucking'.
You'd think the doctor might have realised, you know, when he was doing all of his baby scans and when they had the whole frickin' conversation about 'baby getting a timehead'.
You mean the fake baby that wasn't even growing inside fake-amy properly, that baby he was scanning? If the scanner can't even determine if she's pregnant or not I doubt it'll be able to give an accurate DNA profile. Doc probably put any discrepancies down to it being fake-amy he's scanning.
Plus until reptile lady and blue fat guy questioned him he was sure Rory and Amy hadn't got it on inside the Tardis, so even if he knew about the potential for the time vortex to screw up impregnation he wasn't considering it.
Fair enough, I just thought that given that they had the initial conversation about the time travel screwing with the baby before he'd done the first scan, that might have been the first conclusion. Unless his first thought on that scan was to know instantaneously that she was a ganger rather than wondering if she might be right and that there might be some time-based shenanigans going on.
Image
"...a fountain of mirth, issuing forth from the penis of a cupid..." ~ Dalton / Winner of the 'Frank Hipper Most Horrific Drag EVAR' award - 2004 / The artist formerly known as The_Lumberjack.

Evil Brit Conspiracy: Token Moose Obsessed Kebab Munching Semi Geordie
User avatar
Broomstick
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 28846
Joined: 2004-01-02 07:04pm
Location: Industrial armpit of the US Midwest

Re: Doctor Who S32E7, "A Good Man Goes to War" [spoilers]

Post by Broomstick »

DarkSilver wrote:As Tev points out, family name first isn't a uncommon thing, even in modern times. It could be that River is using the Gamma Forest version of her name, which could put the Family Name first, followed by the Proper name. Thus Melody Pond in the language of the Forest is River Song
Which means when the Doctor calls here "River" it's just like when he calls Amy "Pond" instead of Amy. Probably just as well she uses River, then - having two Ponds would be a bit confusing.
A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. Leonard Nimoy.

Now I did a job. I got nothing but trouble since I did it, not to mention more than a few unkind words as regard to my character so let me make this abundantly clear. I do the job. And then I get paid.- Malcolm Reynolds, Captain of Serenity, which sums up my feelings regarding the lawsuit discussed here.

If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. - John F. Kennedy

Sam Vimes Theory of Economic Injustice
User avatar
HMS Sophia
Jedi Master
Posts: 1231
Joined: 2010-08-22 07:47am
Location: Watching the levee break

Re: Doctor Who S32E7, "A Good Man Goes to War" [spoilers]

Post by HMS Sophia »

Maybe it becomes something of a nickname, the switching. River and pond, you see?
Weirdness either way.
"Seriously though, every time I see something like this I think 'Ooo, I'm living in the future'. Unfortunately it increasingly looks like it's going to be a cyberpunkish dystopia, where the poor eat recycled shit and the rich eat the poor." Evilsoup, on the future

StarGazer, an experiment in RPG creation
Crazedwraith
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11950
Joined: 2003-04-10 03:45pm
Location: Cheshire, England

Re: Doctor Who S32E7, "A Good Man Goes to War" [spoilers]

Post by Crazedwraith »

DarkSilver wrote:As Tev points out, family name first isn't a uncommon thing, even in modern times. It could be that River is using the Gamma Forest version of her name, which could put the Family Name first, followed by the Proper name. Thus Melody Pond in the language of the Forest is River Song
Of course melody to Song is a bit of a fudge because its not pronounced that way. It's pronounced Sung and is clearly used as her family name. Dr River Song, is generally shortened to Dr Song.

I was thinking that the soldier girl could still have been River in a past regeneration, since she seems to have come from the gamma forest were presumably River will grow up. And that's why River couldn't go there because she'd be crossing her own timeline and of course they never told us her name. Unless I forgot it.

Of course the girl's account of meeting the Doctor doesn't really match up with River's account of him knowing all about her. Plus if she had been there at the same time as River's baby timelines would already have been crossed.
User avatar
Ilya Muromets
Jedi Knight
Posts: 711
Joined: 2009-03-18 01:07pm
Location: The Philippines
Contact:

Re: Doctor Who S32E7, "A Good Man Goes to War" [spoilers]

Post by Ilya Muromets »

Crazedwraith wrote: I was thinking that the soldier girl could still have been River in a past regeneration, since she seems to have come from the gamma forest were presumably River will grow up. And that's why River couldn't go there because she'd be crossing her own timeline and of course they never told us her name. Unless I forgot it.

