how would these two imperium superheavy tank matchup to theb famous imperial AT-AT of star wars.
banebalde
shadowsword
baneblade/shadowsword vs AT-AT
Moderator: NecronLord
baneblade/shadowsword vs AT-AT
"a single death is a tragedy, a million deaths are a statistic"-Joseph Stalin
"No plan survives contact with the enemy"-Helmuth Von Moltke
"Women prefer stories about one person dying slowly. Men prefer stories of many people dying quickly."-Niles from Frasier.
"No plan survives contact with the enemy"-Helmuth Von Moltke
"Women prefer stories about one person dying slowly. Men prefer stories of many people dying quickly."-Niles from Frasier.
- white_rabbit
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2039
- Joined: 2002-09-30 09:04pm
Both of these are Superheavy Tanks (1000 tons+ each with crews in the double digits) fron the Warhammer 40,000 Universe.
The Shadowsword ices the AT-AT at a distance with one shot from its Volcano Laser....its designed to take out Titans which dwarf even the largest AT-AT. However the main gun is so large that it is hull mounted and lacks a wide field of fire, if the AT-AT's can flank the tank , then its definatly in danger
The Baneblade is shorter ranged , but its Mega-battle cannon is turret mounted. The AT-AT's will have the initial advantage of range , but will have trouble once the Baneblades open fire.
Both of these tanks are also studded with smaller turrets containing ant-personnel and anti-vehicle weapons
The Shadowsword ices the AT-AT at a distance with one shot from its Volcano Laser....its designed to take out Titans which dwarf even the largest AT-AT. However the main gun is so large that it is hull mounted and lacks a wide field of fire, if the AT-AT's can flank the tank , then its definatly in danger
The Baneblade is shorter ranged , but its Mega-battle cannon is turret mounted. The AT-AT's will have the initial advantage of range , but will have trouble once the Baneblades open fire.
Both of these tanks are also studded with smaller turrets containing ant-personnel and anti-vehicle weapons
BotM
AT-ATs are about the size of a Reaver titan, but much less agile.Sokar wrote:The Shadowsword ices the AT-AT at a distance with one shot from its Volcano Laser....its designed to take out Titans which dwarf even the largest AT-AT. However the main gun is so large that it is hull mounted and lacks a wide field of fire, if the AT-AT's can flank the tank , then its definatly in danger
Of course, the Volcano Cannon can quite easily flatten a Reaver, if it hits in the right place.
In a fight between a Reaver and a Shadowsword, if one flanked the other, it would be utterly decisive. Imperial heavy tanks might have bloody thick armour, but it's weaker at the sides and the ass. I'd say that the Shadowsword has the advantage of range, the Volcano Cannon is one of the longest ranged weapons in the Epic game. It's a dedicated weapon for taking down battle vehicles exactly like the AT-AT.
The Baneblade would probably be outranged, if the AT-AT could stay at long range and hit it with it's full power barrage, it could probably slag the tank.
- NecronLord
- Harbinger of Doom
- Posts: 27384
- Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
- Location: The Lost City
Super-Heavy tanks
(old style) Necron Scarabs
heh
heh heh
heh heh heh
(old style) Necron Scarabs
heh
heh heh
heh heh heh
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth