
It's your fault. You and your AV are the reason I started watching Doctor Who.
Moderator: NecronLord
Which is why it would have been mentioned or hinted at the first time they met. Was it?Havok wrote:Why would he remember Clara from 1000 years ago telling him to take a different TARDIS until he realized it was Clara? She would have just been some helpful Time Lord chick until that moment.
They don't annihilate each other's traces though. They shouldn't anyway.And in theory, the GI and Clara do cancel each other out because their meddling happens in each instance all at once. How she knows what to do is because she filtered through the Doc's timeline to get there. It's ingrained in each one of her incarnations.
She basically Quantum Leaped the Doctor's life.
Mr Clever wouldn't have meant much anyway because that was the doctor deliberately giving away memories he firewalled. He can easily not broadcast one.Parallax wrote:Come to think of, recently we've had various times when the faces of the Doctor have been shown in sequence (people chasing Prisoner Zero comes to mind as just one, as well as Mr Clever's presence in the Doctor's head).
None of these featured The NotDoctor.
So yeah, this is a bit of a retcon and would have been much smoother if they just had given McGann a call.
Personally I would like to see more of Time Lord society and culture, the progression from denial to proportionate reaction to eventually becoming twisted and desperate, maybe some crazy and interesting gambits used in a war that barely makes sense in linear terms. However the writing would have to be substantially better than 'the end of time' to make this worthwhile.Gandalf wrote:Why are people so nuts about wanting to see the Time War? Is the idea that the violence will make their favoured shows more masculine, thus making them more masculine? Aside from the Doctor's "push the button" moment at the end, which was basically done in Parting of The Ways, what's the point?
I think we should ask why people are interested in seeing the Time War in general or the Time War as done with the same creative flair as the current team. I don't think anyone here gives a damn about the latter. For the former I think it could have storytelling potential in the sense that it should have been an epic confrontation between two great powers, who actually fight a war where you can change history the way Enterprise wished it could have done. Plus it can answer a lot of questions which RTD deliberately left vague when he left.Gandalf wrote:Why are people so nuts about wanting to see the Time War? Is the idea that the violence will make their favoured shows more masculine, thus making them more masculine? Aside from the Doctor's "push the button" moment at the end, which was basically done in Parting of The Ways, what's the point?
RTD left it vauge because for once, he admitted his limitations and knew that vauge cool-sounding terms ('nightmare child' etc) conjured better imagery in the imaginations of the viewers than he could ever hope to put on screen.mr friendly guy wrote:Plus it can answer a lot of questions which RTD deliberately left vague when he left.
We absolutely do not need an attempt at giving a full picture of the war, Babylon 5 or Deep Space Nine style. Doctor Who is just not set up as a franchise to give that anything like the depth, detail or cohesiveness it needs. What would work well (given reasonable writing) is having a season arc related to the fallout of the war, with each 'arc episode' containing flashbacks giving little vignettes into the time war. Viewers could get an impression of it without having to make the whole thing comprehensible (and thus dumbed down).Gandalf wrote:For the former I think it could have storytelling potential in the sense that it should have been an epic confrontation between two great powers, who actually fight a war where you can change history the way Enterprise wished it could have done.
I knew he deliberately left it vague because he felt it would be better than putting it on screen. Obviously that would depend on how well the productive team does. Not that I have much faith in the current or previous batch, so it was most probably the right decision not to. Or maybe not to even hint at such things in the first place.Starglider wrote: RTD left it vauge because for once, he admitted his limitations and knew that vauge cool-sounding terms ('nightmare child' etc) conjured better imagery in the imaginations of the viewers than he could ever hope to put on screen.
I am not sure you need a B5 or DS9 style to give a better impression of what happened. For example the show could have the Doctor's adventures, but not the whole war and bits of pieces of what is happening elsewhere is hinted at. Eventually some spin off material like a source book would start filling in the gaps, just like how they have been doing with current source books.Starglider wrote: We absolutely do not need an attempt at giving a full picture of the war, Babylon 5 or Deep Space Nine style. Doctor Who is just not set up as a franchise to give that anything like the depth, detail or cohesiveness it needs. What would work well (given reasonable writing) is having a season arc related to the fallout of the war, with each 'arc episode' containing flashbacks giving little vignettes into the time war. Viewers could get an impression of it without having to make the whole thing comprehensible (and thus dumbed down).