Of course the girl's account of meeting the Doctor doesn't really match up with River's account of him knowing all about her. Plus if she had been there at the same time as River's baby timelines would already have been crossed.
Can't be. We see her body right there, and the Doctor watches her die. None of the shiny-goldy light that signals a new series regeneration. Unless, of course, there's some convolute reason for said regeneration to have been delayed a bit or something.
Image

"Like I said, I don't care about human suffering as long as it doesn't affect me."
----LionElJonson, admitting to being a sociopathic little shit

"Please educate yourself before posting more."
----Sarevok, who really should have taken his own advice
Crazedwraith
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11950
Joined: 2003-04-10 03:45pm
Location: Cheshire, England

Re: Doctor Who S32E7, "A Good Man Goes to War" [spoilers]

Post by Crazedwraith »

Could be similar to Jenny's regeneration. That had such a significant delay on it that the Doctor left before it happened. Yeah, I'm really stretching her.

Anyone else kind of annoyed that the Doctor once again dodges all questions about his family? Would it make him so unrelatable to be s grandfather? To reference Susan?
kaeneth
Youngling
Posts: 126
Joined: 2011-05-06 06:08pm
Contact:

Re: Doctor Who S32E7, "A Good Man Goes to War" [spoilers]

Post by kaeneth »

Thanas wrote:I know I like to harp on RTD a lot, but he never did something this stupid.
Honestly, for a show like Doctor Who, it does make decent plot-sense. If the Eyepatch lady is an agent of the Silence and the war is really between The Silence and The Doctor....making a Timelord to kill him makes a sort-of-sense. They know they have been only able to 'win' rounds with him, not actually kill him. Building a super soldier is something Sci-Fi people have been going on about for decades.

River Song's Mary-suism is no worse than The Doctor himself, to be honest.

So, assuming next season that The Silence turns out to be behind everything it makes sense.
User avatar
Broomstick
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 28846
Joined: 2004-01-02 07:04pm
Location: Industrial armpit of the US Midwest

Re: Doctor Who S32E7, "A Good Man Goes to War" [spoilers]

Post by Broomstick »

Crazedwraith wrote:Anyone else kind of annoyed that the Doctor once again dodges all questions about his family? Would it make him so unrelatable to be s grandfather? To reference Susan?
Presumably, his entire family is dead, including his children and grandchildren. Losing a child is horrifically painful. Keeping in mind that the Doctor destroyed his own species that ALSO means he killed his own family.

That's a pretty painful, complex heap of emotions right there if you're going to do it at all plausibly. He avoids the question because there's no way to talk about it short of emotional agony.

The Doctor has always been reluctant to discuss his family.
A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. Leonard Nimoy.

Now I did a job. I got nothing but trouble since I did it, not to mention more than a few unkind words as regard to my character so let me make this abundantly clear. I do the job. And then I get paid.- Malcolm Reynolds, Captain of Serenity, which sums up my feelings regarding the lawsuit discussed here.

If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. - John F. Kennedy

Sam Vimes Theory of Economic Injustice
User avatar
Broomstick
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 28846
Joined: 2004-01-02 07:04pm
Location: Industrial armpit of the US Midwest

Re: Doctor Who S32E7, "A Good Man Goes to War" [spoilers]

Post by Broomstick »

Crazedwraith wrote:I was thinking that the soldier girl could still have been River in a past regeneration, since she seems to have come from the gamma forest were presumably River will grow up. And that's why River couldn't go there because she'd be crossing her own timeline and of course they never told us her name. Unless I forgot it.
Lorna Bucket. At least I think the second name was Bucket the first was definitely Lorna.

She's not River Song/Melody Pond.
A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. Leonard Nimoy.

Now I did a job. I got nothing but trouble since I did it, not to mention more than a few unkind words as regard to my character so let me make this abundantly clear. I do the job. And then I get paid.- Malcolm Reynolds, Captain of Serenity, which sums up my feelings regarding the lawsuit discussed here.

If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. - John F. Kennedy

Sam Vimes Theory of Economic Injustice
Minischoles
Jedi Knight
Posts: 566
Joined: 2008-04-17 10:09pm
Location: England

Re: Doctor Who S32E7, "A Good Man Goes to War" [spoilers]

Post by Minischoles »

I thought this might interest a few people here, someone on another site linked this
https://groups.google.com/group/rec.art ... 5e9b213df9

Looks like Moffat has been wanting to use those lines for over 15 years.
“The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that the English language is as pure as a crib-house whore. It not only borrows words from other languages; it has on occasion chased other languages down dark alley-ways, clubbed them unconscious and rifled their pockets for new vocabulary. “
- James Nicoll
Post Reply